Using Data from Running Records to Enhance Literacy Instruction

You will complete research on the use of Running Records in Reading Education. Choose one of the following:
1. Research the many uses of Running Records
or 2. Research the Importance of Using Data from Running Records to Effectively Plan for Literacy Instruction
Write a 4-page paper on choice #1 or choice #2. Please use Scholarly Journal Articles on Running Records in Reading Education (actually googling these words will provide many articles you can use to construct your papers).
Proper use of the APA format to cite your sources is required. This paper should include a cover/title page and a reference page (cover/title page and the reference page are not included in the four-page requirement – with the cover/title page and reference page, you should have six pages).
I have attached 3 files that might help facilitate this.

📌 Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

  • Choose one of the two topics:
    1. The importance of using data from running records to effectively plan for literacy instruction.
    2. Research on running records in reading education.
  • The paper must be 4 pages long (excluding the title page and reference page).
  • You must use scholarly journal articles on running records.
  • APA format is required for citations and references.

Step 2: Conduct Research

  • Use Google Scholar or your university’s library database to find peer-reviewed journal articles.
  • Search terms to use:
    • “Running records in reading education”
    • “Using data from running records for literacy instruction”
  • Save at least 3-5 scholarly sources to use as references.

Step 3: Outline Your Paper

A strong structure helps you stay focused. Follow this format:

1️⃣ Title Page (APA Format)

  • Title of your paper
  • Your name
  • Course name
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date

2️⃣ Introduction (½ page – 1 page)

  • Introduce your topic and its significance in reading education.
  • Clearly state your thesis statement (the main argument or focus of your paper).

3️⃣ Body Paragraphs (3-4 pages total)

  • Each paragraph should focus on one main idea supported by research.
  • Use scholarly sources to provide evidence and cite them properly.
  • Possible sections:
    • Definition and Purpose of Running Records
    • How Educators Use Data from Running Records
    • Benefits of Running Records in Literacy Instruction
    • Challenges and Limitations of Running Records

4️⃣ Conclusion (½ page – 1 page)

  • Summarize your main points.
  • Restate your thesis in a new way.
  • Discuss the importance of using running records effectively.

5️⃣ Reference Page (APA Format)

  • List all sources cited in the paper.
  • Ensure proper APA formatting (hanging indent, alphabetical order).

Step 4: Write Your Draft

  • Follow your outline and write your first draft.
  • Use formal academic language and avoid personal opinions.
  • Integrate in-text citations for any ideas or quotes from sources.

Step 5: Edit and Format in APA Style

✅ Check for grammar, clarity, and coherence.
✅ Format the entire paper according to APA guidelines:

  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Double-spaced text
  • 1-inch margins on all sides
  • Page numbers in the top right corner
    ✅ Ensure all citations and the reference page follow APA format.

Final Step: Submit Your Paper

  • Read through your paper one last time.
  • Ensure it meets the length requirement (4 pages of content + title and reference pages).
  • Save as a PDF or Word document and submit before the deadline.

🚀 Now you’re ready to complete your assignment with confidence!

Essential Literacy Resources for New Teachers

Review one literacy website that would be beneficial for new teachers. Share the link and a two-page analysis of the website’s highlights and how new teachers can use it to improve practice. Share a website of your favorite children’s author, perhaps one that focuses on cultural diversity.

Writing a website review and analysis requires a structured approach. Follow this step-by-step guide to complete your assignment successfully.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Choose a Literacy Website for Review

  • Select a website that offers valuable resources for new teachers (e.g., lesson plans, strategies, classroom management tips).
  • Ensure the site is reputable, such as those run by educational organizations, universities, or literacy experts.

Step 2: Analyze the Website’s Highlights

  • Explore key features such as:
    • Free lesson plans and teaching materials
    • Research-based literacy strategies
    • Professional development opportunities
    • Interactive tools for student engagement
  • Consider how easy it is to navigate and whether it offers practical classroom applications.

Step 3: Discuss How New Teachers Can Use It to Improve Practice

  • Explain how teachers can integrate the site’s resources into their daily instruction.
  • Provide examples of lesson plans, reading interventions, or assessment tools available on the site.
  • Mention any additional support, such as webinars, forums, or expert advice.

Step 4: Choose a Children’s Author Website

  • Pick an author known for diverse, inclusive literature (e.g., Jacqueline Woodson, Yuyi Morales, Matt de la Peña).
  • Highlight the author’s contributions to children’s literature and how their books promote cultural awareness and inclusivity.
  • Share the website link and mention any educational resources available for teachers.

Step 5: Format Your Analysis Properly

  • Use APA formatting if required.
  • Include headings, subheadings, and citations for organization.
  • Proofread for clarity and coherence before submitting.

By following this structured guide, you’ll create a thorough and insightful analysis of both a literacy website and a children’s author website. Happy writing! 📚✨

Comparative Analysis of Literacy Assessments: Understanding Their Role in Evaluating Student Learning

For this assignment, follow APA guidelines.
The paper needs a proper title page, a reference page, and in-text citations.
Within the Comparative Analysis of the Literacy Assessments, you will provide an extensive overview of each assessment. You will also share the similarities between the assessments, as well as the differences.
Darrell Morris Spelling Assessment
Letter Recognition Assessment
Reception Key Words in Reading and Spelling Assessment
Language Experience Approach Assessment
In short, how do the assessments relate to one another? Do they extend, complicate, contradict, correct or debate one another? By the end of your analysis paper, share which of the two assessments resonates more with you and why.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of the Assignment

This paper requires you to compare and analyze four literacy assessments:

  • Darrell Morris Spelling Assessment
  • Letter Recognition Assessment
  • Reception Key Words in Reading and Spelling Assessment
  • Language Experience Approach Assessment

Your goal is to examine how these assessments relate to one another. Do they extend, complicate, contradict, correct, or debate each other? By the end, you should also state which two assessments resonate with you the most and why.

Step 2: Research Each Assessment

Dedicate a section of your paper to each assessment. Provide a detailed overview, explaining:

  • What the assessment measures (e.g., spelling skills, letter recognition, reading and spelling ability, language experience)
  • How the assessment is conducted (e.g., structured test, observation-based, student-centered)
  • Who the target audience is (e.g., early learners, struggling readers)
  • The strengths and limitations of each assessment

Step 3: Compare the Assessments

Identify similarities and differences between the four assessments. Consider:

  • Do they assess literacy in a similar way?
  • Do they build upon each other, or do they challenge each other’s effectiveness?
  • Are any of them more practical or research-backed?

Step 4: Synthesize Your Findings

  • Organize your analysis logically, grouping assessments that share similar characteristics.
  • Use evidence to support your claims, referencing credible sources where necessary.

Step 5: Conclude with Your Personal Reflection

  • Select two assessments that resonate with you the most.
  • Explain why these assessments stand out—do they align with your perspective on literacy instruction? Are they more effective or practical in real-world settings?

Step 6: Review and Edit

  • Ensure your paper follows a clear structure: Introduction, Body (with assessment comparisons), Conclusion.
  • Proofread for grammar, clarity, and coherence.
  • Cite any sources used in your research properly.

By following this guide, you’ll be able to structure your analysis paper effectively and present a strong, well-supported argument!

Parenting a Child with a Disability: Benefits, Challenges, and School Support

In the week’s readings, you learned about the benefits and challenges associated with having a child with a disability. For this discussion, revisit your chosen school in the Blooming Park: Meet the Class media piece. (MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL)
Select one student to focus on in this discussion. In your post, identify the student you selected, and assume you are the parent of that child. Address the following questions in your post:
What benefits have you experienced as the parent of your child? What about the challenges?
How have your child’s challenges affected your family’s dynamics?
What school personnel have had the most impact on your child’s learning? What steps have you taken to develop a strong working relationship with these professionals

Struggling with where to start this exam? Follow this guide to tackle your short-essay responses easily!

Parenting a Child with a Disability: Navigating Benefits and Challenges

For this discussion, I have chosen [Student’s Name] from Madison Middle School in the Blooming Park: Meet the Class media piece. As their parent, I have experienced both joys and challenges while supporting their educational journey.

Benefits and Challenges

One of the biggest benefits of raising my child is the resilience and unique perspective they bring to our family. Their determination to overcome obstacles has inspired us all, and I have developed a deeper sense of advocacy, patience, and appreciation for small victories. However, the challenges include navigating complex educational systems, securing appropriate accommodations, and managing daily routines that require additional time and effort.

Impact on Family Dynamics

My child’s challenges have influenced our family dynamics by fostering a sense of teamwork and empathy. Siblings have learned patience and inclusion, but at times, they may feel overshadowed by the extra attention and support their sibling needs. As parents, we have had to balance self-care, marital relationships, and sibling needs while advocating for our child.

School Personnel & Collaboration

The special education teacher and occupational therapist have had the most impact on my child’s learning. To build a strong partnership, I have attended IEP meetings, maintained open communication through emails and conferences, and collaborated on setting realistic goals. Additionally, I have volunteered in school activities and sought feedback on how to best support my child’s learning at home.

By fostering strong relationships with school professionals, I ensure my child receives the best possible support while advocating for their success in and beyond the classroom. 🚀

upporting Families and Students with Special Needs: Insights from a Parent Interview and Effective Strategies for Family Engagement and Differentiated Instruction

Step 1: Watch a Special needs Parent interview: watch from the beginning till 48:20 minute mark. Step 2: Write at least 3 complete Pages of an overview of the parent interview that you watched . Step 3: Reactions to the Parent Video Step 4: Family Engagement and Differentiated Instruction Plan- At least 2 complete pages- Write this essay style with no bullet points or similar things

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide to Structuring and Writing Your Paper on a Special Needs Parent Interview and Family Engagement

This assignment involves several steps, but breaking it down will make it more manageable. Here’s a detailed guide on how to approach each step of the assignment effectively.

Step 1: Watch the Special Needs Parent Interview

  • Action: Start by watching the interview from the beginning until the 48:20-minute mark, paying close attention to the details shared by the parent. Try to note the challenges they discuss, how they navigate their child’s special needs, and any insights they offer into the experience of parenting a child with special needs.

Step 2: Write a 3-Page Overview of the Parent Interview

  • Introduction: Begin with a brief introduction about the parent interview. Mention the general purpose of the video (e.g., to share experiences about raising a child with special needs) and any context or background that helps frame the discussion. Identify the parent’s child’s needs and any relevant challenges they face.

    Example:
    In this interview, a parent of a child with autism shares their experiences navigating the world of special education, the medical system, and day-to-day challenges. The parent discusses how they advocate for their child’s needs in various settings, offering insights into both the rewards and difficulties of parenting a child with special needs.

  • Main Content (Body): Provide an overview of the parent’s key points during the interview. Focus on the following:

    • Challenges they face: Discuss the challenges they experience, such as issues with education, healthcare, and socialization. Provide examples shared in the interview.
    • Support systems: What kind of support does the parent receive? This could be from family, friends, therapists, or school professionals.
    • Their coping strategies: Describe any strategies they use to handle challenges, including resources they rely on or any approaches to managing their child’s behavior.
    • Positive aspects or hope: If the parent discussed any positive experiences, hope, or advice, make sure to include this as well.

    Example:
    The parent explains how navigating the school system has been one of the greatest challenges, often feeling as though they must fight for proper accommodations. However, they also speak about the value of finding a supportive community and the satisfaction that comes from watching their child achieve small milestones.

  • Conclusion: Wrap up the overview by summarizing the main points shared by the parent. Reflect briefly on what you learned from the interview and how it provided insights into the experience of being a parent of a child with special needs.

    Example:
    Overall, the interview provides a candid and insightful look into the daily realities of raising a child with special needs. It highlights both the emotional and practical challenges while showcasing the resilience and dedication required for success.

Step 3: Reactions to the Parent Video (2-3 Paragraphs)

  • Your Reactions: In this section, provide your personal reactions to the parent’s story. Consider your emotional response, what surprised you, and any new insights you gained. Reflect on how the parent’s experiences impacted your understanding of the challenges and rewards of raising a child with special needs.

    Example:
    Watching the interview was an emotional experience for me. I was struck by the parent’s sense of determination despite the many obstacles they face. It made me reflect on how important it is for educators and community members to offer more support for families like theirs. I was also surprised by how often the parent had to advocate for their child, even in situations where I had assumed support would already be in place.

Step 4: Family Engagement and Differentiated Instruction Plan (2 Pages)

  • Introduction: Start by briefly explaining the concepts of family engagement and differentiated instruction. Mention why they are important in the context of special education.

    Example:
    Family engagement refers to the active involvement of families in the education and well-being of their children, particularly in a special education setting. Differentiated instruction, on the other hand, refers to tailoring teaching methods to accommodate the varied needs and learning styles of students. In this section, I will explore how these concepts can be applied to improve the educational experience for students with special needs.

  • Family Engagement Strategies: Discuss ways to engage families in the educational process, particularly for families of children with special needs. How can schools, teachers, or other professionals facilitate this engagement? Provide suggestions based on research or theories about family involvement.

    Example:
    One effective way to engage families is through regular, open communication between teachers and parents. Teachers can hold periodic meetings, both in person and virtually, to discuss the child’s progress, challenges, and any necessary accommodations. Additionally, schools could offer workshops or resources to educate parents about special education rights and how they can advocate for their child. The goal is to create a partnership where both the family and school work together toward the child’s success.

  • Differentiated Instruction Plan: Provide specific suggestions for how teachers can use differentiated instruction to support students with special needs in the classroom. This could include varied teaching methods, flexible assignments, and individualized learning goals.

    Example:
    In a differentiated instruction plan for a student with autism, the teacher might use visual aids and social stories to help the student understand classroom expectations. The teacher could also provide alternative assignments that allow the student to demonstrate understanding in different formats, such as through drawings or oral presentations. By tailoring instruction to the student’s strengths and challenges, the teacher can create an inclusive learning environment where the student can thrive.

  • Conclusion: Wrap up by summarizing the importance of family engagement and differentiated instruction in supporting children with special needs. Mention how these two strategies can work together to create a holistic approach to special education.

    Example:
    When family engagement and differentiated instruction are combined, they create a powerful support system that ensures the child receives the academic and emotional support they need. Together, they foster an environment where children with special needs can succeed, and their families feel empowered to contribute to their learning journey.

Final Checks:

  • Proofread and Revise: Ensure that your paper is clear and well-organized. Check for spelling, grammar, and clarity.
  • Ensure all steps are covered: Double-check that you have followed all steps of the assignment and provided sufficient depth in each section.

Understanding the Classroom Environment and Student Needs: A Comprehensive Report

Please see attached rubric and samples. Samples should NOT be copied, they are only there for guidance. Assignment should be done for a class of 20 boys, aged 7.
Task 1: Learners and Environment
Effective teachers have a strong understanding of their students in order to make sound and research-based instructional decisions that promote student development and learning. To truly understand their students, they must have a deep awareness of students’ life experiences as shaped by their families, communities, and school and appropriately reflect upon this knowledge to guide their practice.
Teacher Candidates will prepare a 3–5-page written report in which they describe responses to Parts 1, 2 and 3 below. Teacher Candidates should take caution in using professional language that presents the characteristics factually and without judgment. The information gathered for this project should remain confidential. Teacher Candidates should use initials or professional pseudonyms for the school, teachers, and students.
Part 1 – Knowledge of Learning Environment: Teachers work with all students to create a dynamic learning environment that supports achievement and growth. Your response will indicate what is known about the classroom, school, and community and how it may impact student learning.
Respond to the following regarding the community:
Describe the diversity of the communities from which the students are drawn. Information on a variety of forms of diversity such as race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, languages spoken, religious affiliations, political affiliations, and geography.
Describe the community resources that are available within the neighborhoods from which the students are drawn (libraries, religious organizations, after school programs, athletic programs, arts and cultural centers, social services, extra-curricular activities, etc.).
Respond to the following regarding the school:
Describe the school setting (rural, urban, suburban, private, public, etc.) and your role in the classroom.
Describe the organization of the school. Identify features such as the number of classrooms, teachers, students; and the special services available including library, computer lab, offices, gym, lunchroom, student support services, extra-curricular activities, etc.

Respond to the following regarding the classroom:
Describe how specific classroom routines and procedures meet the specific learning needs of individual students.
Describe how classroom rules and consequences meet individual student needs or ways in which they have been modified to meet individual student needs.
List the classroom rules and consequences for noncompliance.
Describe the individual and group extrinsic and intrinsic incentives in the classroom.
Identify the strategies used to develop and promote positive relationships with students, among classmates, and with families.
Describe the organization of the classroom. This may include information such as the furniture in the classroom, seating arrangements, technology, displays, bulletin boards, windows, orientation of teacher space, etc.
Part 2 – Knowledge of Students: Teacher candidates will demonstrate the ability to assess student’s individual needs within the classroom and identify appropriately aligned research-based practices to incorporate into planning that promotes student development, learning, and achievement. Your response will describe the students in this class and what is known about the prior learning.
Respond to the following regarding the students:
What is the grade level and how many students are in the class?
What are similarities and differences among student diversities, including racial, ethnic, religious, linguistic, gender, family structure, and socio-economic?
What are the learning characteristics of the students (academic ability, developmental, exceptionality, learning styles, motivational factors, behaviors, etc.)?
What do you know about the students’ prior learning and how will that affect your instructional approach?

Part 3 – Reflection
Thinking about this classroom environment and its impact on student engagement, learning, and motivation, identify specific examples of what you feel works well and why?
Describe changes you would make if this were your own classroom based on your observation and experience with this classroom placement.
Describe how the information gathered about the students and the learning environment influence your planning for instruction.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Report on Learners and Environment

This assignment asks you to write a detailed report that reflects your understanding of the classroom environment, students’ needs, and how these elements influence instructional decisions. Here’s how to break down and approach the paper effectively:


1. Understand the Assignment Requirements

You are asked to prepare a 3-5 page written report, broken down into three main sections: Knowledge of Learning Environment, Knowledge of Students, and Reflection. Each section requires you to address specific aspects of the classroom and school context. Remember that confidentiality is crucial—use initials or pseudonyms for any identifying information about the school, students, or teachers.


2. Part 1: Knowledge of Learning Environment

This section requires you to explore how the community, school, and classroom impact student learning. Use the following guidelines to structure your response:

Community

  • Diversity of the community: Describe the different forms of diversity in the community, such as race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, languages spoken, and religious affiliations.
  • Community resources: Identify resources that are available to students and families, like libraries, religious organizations, after-school programs, sports activities, and social services.

School

  • School setting: Describe the type of school (e.g., rural, urban, suburban, private, public) and your role within the classroom. Are you a teaching assistant, student teacher, or another role?
  • School organization: Outline the number of classrooms, teachers, and students in the school. Describe any special services available, such as the library, computer lab, gym, student support services, and extracurricular activities.

Classroom

  • Classroom routines: Describe how the classroom routines and procedures meet the needs of individual students. Do they help create an inclusive learning environment?
  • Classroom rules and consequences: List the classroom rules and the consequences for noncompliance. Have they been adjusted for specific student needs?
  • Incentives: Identify any intrinsic and extrinsic incentives used in the classroom to motivate students.
  • Promoting relationships: Describe strategies used to build positive relationships between students, classmates, and families.
  • Classroom organization: Detail the classroom layout, including furniture arrangement, seating, technology, displays, and other features like windows and bulletin boards.

3. Part 2: Knowledge of Students

This section focuses on your understanding of the students in the class and their learning characteristics. Use the following prompts to guide your responses:

Student Demographics

  • Class information: What grade level is the class? How many students are in it?
  • Student diversity: What similarities and differences exist among students regarding race, ethnicity, religion, language, family structure, and socio-economic status?

Learning Characteristics

  • Student learning characteristics: Describe students’ academic abilities, developmental stages, learning styles, and motivational factors. Are there any students with exceptionalities or specific learning needs?
  • Prior learning: What do you know about the students’ prior learning experiences? How does this impact your teaching approach and your lesson planning?

4. Part 3: Reflection

In this section, you’ll reflect on how the classroom environment and student characteristics influence learning and motivation. Use the following prompts to guide your reflection:

What Works Well

  • Identify specific examples of what is working well in the classroom and explain why. Does the classroom layout promote learning? Are students engaged? How do the routines and incentives contribute to positive behavior?

Changes You Would Make

  • Think about what you would do differently if this were your classroom. Consider changes to the environment, rules, or teaching strategies to better meet students’ needs.

Influence on Instruction

  • Reflect on how your knowledge of the students and the classroom environment will influence your planning for instruction. How will you adapt your lessons to meet the diverse needs of your students?

5. Formatting Requirements

  • Length: Your report should be 3-5 pages long, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font and 1-inch margins.
  • Professional Language: Ensure your tone is professional and objective. Present your observations factually without judgment.
  • Confidentiality: Do not use real names of students or teachers. Use initials or pseudonyms as needed.
  • APA Format: If required, ensure that any citations are formatted according to APA guidelines. Include a reference page if necessary.

6. Review and Proofread

  • After writing your report, carefully review and proofread it. Ensure all parts of the assignment are addressed clearly and coherently.
  • Double-check that you’ve adhered to the formatting guidelines and maintained confidentiality throughout your report.
  • Ask yourself if the reflection section is thoughtful and how well you’ve articulated how the environment impacts learning.

Final Tips

  • Be descriptive and clear when discussing the community, school, and classroom, as these elements are critical in shaping your understanding of the students.
  • Don’t rush through the reflection section—this is where you connect your observations to teaching strategies and learning outcomes.
  • Stay focused on how the classroom environment can positively impact student learning and engagement.

By following this guide step-by-step, you’ll be able to write a thorough and well-organized report that addresses all aspects of the assignment and reflects your understanding of the students and their learning environment.

The Relationship Between Leadership and Organizational Productivity: A Conceptual Framework”

nstructions: Building on what you developed in your Concept Proposal, ‘elevator speech’ from Week 2, Problem Statement, Research Questions, and Summary you wrote to close Chapter 1, draft an outline of a literature review.
Preparation: Start by reading the EdD Dissertation Content Guide Links to an external site. before getting started on your outline. Understanding these guidelines is crucial before you begin drafting your outline.
Outline Development: Use Your Previous Work: Incorporate elements from your Concept Proposal and Chapter 1, including:
The ‘elevator speech’ from Week 2.
The Problem Statement and Research Questions.
The Summary concluding Chapter 1.
Outline Components:
Introduction:
Draft 1-2 bullet points summarizing each of the following prompts:
The problem you are addressing.
The purpose of your study.
The research questions your literature review aims to answer.
How your literature review will be organized and why (i.e., chronologically; based on a particular theory, etc.).
The theoretical or conceptual framework.
Constructs (Topics):
List 5 to 7 main constructs (topics that you will convert in to sections organized by headings) you plan to explore in Chapter 2 of your dissertation:
For each construct:
Create at least two sub-bullets to delve into related subtopics.
Support each construct with in-text citations from at least two scholarly articles or sources that clarify the construct. For example, if “toxic leadership” is a construct, include it as a main bullet and provide citations that offer insight into toxic leadership that will become a section of your literature review (Chapter 2).
Search Terms:
List the search terms you’ve used to gather literature on your topic. This will help peers and your instructor understand how you’ve sourced your information.
Formatting and Standards:
Follow Required Structure:
Ensure your outline includes all necessary headings.
Include a title page for your outline.
Adhere to Writing Standards:
Your document should meet ACU Writing Expectations, including proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and organization.
References and in-text citations must follow APA formatting guidelines.
Minimum of 2 pages of text for the outline.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

1. Preparation: Review the EdD Dissertation Content Guide

Before starting your outline, it’s essential to familiarize yourself with the EdD Dissertation Content Guide. This guide will give you insight into the structure and formatting requirements for your literature review outline. Take note of any specific formatting rules and section requirements, as this will shape your outline.

2. Use Your Previous Work

You’ve already developed key elements like the Concept Proposal, the ‘elevator speech’ from Week 2, the Problem Statement, Research Questions, and Chapter 1 Summary. These will serve as the foundation for your literature review outline. Your previous work helps ensure that your review stays focused and aligned with your research goals.

  • Elevator Speech (Week 2): This brief overview will help you clarify the essence of your topic and keep your literature review tightly connected to your main focus.
  • Problem Statement: Refer to your problem statement to highlight the issue you’re addressing in the literature review. The problem statement will guide the context and direction of the research.
  • Research Questions: Your research questions will directly inform the themes and sections of your literature review. They act as the map to guide the areas of exploration in your study.
  • Summary of Chapter 1: Use this to create a clear picture of how your literature review should relate to the introduction and goals you’ve already set in Chapter 1.

3. Outline Development

The outline will follow a clear structure. Here’s how you can break it down:

Title Page:

Include a title page at the start of your outline. Make it concise, clear, and related to the content of your dissertation.

Introduction:

This section sets the stage for your literature review. You should aim to include 1-2 bullet points for each of the following prompts:

  • The Problem You Are Addressing: Briefly restate the problem that your study will tackle. For example, “The impact of ineffective leadership on organizational productivity in education.”
  • The Purpose of Your Study: Summarize the purpose of your study in 1-2 sentences. For example, “This study aims to explore the relationship between leadership styles and organizational outcomes.”
  • The Research Questions: Reiterate your research questions, as these will shape the structure of the review. For example, “How does transformational leadership influence employee engagement?”
  • How Your Literature Review Will Be Organized: Decide on how to organize your literature review. Common methods include:
    • Chronologically: Discuss how the understanding of your topic has evolved over time.
    • Thematically: Group the literature around specific themes or constructs.
    • Methodologically: Organize by the types of methods used in the research.
    • By Theory: If your study relies on a particular theoretical framework, organize the literature around that.
    • Theoretical or Conceptual Framework: Identify and briefly describe the framework that guides your study. This could be a leadership theory, a psychological model, or a sociological framework, depending on your topic.

Constructs (Main Topics):

List 5 to 7 key constructs or topics that will form the sections of your literature review. Each construct will become a main section, with sub-topics supporting it. For each construct:

  • Main Bullet (Construct): Define the core concept and briefly explain its relevance to your study.
  • Sub-bullets (Subtopics): Provide more specific areas of focus for each construct. This helps break down the broader topic into manageable sections.
  • Scholarly Sources: For each construct, include at least two scholarly articles or sources that provide insight into that topic. This will be used to support your discussion in the literature review. For example:
    • Leadership Styles:
      • Transformational leadership (Author, Year)
      • Transactional leadership (Author, Year)
    • Toxic Leadership:
      • Definition and impact on organizational culture (Author, Year)
      • Case studies of toxic leadership in education (Author, Year)

Search Terms:

List the search terms you’ve used to gather literature on your topic. These will help clarify the scope of your research and ensure that your sources are relevant. Example search terms:

  • “leadership styles in education”
  • “toxic leadership impact on productivity”
  • “organizational behavior in schools”
  • “transformational leadership and employee engagement”

Formatting and Standards:

Be sure to adhere to these structural and writing standards:

  • Structure: Follow the required structure for your outline, including all necessary headings.
  • Writing Standards: Your document should meet ACU Writing Expectations. Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation, and organization. Ensure that your citations and references follow APA formatting guidelines.
  • Length: The outline should be at least 2 pages of text, excluding the title page.

Final Tips:

  • Clarity: Make sure your outline is clear and logical. This is a plan for your literature review, so it should be easy to follow and organized.
  • Use Bullet Points: Bullet points will help break down complex information and make your outline easy to read.
  • Stay Focused: Stick to the key topics and avoid unnecessary details. This is just an outline, so brevity and focus are essential.

By following these steps, you’ll have a strong and organized outline for your literature review that sets the foundation for your dissertation’s next steps.

Understanding the Role of Rituals in Ancient Greek and Roman Religious Practices

1. Focus on a core idea from the assigned texts that you consider important. It may seem like the most central idea, or one that has led to an “aha!” moment for you or one that you find problematic. A prompt to guide you as to the focus of your reading response will be suggested by the instructor at the start of the respective module.
2. Choose a key quote from one of the readings that illustrates this idea for you and explain why.
3. Then discuss how each of the readings connects to this idea. Do the authors say similar or different things? How do they provide different insights on it?
A reading response asks you to examine, explain and reflect on your personal reactions to the reading. Your response is not an opinion piece and should not simply summarize content, but rather are brief works of reflective educational analysis interrogating the document using critical perspective-taking. As you do this over and over, you will develop stronger critical thinking skills, approach educational sources with greater awareness, and understand how educators use such sources to construct educational prompts.
There is no right or wrong answer to a reader’s response. Nonetheless, it is important that you demonstrate an understanding of the reading and clearly explain and support your reactions.
Submission format
1. A reading response is a full 2 pages long (double-spaced) and thoroughly proofread for spelling and grammar.
2. Give your paper a catchy title, i.e. not “Reading response #2.”
3. Do not include a title page or a separate Works Cited page – what you turn in should be no more than 2 pages under any circumstances.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

1. Choose a Core Idea

Begin by selecting a core idea from Greek and Roman Religions by Rebecca I. Denova that stands out to you. This could be a concept you find especially interesting, or one that sparked an “aha!” moment for you. For example, it could be an idea about the nature of Roman or Greek religious practice, how they viewed gods, or how religion influenced politics. It should be an idea that you can explore deeply.

To guide you, think about the big-picture themes in the book:

  • How do the ancient Greeks and Romans perceive their gods and divine intervention?
  • What role did religious rituals and beliefs play in their daily lives?
  • How did religion serve the state or the community?

Once you’ve chosen your core idea, write a few notes on what stood out to you. Think about how this idea shaped your understanding of the reading.

2. Select a Key Quote

Next, find a key quote from the reading that captures the essence of this idea. The quote should clearly reflect or support the core concept you’ve chosen. It may be a passage that summarizes the central argument or one that makes you reconsider an aspect of the religious practices discussed in the text.

For example, if your idea focuses on the role of rituals, you might choose a quote that discusses how specific rituals were tied to divine favor. After you’ve chosen the quote, explain why you find it significant. What does it reveal about the core idea, and why does it resonate with you?

3. Connect the Readings to Your Chosen Idea

Here’s where you can critically analyze the different perspectives in the readings:

  • Do the authors discuss the same ideas in a similar way, or do they provide differing interpretations?
  • How do the readings contribute different insights into the core idea you’ve chosen?
  • Are there any contradictions between the readings that you find interesting? How do these differences deepen or complicate your understanding of the core idea?

Think about whether Denova’s analysis aligns with or challenges other perspectives on ancient religion. Compare the text to other readings or lectures if necessary.

4. Write Your Response

Once you’ve identified the core idea and the key quote, it’s time to write your response. Your paper should be:

  • 2 pages long (double-spaced): Be sure to stay within the page limit, focusing on clarity and depth of analysis.
  • Reflective: Your response should engage with the material, showing your understanding and analysis, not just a summary of what was read.
  • Critical: Evaluate and discuss the text, showing how it connects to your understanding of the core idea.
  • Proofread: Make sure your work is free of grammatical and spelling errors to maintain academic professionalism.

5. Give Your Response a Catchy Title

Instead of a generic title like “Reading Response #2,” come up with a creative title that reflects the core idea or theme of your response. Make it engaging and reflective of your focus.

Banned Book Review: A Critical Analysis of [Book Title]

The purpose of completing this assignment is to critically review a book from the ALA’s banned book list, providing a perspective on the reasons for its restriction and the implications of such actions. This review aims to offer a comprehensive analysis — including a synopsis, rationale for banning, key quotes, arguments against restriction, potential pedagogical challenges, and the impact on readers if the book were removed from the curriculum. Hi. Your book review of the banned book needs to be between 7-10 pages, double spaced, one inch margins, 12 point font, and in APA format. Must be submitted as .Doc or .PDF. Please don’t use Google Docs unless you are sure you have given me access to the document. I don’t have a minimum of sources you should use, but your analysis of the book should definitely be making reference to many of the sources from the course we have read/watched up to this point. Just because this assignment is part of specific module doesn’t mean that materials from other modules shouldn’t be used. You should be showing me your critical analysis skills in this review. It’s not just a summary. And it’s not just your “opinion.” You should use the materials from the course in your analysis of the book. If you use AI you must only use it as support for your own writing. You must never use it in replacement of your own writing. If you use AI (and I expect most will), you must acknowledge it and when appropriate it, cite it when you do. Your citation should be in APA format. Integrity is a key disposition for an educator and I expect you to be operating at the highest standard when it comes to using AI in your work. Thank you. Task Review a book on the banned book list put out by the ALA (see below). Your review should provide readers with: A synopsis of the book; The rationale for why some people are trying to restrict or ban it from schools and/or libraries; Direct quotes from the book that give readers a sense of why some people want it banned or restricted; A discussion of why some people think it shouldn’t be restricted or banned; An analysis of the ideas that would be made unavailable to readers if the book under consideration was restricted or banned from the school curriculum; A consideration of some of the pedagogical challenges that teaching the book would present to teachers; Your essay should be typed, double-spaced, use 12-point type, have one inch margins, and saved as a Word Doc or PDF. It must adhere to the university’s writing standards. You must cite at least five sources from the course materials in your review. You must use APA format for all citations. Any use of AI in your review must be cited. If AI is used in any way and not cited it is considered cheating and you will fail the assignment. Banned Book List Pick one to review (Just as a reminder, if you use AI or cut/paste content from the internet, you must cite it as you would any other source, otherwise it’s considered cheating.) Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe All Boys Aren’t Blue by George M. Johnson The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison Flamer by Mike Curato Looking for Alaska by John Green The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Perez A Court of Mist and Fury by Sarah J. Maas Crank by Ellen Hopkins Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews This Book Is Gay by Juno Dawson Rubric EDFD449 Assignment Rubric EDFD449 Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Course Materials 40 to >20.0 pts Excellent Effectively integrates course materials into the assignments and cites materials in APA format. Shows a deep and critical understanding the materials by being “in conversation” with the authors and content producers. Makes meaningful connections between quotes and the broader context of the Module’s themes and topics. Shows a critical understanding of the conflicts and ambiguities in the materials and subjects under investigation. 20 to >10.0 pts Satisfactory Somewhat effectively integrates course materials into the assignments and doesn’t always cite materials in APA format. Shows a somewhat superficial understanding of the materials and doesn’t engage the author’s in meaningful or critical ways. Makes occasionally meaningful connections between quotes and the broader context of the Module’s themes and topics. Shows a basic understanding of the conflicts and ambiguities in the materials and subjects under investigation. 10 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Poor integration of course materials. Reliance on cherry-picked quotes without clear explanation of their relevance. Fails to demonstrate understanding of the broader context or complexity of the issues. 40 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Reflection 30 to >15.0 pts Excellent Demonstrates high levels of sophistication in tackling complex and controversial issues. Provides critical self and social reflection, making meaningful self-to-text-world connections. Shows honesty, integrity, professionalism, and commitment in all work. 15 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Addresses complex issues but lacks depth. Some critical reflection is present, but self-to-text-world connections are weak or superficial. Generally honest and professional, but commitment is inconsistent. 5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Struggles with addressing complex issues. Minimal critical reflection and weak self-to-text-world connections. Issues with honesty, professionalism, and commitment are evident. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Standard English Usage 30 to >15.0 pts Excellent Writing is clear, coherent, and fluid. Consistently uses Standard English grammar and syntax. Demonstrates ability to integrate course materials seamlessly into writing. 15 to >5.0 pts Satisfactory Writing is generally clear but may have minor issues with coherence and fluidity. Mostly uses Standard English grammar and syntax, with occasional errors. Course materials are integrated, but not always seamlessly. 5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Writing lacks clarity and coherence. Frequent errors in Standard English grammar and syntax. Poor integration of course materials, leading to disjointed and confusing writing. 30 pts Total Points: 100

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide for Writing Your Banned Book Review

This assignment requires you to critically analyze a book from the American Library Association’s (ALA) banned book list. Your review should go beyond a simple summary and instead engage deeply with the book’s themes, the reasons behind its restriction, and its educational value. Follow this structured approach to ensure your paper meets all requirements.


Step 1: Choose a Book from the Banned List

Pick one of the books from the provided list. If you haven’t read the book yet, make sure to allocate time to read it carefully while taking notes on key themes, controversial elements, and how they relate to broader discussions on censorship and education.


Step 2: Structure Your Paper

Your review should follow a logical structure with clear sections. Here’s how to organize it:

1. Title Page (APA Format)

  • Title of your paper
  • Your name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date

2. Introduction (1-1.5 pages)

  • Introduce the book: Include the title, author, and a brief background on its publication.
  • State the purpose of your review: Explain that you will analyze the book’s content, why it was banned, and its implications for education and society.
  • Present your thesis: Take a stance on whether or not you believe the book should be restricted and why.

3. Synopsis of the Book (1-2 pages)

  • Provide a concise summary of the book’s plot, main themes, and key characters.
  • Avoid excessive detail—focus on elements that are relevant to the controversy surrounding the book.

4. Why Was the Book Banned? (1-2 pages)

  • Research and summarize the reasons why this book has been challenged or removed from schools/libraries.
  • Identify the groups or individuals advocating for its removal.
  • Provide direct quotes from the book that critics argue make it inappropriate.
  • Discuss any specific incidents where the book was banned or challenged (include locations and school districts, if possible).

5. Arguments Against the Ban (1-2 pages)

  • Discuss why others argue that the book should not be banned or restricted.
  • Explain its literary, cultural, or educational significance.
  • Provide quotes or arguments from educators, librarians, or free speech advocates.
  • Reference sources from the course materials to strengthen your argument.

6. Implications of Banning the Book (1-1.5 pages)

  • What ideas or perspectives would be lost if the book were removed from the curriculum?
  • How might this affect students’ ability to engage with important social, historical, or cultural issues?
  • Discuss the potential impact on intellectual freedom and academic exploration.

7. Pedagogical Challenges (1-1.5 pages)

  • Identify the challenges teachers might face when teaching this book.
  • Discuss possible ways to address sensitive content in a classroom setting.
  • Offer strategies for educators to facilitate meaningful discussions around the book.

8. Conclusion (1 page)

  • Restate your thesis and summarize your key arguments.
  • Reflect on the broader significance of book censorship.
  • Offer your final thoughts on how educators and society should handle controversial literature.

Step 3: Formatting and Citation Guidelines

  • APA Format: Ensure all citations and references follow APA style.
  • Length: 7-10 pages (excluding title page and reference list).
  • Font and Margins: 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, 1-inch margins.
  • Sources: Cite at least five sources from the course materials.
  • AI Use: If AI is used to assist with research or drafting, cite it appropriately in APA format.

Step 4: Final Review Before Submission

  • Proofread: Check for spelling, grammar, and clarity.
  • Verify Citations: Ensure all references are correctly formatted in APA.
  • Save as .Doc or .PDF: Avoid using Google Docs unless you have given access to your instructor.

Final Tip

Approach this assignment with a critical lens—don’t just summarize but analyze the book’s content, the controversy, and its educational implications. Engage deeply with course materials to support your arguments.

By following this guide, you will craft a well-structured, insightful, and academically strong banned book review. Good luck! 🚀

Multi-Dimensional Action Plan of Intervention

INSTRUCTIONS • Create a multi-dimensional action plan of intervention. o What can—or should—you do structurally to address this problem? o What can—or should—you do systemically to address this problem? o What can—or should—you do culturally to address this problem? o What can—or should—you do relating to the political lens (power and influence) to address this problem? • Your action plan of intervention should be balanced according to the “weight” given to the various theories regarding how each theory impacts the issue. • Guidelines for this assignment include: o Body of work is to be 3–5 pages o Double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font o Title page o Headings should be used for each area of the action plan o No references are required but if any are used, a references page is to be included o Current APA format (avoid first-person language)

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide for Creating a Multi-Dimensional Action Plan of Intervention

This assignment involves creating an action plan of intervention using multiple lenses: structural, systemic, cultural, and political. You’ll need to consider how each of these approaches can address the problem at hand and balance them according to the theories you believe are most impactful.

Step 1: Title Page and Introduction

  1. Title Page:
    • Title of the paper (centered, bold, and formatted in title case).
    • Your name and institutional affiliation (university or school).
    • Running head and page number in the header.
  2. Introduction (Approx. 1/2 page):
    • Briefly introduce the problem you’re addressing. Clearly explain the issue at hand, providing necessary context.
    • State the goal of the action plan and briefly describe the four lenses (structural, systemic, cultural, and political) that will be used to address the issue.

Step 2: Structurally Addressing the Problem

  • Define Structure: Consider what structural changes need to be made to address the problem. This can include organizational changes, modifications to policies or procedures, physical environments, or institutional frameworks.
  • Interventions:
    • How can the issue be addressed by adjusting the structure of the organization or system?
    • What specific steps can be taken to create a more supportive or effective framework?
    • What new resources, processes, or methods could be implemented at the structural level?

Example: “One structural intervention could be to revise the existing protocols within schools that handle incidents of bullying. Creating a clear chain of command for reporting, investigating, and responding to these incidents ensures that there are no gaps in the process.”

Step 3: Systemically Addressing the Problem

  • Define System: Look at the systems that influence the issue. Consider how broader social, economic, and organizational systems contribute to the problem.
  • Interventions:
    • How can systemic issues—such as inequality, access to resources, or systemic biases—be addressed?
    • What changes can be made at the systemic level to ensure that the problem is managed more effectively?
    • What strategies can be employed to dismantle harmful systems or promote supportive ones?

Example: “A systemic intervention could involve revising how education systems allocate resources to support students facing mental health challenges, ensuring that funding reaches underserved communities and underfunded schools.”

Step 4: Culturally Addressing the Problem

  • Define Culture: Understand the cultural factors that influence the issue. This can include examining how social norms, values, traditions, or community beliefs contribute to the problem.
  • Interventions:
    • What changes should be made to create a more inclusive or culturally sensitive approach to the issue?
    • How can the community’s cultural norms or values be shifted to better support those impacted by the problem?
    • What culturally appropriate methods or strategies can be used to intervene?

Example: “Culturally, interventions might involve implementing programs that emphasize empathy, respect, and understanding of different cultural backgrounds. In schools, this could mean including diverse cultural perspectives in the curriculum and promoting anti-racism initiatives.”

Step 5: Politically Addressing the Problem (Power and Influence)

  • Define Political Lens: Analyze the role of power, influence, and politics in the situation. Consider how political decisions, power dynamics, and the influence of authority figures shape the issue.
  • Interventions:
    • How can political influence be used to address the problem?
    • What policy changes need to be advocated for at the local, state, or national level?
    • How can power dynamics within institutions or organizations be addressed to ensure that marginalized voices are heard and given the appropriate attention?

Example: “Politically, lobbying for changes in legislation or policy could be a powerful intervention. Advocating for stronger laws around harassment, discrimination, or bullying that protect vulnerable populations might be a first step.”

Step 6: Balancing the Weight of Theories

  • Balance the Theories: Reflect on how each of the above lenses (structural, systemic, cultural, and political) impacts the problem. What weight should each theory carry in your plan? This will depend on the problem you are addressing. For example:
    • A systemic approach might be more impactful for addressing issues related to access to resources.
    • A cultural lens could play a significant role in tackling social stigmas or biases.
    • Structural and political interventions could work in tandem when it comes to changing institutional rules or policies.

Explain why you prioritize certain theories over others and how they work together to form a comprehensive intervention.

Step 7: Conclusion

  • Summarize the Action Plan: Recap the multi-dimensional action plan you’ve laid out. Highlight key interventions from each lens.
  • Final Thoughts: Provide final reflections on how this action plan addresses the problem comprehensively and the expected outcomes of such an intervention. What are the long-term benefits?

Step 8: References

  • Include a properly formatted reference list in APA style. Make sure to cite any resources or theories you referenced while creating the action plan.

Formatting Guidelines

  • Length: 3-5 pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font.
  • Headings: Use appropriate headings for each section of the action plan (i.e., Structural, Systemic, Cultural, Political).
  • APA Style: Follow the APA guidelines for in-text citations and references. Ensure the paper is formatted with a title page and a reference page.