1. Please double-space your answers. 2. The minimum word count is 500 words. 3.

1. Please double-space your answers.
2. The minimum word count is 500 words.
3. A complete final exam will address all three parts.
4. You are required to use 2 readings per a part, each must be from a different author.
This means you will use 6 different authors in total.
5. You are required to include 2 quotes per a part, each must be from a different
author. This means you will have 6 quotes in total, each from a different author.
6. Quotes and the bibliography are excluded from your word count.
7. You must include page numbers for quotes, e.g., (Held, 11). If no page number is
available, please cite as follows: (Kalulu).
8. Include word count (minus quotes) at the top
The goal is to assess your comprehension of course material and your ability
to successfully make connections across material, you must define key terminology (e.g., what is an echo chamber?) and explain
central arguments (e.g., what is Held’s argument against abstraction?) when answering.
Part I:
Please
select two options from the following: (1) deontology, (2) virtue ethics, (3)
utilitarianism, and (4) care ethics.
 Explain each theory and its key terms.
 Explain one significant difference between the two and one point of similarity.
Part II:
Pick one of the theories from your answer in Part I and
choose two items from the list
below. For each item separately, explain what the problem is (or one of the problems)
and what kind of action the theory would recommend you take. Because this answer
builds on your prior one, you should not re-explain the theory again here.
1. Low Rights Environments
2. Astro-colonialism
https://www.vice.com/en/article/k78mnz/spacexs-satellite-megaconstellations-are-astrocolonialism-indigenous-advocates-say
3. Epistemic Bubbles & Echo Chambers
https://aeon.co/essays/why-its-as-hard-to-escape-an-echo-chamber-as-it-is-to-flee-a-cult
4. Racism in A.I. and High-Tech Homelessness
5. Effective Altruism
Part III:
Centered around the role of structural injustice in ethical thinking. One of the
central topics was invisibility (Akiko Busch). Using a specific example of structural injustice, explain the
role of invisibility and how it contributes to this injustice. Finally, provide one example of
how invisibility can be used to resist injustice.