Category: Other

paper needs to be done by 7pm pacific time, paper needs to be rephrased and possible have the citations changed, sample paper upload . rubric and instructions upload. biggest thing here is no plagiarism. thank you. this is a nursing paper.

paper is already done I just need the paper rewritten and put in own words and changed up to sound original. I do need it done fairly quick by seven pm pacific time.

Questions: As the nurse leader, what steps would you take to investigate this issue further? Explain what specific information you would try to gather. If your investigation revealed that team members are using the ISBAR tool inconsistently, describe at least two actions you would take as the nurse leader to address this. Discuss whether or not it would be appropriate for you, as the nurse leader, to provide education on using the ISBAR tool to both the nursing students and your staff. Support your position. Submission Guidelines: Length: Your paper must be a minimum of 500 words and should not exceed 750 words, not including the title and reference pages. Title Page: Include a title page with the title of your paper, your name, the course name and number, your instructor’s name, and the date of submission. Introduction: Begin your paper with an introduction that provides a brief overview of the scenario and outlines the main points that will be covered in your paper. Body: The body of your paper should be divided into sections with headings that correspond to each of the questions provided. Each section should thoroughly answer the question, supported by evidence from your references and the scenario. Conclusion: Conclude your paper with a summary of your findings, reiterating the importance of the issue addressed and suggesting possible future steps or implications. References: Include a reference page at the end of your document. At least two references in APA format are required. You may use your textbook as one of the references. Ensure all citations within the text and on the reference page adhere to APA guidelines. View the rubric for details on how your instructor will grade your assignment.

hcm506 Critical Thinking Assignment (110 points) Using the Clinical Trial on breast cancer dataset. Perform a Kaplan-Meier Analysis or the Log-Rank Test to determine the survival curve for the breast cancer survivors. H0 The risk of 50% of the participants dying from breast cancer will occur within five years. (Null Hypothesis) H1 The risk of 50% of the participants dying from breast cancer does not occur within five years. (Alternative Hypothesis) Ensure to submit the following requirements for the assignment: Review the analysis from the standpoint of how many patients survive over the seven-year time period that the clinical trial covered. Present your findings as a Survival Time chart in a Word document, with a title page, introduction explaining why you would conduct a survival analysis, a discussion where you interpret the meaning of the survival analysis, and a conclusion should be included. Your submission should be 2-3 pages to discuss and display your findings. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of three scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. One of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the others must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these sources and should be your primary resource for conducting research. Follow APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.

hcm563 Insurance Fraud and Abuse (110 points) Health insurance fraud is a problem globally, and Saudi Arabia is not immune. Assume you have been tasked with presenting this problem to your healthcare organization so employees can act appropriately when processing health insurance claims. Be sure to address: Actions that would be considered fraudulent; Key indicators that fraud is present; The impact of fraud on the medical community, health insurance companies, and Saudi Arabia; and How to report health insurance fraud and penalties for those that participate in such behavior. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: Be organized, using professional themes and transitions. Consists of seven slides, plus the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes—a minimum of 100 words. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. Provide support for your statements on the presentation slides, as well as in the speaker’s notes, with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the others must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references. Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check Student Guide.

hcm515 Medical Malpractice (130 points) Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing the standard operating procedure in dealing with “near misses” in your facility. Be sure to address the following issues: Examine any applicable rules and regulations pertaining to malpractice in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Detail a specific procedure in dealing with the reporting of medical errors in a healthcare facility. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: Organized, using professional themes and transitions. It should consist of nine slides, not including the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes, with a minimum of 100 words per slide. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the other four must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references. Follow APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check Student Guide.

Research health programs offered by a healthcare organization in your area. Choose one specific health program from your research, Complete one of the cultural competency self-assessments listed here for that program in that organization. A mission statement that articulates its principles, rationale, and values for culturally and linguistically competent healthcare service delivery? If yes, what is the mission statement? 2. Policies and procedures for staff recruitment, hiring, and retention that will achieve the goal of a diverse and culturally competent workforce? If yes, describe them. 3. Position descriptions and personnel performance measures that include skill sets related to linguistic competence? If yes, describe them. 4. Policies and resources to support ongoing professional development and in-service training (at all levels) related to linguistic competence? If yes, describe them. 5. Policies, procedures, and fiscal planning to ensure the provision of translation and interpretation services? If yes, describe them. 6. Policies and procedures regarding the translation of patient consent forms, educational materials, and other information in formats that meet the literacy needs of patients? If yes, describe them. 7. Policies and procedures to evaluate the quality and appropriateness of interpretation and translation services? If yes, describe them. 8. Policies and procedures to periodically evaluate consumer and personnel satisfaction with interpretation and translation services that are provided? If yes, describe them. 9. Policies and resources that support community outreach initiatives to persons with limited English proficiency? If yes, describe them. 10. Policies and procedures to periodically review the current and emergent demographic trends for the geographic area served in order to determine interpretation and translation services needs? If yes, describe them. What surprised you about taking the self-assessment? Which recommendations would you make based on the results of the self-assessment?

Due Date: May 5th Final paper, submitted via Blackboard Prompt: Please write a paper, of 3-4 pages in length (at least 3 FULL pages, but can be more; double-spaced, 12 pt. font size, Times New Roman), in which you apply two ethical frameworks to some particular issue in applied ethics. We’ve looked at several ethical frameworks that are supposed to guide us in our thinking about ethical questions: utilitarianism, Kantianism, Aristotelian virtue ethics, and Confucian virtue ethics. We’ve also discussed a host of particular issues relating to ethics and society. These include: whistle-blowing, professional responsibility, smart technology, corporate social responsibility, genetic engineering, factory farming, etc. In your paper, you are required to: (a) pick two ethical frameworks and succinctly describe them (b) apply both frameworks to some issue in ethics & society (this could be any topic on our syllabus or something else relevantly similar and of comparable real-world significance) (c) discuss to what extent either framework succeeds in tackling this issue. (d) raise some objection to your main thesis, to which you give a response. Some questions you might consider: (i) Is one framework more promising than the other in tackling the particular ethical issue? (ii) Does neither framework succeed in tackling the particular ethical issue? (iii) If not, what is the correct analysis of the ethical issue under consideration and why? Further requirements and advice: You have much freedom with respect to the topic of this assignment, but you should make sure that you defend some specific thesis, which appears somewhere in the introductory paragraph of your essay. You should draw on any relevant readings on our syllabus, but your paper should not be primarily a summary of those readings. Strive for analytical and argumentative depth, not breadth: better to explore one issue deeply, rather than several issues superficially. You should not use any outside philosophy sources. You may appeal to an outside source if you wish to cite some relevant empirical data, but this is not required and should be used only if necessary. For some helpful writing advice: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writing.html Grading for the Assignment: “A” papers typically have all of the following virtues: 1. It has a well-defined thesis stated in the first paragraph and a logical organization. 2. It shows intellectual honesty and struggle. It defends a defensible thesis and takes very seriously objections to that thesis. 3. It is well-informed. If there are passages in the assigned readings for the course that are particularly relevant to the matters under discussion in the essay, these are cited and discussed. The paper shows an awareness of conceptual distinctions and clarifications developed in the course. 4. The argument is carefully articulated and developed. Obvious difficulties are anticipated and answered, and gaps are closed. 5. It is significant. The issues discussed, although detailed, are of some importance, and the essay makes their importance clear. 6. The paper is written in a lucid and grammatical style. “B” papers have at least the following virtues: 1. As before. 2. As before. 3. As before. 4. It is logical and not careless. The argument is well articulated. 5. It is not trivial. The essay provides some motivation for its topic. 6. The paper is grammatical. “C” papers have at least the following features: 1. It is orderly and has some focus. 2. It shows some serious concern with the issues it deals with. 3. It is not uninformed. Where relevant, it shows awareness of the content of the course. 4. There are some definite and cogent arguments in the essay. 5. The paper has some point. 6. The paper is readable and minimally grammatical. “D” papers have the following features: 1. It has only some intelligible organization. 2. It shows only some concern with the issues it deals with. 3. It shows minimal awareness of the course content. 4. It makes some relevant and sensible argument. 5. It has some point. 6. It is comprehensible and minimally grammatical.

The “World’s Most Admired Company” In this module, the role of the corporate headquarters in a multibusiness company — in particular, how the corporate headquarters can create value for the individual businesses. This necessitates examining the role of the corporate headquarters and its relations with individual businesses. For this week’s assignment, review CASE 13 How Do You Solve a Problem Like General Electric?, Chapter 13 (in your textbook). Remember: A case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific case study questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps: 1. Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course module, which apply to the situation described in the case study. 2. Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the module. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course module. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers. 3. Describe in some detail the actions that would address or correct the situation. 4. Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks. 5. Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case. Case Study Questions: 1. What were the key challenges faced by General Electric in the early 2000s, and how did the company respond to these challenges? 2. How did General Electric’s corporate strategy change under the leadership of Jeff Immelt, and what were the implications of these changes for the company’s various business units? 3. What role did divestitures play in General Electric’s corporate strategy, and how did the company decide which businesses to sell off? 4. How did General Electric allocate resources across its various business units, and what factors influenced these resource allocation decisions? 5. How did General Electric leverage synergies across its different businesses, and what benefits did this approach offer the company? Directions: • Write an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph to address the assignment’s guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question-and-answer format. Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements: • Add headlines to the main topics • Be 4-5 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements. • Use University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. • Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook. • Cite your textbooks (Contemporary Strategy Analysis) by Robert Grant and cite any other sources if appropriate. • Include 14-20 references using (APA 7th) and cite current articles published in the last five years. • Free of plagiarism and free of AI. You can find the case of Eni Spa in the attachment

Using the Clinical Trial on breast cancer dataset. Perform a Kaplan-Meier Analysis or the Log-Rank Test to determine the survival curve for the breast cancer survivors. H0 The risk of 50% of the participants dying from breast cancer will occur within five years. (Null Hypothesis) H1 The risk of 50% of the participants dying from breast cancer does not occur within five years. (Alternative Hypothesis) Ensure to submit the following requirements for the assignment: – Review the analysis from the standpoint of how many patients survive over the seven-year time period that the clinical trial covered. – Present your findings as a Survival Time chart in a Word document, with a title page, an introduction explaining why you would conduct a survival analysis, a discussion where you interpret the meaning of the survival analysis, and a conclusion should be included. – Your submission should be 2-3 pages to discuss and display your findings. – Provide support for your statements with in-text citations ( VERY IMPORTANT FOR EACH PARAGRAPH ) from a minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles between 2019-2023. – Follow APA 7th edition writing standards. – Plagiarism percent should not exceed 25%.