I need the final chapter, chapter 5 written to match the data collected throughout the paper. Attached is my current paper, as well as the outlined template for chapter 5.
Category: Education
Because lessons do not stop when a student leaves the classroom, purposeful coll
Because lessons do not stop when a student leaves the classroom, purposeful collaboration with other teachers, staff, and families can help reinforce and expand the student’s knowledge and skills. Whenever possible, teachers should try to engage families in ways that encourage them to have their child practice the math skills at home. Having both the teacher and parents/guardians on the same page helps to support the student.
Read the case study to inform the assignment.
Case Study: Fiona
Grade: 9th
Age: 14
It is the beginning of the second semester, and Fiona is having a great deal of difficulty in her mainstream algebra class. Prior to this year, she was receiving instruction in the resource setting. At her eighth grade transition IEP meeting, her parents expressed their wishes that Fiona be in the mainstream algebra class, despite her special education teacher explaining that low reading comprehension negatively affects the understanding of math concepts. Fiona understands basic concepts of algebra but has not mastered the skills needed to move to the higher-level concepts her class is now working on. Currently, her math performance has been measured two years below grade level and her reading performance one year below grade level. Fiona’s general education math teacher has spoken with her parents about the possible need for additional support, and her parents have agreed to help at home, as they do not want her being pulled out for resource at this time.
The following goals have been identified by the special education teacher collaborating with the general education math teacher for Fiona:
Simplify addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division equations [e.g., (2x + 6) + (4x + 7) = 6x + 13].
Solve expressions with variables (e.g., 3x = -24).
Write and solve the algebraic equation in a real-life word problem.
Part 1: Strategies
As the special education teacher, select two researched-based instructional strategies that could be used to help Fiona meet her identified goals.
Instructional strategies should include:
Explicitly teaching related vocabulary
The use of the concrete-representational-abstract strategies
Graphic organizers
Mnemonic devices
The use of assistive technology
In 250-500 words, summarize the recommended instructional strategies, rationalizing their appropriateness for Fiona’s goals and ability to help motivate Fiona to meet her goals. Include specific tips for implementation.
Part 2: 3 Day Unit Plan
Design a comprehensive mathematics unit plan based on the goals identified for Fiona. Outline three sequenced lesson plans, using the “3 Day Unit Plan Template.”
Your unit plan must include:
Appropriate augmentative and alternative communication systems and assistive technology to make the lesson content more accessible.
Integration of both formative and summative assessments to demonstrate mastery and support the generalization of learning for the student.
Integration of an appropriate ELA writing standard related to Fiona’s third identified goal.
Part 3: Home Connection
In 250-500 words, explain how you plan to involve Fiona’s parents in meeting her goals. Include a specific at-home activity to help in her continued success.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, sold academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
For this preliminary exam, you will continue building on the literature review o
For this preliminary exam, you will continue building on the literature review outline you began in the research methods course last spring semester. Create an 8-10 (double-spaced) page narrative that synthesizes literature relevant to your topic. Organize your response in terms of what is known about the topic, how that knowledge has been produced, and what remains to be known in the literature around your selected research topic. In the first section, discuss the ideas and theories associated with your topic. For example, “Research indicates that involvement with student organizations and clubs positively impact first year students’ transition to campus and sense of belonging (Astin, 1992; Schlossberg, 1984). Use this section to give an overall big picture of what is currently known about your topic. In the next section, overview the methodological genealogy of the literature. In other words, describe previous methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) used within the literature and their associated methods. For example, you might have a statement similar to this, “Researchers have primarily used qualitative methodologies, such as narrative inquiry and case study design, to explore this topic. These researchers generated data through conducting student interviews, reviewing student social media, and observing students throughout the semester.” Use this section to discuss how this topic has been explored through research. In the last section, discuss how your review of the literature supports your previously established problem statement and research questions or how you have been prompted to revise your problem statement or research questions. This section should address what remains to be known (the gap in the literature and what is missing in current literature).
..
Before you begin, please review the following excerpts from Merten’s (2019) Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology.
..
Purpose of a Literature Review
The purpose of the literature review section of a research article is to provide the reader with an overall framework for where this piece of work fits in the “big picture” of what is known about a topic from previous research. Thus, the literature review serves to explain the topic of the research and to build a rationale for the problem that is studied and the need for additional research (p. 89).
..
For Quantitative Studies
Quantitative researchers examine research in order to build a knowledge base of a topic that is sufficient to develop a hypothesis that can be tested and to benefit from guidance in terms of methodology found in prior studies (p. 92).
..
For Qualitative Studies
The researcher should have a good understanding of previous research but remain open to possible emerging hypotheses that would require examination of additional literature during the study. . . . Some qualitative researchers actually suggest that the research questions be formulated before the literature review is conducted in order to guide the literature process. The wording of the questions can then be modified as necessary based on the literature (p. 92).
..
Synthesizing Your Literature
Provide an overview of your topic and describe the methods you used to search the literature. Then provide an advance organizer for the reader of the subtopics that you will address. For each study, make a determination if it is important to report details of its strengths and weaknesses in order to establish the overall picture of knowledge in the field or to provide support for your choice of methods. It is possible to explain several studies in detail and then cite other studies that agree or disagree with the findings of those studies rather than providing a detailed critique of every study in your literature review. . . .The literature review should lead to a statement of the need and purpose for the study, research questions, and hypotheses (pp. 112-113).
..
You may find you need to reorganize your current outline of the literature and/or that you need to gather more sources in order to begin writing your literature review. Make sure your exam response includes the three required components:
What is known: Narrative overview of the literature
How it is known: Discussion on previous methodologies used
What remains to be known (gap in the literature): Problem statement and research questions of your own study and how your review of the literature connects to both
I’ve attached the following documents: a sample outline of a literature review I created last year, a summary of my research topic and key elements to address in the literature review, a document that discusses my dissertation topic (list of several potential dissertation titles) and methodology, and a sample preliminary written exam rubric that my committee will use when grading the final response.
..
Reference
Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (5th ed.). Sage.
just reword it as it is, use the same reference list, do not change anything. th
just reword it as it is, use the same reference list, do not change anything. the assessment is attached for you that you need to work off. please send me the Turnitin report without database storage + AI check. make sure there are no highlighted copied sentence at all. Thank you in advanced
MUST watch the every second of the video and read every words of every articles
MUST watch the every second of the video and read every words of every articles I provided before writing!!!
If you don’t want to spend time to watch video or read articles, don’t work with this order!!!!
All resources need to be read physically by writer himself not using any AI, writing also NO AI using at all.
Instruction:
Read articles first, then go to https://www.timssvideo.com/us3-exponents watch video and attached resources. After you have watched the TIMSS video, and looked at the associated resources (e.g., the Lesson Graph, NRC Comments, etc.), write a 5-10 page written paper, in APA format and incorporating pertinent citations (They should include some the readings I provided but can incorporate other sources as well.), that tailors the readings to the particular instance of teaching you watched. In the paper, make sure you describes:
a. The nature of the mathematical aspects evident in teaching in the video
b. The ways that mathematical work was evident in, or ‘could’ have influenced, the teacher’s planned lesson (even if it did not ‘appear’ to influence their planned lesson).
c. The ways that mathematical work was evident in, or ‘could’ have influenced, the teacher’s enacted instruction (even if it did not ‘appear’ to influence their enacted instruction).
d. The way in which you would structure a teacher education experience in order to best prepare the teacher to engage in the mathematical work for teaching that lesson.
When you cited from video, please provide the exact time of video. Please cite and post some patterns form lesson graph. I will upload an example of this essay. That is for other topic, do not copy or cite anything from the example essay. You can see want I want this essay looks like.
MUST watch the every second of the video and read every words of every articles
MUST watch the every second of the video and read every words of every articles I provided before writing!!!
If you don’t want to spend time to watch video or read articles, don’t work with this order!!!!
All resources need to be read physically by writer himself not using any AI, writing also NO AI using at all.
Instruction:
Read articles first, then go to https://www.timssvideo.com/us3-exponents watch video and attached resources.
After you have watched the TIMSS video, and looked at the associated resources (e.g., the Lesson Graph, NRC Comments, etc.), write a 5-10 page written paper, in APA format and incorporating pertinent citations (They should include some the readings I provided but can incorporate other sources as well.), that tailors the readings to the particular instance of teaching you watched. In the paper, make sure you describes:
a. The nature of the mathematical aspects evident in teaching in the video
b. The ways that mathematical work was evident in, or ‘could’ have influenced, the teacher’s planned lesson (even if it did not ‘appear’ to influence their planned lesson).
c. The ways that mathematical work was evident in, or ‘could’ have influenced, the teacher’s enacted instruction (even if it did not ‘appear’ to influence their enacted instruction).
d. The way in which you would structure a teacher education experience in order to best prepare the teacher to engage in the mathematical work for teaching that lesson.
When you cited from video, please provide the exact time of video. I will upload an example of this essay. That is for other topic, do not copy or cite anything from the example essay. You can see want I want this essay looks like.
Please check Appendix C for details and the chapters for part B. fieldwork Case
Please check Appendix C for details and the chapters for part B. fieldwork Case Analysis. Also for the teacher’s interview helping the student with autism add that the teacher uses accommodations.
Important: I need a 19-page paper (exclusive of title and reference pages), using a minimum of 15 sources in
addition to your course textbook (academic journal articles, dated no older than 2010; sources may include a maximum
of one book other than the assigned course textbook), and paper should demonstrate a polished writing style (APA –
Professional Tone and Style).
Summarize and analyze 1 lesson for any grade between PreK – 3rd grade. For this
Summarize and analyze 1 lesson for any grade between PreK – 3rd grade.
For this assignment, you are required to:
1. Attach the lesson plan used in your critique.
2. Carefully critique the lesson plan in the following areas:
a. Is the lesson plan appropriate for the age group to which it is directed? How do you
know? You will need to cite at least one child developmental source to support your
critique in this area.
b. Is there an appropriate assessment of children’s learning in the lesson plan? How do
you know? Give examples? Does the evaluation match the objective(s) of the lesson?
If evaluation is lacking or inappropriate, give some examples of ways in which
children might be appropriately evaluated based on your own judgment.
c. Is the activity likely to engage children? How do you know this?
d. Which New Jersey Student Learnings Standards are being taught in the lesson.
e. If need be, explain what modifications you would make to the lesson for it to be
appropriate for all children? If no changes are necessary, explain why.
f. Reflect upon and state how your gained knowledge from the course and the textbook
(include at least 3 textbook citations) helped you formulate your analysis of the lesson
plan critique.
Part f (The reflection) should be two–three pages in length and written in APA style. Use the letters
a-f when responding to the above in your paper.
Please follow the professor’s suggestions to revise the previous paper you wrote
Please follow the professor’s suggestions to revise the previous paper you wrote, named ‘4022 final JR’.
However, I was quite surprised to see that you did not cite any of the readings from our class. For me, the most important part of the final paper was being able to see that you understood the theories we studied together, that you had used them as a lens to study the history and think deeply about a place that was important to you, and that you had applied them to analyze the educational context within that place. While I do see some of this in your paper, you chose not to cite any of the theorists or scholars we studied and you did not connect your analysis to a single reading from the course.
Moving forward, one bit of advice I would take from this experience is to always cite readings from the course. While it is a good thing to also weave in your own citations, like you do in this paper, not including any citations from the class doesn’t allow the instructor to see the connections you are making between your analysis in the paper and the content from the course and it makes it harder to discern what you have learned. Also, when it comes to theory, it may be helpful to keep in mind that instructors select the readings for a reason. For example, in this case, although Cedric Robinson is the seminal theorist on racial capitalism, his book is very dense and long, and therefore is not the best introduction to the theory in a short class. So, I chose texts that summarize his contributions in a more succinct and easy to digest manner. I think you would have been better off turning to those readings for your summary of racial capitalism. This is because as it stands, your summary of racial capitalism doesn’t accurately describe the theory.
So, what I am thinking is that if you were able to revise your section on racial capitalism using readings from the class, and weave in at least 4-5 additional readings throughout the paper, (the assignment sheet said to cite at least 5-6 course readings)
Please follow the professor’s suggestions to revise the previous paper you wrote
Please follow the professor’s suggestions to revise the previous paper you wrote, named ‘4022 final JR’.
However, I was quite surprised to see that you did not cite any of the readings from our class. For me, the most important part of the final paper was being able to see that you understood the theories we studied together, that you had used them as a lens to study the history and think deeply about a place that was important to you, and that you had applied them to analyze the educational context within that place. While I do see some of this in your paper, you chose not to cite any of the theorists or scholars we studied and you did not connect your analysis to a single reading from the course.
Moving forward, one bit of advice I would take from this experience is to always cite readings from the course. While it is a good thing to also weave in your own citations, like you do in this paper, not including any citations from the class doesn’t allow the instructor to see the connections you are making between your analysis in the paper and the content from the course and it makes it harder to discern what you have learned. Also, when it comes to theory, it may be helpful to keep in mind that instructors select the readings for a reason. For example, in this case, although Cedric Robinson is the seminal theorist on racial capitalism, his book is very dense and long, and therefore is not the best introduction to the theory in a short class. So, I chose texts that summarize his contributions in a more succinct and easy to digest manner. I think you would have been better off turning to those readings for your summary of racial capitalism. This is because as it stands, your summary of racial capitalism doesn’t accurately describe the theory.
So, what I am thinking is that if you were able to revise your section on racial capitalism using readings from the class, and weave in at least 4-5 additional readings throughout the paper, (the assignment sheet said to cite at least 5-6 course readings)