Greetings, Please read the links, attachment, watch a film then answer the questions below. My goal for the written work is to write clearly and concisely and make clear arguments, and it would help if you considered each piece of writing piece of advocacy writing. Links: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18389776619126544360&q=sutton+v.+united+airlines&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3382304874478067867&q=Toyota+Motor+Manufacturing+v.+Williams&hl=en&as_sdt=6,33 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1992.ZS.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-591.ZS.html Shake with Me (https://www.shakewithmefilm.com) The three cases assigned are often referred to as the “Sutton Trilogy.” They were all decided by the court on the same day, and all are variations on how courts are directed to define “person with a disability.” Please answer the following: 1. What do you think of these cases? Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court’s definition of disability? How do you personally define “disability”? 2. Do you think the amendments fix the problems they purport to? 3. Is it right that people with disabilities need to “prove” their disability under civil rights laws? From a public policy standpoint, is it good or bad to enable everyone to seek the protections available under the ADA?
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount