Locate a PEER REVIEWED article and discuss a ethical delimia from the following

Locate a PEER REVIEWED article and discuss a ethical delimia from the following website:
https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index?item=3
The delimia CANNOT be INTEGRITY.
I. Locate a Peer-Reviewed Article and Discuss an Ethical Dilemma:
For this Assignment, you will be graded on three different components.
1. APA-style style (including 1) TITLE PAGE at the beginning of the paper, 2) REFERENCE PAGE at the end, and 3) PROPERLY CITED SOURCES within your text.
2. Please provide the pdf of a scholarly, peer-reviewed research study found from an online database relevant to Psychology. No other forms of the article are accepted. Please use your lecture as a guide in finding the article. Please upload it to Assignment Part II.
3. Using your textbook and critical thinking skills, please identify a potential ethical dilemma (Other than Integrity) that might come into play, and please explain why that might be. Keep the explanation to one or two paragraphs. Please be specific to which principle the ethical dilemma may compromise (Psych majors use: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=3, Sociology majors use: http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm). This part of the assignment must be submitted separately as a Word Document only. No other forms of the assignment are accepted. Please upload it to Assignment Part I.

Locate a PEER REVIEWED article and discuss a ethical delimia from the following

Locate a PEER REVIEWED article and discuss a ethical delimia from the following website:
https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index?item=3
The delimia CANNOT be INTEGRITY.
I. Locate a Peer-Reviewed Article and Discuss an Ethical Dilemma:
For this Assignment, you will be graded on three different components.
1. APA-style style (including 1) TITLE PAGE at the beginning of the paper, 2) REFERENCE PAGE at the end, and 3) PROPERLY CITED SOURCES within your text.
2. Please provide the pdf of a scholarly, peer-reviewed research study found from an online database relevant to Psychology. No other forms of the article are accepted. Please use your lecture as a guide in finding the article. Please upload it to Assignment Part II.
3. Using your textbook and critical thinking skills, please identify a potential ethical dilemma (Other than Integrity) that might come into play, and please explain why that might be. Keep the explanation to one or two paragraphs. Please be specific to which principle the ethical dilemma may compromise (Psych majors use: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=3, Sociology majors use: http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm). This part of the assignment must be submitted separately as a Word Document only. No other forms of the assignment are accepted. Please upload it to Assignment Part I.

Article: Kislal, S., & Blizard, D.A. (2016). Conditioned context aversion learni

Article: Kislal, S., & Blizard, D.A. (2016). Conditioned context aversion learning in the laboratory mouse. Learning & Behavior, 44, 309-319. https://journals.scholarsportal.info/pdf/15434494/v44i0004/309_ccalitlm.xml
READ AND ANALYZE THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
– SUMMARY ARTICLE IN OWN WORDS IN APPROX 8 PAGES
Some of the terms and ideas will be unfamiliar to you as you read the article. To do this assignment you must
research what these terms mean and how they fit into the study of learning. Some terms will become clearer as you progress in the course, but the ones not covered in the text are your responsibility to research.
You must read the article linked below and provide a summary of the contents within approximately eight (8) double-spaced pages (do not be concerned if it goes a few pages over – up to 12 pages maximum). This assignment must be typed. There is a lot of information to put into eight pages so you must be clear and precise and learn how to edit your thoughts so you can express them in the least amount of space possible.
The various sections you should analyze are as follows:
Introduction
Summarize the previous findings that are reported in the introduction. Comment on what conclusion (hypothesis) can be drawn from these studies. Outline (in your own words) the definitions of some of the key terms discussed in this paper (e.g., Conditioned taste aversion, Conditioned context aversion, CS-UCS delay).
Remember: Using other articles and referencing them properly is a key step to this section. Don’t just rely on information on this topic from this one article.
Hypothesis
What are the authors’ hypotheses? What predictions were they making and why did they make them? Why was this article written and what questions did it try to answer? Why should we care?
Method
Outline the general methods the experimenters used to gather their data. Summarize the different experiments’ methodologies in your own words so that a first year Psychology student could understand what took place. What were the independent variables (HINT: different groups) and dependent variables? They used a few different control groups. Make sure you explain the purpose of each control group.
Results
What did they find? Summarize the results. Explain the graphs in great detail (y-axis, x-axis) and give a description as to what they are telling you. Demonstrate that you know the point of each graph and explain how they support the authors’ hypothesis. Do not be vague! Clearly state what EACH graph is showing.
Discussion
How did the authors interpret their results? Were their questions answered? What questions remained unanswered? Do you think enough evidence was provided to support their hypothesis and to refute the alternative hypotheses? How does this research expand our understanding of learning theory? Why is it important? Feel free to discuss how it is unimportant if you feel you can support that point.
Comments
What were the strengths of their methodology and what were the weaknesses? How might YOU design an experiment to answer the same questions? What experiment might you run (if you had unlimited resources) to further test their hypothesis? Do you agree with the authors’ conclusions? Why or why not?
Assignment Tips
You must accomplish three important things to succeed in this assignment:
1. Read the article many times before you start doing the assignment. As you read the article take notes and write down questions you need to have answered to understand the article and the assignment. Answer these questions by talking to friends, doing some research, and asking the course instructor.
2. Put the assignment in your own words. Often a student will think that “summarize” means to quote some sentences from the paper they are reading. When a professor reads something that you have copied there is no way for them to be able to tell if you UNDERSTAND what you have copied. By putting it into your own words, you demonstrate understanding.
3. Put some thought into answering the assignment’s questions. When you are asked “Is this experiment important?” saying “yes” or “no” without explaining why you felt that is unacceptable. The students getting an A will demonstrate they have put critical thought into answering these questions.
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
• Use the headings (e.g., Introduction, Hypothesis, etc.) to break your paper into sections. You can break your summary into three sections for the methods and results to mirror the paper’s three experiments.
• Essay style answers only, no point form.
• APA referencing style. Remember to write out the ideas in your own words (i.e., no direct quoting from the paper OR other reference) BUT always reference where you got that fact/idea from.
• Maximum of 12 pages.
• No extensions granted – no exceptions.

Article: Kislal, S., & Blizard, D.A. (2016). Conditioned context aversion learni

Article: Kislal, S., & Blizard, D.A. (2016). Conditioned context aversion learning in the laboratory mouse. Learning & Behavior, 44, 309-319. https://journals.scholarsportal.info/pdf/15434494/v44i0004/309_ccalitlm.xml
READ AND ANALYZE THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
– SUMMARY ARTICLE IN OWN WORDS IN APPROX 8 PAGES
Some of the terms and ideas will be unfamiliar to you as you read the article. To do this assignment you must
research what these terms mean and how they fit into the study of learning. Some terms will become clearer as you progress in the course, but the ones not covered in the text are your responsibility to research.
You must read the article linked below and provide a summary of the contents within approximately eight (8) double-spaced pages (do not be concerned if it goes a few pages over – up to 12 pages maximum). This assignment must be typed. There is a lot of information to put into eight pages so you must be clear and precise and learn how to edit your thoughts so you can express them in the least amount of space possible.
The various sections you should analyze are as follows:
Introduction
Summarize the previous findings that are reported in the introduction. Comment on what conclusion (hypothesis) can be drawn from these studies. Outline (in your own words) the definitions of some of the key terms discussed in this paper (e.g., Conditioned taste aversion, Conditioned context aversion, CS-UCS delay).
Remember: Using other articles and referencing them properly is a key step to this section. Don’t just rely on information on this topic from this one article.
Hypothesis
What are the authors’ hypotheses? What predictions were they making and why did they make them? Why was this article written and what questions did it try to answer? Why should we care?
Method
Outline the general methods the experimenters used to gather their data. Summarize the different experiments’ methodologies in your own words so that a first year Psychology student could understand what took place. What were the independent variables (HINT: different groups) and dependent variables? They used a few different control groups. Make sure you explain the purpose of each control group.
Results
What did they find? Summarize the results. Explain the graphs in great detail (y-axis, x-axis) and give a description as to what they are telling you. Demonstrate that you know the point of each graph and explain how they support the authors’ hypothesis. Do not be vague! Clearly state what EACH graph is showing.
Discussion
How did the authors interpret their results? Were their questions answered? What questions remained unanswered? Do you think enough evidence was provided to support their hypothesis and to refute the alternative hypotheses? How does this research expand our understanding of learning theory? Why is it important? Feel free to discuss how it is unimportant if you feel you can support that point.
Comments
What were the strengths of their methodology and what were the weaknesses? How might YOU design an experiment to answer the same questions? What experiment might you run (if you had unlimited resources) to further test their hypothesis? Do you agree with the authors’ conclusions? Why or why not?
Assignment Tips
You must accomplish three important things to succeed in this assignment:
1. Read the article many times before you start doing the assignment. As you read the article take notes and write down questions you need to have answered to understand the article and the assignment. Answer these questions by talking to friends, doing some research, and asking the course instructor.
2. Put the assignment in your own words. Often a student will think that “summarize” means to quote some sentences from the paper they are reading. When a professor reads something that you have copied there is no way for them to be able to tell if you UNDERSTAND what you have copied. By putting it into your own words, you demonstrate understanding.
3. Put some thought into answering the assignment’s questions. When you are asked “Is this experiment important?” saying “yes” or “no” without explaining why you felt that is unacceptable. The students getting an A will demonstrate they have put critical thought into answering these questions.
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
• Use the headings (e.g., Introduction, Hypothesis, etc.) to break your paper into sections. You can break your summary into three sections for the methods and results to mirror the paper’s three experiments.
• Essay style answers only, no point form.
• APA referencing style. Remember to write out the ideas in your own words (i.e., no direct quoting from the paper OR other reference) BUT always reference where you got that fact/idea from.
• Maximum of 12 pages.
• No extensions granted – no exceptions.

Given the following students’ test scores (95, 92, 90, 90, 83, 83, 83, 74, 60, a

Given the following students’ test scores (95, 92, 90, 90, 83, 83, 83, 74, 60, and 50), identify the mean, median, mode, range, variance, and standard deviation for the sample. SPSS is strongly recommended for this assignment.
Write a 500-750 word summary and analysis discussing the results of your calculations.
State your results for the sample by inserting a table from SPSS. Highlight the mean, median, mode, range, variance, and standard deviation.
Explain which descriptive statistic is best for this data set. Why?
Conduct a one-sample t-test and interpret the results (use a population mean of 70). Refer to the attached document for clarification.
In what situations would this information be useful?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines for APA. An abstract is not required.

Given the following students’ test scores (95, 92, 90, 90, 83, 83, 83, 74, 60, a

Given the following students’ test scores (95, 92, 90, 90, 83, 83, 83, 74, 60, and 50), identify the mean, median, mode, range, variance, and standard deviation for the sample. SPSS is strongly recommended for this assignment.
Write a 500-750 word summary and analysis discussing the results of your calculations.
State your results for the sample by inserting a table from SPSS. Highlight the mean, median, mode, range, variance, and standard deviation.
Explain which descriptive statistic is best for this data set. Why?
Conduct a one-sample t-test and interpret the results (use a population mean of 70). Refer to the attached document for clarification.
In what situations would this information be useful?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines for APA. An abstract is not required.

Theories of Maladaptive Behavior Locate at least two peer-reviewed scholarly ar

Theories of Maladaptive Behavior
Locate at least two peer-reviewed scholarly articles that demonstrate how the biological theory explains the etiology of two different mental illnesses. Answer the following questions about each different mental illness:
What are the specific biological mechanisms associated with each diagnosis?
How would each diagnosis be explained by a major psychological theory other than biological theory (e.g., cognitive-behavioral)?
Could each disorder be better understood by the combination of both biological theory and another perspective? If not, why not? If so, which other perspective is best? Why?

Theories of Maladaptive Behavior Locate at least two peer-reviewed scholarly ar

Theories of Maladaptive Behavior
Locate at least two peer-reviewed scholarly articles that demonstrate how the biological theory explains the etiology of two different mental illnesses. Answer the following questions about each different mental illness:
What are the specific biological mechanisms associated with each diagnosis?
How would each diagnosis be explained by a major psychological theory other than biological theory (e.g., cognitive-behavioral)?
Could each disorder be better understood by the combination of both biological theory and another perspective? If not, why not? If so, which other perspective is best? Why?

View the clip on soft language by comedian George Carlin. Comment on how languag

View the clip on soft language by comedian George Carlin. Comment on how language can distort reality and how language can affect ethics and ethical decision making.
Discuss how awareness of soft language can impact your communication with clients and assess the ethical implications of soft language for the client-therapist relationship.
Here is the link to the clip https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h67k9eEw9AY

View the clip on soft language by comedian George Carlin. Comment on how languag

View the clip on soft language by comedian George Carlin. Comment on how language can distort reality and how language can affect ethics and ethical decision making.
Discuss how awareness of soft language can impact your communication with clients and assess the ethical implications of soft language for the client-therapist relationship.
Here is the link to the clip https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h67k9eEw9AY