Explain the Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California with a focus on

Explain the Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California with a focus on the facts of the case and its significance for mental health professional’s duty to warn and to protect.
https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/tarasoff-v-regents-university-california-30278 (Links to an external site.)
What is your reaction to Dr. Lynne Fenton’s rationale for not placing James Holmes under involuntary psychiatric hospitalization?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LO21WBnEEs (Links to an external site.)
What do you think would have happened if Dr. Lynne Fenton had initiated a psychiatric hospitalization?
https://www.criminal-lawyer-colorado.com/your-legal-rights/understanding-colorado-mental-health-m-1-holds-27-65-101-a-criminal-defense-perspective.html (Links to an external site.)
What other steps or actions – from peers, family members, or campus professionals – might have deterred James from carrying out the shooting? In other words, do you think people who knew him could have done more to stop him. Explain your answer with a focus on who, when, and how.
Double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins on all sides;
3-4 pages in length (reference/cover page excluded);
References should be cited in the text as well as the end of the paper, using American Psychological Association (APA) format;
Response paper will be worth 5 points;
No late response papers will be accepted.