“Recommending Evidence-Based Practice Change in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Approach”

Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statementLinks to an external site.. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practiceLinks to an external site.. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.xThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aidsLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/
To Prepare:
Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
Alternate Submission Method
You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the Kaltura Media Uploader guideLinks to an external site.. This guide will walk you through downloading the tool and help you become familiar with the features of Personal Capture. When you are ready to begin recording, you may turn off the webcam option so that only “Screen” and “Audio” are enabled. Start your recording and then open your PowerPoint to slide show view. Once the recording is complete, follow the instructions found on the “Posting Your Video in the Classroom Guide” found on the Kaltura Media Uploader page for instructions on how to submit your video. For this option, in addition to submitting your video, you must also upload your PowerPoint file which must include your speaker notes.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

The first step is to carefully read through the assignment instructions to ensure you understand the key deliverables. You need to create an 8-9 slide narrated PowerPoint presentation that includes:

  1. A description of your healthcare organization, including culture and readiness for change.
  2. An outline of the current problem or opportunity for change, explaining its scope, stakeholders, and risks.
  3. A proposal for an evidence-based practice (EBP) change in your organization.
  4. A plan for knowledge transfer and how this change will be adopted by your organization.
  5. A dissemination strategy to share the results of your project with an audience.
  6. Measurable outcomes you aim to achieve after implementing the EBP change.
  7. A summary of lessons learned, including your critical appraisal of peer-reviewed articles and an explanation of the Evaluation Table findings.

Step 2: Select the Right Topic

Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4. These should be related to your clinical topic of interest and the PICOT question you formulated. This will guide you in selecting the right problem or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization. Look for a gap, a problem, or an opportunity where evidence-based practice could improve outcomes.

Example Topic: Let’s say your topic of interest from the modules is the improvement of patient outcomes in the post-operative care setting, particularly related to pain management. This could be a perfect topic to base your proposal on.

Step 3: Structure Your PowerPoint Presentation

Here is a suggested breakdown for your slides:

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Include the title of your presentation, your name, the course name, and the date.

Slide 2: Healthcare Organization Overview

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization (anonymous if necessary).
  • Discuss its culture, values, and readiness for change (e.g., is it a supportive environment for new ideas?).
  • Include any relevant information that helps your audience understand the organization’s context.

Slide 3: Current Problem or Opportunity for Change

  • Describe the current problem or opportunity in your organization.
  • Provide details about the circumstances surrounding the need for change.
  • Define the scope of the issue and the stakeholders involved (e.g., patients, staff, management).
  • Highlight any risks associated with implementing the change.

Slide 4: Evidence-Based Proposal for Change

  • Propose an evidence-based practice change (based on the research articles you reviewed).
  • Clearly explain the evidence supporting the change.
  • Discuss how the change would address the identified problem or opportunity.

Slide 5: Knowledge Transfer Plan

  • Outline how knowledge about the proposed change will be created, disseminated, and adopted in your organization.
  • Include strategies for training staff, sharing knowledge, and encouraging buy-in.

Slide 6: Dissemination Strategy

  • Describe how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience.
  • Justify why you selected this dissemination strategy (e.g., presentations, written reports, social media).

Slide 7: Measurable Outcomes

  • Define measurable outcomes for the proposed change (e.g., reduced patient pain scores, quicker recovery times).
  • Explain how these outcomes will be tracked and evaluated.

Slide 8: Lessons Learned

  • Provide a brief summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you reviewed.
  • Explain what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet.

Slide 9: References

  • List the APA-formatted references for the research articles you used to support your proposal and ideas.

Step 4: Record Your Narration

Once you’ve created your slides, start recording your narration for each slide. Focus on explaining the content clearly and engagingly. If you’re using PowerPoint, the built-in “Record Slide Show” feature is very useful.

For each slide:

  • Be concise, aiming for about 1 minute of narration per slide.
  • Make sure to emphasize key points and explain any complex ideas to make them easy to understand for your audience.

Step 5: Finalize the PowerPoint and Upload

  • After recording, review your presentation to ensure your narration matches the content on each slide.
  • Add speaker notes if required, and finalize your PowerPoint.
  • Upload your PowerPoint file along with the narration or follow the Kaltura Personal Capture method for video recording.

Choosing a Nursing Specialty: FNP vs. PMHNP and the Role of Professional Organizations

Please reply to discussion board.
Peer 1: Main Post
Post-Master’s Certificate Family Nurse Practitioner
My reason for undertaking a Post-Master’s Certificate in Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) is driven by an intrinsic interest in delivering holistic primary care to people at all life stages (Cherry et al., 2019). In the role of an FNP, I will be able to diagnose and manage a wide range of acute and chronic conditions, and preventive medicine and patient education will be central elements in my practice. This specialty aligns with my commitment to holistic, patient-centered care, allowing me to build long-term relationships with patients and positively impact their well-being (Cherry et al., 2019). The flexibility of the FNP role population, encompassing a variety of practices, like family practices, women’s health care centers, and internal medicine, also strengthened my decision.
Challenges in Choosing My Specialty
The choice of the FNP pathway was not easy. I initially considered other advanced practice roles, including Nurse Educator and Adult-Gerontology Nurse Practitioner (AGNP), given my interest in teaching and geriatric care (Walden University, n.d.). However, after reflecting on my long-term goals and clinical interests, I realized that the FNP specialty would provide the most comprehensive training to serve a diverse patient population (Cherry et al., 2019). Additionally, I weighed factors such as job opportunities, scope of practice, and the growing demand for primary care providers in underserved communities. Balancing personal interests with professional growth was challenging, but my passion for direct patient care and preventive health ultimately solidified my decision.
Factors Influencing My Decision
Several critical determinants guided my decision to pursue a career as an FNP. Another important aspect was providing care in every age group, from pediatric to geriatric wards, and maintaining continuity of care throughout a patient’s life (Walden University, n.d.). Furthermore, the worsening lack of primary care physicians in the US has emphasized the importance of well-educated FNPs in urban and rural regions (Echevarria, 2018). My background in nursing has always emphasized patient advocacy, and I wanted to expand my scope of practice to include diagnosing, prescribing, and managing treatment plans independently. Moreover, the emphasis on health promotion and disease prevention in the FNP role aligns with my belief in proactive rather than reactive healthcare.
Professional Organization: American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP)
A key professional association for my area of practice is the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). The AANP represents the interests of over 385,000 nurse practitioners in the US and provides invaluable resources, including continuing education, policy advocacy, and networking opportunities (AANP,n.d.). Membership privileges are obtained by access to a research article, professional development programs, certificate exams, and affiliation conference discounts (AANP,n.d.). Joining AANP, I will receive updates on legislation impacting FNP practice, an opportunity to learn from others, and access to leadership and advocacy programs that support professional development.
Steps to Becoming an AANP Member
Becoming a member of the AANP requires the completion of an online application and a membership fee, which is dependent on membership type (Echevarria, 2018). Student memberships are sold at a reduction, and this is a fantastic opportunity for trainees. Members are provided access to unique content, such as clinical practice guidelines, policy updates, and networking, which have been found to be very valuable for career development (AANP, n.d.). Further, AANP makes connections between and among new/aspiring FNPs and experienced participants in the field. In this way, AANP membership would help me to keep abreast of advances and the best processes in the profession of the FNP.Conclusion
Making the decision to enroll in the Post-Master’s Certificate in Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) program was motivated by my passion for primary care and my interest in improving patients’ outcomes throughout their lifespan. Despite initial difficulties in selecting a specialty, my commitment to holistic, patient-centered care guided me toward the FNP role. The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) will be an important gateway for professional growth, advocacy, and networking as I develop my career (Echevarria, 2018). By joining AANP and staying active in the nurse practitioner community, I will ensure that I continue to grow as a healthcare professional while making meaningful contributions to patient care and the nursing profession.
References
AANP. (n.d.). About the American Association of Nurse Practitioners® (AANP). American Association of Nurse Practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/about/about-the-american-association-of-nurse-practitioners-aanp Links to an external site.
Cherry, B., Caramanica, L, Everett, L. Q., Fennimore, L., & Elaine, S. (2019). Leveraging the power of board leadership in professional nursing organizations. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 517-519.
Echevarria, I. M. (2018). Make connections by joining a professional nursing organization. Nursing, 48(12), 35–38.
Walden University. (n.d.).Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://www.waldenu.edu/masters/master-of-
Peer 2: I have chosen to specialize in psychiatric-mental health nursing (PMHNP) due to my strong interest in mental health advocacy and holistic patient care. One of the challenges in making this decision was initially considering other specialties, such as family practice, due to their broader scope. However, the growing mental health crisis, the stigma surrounding psychiatric disorders, and the need for compassionate, skilled providers in this field ultimately solidified my choice (Delaney & Vanderhoef, 2019). Factors influencing my decision include the increasing demand for mental health professionals, the opportunity to provide therapy and medication management, and the ability to form meaningful, long-term relationships with patients (American Psychiatric Nurses Association [APNA], 2023).
A key professional organization for psychiatric nurses is the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA), which offers continuing education, networking, and advocacy opportunities. To become a member, individuals can join through the APNA website, with membership options available for students, new graduates, and licensed psychiatric nurses. Membership provides access to clinical resources, webinars, and discounts on certification exams, supporting ongoing professional development (APNA, 2023).
References
American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA). (2023). Membership benefits. Retrieved from www.apna.org Links to an external site.
Delaney, K. R., & Vanderhoef, D. (2019). Advanced practice psychiatric nursing: Overcoming barriers to care. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 33(2), 177-184.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2022). The mental health workforce: Trends and challenges. Retrieved

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

1. Understand Your Assignment’s Purpose:

  • Begin by understanding the core purpose of your assignment. In this case, your goal is to analyze why you’ve chosen a particular nursing specialty (either FNP or PMHNP) and highlight the factors that led to your decision. Additionally, you’ll explore a professional organization relevant to your field of choice and the steps to become a member.
  • Keep in mind that you’re being asked to focus on personal motivations, career development, and professional engagement, so your tone should reflect personal insight combined with academic rigor.

2. Reflect on Your Personal Motivation:

  • Start by articulating your intrinsic motivations for selecting a particular nursing specialty. For instance, if you are focusing on the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) path, explain how your desire to provide holistic, patient-centered care at all life stages influenced your decision. If you’ve chosen Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP), emphasize your passion for mental health advocacy, providing therapy, and combating stigma.
  • Acknowledge any challenges you faced in choosing between other specialties (e.g., Nurse Educator, AGNP for FNP or Family Practice for PMHNP), and explain what ultimately solidified your decision. This helps in showing your process of self-reflection.

3. Discuss Key Factors Influencing Your Decision:

  • Explain the critical determinants that led you to choose your specialty. For the FNP, this could include factors like the flexibility of the role, the broad scope of practice, and the increasing demand for primary care providers in underserved areas. For PMHNP, factors such as the growing mental health crisis, the need for compassionate care, and your ability to form long-term relationships with patients should be highlighted.
  • Make sure you also address why you see your specialty as a perfect fit for your personal values and goals. This will make your reasoning stronger and more compelling.

4. Analyze Your Chosen Professional Organization:

  • Identify a professional organization relevant to your field of study. If you’re writing about FNP, you would talk about the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) and the resources it offers to its members. For PMHNP, discuss the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) and its support for mental health nurses.
  • Include specific benefits of joining this organization, such as access to continuing education, networking opportunities, certifications, policy advocacy, and research updates. These benefits play a significant role in your professional growth, so be sure to articulate them clearly.

5. Outline the Steps to Join the Organization:

  • Provide step-by-step instructions on how to join the professional organization you’ve discussed. For example, the process might involve completing an online application and paying a membership fee, which can vary depending on whether you’re a student or a licensed practitioner.
  • Be specific about the membership benefits that come with joining, such as discounts, access to webinars, or specific resources (e.g., clinical practice guidelines, professional development programs, etc.). These will show how the organization can help advance your career.

6. Introduce Your Paper with a Strong Thesis:

  • Your introduction should briefly summarize the main points of your paper. It should address the reason for choosing your specialty, the professional organization you are aligning with, and the factors that influenced these decisions.
  • For example, “This paper explores my decision to pursue a career as a Family Nurse Practitioner, detailing the personal, professional, and societal factors that guided my choice, as well as the role of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners in supporting my career development.”

7. Develop the Body of Your Paper:

  • Expand on each section of your outline. Start by explaining your motivation and decision-making process in depth. Provide examples from your personal experience or research that strengthen your argument.
  • In the section discussing your professional organization, provide concrete examples of how the organization supports its members and why this is beneficial for your career.

8. Conclude with Reflection:

  • Your conclusion should summarize the key points you’ve made about your specialty choice and the value of joining a professional organization. Reflect on how these decisions align with your long-term goals.
  • End with a thought-provoking statement about your future in nursing and how your specialty and professional membership will contribute to your growth and impact on patient care.

9. Review and Revise:

  • Once your paper is complete, take the time to revise and edit for clarity, coherence, and flow. Check for any grammatical or spelling errors.
  • Make sure that your paper adheres to the assignment requirements and includes all the necessary sections. Ensure that your arguments are clearly presented and supported by credible sources.

Sertraline (Zoloft) Patient Education: What You Need to Know

Margo is a 49-year-old divorced woman who works as a bank teller. She tells her primary care provider (PCP) that she feels tired all the time and that she is gaining weight because she has no interest in her usual exercise activities, and that she has been overeating, even though she is often not really hungry. She notices that she has difficulty falling asleep at night and awakens around 4 a.m. most mornings, without her alarm, and cannot go back to sleep even though she still feels tired. She finds little joy in her life but cannot pinpoint any particular concern or event causing this problem. The PCP asks Angela to fill out a Beck’s Depression Scale, which indicates she has moderate depression.
Choose a pharmacologic intervention for Margo.
Provide Margo with written education regarding her prescriiption. (Include what she should expect when first taking the drug, appropriate activity warnings, when to expect improvement, side effects she may experience, and anything she should report to the provider).

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Pharmacologic Intervention: Sertraline (Zoloft) 50 mg once daily

Rationale:
Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) commonly prescribed for moderate depression. It helps balance serotonin levels in the brain, improving mood, energy levels, and sleep patterns.


Patient Education for Sertraline (Zoloft)

Dear Margo,

Your provider has prescribed Sertraline (Zoloft) 50 mg once daily to help manage your symptoms of depression. Below is important information to help you understand what to expect while taking this medication.

1. What to Expect When Starting Sertraline

  • It may take 2 to 4 weeks to start feeling improvements in mood and energy.
  • Full benefits may take up to 6 to 8 weeks of consistent use.
  • You may experience mild side effects initially, which often improve within a few days to weeks.

2. How to Take Your Medication

  • Take one tablet (50 mg) once daily, preferably in the morning or evening.
  • You can take it with or without food, but taking it with food may help reduce nausea.
  • Take it at the same time each day to maintain stable levels in your body.

3. Possible Side Effects

Some side effects may occur but often go away with time. These include:
✔️ Nausea or upset stomach
✔️ Dizziness or lightheadedness
✔️ Dry mouth
✔️ Sleep disturbances (either drowsiness or difficulty sleeping)
✔️ Mild headache
✔️ Increased sweating

If these symptoms persist or become bothersome, contact your provider.

4. Activity Warnings

⚠️ Avoid alcohol while taking Sertraline, as it may increase drowsiness and impair judgment.
⚠️ Use caution when driving or operating machinery until you know how the medication affects you.
⚠️ If you feel dizzy when standing up, rise slowly from a sitting or lying position.

5. When to Expect Improvement

  • First few weeks: Possible mild improvement in sleep and appetite.
  • 2-4 weeks: Gradual improvement in energy and interest in daily activities.
  • 4-8 weeks: Full effects on mood and overall well-being.

6. When to Contact Your Provider

🚨 Call your provider if you experience:

  • Worsening depression or anxiety
  • Thoughts of self-harm or suicidal thoughts (Seek immediate help)
  • Severe nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea
  • Unusual bleeding or bruising
  • Increased restlessness or agitation
  • Signs of serotonin syndrome (fast heartbeat, fever, confusion, muscle stiffness)

7. Do Not Stop Abruptly

  • Do not stop taking Sertraline suddenly, as it may cause withdrawal symptoms (dizziness, irritability, flu-like symptoms).
  • If you wish to stop, consult your provider for a gradual tapering plan.

If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to your provider. We are here to support you!

Wishing you good health,

Critique of the Systematic Review on the Effect of Parental Leave on Parents’ Mental Health: An Analysis Using the JBI Checklist”

In this assessment, you are required to critique a systematic literature review using short answer questions adapted from the JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses (JBI 2020). You will also use GenAI to generate an initial critique of the systematic review, which you will then evaluate for accuracy.
Your task is to critique the systematic review using the adapted questions from the JBI checklist and provide a review of the GenAI-generated critique. Whether GenAI’s responses contain errors or not, you must demonstrate a clear understanding of the systematic review and provide evidence-based answers to the questions that are supported by further reading (references).
Steps for Completing the Assessment:

Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review
Access the Article: Download the systematic review article provided on the Canvas site under “Assignments
Familiarise yourself: Carefully read and understand the article, focusing on key elements such as the research question, inclusion criteria, search strategy, sources of information, critical appraisal, data extraction, methods, publication bias and recommendations.
You will need a strong understanding of the review publication in order to critique it thoroughly using the questions adapted from the JBI Checklist.

Step 2: Understand the questions adapted from the JBI Checklist:
Download the Assessment Template: Access and download the assessment template provided on Canvas. Review the short answer questions that you will need to answer.
Review the JBI Checklist: If there are any questions from the template that you do not understand, refer to the explanations provided in the JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses (JBI 2020; provided below in CANVAS). This will help you interpret and apply the checklist questions accurately to the systematic review.

Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique
Access GenAI: Log into the GenAI platform and upload your chosen systematic review.
Ask GenAI to Answer the JBI Questions: Use specific prompts to ask GenAI to generate responses to each question from the JBI Checklist. For example, you can ask:
“Critique the research question in this systematic review .”
“Evaluate the inclusion criteria .”
“Does this review assess publication bias?”
Save the Output: Copy and paste the GenAI-generated responses for each question into the assessment template word document (found below) for Step 1. These will form the first part of your submission.

Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Short Answer Questions
For each short answer question adapted from the JBI Checklist, critically assess the systematic review GenAI. This step will form the core of your assignment, demonstrating your understanding of the review and the JBI framework.
Your responses should address the 12 questions adapted from the JBI Checklist listed below:
Review Question and Objectives
Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated?
What is the purpose, objective, and/or question of the systematic review?
Inclusion Criteria
What is the inclusion criteria for this review?
Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? Explain why or why not.
Search Strategy
Is a clear search strategy provided?
Is the search strategy appropriate? Explain why or why not.
Sources and Resources for Article Search
What sources and resources were used to search for articles?
Are the sources and resources adequate? Explain why or why not.
Criteria for Appraising Studies
What was the criteria for appraising studies?
Was this criteria appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Independent Critical Appraisal
Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently?
Explain why it is important to have two or more reviewers.
Data Extraction Methods
How was the data extracted?
What methods were used to minimize errors in data extraction? Are these methods appropriate? Explain.
Methods for Combining Studies
Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Assessment of Publication Bias
Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed?
Provide a rationale for your answer.
Support for Recommendations
Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data?
Explain how the data supports the recommendations.
Directives for New Research
Were specific directives for new research identified?
Are these appropriate? Provide a rationale for your answer.
Application of Findings to Clinical Practice
Based on your appraisal of this review, would you apply the findings to your clinical practice?
Explain why or why not.
Step 5: Compare and Report Findings: Finally, compare GenAI’s critique to your own. Identify any differences, errors, inaccuracies, or irregularities between the two critiques, noting specific points where GenAI’s response may have missed details, misunderstood context, or provided inaccurate assessments based on the checklist criteria.
For each question:
If GenAI provides incorrect or incomplete responses: Identify the errors, explain why they are incorrect, and provide the correct information based on the systematic review.
If GenAI’s answers are correct: Provide a justification explaining why the response is accurate, supported by evidence from the review.

Submission:
Use the assessment template (word doc) provided on Canvas to provide your responses. Your submission should include the following:
GenAI Output:
Paste the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI in response to each of the JBI checklist questions.
Your Critique
For each JBI checklist question, provide your detailed review and critique along with page numbers from the publication.
Compare and Report Findings If errors were found: Identify the errors, explain why they are incorrect, and provide the corrected information with evidence from the systematic review.
If no errors were found: Justify why GenAI’s response is accurate, Support Your Analysis with Evidence: Each of your short answer responses must be backed by evidence from the systematic review.
4. References
Cite and reference the systematic review and any other sources using APA 7th edition

*The assessment template should be used to complete this assessment and is found below.
Systematic review 2 (Mental Health Nursing):
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00311-5

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.

Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review

You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.

While reading the article, focus on the following sections:

  • Research Question
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Search Strategy
  • Sources of Information
  • Methods
  • Critical Appraisal
  • Data Extraction Methods
  • Publication Bias Assessment
  • Recommendations

Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.

Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions

The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:

1. Review Question and Objectives:

  • Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?

2. Inclusion Criteria:

  • What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?

3. Search Strategy:

  • Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?

4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:

  • Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?

5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:

  • What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?

6. Independent Critical Appraisal:

  • Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?

7. Data Extraction Methods:

  • How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?

8. Methods for Combining Studies:

  • Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?

9. Assessment of Publication Bias:

  • Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?

10. Support for Recommendations:

  • Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?

11. Directives for New Research:

  • Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?

12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:

  • Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?

Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique

Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.

For example:

  • Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
  • Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”

After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.

Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions

For each question, you will:

  • Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
  • Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.

For example:

  • Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
  • GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
  • Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”

Step 5: Compare and Report Findings

In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:

  • If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
  • If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.

Submission Requirements:

  1. GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
  2. Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
  3. References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.

In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.

Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review

You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.

While reading the article, focus on the following sections:

  • Research Question
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Search Strategy
  • Sources of Information
  • Methods
  • Critical Appraisal
  • Data Extraction Methods
  • Publication Bias Assessment
  • Recommendations

Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.

Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions

The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:

1. Review Question and Objectives:

  • Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?

2. Inclusion Criteria:

  • What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?

3. Search Strategy:

  • Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?

4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:

  • Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?

5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:

  • What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?

6. Independent Critical Appraisal:

  • Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?

7. Data Extraction Methods:

  • How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?

8. Methods for Combining Studies:

  • Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?

9. Assessment of Publication Bias:

  • Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?

10. Support for Recommendations:

  • Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?

11. Directives for New Research:

  • Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?

12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:

  • Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?

Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique

Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.

For example:

  • Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
  • Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”

After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.

Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions

For each question, you will:

  • Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
  • Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.

For example:

  • Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
  • GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
  • Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”

Step 5: Compare and Report Findings

In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:

  • If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
  • If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.

Submission Requirements:

  1. GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
  2. Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
  3. References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.

In order to effectively complete your assessment, let’s break it down step by step, focusing on critiquing the systematic review based on the JBI Checklist and incorporating the use of GenAI for generating an initial critique.

Step 1: Read the Provided Systematic Review

You need to download and thoroughly read the systematic review titled:
Heshmati, A., Honkaniemi, H., & Juárez, S. P. (2023). The effect of parental leave on parents’ mental health: a systematic review. The Lancet. Public Health, 8(1), e57–e75.

While reading the article, focus on the following sections:

  • Research Question
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Search Strategy
  • Sources of Information
  • Methods
  • Critical Appraisal
  • Data Extraction Methods
  • Publication Bias Assessment
  • Recommendations

Make note of any key details that will help answer the questions in the JBI Checklist.

Step 2: Understand the JBI Checklist Questions

The questions adapted from the JBI Checklist will guide your critique of the systematic review. Here are the key areas to focus on:

1. Review Question and Objectives:

  • Does the systematic review clearly state its research question and objectives? Is the question relevant and focused?

2. Inclusion Criteria:

  • What are the inclusion criteria for the systematic review? Are these criteria suitable for answering the research question?

3. Search Strategy:

  • Does the review provide a clear and comprehensive search strategy? Is the strategy adequate for identifying all relevant studies?

4. Sources and Resources for Article Search:

  • Which sources did the authors use to find articles? Are these sources comprehensive and reliable?

5. Criteria for Appraising Studies:

  • What criteria did the authors use to appraise the studies included in the review? Were these criteria appropriate?

6. Independent Critical Appraisal:

  • Was critical appraisal conducted independently by more than one reviewer? Why is this important?

7. Data Extraction Methods:

  • How was data extracted? Were methods used to minimize errors in data extraction, and are they appropriate?

8. Methods for Combining Studies:

  • Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Did the authors provide a rationale for their methods?

9. Assessment of Publication Bias:

  • Was publication bias assessed? If so, how? What is the rationale for assessing publication bias?

10. Support for Recommendations:

  • Were the recommendations made by the authors supported by the data they reported?

11. Directives for New Research:

  • Did the authors suggest areas for future research? Were these suggestions appropriate?

12. Application of Findings to Clinical Practice:

  • Do the findings of this review have practical applications in clinical practice? Should these findings be applied in your clinical setting?

Step 3: Use GenAI to Generate an Initial Critique

Once you have thoroughly read the systematic review, you can now use GenAI to generate responses for each question on the JBI Checklist.

For example:

  • Prompt for GenAI: “Critique the research question in the systematic review by Heshmati et al. (2023). Does it clearly and explicitly state the purpose of the review?”
  • Prompt for GenAI: “Evaluate the inclusion criteria used in the systematic review. Are they appropriate for the research question and objectives?”

After generating responses from GenAI, paste them into the assessment template.

Step 4: Critique the Systematic Review Based on JBI Questions

For each question, you will:

  • Review GenAI’s critique and compare it with your own analysis.
  • Provide a detailed evaluation based on the content of the review and support your answers with evidence from the text.

For example:

  • Question: “Is the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question?”
  • GenAI response: “Yes, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined, focusing on studies that examined the effects of parental leave on mental health.”
  • Your critique: “The inclusion criteria are indeed appropriate as they focus on relevant studies that meet the research question. However, the exclusion criteria could have been more explicitly stated to ensure transparency. The focus on studies involving parents’ mental health after parental leave is relevant, but there is limited information on the diversity of the sample populations.”

Step 5: Compare and Report Findings

In this step, you’ll evaluate the differences between GenAI’s critique and your own analysis:

  • If GenAI’s critique contains errors, provide a detailed explanation of why it is incorrect, and correct it with your findings from the systematic review.
  • If GenAI’s critique is correct, justify why it is accurate and relevant to the research.

Submission Requirements:

  1. GenAI Output: Include the full, unedited critique generated by GenAI for each question.
  2. Your Critique: Provide your own analysis and comparison with GenAI’s critique for each question, using evidence from the systematic review.
  3. References: Cite the systematic review and any additional sources you use to support your critique using APA 7th edition format.

the incidences of falls in nursing homes as a workplace or clinical issue.

Objectives
Identify qualitative and quantitative research processes
Deliverables
Write a 2-3 page (not including the title and reference pages)
APA 7 formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion
APA 7 headings for each section of the paper
At least (2) research sources, including 1 source from a periodical database that is most relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old), and reliable.
Step 1: Research
Find qualitative, quantitative, and mixed (both quantitative and qualitative) research sources.
Capstone project topics cannot be used in this course due to the potential for self-plagiarism, a new topic must be chosen instead.
Step 2: Consider
Compare and contrast qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-design research characteristics.
Identify a problem in your place of work or at a clinical site: Examine incidences of falls in nursing homes
What type of research listed above would you conduct to address this problem?
Why or why not?
Step 3: Write
Use the template provided to complete paper.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Research and Choose Your Topic

  • Select Your Topic: For this paper, your topic will revolve around the incidences of falls in nursing homes as a workplace or clinical issue.
  • Research Sources: Gather information on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research. You’ll need to find sources that explain the differences, and ideally, you should use a periodical database to find at least one recent scholarly article (less than 5 years old) and one more source to meet the minimum requirement.

Step 2: Organize Your Paper

Your paper will be structured in the following format:

  1. Title Page:
    • Create a title for your paper, ensuring it is relevant and engaging (e.g., Exploring Research Approaches for Addressing Fall Incidences in Nursing Homes).
    • Include the name of the course, your name, and the date in proper APA 7 format.
  2. Introduction:
    • Start with an overview of the issue (falls in nursing homes).
    • Explain why this problem is important to address in your workplace or clinical site.
    • Briefly introduce the types of research (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed) that you will explore and how they relate to addressing this issue.
  3. Research Process Characteristics Section:
    • Use APA headings to clearly break up each section of your paper.

    a. Qualitative Research:

    • Define qualitative research, and explain its characteristics (e.g., focuses on in-depth understanding, interviews, observations).
    • Discuss how qualitative research could be applied to exploring the root causes of falls in nursing homes (e.g., interviewing nursing staff, patients, or caregivers about their experiences).
    • Use one research source related to qualitative research and falls (use a scholarly journal article).

    b. Quantitative Research:

    • Define quantitative research and its characteristics (e.g., focuses on numerical data, statistical analysis).
    • Explain how quantitative research can be used to measure incidence rates of falls, and the effectiveness of interventions (e.g., tracking fall incidents over time, testing specific interventions).
    • Use one research source related to quantitative research and falls (use a scholarly journal article).

    c. Mixed Methods Research:

    • Define mixed-methods research, explaining how both qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
    • Discuss how mixed methods could be applied to this issue, such as combining surveys (quantitative) and interviews (qualitative) to understand both the extent and the factors influencing fall incidents in nursing homes.
  4. Problem and Research Choice Section:
    • Identify the problem you’re addressing (fall incidents in nursing homes).
    • Explain which research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) you would choose to study this problem, and why.
    • For instance, you might prefer quantitative research if you want measurable data on fall rates, or qualitative research if you’re interested in understanding personal experiences and causes behind falls.
    • Justify your choice based on the strengths of the selected research method in addressing the problem.
  5. Conclusion:
    • Summarize your findings on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods.
    • Reinforce why understanding these research types is important in addressing the fall incident problem in nursing homes.
  6. References Page:
    • Cite at least 2 sources, including 1 from a periodical database. Ensure all references are recent (within 5 years), and formatted correctly in APA 7 style.

Step 3: Proofread and Format

  • APA 7 Formatting: Double-check that the paper follows APA 7 formatting guidelines (12-pt Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, double spacing).
  • Citations: Ensure your in-text citations and references are correctly formatted in APA style.
  • Proofread: Review your paper for grammar, clarity, and coherence.

By following this guide step-by-step, you’ll be able to craft a comprehensive and well-organized paper comparing and contrasting research types and discussing how they apply to your workplace problem, falls in nursing homes.

“Creating an Infographic and Video Presentation Based on Your SWOT Analysis”

Assignment Overview: In this assignment, you will create an infographic presentation that synthesizes the findings from your SWOT analysis in Unit 2. Your infographic should include an issue within your healthcare environment that affects nurse leaders and impacts patient care.
You will then record a 4-to-6 minute video presentation with a voiceover summarizing your infographic. This video will be presented to a nurse leader in your workplace in Week 5/Unit 5 to receive feedback and discuss next steps for implementing your recommendations. The video presentation should be seamless, a continuous voiceover. ScreenPal creates a seamless, continuous voiceover, which helps ensure a smooth and engaging presentation. While other voiceover software (PowerPoint) requires viewers to click on each slide to hear the narration, using ScreenPal provides a more polished and professional experience.
Instructions: You have the option of selecting your own template-if you select your own template, it must include the elements list below and include the following statement on your infographic as a footer: Student assignment, not for official college or facility use. You also have the option of using the template provided.
Unit 4 Poster Presentation Template
Infographic Content Assignment Requirements: Strategic Leadership Brief
Identified Issue
Description of the Issue: Provide a clear, concise statement of the issue identified in your SWOT analysis. Support your description with rationale and in-text citations (Author, Year).
Problem Discussion and Evidence-Based Support
Significance of the Issue: Explain why this issue is important and the challenges it presents within the healthcare environment. Support your discussion with rationale and 2 scholarly sources, including in-text citations (Author, Year).
SWOT Details
Strengths:
Identify at least 4 internal strengths specific to your healthcare organization/unit that can be leveraged to address the selected issue. Examples include experienced staff, strong leadership, advanced technology, or efficient processes. Include in-text citations if referencing specific data or studies (Author, Year).
Weaknesses:
Identify at least 4 internal weaknesses within your organization/unit that may contribute to the problem. Include in-text citations to support your points if necessary (Author, Year).
Opportunities:
Identify at least 4 potential opportunities for improvement or innovation that could benefit your organization/unit. These opportunities could include partnerships, training programs, new technologies, or policy changes. Include in-text citations as needed (Author, Year).
Threats:
Identify at least 4 external threats that could impact your organization/unit and exacerbate the issue. Examples may include regulatory changes, competitive pressures, economic challenges, or patient expectations. Include in-text citations if referencing external studies or industry data (Author, Year).
Key Findings:
Summarize the key findings from your SWOT analysis, supported by at least 2 scholarly sources that are less than 2-3 years old. Include an overview of how your analysis reflects the current situation in your organization/unit and identifies areas for strategic improvements. Ensure to cite sources in-text (Author, Year) and explain how the evidence supports your analysis.
Recommendations
Proposed Solutions: Provide 3 to 4 evidence-based recommendations for addressing the issue, each supported by scholarly evidence (Author, Year).
Supporting References:
In-text citation (Author, Year)
In-text citation (Author, Year)
In-text citation (Author, Year)
In-text citation (Author, Year)
Call to Action
Encouragement for Action: State practical, actionable steps that stakeholders should take to address the issue.
References
List all references used, formatted in APA style. Ensure references are less than 2-3 years old.
This inforgraphic should be based off of my swot analysis paper that is attached. Please use the template attached.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

Begin by thoroughly reading the assignment prompt to grasp its objectives. You are tasked with creating an infographic presentation that synthesizes findings from your Unit 2 SWOT analysis, focusing on an issue within your healthcare environment that affects nurse leaders and impacts patient care. Additionally, you’ll record a 4-to-6 minute video presentation with a continuous voiceover summarizing your infographic.

Step 2: Choose an Infographic Template

You have two options:

  • Use the Provided Template: Utilize the “Unit 4 Poster Presentation Template” supplied by your instructor.
  • Select Your Own Template: If you opt for a different template, ensure it includes all required elements and add the following footer: “Student assignment, not for official college or facility use.”

Step 3: Develop the Infographic Content

Your infographic should encompass the following sections:

  1. Strategic Leadership Brief
    • Identified Issue: Clearly state the issue identified in your SWOT analysis. Support your description with rationale and in-text citations (Author, Year).
  2. Problem Discussion and Evidence-Based Support
    • Significance of the Issue: Explain why this issue is important and the challenges it presents within the healthcare environment. Support your discussion with rationale and at least two scholarly sources, including in-text citations (Author, Year).
  3. SWOT Details
    • Strengths: Identify at least four internal strengths specific to your healthcare organization/unit that can be leveraged to address the selected issue. Examples include experienced staff, strong leadership, advanced technology, or efficient processes. Include in-text citations if referencing specific data or studies (Author, Year).
    • Weaknesses: Identify at least four internal weaknesses within your organization/unit that may contribute to the problem. Include in-text citations to support your points if necessary (Author, Year).
    • Opportunities: Identify at least four potential opportunities for improvement or innovation that could benefit your organization/unit. These opportunities could include partnerships, training programs, new technologies, or policy changes. Include in-text citations as needed (Author, Year).
    • Threats: Identify at least four external threats that could impact your organization/unit and exacerbate the issue. Examples may include regulatory changes, competitive pressures, economic challenges, or patient expectations. Include in-text citations if referencing external studies or industry data (Author, Year).
  4. Key Findings
    • Summarize the key findings from your SWOT analysis, supported by at least two scholarly sources that are less than 2-3 years old. Include an overview of how your analysis reflects the current situation in your organization/unit and identifies areas for strategic improvements. Ensure to cite sources in-text (Author, Year) and explain how the evidence supports your analysis.
  5. Recommendations
    • Proposed Solutions: Provide 3 to 4 evidence-based recommendations for addressing the issue, each supported by scholarly evidence (Author, Year).
    • Supporting References: Include in-text citations for each recommendation (Author, Year).

Step 4: Create the Infographic

Utilize design tools such as Canva, Piktochart, or Adobe Spark to create your infographic. Ensure it is visually appealing, well-organized, and effectively communicates your analysis and recommendations.

Step 5: Record the Video Presentation

Use ScreenPal to record a seamless, continuous voiceover presentation of your infographic. This approach ensures a smooth and engaging experience for your audience. Avoid using software that requires viewers to click on each slide to hear the narration, as this can disrupt the flow of your presentation.

Step 6: Review and Finalize

Before submitting, review your infographic and video presentation to ensure they meet all assignment requirements. Check for clarity, coherence, and adherence to guidelines. Ensure all sources are properly cited in APA format.

By following these steps, you’ll be well-prepared to create a compelling infographic and presentation that effectively communicates your SWOT analysis findings and recommendations.

Select and define the data that would be collected to inform the QI project.

General instructions
Use the topic identified in the Week 1 discussion to address the assignment criteria. (YOU CAN CHOOSE A TOPIC)
Use the Week 5 Quality Improvement Worksheet Template Links to an external site. or create a template of your choice. Save the template and include your name in the file name.( I ATTACHED THE TEMPLATE)
Complete the Quality Improvement Template. Use complete sentences.
Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
Provide an in-text citation from three scholarly sources to support your writing.
Introduction
Identify a quality or client safety issue.
Provide a background of the issue, including the scope, impact, and rationale for the selected issue.
You may reuse content from your Week 1 Discussion post to introduce the issue.
Quality Measures
Select one NCQA HEDIS performance measure Links to an external site. related to your selected quality or client safety issue. Note: Expand each HEDIS domain to review the associated performance measures.
Select and define the data that would be collected to inform the QI project.
Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
Regulatory Guidelines and Benchmarks
Identify regulatory guidelines to inform quality improvement.
Identify the internal and external benchmarks that would exhibit success in quality improvement.
Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
Data Analysis Techniques
Describe one data analysis technique used in quality improvement that could be used to evaluate the problem.
Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
Dissemination
Identify at least two ways to disseminate the quality improvement results.
Identify the key stakeholder to whom the information would be disseminated.
Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
Reflection
Discuss how you will apply the quality improvement strategies in your practice.
Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Completing Your Quality Improvement Assignment

1. Choose Your Topic

Use the topic you identified in the Week 1 discussion. If you have not selected a topic, choose a quality or client safety issue relevant to healthcare.


2. Download or Create the Template

  • Use the Week 5 Quality Improvement Worksheet Template or create your own.
  • Save the template with your name in the file name.
  • Ensure the template follows APA formatting.

3. Write the Introduction

  • Identify a quality or client safety issue.
  • Provide background information on the issue, including:
    • Scope: How widespread is the issue?
    • Impact: How does this issue affect patient care and healthcare providers?
    • Rationale: Why is this issue important to address?
  • You may reuse content from your Week 1 discussion post.
  • Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source.

4. Define Quality Measures

  • Select one NCQA HEDIS performance measure related to your topic.
  • Expand the relevant HEDIS domain and choose an appropriate performance measure.
  • Define the data that will be collected for the Quality Improvement (QI) project.
  • Support your writing with an in-text citation from a scholarly source.

5. Regulatory Guidelines and Benchmarks

  • Identify regulatory guidelines that apply to your quality improvement topic.
  • Determine internal and external benchmarks that indicate successful quality improvement.
  • Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source.

6. Data Analysis Techniques

  • Describe one data analysis technique that could be used to evaluate the problem.
  • Explain how the technique helps in analyzing and interpreting the collected data.
  • Support your writing with an in-text citation from a scholarly source.

7. Dissemination of Results

  • Identify two ways to share the results of your quality improvement project (e.g., staff meetings, reports, academic journals, conferences).
  • Identify the key stakeholders who need to receive this information.
  • Provide an in-text citation from a scholarly source.

8. Reflection

  • Discuss how you will apply the quality improvement strategies in your nursing or healthcare practice.
  • Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment and how it will impact your professional growth.
  • Ensure your reflection aligns with formal, scholarly writing.

Final Review Before Submission

✅ Ensure you have used complete sentences. ✅ Check for APA grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. ✅ Verify that you have included at least three scholarly sources with in-text citations. ✅ Save your document with your name in the file name before submitting.

16-Year-Old Male with Fever, Body Aches, and Sore Throat: Possible Viral or Bacterial Infection

The patient was a 16 year old boy, that have the symptoms of fever, body aches, poor appetite with nausea and a sore throat. No medical problems

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Based on the information provided, it sounds like the 16-year-old patient could be presenting with symptoms commonly associated with viral infections such as the flu or mononucleosis. These symptoms—fever, body aches, poor appetite with nausea, and a sore throat—are often indicative of an infectious illness, but they are not exclusive to any one condition.

Here are a few potential causes:

  1. Influenza (Flu) – The flu commonly presents with fever, body aches, sore throat, fatigue, poor appetite, and nausea.
  2. Mononucleosis (Mono) – This condition, often caused by the Epstein-Barr virus, can cause a sore throat, fever, body aches, poor appetite, and swollen lymph nodes.
  3. Streptococcal Pharyngitis (Strep Throat) – A bacterial infection that could cause a sore throat, fever, and body aches, sometimes with nausea. It is often treated with antibiotics.
  4. Viral Pharyngitis – Similar to the flu but may present with mild or moderate fever, body aches, sore throat, and nausea.

Assessment: Given the age of the patient and the symptoms, it’s important to rule out strep throat (which requires a throat culture or rapid strep test for diagnosis) and consider the possibility of mononucleosis, especially if there’s swelling of the lymph nodes or if the symptoms persist longer than expected.

Recommendations: Further testing, such as a rapid strep test, mono spot test, or a full blood panel, may be needed for accurate diagnosis. Supportive care (hydration, rest, and over-the-counter medications for fever and pain relief) is generally recommended unless a bacterial infection like strep throat is confirmed, in which case antibiotics would be necessary.

Would you like additional details about these conditions or advice on what to look out for in further assessments?

Coordinating Care as a Family Nurse Practitioner: Strategies for Transition and Interprofessional Collaboration

Select a practice that employs family nurse practitioners. This could be a practice in which you currently work, a practice to which you plan to apply, or your own practice you intend to start. Identify your team members and use a patient scenario to describe how you would coordinate care within the interprofessional team. Explain strategies you would implement for transitioning from an FNP learner to a family nurse practitioner. Support your answer with a minimum of two APRN-approved scholarly resources.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

For this exercise, let’s assume you plan to apply for a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) position at a primary care clinic. The scenario will involve an interprofessional team approach to patient care. Here’s a breakdown of how you can answer this question:


Practice and Team Members

Let’s say you’re applying to a primary care clinic where the interprofessional team includes the following members:

  1. Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs): Responsible for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients.
  2. Physicians: Oversee complex cases, prescribe medications when needed, and collaborate with the FNPs for patient management.
  3. Registered Nurses (RNs): Assist with patient education, administer treatments, and provide follow-up care.
  4. Medical Assistants (MAs): Help with patient intake, prepare exam rooms, and manage basic administrative tasks.
  5. Pharmacists: Offer medication counseling and manage pharmacological treatments.
  6. Social Workers: Support patients with resources, mental health, and community-based services.
  7. Dietitians/Nutritionists: Provide dietary counseling, especially for patients with chronic conditions such as diabetes or hypertension.

Patient Scenario

A 45-year-old female patient presents with uncontrolled hypertension, weight gain, and fatigue. She reports difficulty managing her diet and adheres inconsistently to her prescribed antihypertensive medication regimen. She also has a family history of type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

Coordinating Care Within the Inter professional Team

In this scenario, as an FNP, you would take the following steps to coordinate care:

  1. Initial Assessment: As an FNP, you would conduct a comprehensive health assessment, taking into account the patient’s medical history, lifestyle, and family history. You would perform a physical exam, check her vital signs (especially blood pressure), and order lab tests (such as cholesterol and blood glucose levels) to assess her cardiovascular health.
  2. Collaboration with Physicians: After diagnosing the patient with stage 1 hypertension and risk factors for diabetes, you would discuss the case with the supervising physician. Together, you would adjust her medication regimen and consider prescribing antihypertensive drugs or medications to manage her blood sugar levels.
  3. Nursing and MA Support: The RN or MA would assist in educating the patient on the importance of medication adherence and lifestyle modifications. They would also provide follow-up calls or appointments to ensure the patient is managing her medications effectively.
  4. Referral to Dietitian: Given her weight gain and potential risk for diabetes, you would refer the patient to a dietitian for individualized dietary counseling to manage her blood pressure and prevent diabetes onset.
  5. Involvement of Social Worker: If the patient faces barriers to accessing healthy foods or medications, a social worker would assess her socioeconomic situation and offer resources or support programs.
  6. Pharmacist Consult: The pharmacist would ensure that the prescribed medications are compatible, explain any potential side effects, and assist with medication management.

Strategies for Transitioning from FNP Learner to Family Nurse Practitioner

Transitioning from an FNP learner to a fully licensed Family Nurse Practitioner involves several key strategies:

  1. Mentorship and Ongoing Collaboration: During your initial transition, seek mentorship from more experienced FNPs or physicians. Collaborating on complex cases and participating in case reviews will improve your confidence and skills.
  2. Continuing Education: Stay updated with the latest guidelines and research in primary care, pharmacology, and chronic disease management. Continuing education is critical to refining your clinical knowledge and ensuring evidence-based practice.
  3. Building Leadership Skills: As a new FNP, it’s important to develop your leadership skills. This includes taking the lead in patient education, advocating for patients, and leading interdisciplinary team meetings.
  4. Time Management and Efficiency: Managing multiple patients and coordinating care among various team members can be overwhelming at first. Focus on time management skills to balance patient care, documentation, and interprofessional communication.
  5. Reflective Practice: Regularly engage in reflective practice by reviewing your patient cases, identifying areas for improvement, and seeking feedback from colleagues. This process is vital for professional growth.

Scholarly Resources

  1. American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2021). Core Competencies for Nurse Practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/
  2. Zaccagnini, M., & White, K. (2019). The Doctor of Nursing Practice Essentials: A New Model for Advanced Practice Nursing (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

By focusing on patient-centered care, interprofessional collaboration, and continuous self-improvement, transitioning from an FNP learner to an FNP practitioner can be a smooth and rewarding process.

Your Complete Guide to Completing Homework on Pre-Operative Patient Education and Post-Operative Outcomes

Topic: A single topic is chosen each semester and all students must use the same topic. For this semester, the topic is “The Role of Pre-Operative Patient Education in Post-Operative Outcomes”. All Homework and the Literature Review and Analysis must use this topic. Using any other topic will result in a grade of no credit (0) with no allowance for a re-submission.

Overview: In this course, you will learn about the distinct types of research, the categories of evidence, and the strengths and limitations of each. The goals are for you to learn to evaluate evidence, analyze its content, synthesize disparate sources, and make decisions about nursing-related issues based on the best current evidence. To achieve this goal, for the homework you will have three activities. Part I is an exercise to reinforce the EBP content for the week. For Part II, HW A, B, and C, you will be provided with a piece of evidence that is representative of the category of evidence being covered that week. You will be asked to read the item provided and answer questions about it using the fill-in-the-blanks homework form provided. For Part III you will also be required to find other evidence on the assigned topic on your own and answer brief questions about it. Homework E has three activities. Part I, requires that you visit the provided website and answer questions. Part II will require that you find other evidence on the assigned topic and answer brief questions about it. Part III requires that you complete a Literature Review table on your 3 pieces of evidence that you will synthesize for your final assignment. (Be sure that you have your 3 pieces of evidence by the time Homework E is due!) Your final assignment is to write a Literature Review and Analysis on 3 pieces of evidence/articles. The evidence must be primary, peer-reviewed, and quantitative research that has been published within the last 5 years. The skills you acquire and the evidence you compile while doing the homework each time should be used by you as the basis for composing your Literature Review assignment. You may also use any of the homework evidence that I provided for your assignments as support literature OR as one of your chosen 3 pieces of evidence to analyze for the final assignment. Pay close attention should you choose to use any of the evidence provided during this course because your final assignment requires that your 3 articles be (1) primary, (2) quantitative, and (3) peer-reviewed research.

Homework Directions: These are individual homework assignments that consist of separate submissions as per the course calendar. To fulfill this assignment:
Complete all of the Required Learning Activities for the week before beginning the homework.
Complete the week’s homework using the template provided. Only the provided template will be accepted: all other layouts will be returned for reformatting with the associated late penalty applied.
Each week’s Homework has three parts:
Part I – Following the directions provided on the template, complete the EBP exercise. This is different every week so read the directions on the template for details. You can access the template by clicking on the link above.
Part II – This part requires you to read and analyze a document provided to you, except for HW D and E. You can access this evidence by clicking on the link above. There is one specific example to analyze for each Homework. Using the evidence provided to you for the Homework you are working on, answer the questions listed about the Provided Evidence item (Questions 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d).
Part III (excluding HW E) – This part requires you to perform a search to find a specific type of evidence on the semester’s topic and answer three questions (3a, 3b, and 3c). ALL RESEARCH MUST PERTAIN TO HEALTHCARE (NURSING, PHYSICAL THERAPY, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, PHYSICIANS, RESPIRATORY THERAPY, ETC.)
Look at the directions in Question 3a to see exactly what type of evidence is required for the homework as it is different and specific each week.
Perform a search and locate the required type of document. (i.e. if the evidence category for the week is government documents, you must locate a specific example of an applicable government document on the topic). You may not re-use a source from a previous week nor use the provided evidence from a previous or upcoming week as your “located” evidence. Evidence may be no more than 5 years old
Answer the questions (3a, 3b, and 3c) about the item you located.
For the evidence you locate, you must provide the complete document (not just the abstract), excluding Homework A in which you may provide the article/evidence OR the URL link that links to the article. For Homework B, C, D, and E you must attach an electronic copy of the document you located. You will not receive credit for the evidence if there is no attachment!
No points may be earned for Part III if the type of evidence is incorrect (no partial credit).

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide for Completing Homework on “The Role of Pre-Operative Patient Education in Post-Operative Outcomes”

  1. Understand the Assignment: The main objective of this course is to teach you how to evaluate, analyze, and synthesize evidence on a specific healthcare topic. For this semester, the topic is “The Role of Pre-Operative Patient Education in Post-Operative Outcomes.” You will be working with primary, peer-reviewed, and quantitative research articles published within the last 5 years.
  2. Focus on the Topic: All your assignments, literature review, and analysis must revolve around this topic. Make sure to stay within the scope of pre-operative education and its impact on post-operative recovery.
  3. Complete Part I – EBP Exercise: Each week, you will have a different evidence-based practice (EBP) exercise to complete. Follow the instructions provided in the template for this part. This exercise will reinforce the concepts learned for the week.
  4. Complete Part II – Analyze Provided Evidence: For Part II, you will be given an article or piece of evidence to analyze. Read it thoroughly and answer the questions in the template (e.g., Questions 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d). Be sure to follow the format provided and complete the analysis based on the article’s content.
  5. Complete Part III – Find Additional Evidence: For Part III, you will need to conduct your own search for primary, peer-reviewed, and quantitative research on the semester’s topic. Use databases like PubMed, CINAHL, or Google Scholar to find research articles related to pre-operative education and its effect on post-operative outcomes. The research you find must be published within the last 5 years.
  6. Answer the Questions for Part III: After locating the evidence, you will need to answer three specific questions (e.g., 3a, 3b, and 3c). These questions will ask you to evaluate the quality and relevance of the evidence you found. Be sure to attach the complete document or provide the URL link to the article (if applicable).
  7. Homework E – Literature Review Table: For Homework E, you will be asked to complete a Literature Review table summarizing the three pieces of evidence you have found. This will help you synthesize your research and prepare for the final assignment. Ensure that you have the required three pieces of evidence ready by the time Homework E is due.
  8. Final Literature Review and Analysis: The final assignment will require you to write a comprehensive Literature Review and Analysis on the three pieces of evidence you have gathered throughout the course. Focus on synthesizing the research findings, analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the studies, and discussing their relevance to the role of pre-operative education in post-operative outcomes.
  9. Pay Attention to Submission Guidelines: Follow the submission guidelines carefully. Use the provided templates for all parts of the assignment, and make sure to submit the documents in the correct format (including attachments when required). Submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines will not receive credit.
  10. Review the Rubric: Always refer to the rubric provided for each assignment. This will help you understand the criteria for grading and ensure that you meet all expectations for the tasks.

By following these steps, you will be able to stay on track and complete the assignments effectively, leading to a thorough understanding of pre-operative education and its impact on post-operative recovery.