QUESTION

Enemy (1931)
Director
William Wellman
Theme
Corruption of the American Dream
Public Enemy deserves its’ reputation as a classic and a landmark film. The year of its’ release saw the world in the deep midst of the Depression and it still resonates with audiences today, even if it was a product of its’ time.
The film focused almost entirely of the making of a gangster. It brought audience sympathy and a along with it a moral question by depicting Tom and Matt’s growth into enemies of society as one that was not only economic but social in nature.
Prompt
In a two page paper discuss why this film fits into the gangster genre and give at least three examples. Then examine if the film’s depiction of the protagonist, Tom Powers, creates sympathy for him. Describe an instance from the film that reinforces your point.
https://evolated.monster/movies/play/the-public-enemy-1931?mid=17&sid=&sec=3498b486ae6bdb8e62f01d9bb62e66a7bdff6dd6&t=1669029938

 

SOLUTION

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

✅ Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Paper on The Public Enemy (1931)

---

Step 1: Introduction (1 Paragraph)

Start by introducing the film, the director (William Wellman), and its historical context—released in 1931 during the Great Depression.

Include:

• A brief sentence on the film’s reputation as a classic

• Mention its genre: the gangster film

• A thesis statement: The Public Enemy is a quintessential gangster film that explores crime, ambition, and societal decay through the rise and fall of Tom Powers.

---

Step 2: Explain Why It Fits the Gangster Genre (2–3 Paragraphs)

Give at least 3 examples with brief explanations.

Example 1: Rise through Crime

Like many gangster films, Tom’s journey begins in poverty and rises through illegal means, primarily bootlegging during Prohibition. His transformation into a feared criminal is a classic trope of the genre.

Example 2: Violence and Power

The film showcases brutal violence, a hallmark of the genre. Tom’s use of intimidation and murder to rise through the ranks aligns with gangster archetypes. For example, the infamous scene where Tom shoves a grapefruit in his girlfriend’s face demonstrates both his aggression and control.

Example 3: Inevitable Downfall

The gangster genre often ends with the protagonist’s demise as a moral consequence. Tom’s death is both violent and inevitable, reinforcing the message that crime ultimately leads to destruction.

---

Step 3: Examine Sympathy Toward Tom Powers (1–2 Paragraphs)

Discuss whether the film creates sympathy for Tom despite his actions.

Points to consider:

• His troubled upbringing and environment

• Lack of strong moral guidance

• His close relationship with his friend Matt

• Desire for approval from his family

Example Instance:

One sympathetic moment is when Tom attempts to reconcile with his family and show affection toward his mother. Despite his violent lifestyle, the scene where he brings her gifts and tries to act “normal” shows his internal conflict and desire for connection.

---

Step 4: Conclusion (1 Paragraph)

Wrap up your analysis.

Include:

• Restate how The Public Enemy fits the gangster genre

• Reflect briefly on the complex portrayal of Tom Powers

• Comment on the lasting impact of the film in American cinema and how it still resonates

---

💡 Bonus Tips:

• Watch the film and take notes on key scenes involving crime, character development, and turning points.

• Keep your paper around 500–600 words (double-spaced) to meet the two-page length requirement.

• Use film terminology (e.g., protagonist, antagonist, mise-en-scène, conflict, arc).

QUESTION

Select a program to evaluate. Create a program evaluation plan which includes
the 8 sections listed below. See chapter 3 for more details regarding the
sections.
I want it to be Charter school authorizers
The plan should be between 2 – 4 pages. Submit the paper to the
dropbox.
1. Program background: describe the history, funding source, individuals
commissioning the evaluation, factors leading to the evaluation
2. Program logic model: reflect on the underlying assumptions, activities,
resources needed, short and long term objectives
3. Evaluation purpose statement: a few sentences that succinctly describe
the reason for the evaluation and how the results will be used
4. Stakeholders: an individual or group what has a vested interest in the
outcome of the evaluation.
5. Evaluation questions: broad, that frame the evaluation, open-ended and
used to determine which data collection methods best address needs
6. Evaluation approach: methods for data collection and analysis
7. Project management plan: Timeline and project management practices
8. Evaluation budget: budget for design and implementation of evaluation

 

SOLUTION

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

✅ Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Charter School Authorizers Program Evaluation Plan

---

1. Program Background

Begin by providing context for the program.

What to include:

• History: When and why charter school authorizing began in your chosen state or nationally.

• Funding Source: Federal or state funds, philanthropic organizations (e.g., Walton Foundation, Gates Foundation).

• Commissioning the Evaluation: Identify who is requesting the evaluation (e.g., state education department, legislative committee, education board).

• Factors Leading to Evaluation: Recent controversies, new legislation, performance issues, accountability concerns, or need for renewal processes.

Example Prompt Starter:

Charter school authorizers are entities responsible for approving, monitoring, and renewing charter schools. With increasing demands for accountability and transparency in education, evaluating the effectiveness of authorizers has become a priority for both policymakers and stakeholders.

---

2. Program Logic Model

You will outline the structure of the program using a logic model format.

What to include:

• Inputs/Resources: Staff, policies, legal authority, budget

• Activities: Application review, site visits, performance monitoring

• Outputs: Number of schools authorized, frequency of evaluations, oversight reports

• Short-Term Outcomes: Improved school compliance, transparent oversight

• Long-Term Outcomes: Higher student performance, equitable access, closure of underperforming schools

Tip: Use bullet points or a logic model chart if helpful.

---

3. Evaluation Purpose Statement

This should be short and specific.

What to include:

• Why you’re doing the evaluation

• How the results will be used

Example:

The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the effectiveness and accountability practices of charter school authorizers in ensuring school quality and compliance. Findings will inform policy improvements and guide future authorizing standards.

---

4. Stakeholders

Identify who cares about the results.

Who to include:

• State education officials

• Charter school operators

• Students and parents

• Taxpayers

• Charter advocacy groups

• Community leaders

Tip: Explain why each group is invested in the evaluation results.

---

5. Evaluation Questions

These should be broad and guide your data collection methods.

Examples:

• How effectively do authorizers monitor the performance of charter schools?

• What accountability measures are currently in place, and how consistently are they applied?

• How do stakeholders perceive the effectiveness of the authorizing process?

• What outcomes (academic, financial, operational) are being achieved under current authorizing practices?

---

6. Evaluation Approach

Describe how you will collect and analyze your data.

What to include:

• Qualitative Methods: Interviews with authorizers, focus groups with charter leaders, surveys for parents

• Quantitative Methods: Analysis of school performance data, renewal/closure rates, funding allocation

• Tools: Surveys, performance dashboards, public data reports

Tip: Match methods to your questions (e.g., perceptions → surveys/interviews, performance → data analysis).

---

7. Project Management Plan

Lay out how you’ll manage time and tasks.

What to include:

• Timeline (sample):

  • Week 1: Stakeholder meetings & scope refinement

  • Weeks 2–4: Data collection

  • Week 5: Data analysis

  • Week 6: Drafting report

  • Week 7: Review & final report delivery

• Management Practices: Weekly check-ins, task delegation, risk mitigation strategies (e.g., delays in data)

---

8. Evaluation Budget

Include expected costs for your evaluation plan.

What to include:

• Staff time (researchers, data analysts)

• Travel for site visits or interviews

• Survey platform costs

• Transcription or data entry services

• Report production and distribution

Example Table Format:

---

Once you’ve filled out each section using this guide, format your work in a clean document with headings for each of the 8 parts, and submit as a PDF or Word file to your course dropbox.

Instructions
You are tasked with reporting to your organizational executives or school board, consisting of parents and other community members, about three possible Open Education (OER) Resources that you would like incorporated into your organizational setting and potential use for parents to utilize at home.
Write a proposal for these three Open Education Resources, including:
Purpose/reasoning for use—how will learners benefit?
Any potential limitations, as well as how to overcome those limitations.
A clear definition of your evaluation criteria and the steps you took in your evaluation.
Research that backs up your decisions.
An audience handout of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Although many board members may have a background in education, depending on your organization, such a qualification may not be required to serve on a board. Usually, members of the public sit in on school board meetings, though not necessarily for board meetings of other organizations, especially if those organizations are private. Thus, your writing needs to reflect the varied educational knowledge of the audience.
Length: 3-5 pages, plus a handout for the audience in the form of a one-page Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
References: Minimum of 3 scholarly resources
Your proposal and handout should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

Title Page

(Include your name, date, course title, and instructor’s name following APA format.)

Introduction

Open Educational Resources (OER) provide accessible, high-quality learning materials that can be used in various educational settings. This proposal outlines three OER options, their benefits, potential limitations, and evaluation criteria, along with supporting research.

Selected Open Educational Resources

1. [OER Resource Name]

Purpose and Benefits:

• How it supports learners.
• Enhances accessibility and engagement.

Limitations and Solutions:

• Possible challenges and how they can be mitigated.

2. [OER Resource Name]

Purpose and Benefits:

• How it supports learners.
• Enhances accessibility and engagement.

Limitations and Solutions:

• Possible challenges and how they can be mitigated.

3. [OER Resource Name]

Purpose and Benefits:

• How it supports learners.
• Enhances accessibility and engagement.

Limitations and Solutions:

• Possible challenges and how they can be mitigated.

Evaluation Criteria and Methodology

• Clear criteria for evaluating OER (e.g., credibility, usability, adaptability).
• Steps taken to assess quality and effectiveness.

Supporting Research

• Overview of studies that support OER integration.
• Evidence of improved learning outcomes.

Conclusion

Summarize key points and reinforce the significance of incorporating OER.

References

(Provide at least three scholarly references in APA format.)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are Open Educational Resources (OER)?
   • Explanation of OER and how they are used.
2. How can OER benefit students and teachers?
   • Discuss affordability, accessibility, and engagement.
3. Are OER materials reliable?
   • Address quality control measures and credible sources.
4. How can parents support OER use at home?
   • Provide practical suggestions for parental involvement.
5. What challenges might arise with OER implementation?
   • Identify key challenges and solutions for overcoming them.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Read the Instructions Carefully

• Ensure you understand all requirements, including length, formatting, and the audience.

Step 2: Choose Your OER Resources

• Research and select three OER that align with your organization’s needs.

Step 3: Structure Your Proposal

• Introduction: Introduce OER and the purpose of your proposal.
• Resource Descriptions: Provide details on each selected OER.
• Evaluation and Research: Explain your evaluation process and research support.
• Conclusion: Summarize key findings and reinforce the value of OER.
• References: Cite scholarly sources in APA format.

Step 4: Create the FAQ Handout

• Address common questions about OER.
• Keep it concise, clear, and informative.

Step 5: Review and Edit

• Check for clarity, organization, and APA formatting.
• Proofread for grammar and coherence.

By following these steps, you can confidently complete your proposal while ensuring it meets academic and professional standards.

Write an 875- to 1,050-word paper in which you do the following:
Summarize Tennessee v. Garner (1985) and Graham v. Connor (1989). How do these cases regulate the use of force by police? What is the three-prong test?
How did the two cases above influence policy agencies?
Now, choose a police agency in the United States to research for the following questions:
Describe the selection process for police officers at your chosen agency. This includes the minimum age and education requirements, as well as the types of selection tests (written, physical, oral boards, etc.).
Briefly discuss issues that are affecting the police–community partnership at your chosen agency.
Explain how the agency partners with the community to address issues. Consider any public programs the agency offers and whether citizens have roles on advisory boards.
Identify if your selected agency shares their use of force policies on their website. How do they investigate use of force incidents? Can a citizen review the use of force reports through the agency website? Discuss the level of transparency the agency provides.

🚨 Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily! 🚨

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

• Your paper should be 1-1.5 pages, double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman or Cambria.
• Use 1” x 1.25” margins, include page numbers, and follow MLA conventions.
• The header should include your name, date, course, and instructor’s name.

Step 2: Structure Your Essay

1. Introduction (1 paragraph)
   • Provide a brief overview of the two court cases.
   • Include a thesis statement outlining how these cases shaped police use-of-force policies.
2. Body Paragraphs (3-4 paragraphs)
   • Paragraph 1: Summarize Tennessee v. Garner (1985) and its impact on deadly force regulations.
   • Paragraph 2: Summarize Graham v. Connor (1989) and explain the three-prong test.
   • Paragraph 3: Discuss how these cases influenced policing policies nationwide.
   • Paragraph 4: Research a police agency and discuss its selection process, community partnership, and transparency.
3. Conclusion (1 paragraph)
   • Summarize key points and reinforce the importance of constitutional policing.
   • End with a strong statement on transparency and community trust.

Step 3: Cite Your Sources

• Use MLA format for citations.
• Reference any official police department websites, legal documents, or scholarly sources.

Following this guide will ensure you cover all aspects of your assignment while maintaining a well-structured and academically sound essay.

 

In a 300 to 600 or more-word report, describe how the media portrays the police today. Is this portrayal a fair assessment of the work the police are performing? Why

Post Content:

This report requires an analysis of how the media represents law enforcement today and whether this portrayal accurately reflects the realities of police work. You will need to examine different perspectives, provide examples, and justify your stance with logical reasoning.

🚨 Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily! 🚨

Step 1: Plan Your Report Structure (300-600+ Words)

Your report should be well-structured and divided into:

1. Introduction (1 Paragraph)

   • Briefly introduce the topic of media portrayal of police.
   • Mention the significance of public perception and how media influences it.
   • State your thesis: Does the media provide a fair and accurate representation of police work?

2. Body (2-3 Paragraphs Minimum)

   Paragraph 1: How the Media Portrays Police

   • Explain the common narratives used in the media regarding law enforcement.
   • Discuss differences between news media, social media, and entertainment portrayals.
   • Provide real-world examples (e.g., high-profile cases, TV shows, viral videos).

   Paragraph 2: Evaluating the Fairness of This Portrayal

   • Compare media portrayals to actual law enforcement statistics and studies.
   • Consider both positive and negative representations of police work.
   • Address whether media coverage focuses on sensational incidents rather than everyday policing.

   Paragraph 3: Factors Influencing Media Representation

   • Discuss political, social, and historical factors affecting how police are shown.
   • Analyze how different sources (news outlets, advocacy groups, personal stories) shape narratives.
   • Explain how media bias, selective reporting, or agenda-driven coverage may impact public opinion.

3. Conclusion (1 Paragraph)

   • Summarize key points regarding media portrayals and their accuracy.
   • State whether you believe the media provides a balanced view of police work.
   • Suggest improvements, such as more objective reporting or increased transparency from law enforcement.

Step 2: Support Your Argument with Evidence

• Use news reports, crime statistics, academic sources, or expert opinions.
• Provide balanced perspectives, avoiding extreme biases.

Step 3: Final Review Checklist ✅

✔ Does your report clearly analyze the media’s portrayal of police?
✔ Have you provided real-world examples and supporting evidence?
✔ Is your writing clear, structured, and free of grammatical errors?
✔ Have you followed the word count and formatting guidelines?

By following this structured approach, you’ll develop a thoughtful and well-researched report on the media’s influence on public perceptions of law enforcement.

Explain how the results of your project could potentially address the gap in practice among an organization or community.
Explain how your capstone project can create positive social change.
READING

The Why: Explaining the significance of your research

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

The results of my capstone project can address gaps in practice by providing evidence-based recommendations and innovative strategies that help an organization or community improve efficiency, effectiveness, or equity in a specific area. By identifying current challenges, limitations, or inefficiencies, my research can guide decision-makers in adopting best practices that align with industry standards, ethical considerations, and societal needs.

For example, if my capstone project focuses on policy reform in the bail bond system, the findings could highlight systemic disparities and provide alternative policy recommendations that ensure fairness and accessibility in pretrial detention practices. By presenting data-driven solutions, stakeholders—such as lawmakers, legal professionals, and advocacy groups—can use this research to implement changes that improve justice outcomes and reduce socioeconomic inequalities.

Creating Positive Social Change

Beyond addressing professional gaps, my capstone project has the potential to create meaningful social impact by:

1. Raising Awareness – Educating policymakers, professionals, and the public on critical issues affecting individuals and communities.
2. Influencing Policy & Practice – Providing well-researched solutions that encourage policy adjustments, organizational reforms, or new community initiatives.
3. Promoting Equity & Inclusion – Addressing disparities in healthcare, criminal justice, education, or technology access, leading to more inclusive and fair systems.
4. Encouraging Collaboration – Bringing together academics, industry leaders, and community organizations to work toward shared goals.
5. Driving Innovation – Offering new perspectives and strategies that encourage creative problem-solving and continuous improvement in the field.

By applying the principles outlined in the TAA article, my capstone project will not only fill a knowledge gap but also contribute to tangible improvements that benefit individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.

Please see the files attached here that include the argument essay.
Below are two files.
A. Instructions
Remember the word “argument” does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of the issue.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the touchstone.
Your submission must include an APA-style reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need 2-4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.
On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.
B. Think About Your
Writing
Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)? Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?
C. Argumentative Essay
Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your research essay until it meets these guidelines.
Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement
❒ Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue?
Argument Development
❒ Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?
❒ Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and source material?
❒ Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?
Research
❒ Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?
❒ Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?
❒ Have you referenced a range of 2-4 credible sources?
❒ Have you included an APA style reference page below your essa?
Organization and Flow
❒ Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?
❒ Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?
❒ Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?
Style
❒ Are the word choices accurate and effective?
❒ Are the sentence structures varied?
Conventions and Formatting
❒ Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?
❒ Have you double-checked for correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, and capitalization?
❒ Have you proofread for typos?
Before You Submit
❒ Have you answered all of the Think About Your Writing questions on a separate page below your reference page? Are your answers thoughtful and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Does your submission include your essay, followed by your reference page, followed by your Think About Your Writing questions?
E. Requirements
The essay should be 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words in length
Argumentative Essay Guidelines must be followed or submission will not be graded
Double-space the essay and use 1-inch margins
Use a readable 12-point font
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context
Composition must be original and written for this assignment
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited
Submission should include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition
Your submission must include the essay, reference page, and your answers to the refection questions
Submit a single file only, including all assignment components
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

Step 1: Understand the Assignment

Your task is to write an argumentative essay on a debatable issue. The goal is not to get into a fight with opposing views, but to have a thoughtful conversation with evidence supporting your stance. Your essay must have a clear thesis (your position on the issue) and provide 2-4 credible sources to back your claims.

Keep in mind that plagiarism is strictly prohibited, so your work must be original and newly written for this course. You’ll need to answer some reflective questions after your essay, but those will not count toward your word count.

---

Step 2: Choose a Topic and Develop a Thesis

Your first major task is choosing a debatable issue. This should be something where people hold differing viewpoints, allowing you to argue one side of the issue. Once you’ve chosen a topic, craft a thesis statement that clearly states your position.

Example Thesis Statement:

• “The use of social media should be regulated to protect young users’ mental health.”

Your thesis needs to take a clear position—do not leave room for ambiguity.

---

Step 3: Conduct Research

Now that you’ve got your thesis, it’s time to find credible sources. You need at least 2-4 sources, and they can either be primary or secondary sources (e.g., research studies, books, academic journal articles, or credible websites). While researching, keep in mind that only credible sources should be used to support your argument. As you gather information, consider how each source will support or strengthen your thesis.

Tip for Incorporating Sources: When you bring in information from your sources, make sure to paraphrase, quote, or summarize them properly using APA citation style.

---

Step 4: Create an Outline

Before you start writing, it’s helpful to create an outline. This will help organize your thoughts and ensure your essay flows logically. A typical argumentative essay structure includes:

1. Introduction

   • Start with a hook to grab the reader’s attention.
   • Introduce the issue at hand and lead to your thesis statement.

2. Body Paragraphs

   • Each paragraph should present a point that supports your thesis.
   • Use evidence from your sources to back up each claim.
   • Consider presenting a counterargument to show you understand differing viewpoints, then refute it to strengthen your own argument.

3. Conclusion

   • Summarize your key points and restate your thesis.
   • Leave the reader with something to think about—often a call to action or a thought-provoking statement.

---

Step 5: Write the First Draft

Once your outline is ready, start writing your essay. Focus on getting your ideas down first without worrying too much about perfection. Be sure to:

• Start with a strong introduction that leads to your thesis.
• Use evidence from your sources to support your points in each body paragraph.
• Refute opposing viewpoints to make your argument stronger.
• End with a conclusion that summarizes your points and reinforces your thesis.

Remember, your essay should be 4-6 pages long (1000-1500 words).

---

Step 6: Reflect on Your Writing Process

After finishing your essay, you’ll need to answer some reflective questions on your writing process. These answers should go below your reference page and should not be included in your word count.

Reflection Questions:

1. What have you learned about presenting a strong argument?
   Reflect on the techniques you used in developing and writing your essay. Consider how you can apply these skills in your professional or personal life.

2. What have you learned about yourself as a writer?
   Think about your growth throughout the course. What surprised you about your abilities? Is there something you struggled with previously but feel more confident about now?

---

Step 7: Revise and Edit

It’s time to go back and revise your essay. Look for areas where you can improve your clarity, argument development, and flow. Here’s a checklist to help you:

• Argument Development:

  • Does your essay stay on topic?
  • Are all your points relevant to your thesis?
  • Have you incorporated rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, pathos) effectively?

• Source Integration:

  • Are your sources smoothly incorporated into the text with proper citations?
  • Have you referenced 2-4 credible sources?

• Organization and Flow:

  • Does your essay have a logical order (introduction, body paragraphs, counterargument, conclusion)?
  • Are there clear transitions between paragraphs?

• APA Style:

  • Have you cited your sources properly?
  • Is your reference page formatted according to APA guidelines?

• Grammar and Formatting:

  • Have you double-checked for grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting errors?
  • Is your essay double-spaced with 1-inch margins and a 12-point readable font?

---

Step 8: Format and Final Submission

Ensure your essay meets the following submission requirements:

• Double-spaced text with 1-inch margins
• Use a readable 12-point font
• Include your name, course name, and date at the top of the essay
• Ensure your reference page follows APA format
• Submit only one file containing your essay, reference page, and reflection questions

Once everything is formatted correctly, submit your essay as a .doc or .docx file.

---

Step 9: Submit and Celebrate!

After ensuring that everything is in place—your essay, reference page, and reflection questions—it’s time to submit your work. You’ve worked hard to get here, so take a moment to celebrate your accomplishment!

---

By following this step-by-step guide, you’ll be able to confidently write your argumentative essay, present a well-supported argument, and reflect on your writing growth. Best of luck with your assignment!

Following directions- paper should be submitted with a title page that includes the student’s name, date,
and course title. Typed, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins and 12 pt. font. The paper should be 8 to 10
pages in length, not including the title page or the references. In addition, the paper must have a minimum of
five sources including the textbook and at least four peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles. Students will
submit it through Canvas. (75 points)
Content and development- major points of the paper are stated clearly and supported. By details, examples
or analysis. Points are organized logically. The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and
an overview of the paper; the conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major
points. (75 points)
Readability and style-sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Sentences are well constructed with
consistently strong, varied sentences. Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow
throughout the paper. Subheadings are present if needed. The tone is appropriate to the content and
assignment. (75 points)
Mechanics-spelling is correct, rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed. APA format is used
throughout the paper and citations follow APA guidelines. (75 points)

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Paper

1. Understanding the Requirements

The assignment requires you to:

• Write a paper between 8-10 pages in length (not counting the title page or references).
• Use at least five sources, including your textbook and at least four peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles.
• Follow proper formatting: Typed, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins and 12 pt font.
• Submit via Canvas.

Each paper will be graded based on:

• Content and Development (75 points): Clear major points supported by examples and analysis.
• Readability and Style (75 points): Well-organized sentences, transitions, and logical flow.
• Mechanics (75 points): Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.

---

2. Step 1: Choosing Your Topic

Your first step is to choose a topic that interests you and aligns with the course material. Some possible topics might be:

• The Impact of Substance Use on Adolescent Development
• Neurobiology of Addiction and Behavioral Disorders
• Models of Addiction: A Historical Perspective
• The Role of Family in Recovery from Substance Abuse

Once you choose a topic, please let me know so we can proceed to the next step. This will be the foundation for your paper.

3. Step 2: Write the Abstract

Once the topic is selected, I will help you write a brief abstract summarizing the key points of your paper. The abstract should clearly explain the purpose of the paper, the main points you’ll discuss, and the conclusions you intend to draw. This will be one of the first things readers see, so it needs to be succinct yet informative.

4. Step 3: Research and Gather Sources

You’ll need to gather at least five sources:

• Textbook: Make sure to reference concepts and theories discussed in the course material.
• Peer-reviewed articles: These will help back up your arguments and provide scholarly context.

We will go through the sources together and integrate them into your paper. I will guide you on how to select appropriate, credible, and scholarly journal articles to support your topic.

5. Step 4: Outline the Structure of Your Paper

We will create a detailed outline to ensure your paper is well-organized. The outline will include:

• Introduction: Provide background on your topic, set the context, and state your thesis (main argument).
• Body: Break this into sections with logical subheadings if necessary. Each section will explore different points of your topic with supporting evidence and analysis.
• Conclusion: Summarize the major points discussed, and restate the thesis in light of the information presented.

Each section will be thorough and clearly linked to the overall theme of your paper.

6. Step 5: Writing the Paper

With the outline in place, we’ll start writing. I will guide you on:

• Paraphrasing: Avoiding direct quotes, making sure to restate the material in your own words.
• Citing sources: Properly cite all references using APA format both within the text and in the references list at the end of the paper.
• Writing style: Ensuring the tone is appropriate, sentences are clear and concise, and transitions between paragraphs are smooth.

Make sure each section directly relates to your thesis and builds upon the previous one.

7. Step 6: Reviewing and Revising

Once your draft is complete, we will:

• Proofread for clarity, grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
• Ensure logical flow between ideas, making sure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next.
• Check formatting: Ensure it meets the assignment guidelines, including proper APA citations.

8. Step 7: Submit the Paper

Before submitting:

• Double-check the title page: It should include your name, the date, and the course title.
• Ensure all references are properly cited in the reference list, adhering to APA formatting.
• Submit the paper through Canvas as a Word document or RTF file.

---

Let me know your chosen topic, and we will proceed with the next steps!

Ethics Autobiography (200 points): Each student will write an ethics autobiography as a way to understand how their own background affects their approach to ethics. Students should consider the following questions when writing their paper (don’t try to answer all of them):
What is your idea of right and wrong personal behavior, and where does this conception come from? What did you learn from your family of origin about right and wrong? What do you recall were the messages about ethnic or cultural groups different from yourself, and how they see right and wrong? What is your idea of right and wrong professional behavior, and where does this conception come from? What aspects of this profession strike you as being “not intuitive”? What are your top three values, and where do they come from? What are three personal needs that you think match well with the profession? What are three personal needs that you think might conflict with the profession? What morals are most important to you, and where do they come from? How do these align with or conflict with the ethics code and professional standards? How might the alignment or conflict influence your work with clients or students? (see citation below).
The paper should be a minimum of three pages in length.
*Please know that you should only disclose personal information you are comfortable with sharing.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

Step-by-Step Guide on Writing Your Ethics Autobiography

1. Understanding the Assignment Requirements

The task is to write an ethics autobiography, a reflective paper where you analyze how your personal background and experiences shape your views on ethics. You will address how your values, moral beliefs, and upbringing influence your approach to right and wrong, both personally and professionally.

Your autobiography should cover:

• Your ideas of right and wrong personal behavior, including where this conception originates.
• Insights into how your family shaped your moral views.
• Your perspective on professional ethics and where your understanding of it comes from.
• Your top three values and how they align with the profession.
• Any potential conflicts between your personal needs and the demands of the profession.
• Your moral code, how it fits with professional standards, and how this might affect your work.

The paper should be at least three pages long. It’s important to focus on your personal reflections and be honest in your responses.

2. Begin by Reflecting on Your Personal Background

Start by reflecting on the early stages of your life and how they shaped your ethical views. Some questions to help guide you:

• What is your idea of right and wrong personal behavior? Think about the actions or behaviors you deem acceptable or unacceptable in your life. Are they guided by rules, principles, or how you feel about the situation?
• Where did this conception come from? Consider the influences that shaped your view—your family, religion, community, or broader societal values. Were there specific experiences or lessons that influenced your moral compass?
• What did you learn from your family of origin about right and wrong? Reflect on your family’s role in forming your ideas of ethics. What behaviors were encouraged or discouraged? Were there explicit discussions of ethics, or was it more about modeling behavior?

Use this section to provide personal anecdotes or insights into how your family impacted your sense of right and wrong.

3. Consider Cultural and Ethnic Perspectives

In this section, consider your experiences with diverse cultural or ethnic groups:

• What messages did you receive about ethnic or cultural groups different from yourself? How did you perceive right and wrong from the perspectives of people from different cultural backgrounds? Were there any contrasts with your own upbringing or cultural context?
• How do these different perspectives affect your views on ethics? Have these experiences helped you to think more broadly about ethical issues or made you more aware of cultural influences on moral decision-making?

This section allows you to explore the role of cultural diversity in your ethical understanding and how you engage with different perspectives.

4. Explore Professional Ethics and Values

Now, reflect on your professional values and ethics:

• What is your idea of right and wrong professional behavior? Think about what constitutes ethical behavior in your future profession. How do you think professionals in your field should behave, and where does this conception come from (e.g., education, professional codes of ethics, mentors)?
• What aspects of your profession seem “not intuitive”? Is there anything about your profession’s ethical expectations that surprises or challenges you? For example, how might professional ethics sometimes conflict with personal ethics?

You can also discuss:

• Top three values: What values are most important to you in your professional life (e.g., honesty, integrity, empathy)? Where do these values come from—your upbringing, personal experiences, or cultural influences?
• Three personal needs that match well with the profession: What aspects of your personality, values, or life experiences align with the ethical expectations of your chosen field?
• Three personal needs that might conflict with the profession: Are there any personal traits or values you hold that could potentially clash with the professional standards in your field?

For example:

• You may value independence and prefer making your own decisions, but a profession like teaching or counseling may require following specific codes or collaborating with a team.

5. Evaluate Your Moral Code and Professional Ethics Alignment

Now, turn to how your personal moral code aligns with or differs from the ethics code and professional standards:

• What morals are most important to you? Think about your core moral beliefs (e.g., fairness, justice, respect for others). Where do they come from? Were they instilled by family, religion, or your own experiences?
• How do these morals align with the professional ethics code? Do the values you hold conflict with the professional ethical standards, or do they align? Are there any areas where you foresee ethical dilemmas arising because of these differences?

This is where you’ll delve into the potential ethical conflicts or synergies between your personal beliefs and your chosen profession’s ethical codes. Reflect on how these conflicts might influence your work with clients or students in the future.

6. Conclusion

Conclude your autobiography by reflecting on:

• The overall alignment or conflict between your personal ethics and your professional field’s ethics.
• The importance of self-awareness in navigating ethical issues professionally.
• How understanding your own ethical background can help you approach ethical challenges with greater clarity and empathy.

---

7. Formatting and Citations

• Formatting: Use Times New Roman, size 12, with double-spacing and standard margins in Microsoft Word.
• Citations: If you reference any outside materials, cite them in APA or Chicago Manual of Style. However, this paper is based on your personal reflections, so citations might not be necessary unless you refer to specific sources.

---

8. Proofreading and Submitting

Before submitting your ethics autobiography:

• Proofread your paper for clarity, grammar, and punctuation.
• Ensure your paper is well-organized and your arguments flow logically.
• Double-check that you’ve addressed all aspects of the prompt, particularly the reflection on your personal and professional ethics.

---

By following this guide, you’ll be able to write a reflective and introspective ethics autobiography that provides insight into your personal values, professional aspirations, and ethical considerations. Good luck with your assignment!

Summarize the research surrounding Importance of Diet and Nutrition In your paper, consider
mentioning
what is already known about this topic
what the research says,
and (depending upon your topic)
what can be done about this issue.
What is the importance of the topic
Find
at least SIX references from peer-reviewed sources.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

Step-by-Step Guide on Writing Your Paper

1. Understanding the Assignment Requirements

The task here is to write a paper summarizing the research surrounding the importance of diet and nutrition. Your paper should address:

• What is already known about the topic of diet and nutrition.
• What current research says on this topic.
• What can be done about the issues related to diet and nutrition (if applicable).

2. Understanding What is Already Known About Diet and Nutrition

Start by reviewing general information that is commonly accepted in the scientific community about diet and nutrition. This could include:

• The relationship between diet and health outcomes (e.g., heart disease, obesity, diabetes).
• The importance of macronutrients (proteins, fats, carbohydrates) and micronutrients (vitamins, minerals).
• Basic principles like balanced diets, the role of fiber, hydration, etc.

You can find this information in textbooks, review articles, or credible health websites. This is the “known” information, often based on established scientific consensus.

3. Researching What Current Studies Say

Next, dive into more recent research to understand the current trends and findings related to diet and nutrition. Look for peer-reviewed articles in journals or reputable sources such as:

• Studies that show how different diets (e.g., Mediterranean, Keto, Vegan) impact long-term health.
• Research on the role of supplements, functional foods, or the gut microbiome in nutrition.
• Studies related to food security, accessibility, and how these affect population health.

Take notes on how these studies contribute to understanding the relationship between diet and health. If you find any contradictions between findings, make sure to mention them as well, as this is part of the evolving nature of the topic.

4. Discussing What Can Be Done About Diet and Nutrition Issues

Depending on the specific focus of your paper, consider proposing potential solutions to nutrition-related issues. For example:

• If you’re focusing on diet-related diseases like obesity or heart disease, what public health interventions could help?
• Should there be more emphasis on nutrition education in schools or communities?
• What role does government policy play in promoting healthy eating (e.g., subsidies for fruits and vegetables, labeling laws)?

You can also discuss current efforts being made in society, such as campaigns promoting balanced eating or policies regulating food marketing to children.

5. Creating the Structure of Your Paper

Your paper should follow a clear structure. Here’s how to organize it:

• Introduction: Briefly introduce the topic of diet and nutrition, explaining why it is important. State the purpose of your paper (to summarize the research on the importance of diet and nutrition).

• What is Already Known: Summarize basic concepts that are widely recognized in the field, such as the impact of diet on general health.

• Current Research: Present key findings from the most recent studies on diet and nutrition. Be sure to provide citations for these studies.

• What Can Be Done: Discuss possible solutions to address nutrition-related issues, whether at the individual, community, or policy level.

• Conclusion: Summarize the main points of your paper, highlighting the significance of diet and nutrition and what can be done to improve public health.

6. Citing Your Sources

Make sure to cite all the sources you refer to in your paper. Use the appropriate citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) depending on your instructor’s preference.

7. Proofreading and Submitting

Finally, carefully proofread your paper to ensure clarity and accuracy. Check for any spelling or grammatical errors, and ensure that your arguments are logically structured and well-supported by evidence.

---

By following these steps, you’ll be able to effectively summarize the research surrounding diet and nutrition, providing a comprehensive view of what is known, what is currently being researched, and what can be done about the issues. Good luck with your assignment!