Category: Psychology

Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation for organizational leadership that compares and contrasts the cultural context of two selected countries.
Using Geert Hofstede’s and others’ work on comparative country cultures, you will select and conduct research on two countries, comparing and contrasting their cultures on several dimensions, including business climate and leadership and management practices. Then, you will suppose you have been asked to prepare a presentation for senior leadership in your company to help them plan for and prepare expert teams who will be sent to the two countries you have selected. These relocated team members will work with U.S. members as well as members from both countries.
References: Support your presentation with at least 10 scholarly resources from the
Length: 10–15 slides (with detailed speaker’s notes), in addition to a references list slide.
Written communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills through concise communication of thoughts that convey the overall goals of the presentation and do not detract from the message.
Font and font size: Appropriate for a visual presentation.
Prepare a 10–15 slide PowerPoint presentation intended for organizational leadership. Your presentation should include detailed speaker’s notes. Address the following in your presentation and notes:
Compare and contrast the cultural context of the selected countries. Comparison criteria includes:
Culture.
Economics.
Business climate.
Common business practices in each culture.
Management and leadership practices.
The status of and cultural expectations for women in each culture.
Analyze the implications of working with and leading others in the selected countries.
Synthesize development strategies and ethical global leadership requirements.
Include elements of ethics and social responsibility.
Develop recommendations for the application of cultural intelligence to leadership strategies and practices in the selected countries.
Your presentation should be written clearly and be communicated effectively to organizational leadership in a business environment. Keep in mind that the audience is composed of upper-level leadership, and tailor your content to appeal to that audience.
you can choose any two countries

Case conceptualization on the Gilmore Girls ( Using Bowenian Family Therapy) and please use 5 peer-reviewed articles.

Case conceptualization on the Gilmore Girls ( Using Bowenian Family Therapy) and please use 5 peer-reviewed articles.

**MUST READ THE INSTRUCTIONS VERY CAREFULLY.
**I INCLUDED THE PAGE NUMBERS FOR THE INSTRUCTIONS.
**IF ANY DOUBTS ARISES, PLEASE CONTACT ME BEFORE FINISHING THE PAPER.
**WORD LIMIT IS 300.
**USE ESSAY FORMAT.
**DO NOT PLAGIARIZE (MOST IMPORTANT).
**DO NOT USE ANY AI.
**MAKE SURE TO CONNECT COURSE MATERIAL (LESSON 5) WHICH I ATTACHED LOWER.

Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation for organizational leadership that compares and contrasts the cultural context of two selected countries.
Using Geert Hofstede’s and others’ work on comparative country cultures, you will select and conduct research on two countries, comparing and contrasting their cultures on several dimensions, including business climate and leadership and management practices. Then, you will suppose you have been asked to prepare a presentation for senior leadership in your company to help them plan for and prepare expert teams who will be sent to the two countries you have selected. These relocated team members will work with U.S. members as well as members from both countries.
References: Support your presentation with at least 10 scholarly resources from the
Length: 10–15 slides (with detailed speaker’s notes), in addition to a references list slide.
Written communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills through concise communication of thoughts that convey the overall goals of the presentation and do not detract from the message.
Font and font size: Appropriate for a visual presentation.
Prepare a 10–15 slide PowerPoint presentation intended for organizational leadership. Your presentation should include detailed speaker’s notes. Address the following in your presentation and notes:
Compare and contrast the cultural context of the selected countries. Comparison criteria includes:
Culture.
Economics.
Business climate.
Common business practices in each culture.
Management and leadership practices.
The status of and cultural expectations for women in each culture.
Analyze the implications of working with and leading others in the selected countries.
Synthesize development strategies and ethical global leadership requirements.
Include elements of ethics and social responsibility.
Develop recommendations for the application of cultural intelligence to leadership strategies and practices in the selected countries.
Your presentation should be written clearly and be communicated effectively to organizational leadership in a business environment. Keep in mind that the audience is composed of upper-level leadership, and tailor your content to appeal to that audience.
you can choose any two countries

This week’s topic: How would you use relational frame theory (Hayes, 1991) to describe addictive behaviors such as gambling and drug use? Do you think this fully explains these behaviors?
All responses need to be a minimum of 7 sentences and include proper citation of text material (textbook chapter or assigned article only) in the body of the post. You must incorporate the weekly reading material in your post. You may use additional sources, but at least one citation must be from the textbook chapter or assigned article. Students are expected to use complete sentences, appropriate grammar, and accurate spelling when submitting written responses. Failure to do so may require you to resubmit the assignment. Discussion board posts will be graded as follows:
4 points: Completely and accurately addresses the question
2 points: Uses information from the text or other course materials to answer the question and includes a citation of the material in the answer
1 point: At least 7 complete sentences in length
Although not required, students are encouraged to utilize the discussion boards throughout the semester to discuss course content.
When citing another person’s idea, you must always include the name of the author(s) and date that the work was published such as: (Hawkins, 2023). You cannot leave out the date, nor can you write the name of the book or any other information in the place of the author’s name. If you are using a direct quote, which is not required, you must include the page number where it can be found in addition to the other information such as (Hawkins, 2023 p.43). The citation must occur immediately upon discussion of the idea and appear in the body of your post. Just placing it at the end of the post or after the post is unacceptable and will not be awarded credit.
There are no right or wrong answers. Grading is based solely on the requirements posted above.

Overview:
You should see your capstone project as a work in progress (see attached draft). Always allow yourself room for adjustments and modifications of your own position. Last term we identified our interests, chose a topic, put together a research plan, refined our topic to a position (thesis), did a considerable amount of research to inform ourselves about our topic and documented the extent of our research in a review of literature. That is a substantial amount of work, and the process was designed to set you up for success in the drafting phase of the project.
This first assignment is designed to reassess your thesis and to begin to arrange your thoughts. Remember that a successful paper will be a paper that is committed to and focused on the development of the thesis. Everything you write should serve the thesis. If it doesn’t, it doesn’t belong, or it needs to be rethought as to how it can be made to serve the thesis.
Part I: Reassessment section
Restate your thesis. Do not provide background. Do not provide commentary. State your position in a clear, defensible, declarative statement that will be the focus of all your efforts from here on out. It may have changed somewhat since you initially stated it a few weeks ago. This is a good time to reassess that point of view, and it is your opportunity to strengthen it based on how you’ve grown in your thoughts in the intervening weeks of research. Your thesis statement should be only one (1) sentence!
Purpose statement. Draft a paragraph of not more than 200 words that explains what you now want to accomplish with this thesis.
Part II: Organizational Outline section
Now that you are refocused and are committed to your thesis, it’s time to begin to “arrange” your ideas. This is a rhetorically technical term that ultimately refers to about 80% of the drafting process to come. But to get this kicked off, I need you to think about your own ideas. All the things you want to say in your paper—not the things that other people have said, but what you think you have to say to develop your thesis.
Start with a brainstorming session and simply write down all the ideas that you think are supportive of your thesis. Attempt to state the ideas in a way that you stated your thesis, i.e. as a single declarative sentence. After you have a good collection, start to evaluate the ideas. How strong is each? What do they contribute to the thesis? What are their logical connections to the other ideas? Once you have evaluated the ideas individually, begin to “arrange” the ideas into a logical, persuasive sequence.
Submit a “working” or draft outline in full-sentence form (as opposed to key words) that represent the reasons that will serve as a starting point for drafting.

Designing and Building Support Develop a frame for the condition that needs to change by including a qualitative statement, a quantitative statement, and a justification-of-action statement along with a working intervention hypothesis. Refer to page 329 of your course text for more information. Assess critical functions and participants necessary to support the intervention by developing a roster of critical functions (systems) and participants (system representatives). Refer to page 334 of your course text for more information. If the terminology used by the organization or community you are writing about is different than presented in the example, be sure to note which system it aligns with (initiator, change agent, client, support, controlling, host and implementing, target, or action). Explain your rationale for selecting each system representative. Explain how you ensured a wide variety of perspectives by addressing intersections of diversity, such as race/ethnicity, age, gender, faith, allies, and politics. Strategies and Tactics Analyze the political and/or economic feasibility for implementing the proposed intervention and how you might address any barriers. How have similar barriers been addressed by other organizations and communities in the past? Be sure to include professional and academic sources to support analysis. Explain the reason for selecting the strategy, or strategies, you plan to use in the proposed intervention (for example, collaborative, campaign, or contest) and any strategic taboos you have identified. Be sure to include professional and academic sources to support your rationale. Describe how implementing the strategies will impact the quality of life for the focal population in the organization or community. How will quality of life improve? What might occur is there is no intervention? Include professional and academic sources to support your rationale. Explain two tactics you will use as part of your intervention strategy and your rationale for selecting them. Be sure to include professional and academic sources to support your rationale. Planning and Implementing Explain the rationale for the type of approach you plan to use to evaluate your proposed intervention (for example, outcome-based, linear versus emergent, or non-linear). Be sure to include professional and academic sources to support your rationale. Apply a practical, a political, and an ethical issue associated with using the evaluation approach you selected for your specific intervention. Be sure to include professional and academic sources to support your ideas. Develop a broad statement for what you expect to happen as a result of the proposed intervention using each of the following approaches: organization or community approach, policy approach, and practice approach.

1. In your words, Identify and DISCUSS three (3) benefits of Multiple Aptitude Test Batteries as discussed in Chapter 10. 2. As indicated in chapter 11, DISCUSS the importance of using a career interest inventory to assist unemployed workers back into the workforce effected by COVID-19. Which tests would you administer and why? 3. In reviewing the examples of Developmental Disabilities, identify and DISCUSS which disability you consider the most under-identified, and why. 4. In your words, DISCUSS which personality assessments you would administer for diverse populations (race, culture, gender, sexuality/trans, religion, socio-economic)?

First of all, for any type of journal article your critique should include some basic information:1. Name(s) of the author(s)2. Title of article3. Title of journal, volume number, date, month and page numbers4. Statement of the problem or issue discussed5. The author’s purpose, approach or methods, hypothesis, and major conclusions.The bulk of your critique, however, should consist of your qualified opinion of the article.Read the article you are to critique once to get an overview. Then read it again, critically. At this point you may want to make some notes to yourself on your copy (not the library’s copy, please).The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what typeof article you are critiquing. (Use your discretion. These points don’t have to be discussed in this order, and some may not be pertinent to your particular article.)1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?2. Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?4. Do you find errors of fact and interpretation? (This is a good one! You won’t believe how often authors misinterpret or misrepresent the work of others. You can check on this by looking up for yourself the references the author cites.)5. Is all of the discussion relevant?6. Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included in consequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.7. Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.8. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed, or omitted?9. Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.10. What underlying assumptions does the author have?11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?