Category: Other

Directions:
Shante’ is a 62-year-old divorcee’ with 3 adult children. While married, she ascribed to the traditional gender roles that she learned from a little girl on what a wife should look like and what a wife should be doing within the household. Since her divorce 2 years ago, Shante’ has felt lonely and has increasingly felt the need for companionship. In a phone conversation with her younger sister, Eloise, the conversation goes as such:
Shante’: “It’s Saturday night and I am at home watching television. I have two neighbors who appear to be older than me, but they are getting out and enjoying life. One of them looks like she was getting ready to go out on a date earlier this week. I must admit, I am lonely”.
Eloise: “You need to live, honey. Your marriage ended two years ago. Your kids are doing well living their lives. What about you? You know, I watched you be unhappy within your marriage because you were doing what he wanted you to do. Being a good wife does not mean conforming to those traditional roles that our mother fulfilled, as did our grandmother. I’m getting off subject, but let me tell you about this dating phone app, 50+LOVE—if you’re interested in doing something different and exploring life and the fun person I used to know you to be in our teens and 20’s”.
Shante’: “You’re right. I’ve worked through my feelings of being ‘less than’ throughout my marriage. I gained weight and eventually lost 80 pounds after my battle with cervical cancer 15 years ago. At one time, I felt attractive and then begin to feel like I wasn’t good enough because I wasn’t happy. I am a woman worthy of change, happiness, and doing what I need to do. I still have feelings of wanting to have sex. I’m human. And if I do so, it will be responsibly and on my terms. We were raised with the adage “No sex before marriage” because of being raised by our pastor father and going to church several days a week. I’m 62, not married, but what if I meet someone eventually and the mutual desire(s) are there. Then what? I want and need my own sense of self and to live in accordance with my own self-identified values, right?
Eloise: “Right on! It’s all about continuing to be responsible, live responsibly, and not let the world tell you what you should and should not do. Don’t you agree?
Shante’: “I do. I am woman, hear me roar. These are thoughts that I have been thinking about for years and have appreciated when listening to women of all ages throughout the years talk about their version of womanhood and sexuality. I’ll be 63 in two months. Thank you for giving me the motivation to reclaim and to rethink who I am.
Eloise: “Sure thing! I wholeheartedly understand.
Initial Posting
Though Shante’ is a middle-aged woman, sexuality continues to be important within all phases of the developmental lifespan. Discuss Shante’s position relative to sexuality from psychological, biological, and social/sociological characteristics, based upon her indicated experiences and where she is presently, based upon the transcript.

Directions:
You are working for a local youth center that provides afterschool activities including games, tutoring and peer groups. You have recently discovered that a couple of your regular attendees have not been attending the afterschool program but are rumored to be socializing with known gang members.
The following week, your students return. Hoping to dissuade the students from further gang affiliation, you employ a systems approach in addressing the problem. Discuss and describe what this approach will look like. Be specific. Give examples.

Directions:
Consider the following scenario:
Norma, a 43 year old mother and wife is struggling with alcohol addiction. She has two teenage children, a 13 year old daughter and a 9 year old son. Her husband is a truck driver and is often on the road working long hours. He is rarely home. Norma has a history of seizures and kidney stones. She is frequently ill with stomach problems. She has few friends and rarely socializes.
Norma has come into your local mental health center seeking services. You must now assemble a team of professionals to assist you in working with Norma. Discuss what professionals you will use to help you work with Norma and in what capacity. Be specific. Give examples.

Please discuss the details of my assignment
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Write a evaluation essay on your chosen topic: Pick a topic and evaluate it for specific category or evaluate as ″as″ For example: Hoka as a running shoe brand, Lg as a gaming computer, _ as a _, casetify as a phone case etc -Category ＝ What you are evaluating your topic as. good enough service, and really tasty food, etc.
Start with a background or something that shows what makes you an expert or the right to evaluate the topic or to establish credibility and add final sentence that shares overall evaluation of the topic at the end or a thesis statement( a reader would know from reading this sentence whether you think your subject is great, lousy, or somewhere in between/It should get your reader interested in the topic and leave your reader with the feeling that you′re ″expert,″ some one who knows what their talking about when it come to the person, place, or thing you′ve chosen to evaluate. -To gain the reader′s trust, show your breadth of experience in the category you are using for the evaluation.
Dedicate on paragraph for each criteria. begin with a topic sentence for each body paragraph: Start the body paragraphs by declaring your rating on a criterion/ telling the reader what the paragraph is going about. The topic sentence should proclaim your evaluation of your topic based on just one criteria. Look at the topic sentences, do they include an evaluation? Do they include a criterion? For example: The nostalgic atmosphere at Ruby′s creates a wonderful (evaluation) environmental for fun family dining(criterion)
Followed by a support for the rating as the body: each topic sentence should be supported with specific details, facts, and examples that make clear to the reader how your observation came about. Based on observational or desсrіption or experience of the topic, describe or tell in detail that show why you evaluate it like that. Zoom in: tell what you observed/ what have you observed or experienced to support the rating. -Starting paragraphs with clear rating and adding zoom ins that describe actual experience on the topic End with your overall evaluation of your topic( your essays thesis). Finish though as an evaluator who has rated the topic. Get back to the point you made in the opening thesis. You can make your point in a more confident and powerful way because you have already ″proven″ it to the reader. End by suggesting how readers should act in response to your evaluation. -Why is your evaluation meaningful to a reader?Should they visit this restaurant?Should they try to find a job like yours?Should they buy that product?Should they feel lucky if they have a friend like yours?
″Evaluation Essay: How Good Is It?″ – main instruction of the assignment
Other photos are extra guide for the essay and ″run with confidence″ and ″auntie ruby″ is an example.
Just a little note when picking a topic: I′m 18 years old female student 🙂 any topic would be fine as long as evaluated within a category or as a ″as″ (included in the photo instruction ″evaluation essay; how good is it?″). thanks and sorry for the long instruction and lots of pictures. Please kindly refer to the images attached.
Grading Criteria: Major criteria:
The writer presents a clear, convincing evaluation of the topic′s quality based on criteria that match the interests of target readers.
The writer gives detailed examples that show how the evaluation came about, including personal testimony and comparisons when appropriate.
Other criteria:
The writer shows that he or she is an ″expert″ in the evaluation category.
The writer persuades the reader to act on the evaluation.
The title is evocative.
Sentences are clear and varied in style.
Paragraphs are unified and coherent with effective transitions.
The format is correct.
The essay is free of proofreading errors.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Write a evaluation essay on your chosen topic: Pick a topic and evaluate it for specific category or evaluate as ″as″ For example: Hoka as a running shoe brand, Lg as a gaming computer, _ as a _, casetify as a phone case etc -Category ＝ What you are evaluating your topic as. good enough service, and really tasty food, etc.
Start with a background or something that shows what makes you an expert or the right to evaluate the topic or to establish credibility and add final sentence that shares overall evaluation of the topic at the end or a thesis statement( a reader would know from reading this sentence whether you think your subject is great, lousy, or somewhere in between/It should get your reader interested in the topic and leave your reader with the feeling that you′re ″expert,″ some one who knows what their talking about when it come to the person, place, or thing you′ve chosen to evaluate. -To gain the reader′s trust, show your breadth of experience in the category you are using for the evaluation.
Dedicate on paragraph for each criteria. begin with a topic sentence for each body paragraph: Start the body paragraphs by declaring your rating on a criterion/ telling the reader what the paragraph is going about. The topic sentence should proclaim your evaluation of your topic based on just one criteria. Look at the topic sentences, do they include an evaluation? Do they include a criterion? For example: The nostalgic atmosphere at Ruby′s creates a wonderful (evaluation) environmental for fun family dining(criterion)
Followed by a support for the rating as the body: each topic sentence should be supported with specific details, facts, and examples that make clear to the reader how your observation came about. Based on observational or desсrіption or experience of the topic, describe or tell in detail that show why you evaluate it like that. Zoom in: tell what you observed/ what have you observed or experienced to support the rating. -Starting paragraphs with clear rating and adding zoom ins that describe actual experience on the topic End with your overall evaluation of your topic( your essays thesis). Finish though as an evaluator who has rated the topic. Get back to the point you made in the opening thesis. You can make your point in a more confident and powerful way because you have already ″proven″ it to the reader. End by suggesting how readers should act in response to your evaluation. -Why is your evaluation meaningful to a reader?Should they visit this restaurant?Should they try to find a job like yours?Should they buy that product?Should they feel lucky if they have a friend like yours?
″Evaluation Essay: How Good Is It?″ – main instruction of the assignment
Other photos are extra guide for the essay and ″run with confidence″ and ″auntie ruby″ is an example.
Just a little note when picking a topic: I′m 18 years old female student 🙂 any topic would be fine as long as evaluated within a category or as a ″as″ (included in the photo instruction ″evaluation essay; how good is it?″). thanks and sorry for the long instruction and lots of pictures. Please kindly refer to the images attached.
Grading Criteria: Major criteria:
The writer presents a clear, convincing evaluation of the topic′s quality based on criteria that match the interests of target readers.
The writer gives detailed examples that show how the evaluation came about, including personal testimony and comparisons when appropriate.
Other criteria:
The writer shows that he or she is an ″expert″ in the evaluation category.
The writer persuades the reader to act on the evaluation.
The title is evocative.
Sentences are clear and varied in style.
Paragraphs are unified and coherent with effective transitions.
The format is correct.
The essay is free of proofreading errors.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Revision as per the given feedback.
Your tutorial assignment was not completed correctly. In fact, it’s not even close to what you were asked to complete. There were specific texts assigned for this assignment. In the assignment folder there was one for discourse analysis and another for the semiotic analysis. You needed to complete the assignment using those texts, not a text of your own choosing. Please review the guidelines for assignment 3, use the correct texts, the sample table provided and try again.
Follow the assignment instructions and submitted a paper about the UN sustainable development goals.

Your case study should be a 4- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines Summarizes the case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period of the incident that occurred Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates sophisticated understanding of the key legal components of the case , demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of which policies address the issues within the case. demonstrates astute ability in applying what the law states about standard of care to determine whether or not it was breached in the case. makes cogent connections between the incident and its impact on healthcare consumers from different cultural backgrounds. makes a cogent connection to the level of accountability held against the healthcare provider based on the severity of the case . research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical issues led to the malpractice case . research and examples provided demonstrate a complex grasp of how the ethical theory would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. demonstrates a nuanced understanding of appropriate physician–patient shared decision-making models that would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes a cogent connection between the proposed ethical guidelines and how they would prevent the current and future incidents (100%) Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents (85%) Proposes ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the incident and would help the organization prevent future incidents, but proposal is cursory (55%) Does not propose ethical guidelines that would have helped prevent the current and future incidents (0%) 7.96 Ethical Component: Defend Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the proposed ethical guidelines and how to hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (100%) Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (85%) Defends how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public, but defense lacks detail or is illogical (55%) Does not defend how the proposed ethical guidelines will hold healthcare providers accountable to themselves, their profession, their patients, and the public (0%) 6.37 Recommendations: Preventative Strategies Meets “Proficient” criteria, and recommendations masterfully demonstrate how the healthcare provider can avoid liability in the future (100%) Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (85%) Recommends preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future, but recommendations are cursory or illogical (55%) Does not recommend preventative strategies the healthcare provider could implement to avoid liability in the future (0%) 6.37 Recommendations: Defend Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections among the recommended preventative strategies and how they would assist in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (100%) Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (85%) Defends how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient, but defense is cursory or illogical (55%) Does not defend how the recommended preventative strategies would assist the healthcare provider in avoiding liability and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient (0%) 6.37 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format (100%) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (85%) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (55%) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0%
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Paper 2 Assignment
In roughly two to three double-spaced pages, answer the following prompt:
St. Augustine loves a good paradox. A paradox is a puzzling or obviously false conclusion that follows from seemingly obvious premises and apparently acceptable reasoning. Choose a paradoxical question that St. Augustine asks in the Confessions and explain what is paradoxical about it. What (if any) solution does Augustine suggest? Does it succeed in resolving the paradox? Why or why not?

Note: this paper has both an expository component—carefully and accurately explain a philosophical puzzle that St. Augustine explores in Book VII, Book VIII, Book X, or Book XI of the Confessions; explain his reasons for thinking it is a problem, as well as his response to it—and an argumentative component—evaluate whether his arguments are persuasive. For the latter, you should be giving your own, original assessment of the success of Augustine’s response to the puzzle you have chosen. You may also want to assess whether there are other potential responses that he does not consider, or whether he is correct in the way he formulates the puzzle in the first place.
Here are some ideas of paradoxes you might choose (but you may choose a paradox not on this list):
The problem of evil: if God is all-good and all-powerful, where does evil come from? If evil comes from the human will, why does God allow us the freedom to choose evil?
How is weakness of the will possible? Why can Augustine (and humans in general) fail to do what he (we) will(s) to do, given that the will just is the power to motivate action?
How is the memory of emotion possible without actually re-experiencing that emotion?
The paradox of time: if time is composed of the past, the present, and the future, yet the past is gone, the future is not yet, and the present instant occupies “no space,” then does time not exist?
The paradox of divine providence: if God is omnipresent, and is always with us, how is it possible to stray from him? Relatedly, if God already knows everything about us, why does Augustine feel the need to confess his sins and temptations?
You may choose any philosophical puzzle from the text that you wish. If you have a different topic in mind, feel free to run it by me in advance to make sure you’re on the right track.

Successful papers will do all of the following:
Address all parts of the prompt
Accurately, clearly, and completely explain both the philosophical problem/paradox at hand, Augustine’s answer/position, and his argument(s) for his position
Use direct and concise language
Evaluate Augustine’s response to the puzzle. This means you should do at least one of three things: give your own, original reasons why you think he’s correct; raise an objection to Augustine’s response to the puzzle in question; or suggest a different response to the puzzle that you think is better than the one Augustine offers.

Guidelines:
Your paper should draw only on Augustine’s Confessions. Do not consult any outside sources.
Read and cite the text you are drawing from closely, but use quotations from the text sparingly. Direct quotations should be no longer than three lines of text, maximum. When you do quote, cite the text using parenthetical citations with either the page number or book and marginal line number. You do not need to include a works cited list.
Pay attention to the structure of your paper. It is perfectly acceptable (even encouraged!) to structure your paper in two parts: part one explains/reconstructs the arguments from the text and part two provides your own original response to those arguments.
The second part of this exercise is asking you to do some philosophy of your own! So, try to critique an argument (even if you actually think it’s a good one) by either picking one of its premises and objecting to it, or arguing that one of the logical “steps” in the argument, from the premises to the conclusion, is flawed. This part should be solely the product of your own thinking about the persuasiveness of the argument presented in the text. First-person language (e.g. ,“I argue,” “I think”) is appropriate here, as long as you are providing reasons for your thinking (and not merely stating your opinion or reaction to the text without providing support for your view).
Don’t try to do too much in your evaluation. It is better to spend a lot of space arguing thoroughly for one point than it is to make many different, but less well supported, points.
Proofread! Frequent grammatical and spelling errors will negatively impact your grade.
Avoid flowery and/or redundant language, unnecessary generalizations (“For millennia, philosophers have pondered…”), and the like.

Length: Your paper should be roughly 2-3 pages in length, double-spaced. Use 11-12 pt. font and 1” margins.
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)