Category: Research & Summaries

Title: RES500-Critical Thinking-1
Exiplination:
Assignment-I: Topic selection & research questions
* A topic of research should be chosen. It can be either a research paper or a startup concept.
A topic that interests you. You are going to live with this topic for weeks while you research, read, and write your assignment. Choose something that will hold your interest and that you might even be excited about. Your attitude towards your topic will come across in your writing or presentation!
My Topic is (Examining the role of public-private partnership in healthcare quality and accessibility in public/private hospitals in KSA)
1- Once the topic is finalized, the research questions (based on which objectives of the study will be formed) must be developed (not more than three). (consider revising them with scientifc language)
2- Each selection must be discussed in detail with logic and rationale.
3- Reasons for the topic should be discussed first followed by discussion on selection of each of the research questions.
Rules:
* Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook along with few scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
* Use The University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines, citing references as appropriate.
* Submit your findings in a 3–4-page document, excluding the title page, abstract and required reference page, which are never a part of the minimum content requirements, in the Assignment Dropbox.
* It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check (available under Information folder on your Blackboard) prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
* Plagiarism: Plagiarism is NOT tolerated. All assignments will be auto checked for plagiarism. If you are found to have more than 25% similarity with previous work, you will be graded zero in your assignment. Repeating such offense could result in your termination. Review the grading rubric (Attached) to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Attachment:
1- The document of the assignment.
2- An Example to have a look at and follow.

Page 55 she write fix the reference this is the file of the article https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35062086/
Page 32
Page 34

1-Please write a long reflection paragraph after reading the article.
2-Please consult the article (Students’ Public Speaking Assessment for Persuasive Speech) Focus on 2.2 PERSUASIVE SPEECH to complete your writing task.
3-Your reflection must be between 250 and 300 words in length.
4-Please prioritize creating a quality piece of writing which fulfils the requirements stated in the instructions. Your writing does not need to be fancy or complicated.

Hi Good Day
I need help in making a plan for the research project (Applied Project Execution Plan)
the research topic I want it about the investor. How can the company owner choose the appropriate investor according to the company’s business activity?
Or a topic similar to this type of investor question and how the company owner chooses it
Then I attached Applied Project Execution Plan plz fill the typle deband on the above question
also i attched extra metrial to know about Applied Project guidelines for the Dr
and also for more info ( Beginners’ Guide for Applied Research Process What Is It, and Why and How to Do It)
thank you

A walk through the Business section of any bookstore or a quick Internet search on the topic will reveal a seemingly endless supply of writings on leadership. Formal research literature is also teeming with volumes on the subject.
However, your own observation and experiences may suggest these theories are not always so easily found in practice. Not that the potential isn’t there; current evidence suggests that leadership factors such as emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behaviors, for example, can be highly effective for leading nurses and organizations.
Yet, how well are these theories put to practice? In this Discussion, you will examine formal leadership theories. You will compare these theories to behaviors you have observed firsthand and discuss their effectiveness in impacting your organization.
RESOURCESRequired Readings
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Chapter 1, “Frameworks for Becoming a Transformational Leader” (pp. 2–19 ONLY)
Chapter 6, “Shaping Your Own Leadership Journey” (pp. 182-211)
Duggan, K., Aisaka, K., Tabak, R. G., Smith, C., Erwin, P., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Implementing administrative evidence-based practices: Lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States. BMC Health Services Research, 15Links to an external site.(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0891-3. Retrieved from https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/article…
Resources for the StrengthsFinder Assessment Tool
Rath, T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0 – with Access Code.Purchase the access code from the Walden bookstore. Then follow the instructions in the document “How to Access the Strengths Finder 2.0.
Document: How to Access Strengths Finder 2.0 (PDF)Download How to Access Strengths Finder 2.0 (PDF)
Required Media
Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2014). Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the leadership theories and behaviors introduced.
Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 4
Post two key insights you had from the scholarly resources you selected. Describe a leader whom you have seen use such behaviors and skills, or a situation where you have seen these behaviors and skills used in practice. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain to what extent these skills were effective and how their practice impacted the workplace.
BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 4
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by explaining how the leadership skills they described may impact your organization or your personal leadership, or by identifying challenges you see in applying the skills described.
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
44 to >39.0 ptsGood
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
39 to >34.0 ptsFair
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.
34 to >0 ptsPoor
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent
Posts main post by day 3.
0 ptsPoor
Does not post by day 3.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response
18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
16 to >14.0 ptsGood
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 to >12.0 ptsFair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
12 to >0 ptsPoor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response
17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 to >13.0 ptsGood
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 to >11.0 ptsFair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
11 to >0 ptsPoor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 ptsPoor
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

Week 3 Reflective Journal Prompt:
In your reflective journal, write a 500-word (minimum) entry regarding the concept of cultural humility and distinguish it from similar concepts, particularly cultural competence. Consider the following points as you reflect on your understanding and experiences:
Defining Cultural Humility: Begin by summarizing your understanding of cultural humility.
How does this definition resonate with your values and beliefs?
In what ways do you think cultural humility differs from cultural competence?
Can you think of any instances where focusing solely on cultural competence might lead to “checking the box” rather than fostering genuine understanding?
Consider the emphasis on self-reflection in cultural humility. How does the idea of self-reflection align with your own experiences and journey? Have you ever encountered situations where self-reflection prompted a shift in your understanding of cultures, identities, or beliefs?
Guidelines:
Write a 500-word reflection
Support your arguments with evidence from the course readings or scholarly sources
Include a references list in APA format

Week 3 Reflective Journal Prompt:
In your reflective journal, write a 500-word (minimum) entry regarding the concept of cultural humility and distinguish it from similar concepts, particularly cultural competence. Consider the following points as you reflect on your understanding and experiences:
Defining Cultural Humility: Begin by summarizing your understanding of cultural humility.
How does this definition resonate with your values and beliefs?
In what ways do you think cultural humility differs from cultural competence?
Can you think of any instances where focusing solely on cultural competence might lead to “checking the box” rather than fostering genuine understanding?
Consider the emphasis on self-reflection in cultural humility. How does the idea of self-reflection align with your own experiences and journey? Have you ever encountered situations where self-reflection prompted a shift in your understanding of cultures, identities, or beliefs?
Guidelines:
Write a 500-word reflection
Support your arguments with evidence from the course readings or scholarly sources
Include a references list in APA format

I need you to write for me an introduction for a research
All things in the files including rubric and an 2 samples
Key words that need my own definition and google scoller definition and the words are ( happiness , Academic motivation, grade orientation, learning orientation)

I need you to write for me an introduction for a research
All things in the files including rubric and an 2 samples
Key words that need my own definition and google scoller definition and the words are ( happiness , Academic motivation, grade orientation, learning orientation)

This assignment is an individual assignment.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook along with few scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines, citing references as appropriate.
Submit your findings in a 3–4-page document, excluding the title page, abstract and required reference page, which are never a part of the minimum content requirements, in the Assignment Dropbox.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check (available under Information folder on your Blackboard) prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
Assignment-I: Topic selection & research questions (80 points)

A topic of research should be chosen. It can be either a research paper or a startup concept. Once the topic is finalized, the research questions (based on which objectives of the study will be formed) must be developed (not more than three). Each selection must be discussed in detail with logic and rationale. Reasons for the topic should be discussed first followed by discussion on selection of each of the research questions.
Schindler, P. (2019). Business Research Methods (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN10: 1259918939 ISBN13: 9781259918933