J.S. is a 65 year-old man who began experiencing difficulty with his voice after

J.S. is a 65 year-old man who began experiencing difficulty with his voice after a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. He described his symptoms at that time as an inability to increase vocal intensity without voice “breaks” and poor quality and control. His family has reported that his vocal volume is low, but he doesn’t believe that it is low. While working in other fields, he continued to experience low vocal intensity that impacted his work because his coworkers couldn’t hear him. He is not a smoker and has no injuries to his neck. He also states he has not had any surgical procedures that required intubation or affected the head or neck.
Here are the results of acoustic analysis: Fundamental frequency was 102 Hz Maximum Phonation Time: 5 seconds Vocal Intensity: 50 dB
Laryngeal imaging with rigid endoscopy and stroboscopy revealed reduced vocal closure (reduced adduction) and bowing of the vocal folds upon phonation. You’re the SLP who specializes in treatment strategies for patients with Parkinson’s disease.
Need a handout of information on takeways, discussing diagnostic and treatment strategies from your textbook and other reputable sources. Resources must be cited on a references page for the handout.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Hi I need help on statistics homework assignment on 6 problems and questions. Th

Hi I need help on statistics homework assignment on 6 problems and questions. The assignment requires to show all work to receive the most points which includes all work on calculations, graphs and full written statements from questions. Assignment is uploaded and I will need before 6pm on Sunday May 5, 2024. Thank you

Review the five perspectives for community health assessment in the table below.

Review the five perspectives for community health assessment in the table below. Sometimes one perspective dominates, but more often, planners use a combination of approaches. In a 4-5 page essay: Describe a situation where two or more perspectives would be valuable. Which perspectives would you use in that situation?

Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing the standard operating procedure in d

Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing the standard operating procedure in dealing with “near misses” in your facility. Be sure to address the following issues: • Examine any applicable rules and regulations about malpractice in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. • Detail a specific procedure in dealing with the reporting of medical errors in a healthcare facility. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: • Organized, using professional themes and transitions. • It should consist of nine slides, not including the title and reference slides. • Each slide must provide detailed speaker notes, with a minimum of 100 words per slide. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. • Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles (peer-reviewed articles between 2019 and 2023). • Follow APA 7th edition writing standards. You are strongly encouraged to check the assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check before submitting ( percentage should not exceed 25%)

You are a public health scientist and informatician assigned to lead a team of e

You are a public health scientist and informatician assigned to lead a team of environmental specialists investigating an outbreak of lead poisoning in a small community. The suspicion is that the lead poisoning has been caused by pollution generated by a large commercial plant that produces paints under a federal contract. The community water sources have been contaminated with the plant waste. Your assigned task is to organize your team and lead a surveillance investigation. You must meet with the community’s elected leaders to discuss the outbreak, present preliminary outbreak data, and explain how your team will proceed with its investigation (O’Carroll, Yasnoff, Ward, & Ripp, 2010). You have chosen the Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which is used in the CDC’S Epi Info™ application to understand, question, interpret, and visualize data. As the team leader and primary informatician, explain the data collection procedures, which you will instruct the team to use to investigate the outbreak. Why might you choose to use the CDC’s Epi Info™ and its GIS for the outbreak analyses and report? From your readings on theory and strategy-based communication principles, describe what approach you will use to present likely outcomes, and to best answer questions posed by the community leaders. Assume the questions posed will inquire about the community and individual factors affected by the information outcomes.

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2) Demonstrate expertise in that specific area in Gerontology. Ask a question that pertains to Gerontology, then provide “an answer” using empirical results from professional publications. Peer-reviewed literature from other scientific domains may be used (e.g., developmental psychology, personality/social psychology, health, community, medicine & nursing (palliative care), and public policy). · Topic/Questions must be pre-approved · Length: 3-5 pages · Three articles from professional journals that report research studies (not popular magazines or web pages) · APA Format INTRODUCTION: (4 POINTS) Explain why you chose your research question and why it is an important one. Provide a basic overview of the topic (i.e., definitions, where might you encounter topic in life, frequency of topic, general research done on topic). Provide a hypothesis of what you expect to find. METHOD: (5 POINTS) State the type of experiments/studies that were conducted in each of the publications used. What questions were asked? What was being measured? How was it being measured? How will the methods provide answers to your question? Who did they sample? For instance, 200 undergraduate students from a liberal arts college were surveyed. Likert scales surveys were used to measure well-being, a higher score meant more positive sense of well-being; the participants were judged by three independent observers for anxious behaviors, the higher the rating meant that they were exhibiting greater anxious behaviors according to the judges. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (6 POINTS) Explain the results and discuss them. What is your interpretation of the results? How does everything fit together? What did you learn? What did you gather from results? Where there any surprises? The results and discussion should be “the bulk” of your paper. Add whatever you think is appropriate to support how you formulated your conclusions. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE SUGGESTIONS: (2 POINTS) Discuss any limitations encountered by the studies you reviewed in your paper. Provide suggestions about the possible future implications of the research and what can be improved upon. Suggest a more “ideal” future study that would fill in some hole in knowledge. CONCLUSION: (2 POINTS) Short synopsis of what you learned (about a paragraph). REFERENCES AND APA FORMAT: (1 POINTS) Cite all references used (APA format)

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2) Demonstrate expertise in that specific area in Gerontology. Ask a question that pertains to Gerontology, then provide “an answer” using empirical results from professional publications. Peer-reviewed literature from other scientific domains may be used (e.g., developmental psychology, personality/social psychology, health, community, medicine & nursing (palliative care), and public policy). · Topic/Questions must be pre-approved · Length: 3-5 pages · Three articles from professional journals that report research studies (not popular magazines or web pages) · APA Format INTRODUCTION: (4 POINTS) Explain why you chose your research question and why it is an important one. Provide a basic overview of the topic (i.e., definitions, where might you encounter topic in life, frequency of topic, general research done on topic). Provide a hypothesis of what you expect to find. METHOD: (5 POINTS) State the type of experiments/studies that were conducted in each of the publications used. What questions were asked? What was being measured? How was it being measured? How will the methods provide answers to your question? Who did they sample? For instance, 200 undergraduate students from a liberal arts college were surveyed. Likert scales surveys were used to measure well-being, a higher score meant more positive sense of well-being; the participants were judged by three independent observers for anxious behaviors, the higher the rating meant that they were exhibiting greater anxious behaviors according to the judges. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (6 POINTS) Explain the results and discuss them. What is your interpretation of the results? How does everything fit together? What did you learn? What did you gather from results? Where there any surprises? The results and discussion should be “the bulk” of your paper. Add whatever you think is appropriate to support how you formulated your conclusions. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE SUGGESTIONS: (2 POINTS) Discuss any limitations encountered by the studies you reviewed in your paper. Provide suggestions about the possible future implications of the research and what can be improved upon. Suggest a more “ideal” future study that would fill in some hole in knowledge. CONCLUSION: (2 POINTS) Short synopsis of what you learned (about a paragraph). REFERENCES AND APA FORMAT: (1 POINTS) Cite all references used (APA format)

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2) Demonstrate expertise in that specific area in Gerontology. Ask a question that pertains to Gerontology, then provide “an answer” using empirical results from professional publications. Peer-reviewed literature from other scientific domains may be used (e.g., developmental psychology, personality/social psychology, health, community, medicine & nursing (palliative care), and public policy). · Topic/Questions must be pre-approved · Length: 3-5 pages · Three articles from professional journals that report research studies (not popular magazines or web pages) · APA Format INTRODUCTION: (4 POINTS) Explain why you chose your research question and why it is an important one. Provide a basic overview of the topic (i.e., definitions, where might you encounter topic in life, frequency of topic, general research done on topic). Provide a hypothesis of what you expect to find. METHOD: (5 POINTS) State the type of experiments/studies that were conducted in each of the publications used. What questions were asked? What was being measured? How was it being measured? How will the methods provide answers to your question? Who did they sample? For instance, 200 undergraduate students from a liberal arts college were surveyed. Likert scales surveys were used to measure well-being, a higher score meant more positive sense of well-being; the participants were judged by three independent observers for anxious behaviors, the higher the rating meant that they were exhibiting greater anxious behaviors according to the judges. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (6 POINTS) Explain the results and discuss them. What is your interpretation of the results? How does everything fit together? What did you learn? What did you gather from results? Where there any surprises? The results and discussion should be “the bulk” of your paper. Add whatever you think is appropriate to support how you formulated your conclusions. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE SUGGESTIONS: (2 POINTS) Discuss any limitations encountered by the studies you reviewed in your paper. Provide suggestions about the possible future implications of the research and what can be improved upon. Suggest a more “ideal” future study that would fill in some hole in knowledge. CONCLUSION: (2 POINTS) Short synopsis of what you learned (about a paragraph). REFERENCES AND APA FORMAT: (1 POINTS) Cite all references used (APA format)

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2

MAIN OBJECTIVE OF TERM PAPER 1) Explore in-depth your interest in Gerontology; 2) Demonstrate expertise in that specific area in Gerontology. Ask a question that pertains to Gerontology, then provide “an answer” using empirical results from professional publications. Peer-reviewed literature from other scientific domains may be used (e.g., developmental psychology, personality/social psychology, health, community, medicine & nursing (palliative care), and public policy). · Topic/Questions must be pre-approved · Length: 3-5 pages · Three articles from professional journals that report research studies (not popular magazines or web pages) · APA Format INTRODUCTION: (4 POINTS) Explain why you chose your research question and why it is an important one. Provide a basic overview of the topic (i.e., definitions, where might you encounter topic in life, frequency of topic, general research done on topic). Provide a hypothesis of what you expect to find. METHOD: (5 POINTS) State the type of experiments/studies that were conducted in each of the publications used. What questions were asked? What was being measured? How was it being measured? How will the methods provide answers to your question? Who did they sample? For instance, 200 undergraduate students from a liberal arts college were surveyed. Likert scales surveys were used to measure well-being, a higher score meant more positive sense of well-being; the participants were judged by three independent observers for anxious behaviors, the higher the rating meant that they were exhibiting greater anxious behaviors according to the judges. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (6 POINTS) Explain the results and discuss them. What is your interpretation of the results? How does everything fit together? What did you learn? What did you gather from results? Where there any surprises? The results and discussion should be “the bulk” of your paper. Add whatever you think is appropriate to support how you formulated your conclusions. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE SUGGESTIONS: (2 POINTS) Discuss any limitations encountered by the studies you reviewed in your paper. Provide suggestions about the possible future implications of the research and what can be improved upon. Suggest a more “ideal” future study that would fill in some hole in knowledge. CONCLUSION: (2 POINTS) Short synopsis of what you learned (about a paragraph). REFERENCES AND APA FORMAT: (1 POINTS) Cite all references used (APA format)