Category: Nursing

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Discussion post should at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. No AI please. Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the five years) scholarly journal articles. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style. Please no charts or columns.
Requirements: At Least 500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file | .doc file
lease provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each paragraph.

Students will identify key personal relationships and reflect on any missing voices and influences within
their Inner Circle.
1. First, name the key people already part of your inner circle.
a. What do you think their Voice is? (Feel free to invite them to take the 5 Voices
assessment)

Assessment Description
Write a short (50-100-word) paragraph response for each question. This assignment is to be submitted as a Microsoft Word document.
Give examples of psychosocial factors that affect the health care professional and the effect those factors could have on patient education.
Give examples of psychosocial factors that affect the patient and the effect those factors could have on patient education.
Explain what is meant by personality styles and give examples of approaches that could be used to help the patient. Include self-perception as a factor.
List the steps in adjustment to illness and how the patient copes with each step.
Explain the health professional’s role in teaching the patient at different life stages.
Define the role of the family in patient education.
How might the family influence the compliance of the patient and what measures can the health care professional use in communication with the family?

Write three short- and two long-term goals (or vice versa) professional nursing SMART goals. Each goal must be written in the SMART format and include a month and year deadline. In addition, each SMART goal must include three action steps that need to be accomplished to meet the goal. SMART goals must be related only to your professional nursing career development and growth.
SMART Goals TemplateDownload SMART Goals Template
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Important: After you receive feedback from your instructor on this portfolio item, integrate the suggestions and revise it for your final portfolio submission.
Rubric
SMART Goals
SMART Goals
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSMART Goals
10 to >8.9 ptsFive or more goals (two Long-Term and three Short-Term SMART goals) are provided in correct SMART format.
8.9 to >7.5 ptsFour goals are provided in correct SMART format.
7.5 to >5.9 ptsThree goals are provided in correct SMART format, or four goals are provided, but not all are in SMART format.
5.9 to >0 ptsNo SMART goals are provided.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan for Achieving Goals with Completion Dates
10 to >8.9 ptsThe students provides a detailed plan for achieving all five goals and includes completion dates for each.
8.9 to >7.5 ptsThe student provides a general plan for achieving all five goals but some plans may lack detail or structure. Completion dates are included.
7.5 to >5.9 ptsThe student provides a generic or vague plan for achieving goals. There are few if any details. All five goals may not be provided. Completion dates may not be provided.
5.9 to >0 ptsNo goal plan is provided.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Mechanics
10 to >8.9 ptsThe student uses APA Style accurately and consistently. The assignment meets all formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.
8.9 to >7.5 ptsThe student uses APA Style, but there are with only 1–2 errors. The assignment meets most formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with 3–4 errors.
7.5 to >5.9 ptsThe student reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. The assignment meets most formatting requirements (length and style). Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
5.9 to >0 ptsThe student does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. The assignment does not meet formatting requirements (length and style). There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
10 pts
Total Points: 30
PreviousNext

Create a PICO question and submit your completed search strategy sheet along with your PICO question. Additional details for each project can be viewed in the Course Projects Module Use the Search Strategy Sheet that you find in the Week 4 Module. Fill that out your search strategy sheet first, and then attach it to your PICO assignment paper. The paper should be 1-2 pages, plus your search strategy sheet. The 2-3 pages does not include your title page or reference page..
For this assignment I need the PICO question and the strategy sheet done, I am uploading the last two assignments I created, that can be useful in guiding you to create a PICO question for this assignment.

Submit a one-page paper in APA Style that explains your personal nursing philosophy, your view of health, your growth in critical thinking, and your future role as a nurse. Include your view of health and your thoughts on your future role as a nurse.
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Important: After you receive feedback from your instructor on this portfolio item, integrate the suggestions and revise it for your final portfolio submission.
Rubric
Rubric: Nursing Philosophy
Rubric: Nursing Philosophy
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffects on Health
10 to >8.9 ptsThe student provides a thoughtful, descriptive explanation of their beliefs on health.
8.9 to >7.5 ptsThe student provides a general explanation of their beliefs on health. Details may be missing and some ideas expressed may be generic, popular opinion, or impersonal.
7.5 to >5.9 ptsThe student provides a vague or unclear explanation of their beliefs on health. Details are missing and one does not get a sense of the student’s beliefs on health.
5.9 to >0 ptsThe student does not provide personal beliefs on health.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Nursing Philosophy Content
10 to >8.9 ptsThe student provides a thoughtful, descriptive personal nursing philosophy. The student includes multiple details to support their thoughts and reasons.
8.9 to >7.5 ptsThe student provides a satisfactory, descriptive personal nursing philosophy but some ideas are underdeveloped or vague. The student includes minimal detail to support their thoughts and reasons. Ideas may be generic, popular opinion, or impersonal.
7.5 to >5.9 ptsThe student provides a vague or incoherent personal nursing philosophy. The student does not include details to support their thoughts and reasons. Ideas may be confusing or incomplete.
5.9 to >0 ptsThe student does not include a personal nursing philosophy.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/Composition
5 to >4.45 ptsThe assignment is organized in a clear, concise, formal, and well-organized manner. Writing is sophisticated and word choice is thoughtful and professional.
4.45 to >3.75 ptsMost of the writing is clear and organized, but there may be one or two instances where it is not. Most word choice is thoughtful and professional.
3.75 to >2.95 ptsThe writing lacks clarity, conciseness, and organization in many places. Some of the word choice does not reflect professionalism.
2.95 to >0 ptsThe paper is unfocused or contains serious errors with organization. The paper lacks professionalism.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Mechanics
5 to >4.45 ptsThe student uses APA Style accurately and consistently. The assignment meets all formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.
4.45 to >3.75 ptsThe students uses APA Style but there are 1–2 errors. The assignment meets most formatting requirements (length and style). Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with only 3-4 errors.
3.75 to >2.95 ptsThe student reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style and there are 3-4 errors. Teh assignment meets half of the formatting requirements (length and style). Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the assignment.
2.95 to >0 ptsMechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. No attempt to follow the required format is indicated. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
5 pts
Total Points: 30

What concerns or reservations do nurses have about the privacy and security in the digital healthcare landscape?

review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care interventions throughout their plan of care. In particular, the focus will be on the Christian application of the four principles, as well as appropriate options in providing a patient with spiritual care.
Based on the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and reading the topic Resources, complete the “Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis” document in a maximum of 1,500 words, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:
Patient autonomy
Christian perspective and actions related to sickness and health, principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence
Spiritual needs assessment and appropriate interventions for all involved in providing care
Accountability that would demonstrate an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and person-centered care and participatory approach to care
Note: Participatory approach to care calls for involving stakeholders, particularly the participants in a program or those affected by a given policy, in specific aspects of the evaluation process. The approach covers a wide range of different types of participation, and stakeholders can be involved at any stage of the impact evaluation process, including its design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and managing a study.
Also, person-centered care is “empowering people to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services” (WHO, 2021). This care strategy is based on the belief that patient views, input, and experiences can help improve overall health outcomes.
Support your response using only the following Topic 5 Resources:
Chapter 5 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
“Assessing Spiritual Health Through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care”
“Faith-Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families”
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Create a 3-5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question.
INTRODUCTION
PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.
It stands for:
P – Patient/population/problem.
I – Intervention.
C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).
O – Outcome(s).
T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).
The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are starting to apply an evidence-based model or EBPs. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.
You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health PICO(T) Process activity before you develop the plan proposal. This activity offers an opportunity to practice working through creating a PICO(T) question within the context of an issue at a Vila Health facility. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 3 successfully. This is for your own practice and self-assessment and demonstrates your engagement in the course.
SCENARIO
For this assessment, please use the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments.
INSTRUCTIONS
After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.
Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question
In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria:
Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question
Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.).
Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue.
Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 3 Example [PDF]Download Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
Length of submission: Create a 3-5 page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Develop a 2-4 page scholarly paper in which you describe the diagnosis you researched for the previous assessment, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.
The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.
Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:
Evidence-Based Practice Models
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
Stetler Model
Ottawa Model
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode
John Hopkins Model
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model
For this assessment:
Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen diagnosis for this assessment. Your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented diagnosis you selected. Since you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe a chosen diagnosis that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a chosen diagnosis.This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the diagnosis you selected for the first assessment.
Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a chosen diagnosis. Review the literature below and choose the appropriate model for your diagnosis.Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF] and Evidence-Based Practice Models help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
(you should be able to access this link with more info about EBP models
https://connect.springerpub.com/content/book/978-0…
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
Length of submission: 2-4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
Number of references: Cite 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.