Category: Research & Summaries

I need someone who can do Valuation report on a specific site for my ( Property market and valuatin) class.

Surgical interventions for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in dogs typically yield favourable outcomes when performed by skilled surgeons. Mortality rates for experienced surgeons, having conducted over 100 procedures, range from 0% to 2%, indicating a high success rate. However, despite the overall effectiveness of the procedure, potential complications must be considered (Orton & Monnet, 2017).
One of the most severe complications associated with PDA ligation is haemorrhage, occurring in approximately 6.25% of cases. Haemorrhage typically arises during dissection around the medial aspect of the PDA near the right pulmonary arterial junction, especially when surgeons attempt to visualize the tips of the right-angle forceps. While small ruptures may respond to digital tamponade, further dissection can exacerbate the situation, potentially leading to increased mortality rates, which can range from 42% to 100%. Additionally, postoperative deaths have been reported due to the rupture of an aortic aneurysm, highlighting the critical nature of surgical procedures involving the PDA.
Numerous studies have investigated risk factors associated with both short- and long-term complications following surgical ligation of a PDA. For instance, a study conducted in 1976 by Eyster et al. reviewed 100 cases of PDA and found an 8% mortality rate among surgically managed dogs. Factors such as the absence of electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of atrial fibrillation, no clinical signs of congestive heart failure (CHF), age younger than two years, and weight less than 23 kg were associated with better survival outcomes. Conversely, dogs presenting with ECG documentation of atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation had a higher mortality rate within the first-month post-surgery. Another extensive review involving 201 dogs undergoing surgical ligation of a PDA found no correlation between long-term patient survival and age, body weight, level of surgical training, or surgical technique. However, intraoperative complications, such as haemorrhage from the PDA, negatively affected long-term survival.
In a more recent study conducted in 2005, factors such as age, weight, lethargy, pre-operative treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and right atrial dilation on radiography were found to be negatively associated with survival. Despite these risk factors, most dogs undergoing PDA ligation surgery survived beyond one year postoperatively, with a survival rate of 92% and 87% surviving up to 2 years.
rewrite this so it is plagiarism free and use other sources: see sources https://vetfolio-vetstreet.s3.amazonaws.com/mmah/06/b386719f2a4282afa144b8772e77fd/filePV0910_broaddus_CE.pdf
and do the same for this This procedure has a limitation based on the size of the patient. Animals need to weigh at least 2.5 kg because of the device sizes currently available. Also, using the canine ductal occluder to close the duct is not recommended for dogs with a type III ductal shape (Orton & Monnet, 2017).
Primary procedure-related complications with PDA occlusion using ACDO include device infection, device dislocation, and femoral artery rupture (Stauthammer, 2015). Device infection is considered severe because it is rarely successfully treated with antibiotics and may lead to septic embolism (Fine & Tobias, 2007). Maintaining aseptic conditions in a hygienic environment can help prevent infection. Patients should undergo optimal screening for infections through blood tests and urine cultures before the procedure. Perioperative antibiotics, although controversial, may be administered for 1-2 weeks following the procedure (Stauthammer, 2015). Elective surgeries or dental treatments are not recommended within the first three months postoperatively. After this period, the device is covered with vascular endothelium and is no longer in contact with potential bacteria. Device dislocation is exceptionally rare and appears well-tolerated by the patient if the device embolizes the pulmonary vasculature (Gordon et al., 2010; Nguyenba & Tobias, 2008). The embolized device does not seem to hinder lung function. If necessary, the device can be removed. Femoral artery rupture is mainly risky in small patients (Stauthammer, 2015).
ACDO is a non-invasive method with a low complication rate (3-7%) and high ease of use Nguyenba & Tobias, 2007). Several small studies have demonstrated promising results with a total mortality of 0% and a success rate of 94-100% Leakage from the ductus after ACDO placement is observed in <6% of cases, and device dislocation in 3% (Stauthammer, 2015). also add a discussion where you compare those 2

Students in your groups, listen to the news report on you tube and in your group answer the following questions:
Based on this emergency you are a part of the project team to help reestablish the town/city after the disaster.
Address the following questions in a 8 to 10 page report Times New Roman double space, with a report cover of the group participants submitting (please submit the final in a PDF version). File name structure MSPM 600 (Semester, Year – Final Case Report (date))
1. Define the scope of your activities.
2. What planning is needed?
3. What are your initial and post communication activities and with whom?
4. What risk has your team identified and what are the mitigation activities?
5. Who are the stakeholders?
6. What kind of resources do you need and what are their skill sets?
7. What would need to be procured?
7. What would be potential cost estimates? How much would the team need?
8. What kind of quality measures would you need to communicate?
9. What time frame would you need to implement these activities?

read the 10 discussions questions with answers in the file and then write 1100 words and try to answer these questions in the writing
What did you learn from this course?
What will you be taking with you to your future endeavors?
How does this course content relate to your life?
How can what you’ve learned in this course help you achieve your future goals?
What “aha” moments did you have?
What was the most valuable lesson or thing you learned this semester?
What misconceptions did you have and what is your new line of thinking?
Requirements: 1100 words

please check the sample and instruction. The topic is: Maternal and Infant Morbidity and Mortality in rural areas of Nepal. Please also check the assessment 1.

CS-3001 Computer Ethics and research methods
(Research Project)
Objective: The objective of this project is for students to summarize a published research paper from a peer-reviewed journal/conference.
1)
Students will have to work in a group of exactly TWO (2) persons for this assignment.
Task 1: Background Reading
Each team will need to identify a survey paper from a research area. This is to help you gain an overview of the research area. Students can freely choose any research area as long as it is under Computing domain. Example of research areas: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Graphics, Computer Vision, Data Mining, Image Processing, Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Networking, Operation Systems, Robotics, Software, Theory and many more. Please choose one. You can discuss with your instructor.
Task 2: Summarizing Research Papers
Each group will have to summarize ONE unique paper in the SAME selected area of research.
The selected research paper should be relatively recent (published within the last 5 years). To look for the recent papers, please browse to https://scholar.google.com/ (Figure 1). After keying in the research area, click on the left panel to select the publication year (Figure 2). [Advice: First, look for a survey paper. You can type “survey”, and then followed by a research area. Example, type “survey recommender system”. After reading the survey papers, each member further searches for one recent paper (not survey paper anymore) and summarize it.
Figure 1: Google Scholar
Figure 2: Select publication year
2) Ensure the Summary research paper incorporates appropriate writing styles,
grammar, construction of sentences (appropriate use of active/passive voice),
mathematical notations, ethical issues etc. You may refer to the lecture notes for details.
3) You may include necessary citations. All citations in your reference section are to be in
APA format. Below are some sample references. You may also refer to
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/03… for more details on the APA
format.
[1] Aaker, D. A., (1992). Managing the Most Important Asset: Brand Equity.
Planning Review, 20, 56-58.
[2] Abdullah, M. M., Uli, J., and Tari, J. J. (2008). The Influence of Soft Factors on
Quality Improvement and Performance: Perceptions from Managers. The TQM
Journal, 20(5), 436-452.
Google Scholar webpage does provide citation detail and students can copy the APA citation
directly from the website (Figure 3). Click on this symbol.
4)
The Summary research paper should be prepared using LaTeX or Microsoft Word. You must use Times New Roman, 12-point font, single spacing. The report would typically be about 4 pages in length.
5)
Submission Details: Each team is required to submit the following:
a.
The selected survey paper (for Reading only).
b.
2 selected research papers (not survey paper) one for each student.
c.
The summery reports of the selected research paper one for each student.
d.
presentation is required in class.
6)
Guidelines for Written Report (summery of the research paper)
The summary research paper will contribute 20 marks in this project. Read the selected research paper and write a summary research paper that addresses the following issues:
a.
Problem solved
What is the main research problem addressed in the research paper?
b.
Related workPrior research (Literature review)
Briefly discuss the body of literature that is used to motivate the research. You will need to review some of the key papers referenced by the authors. Identify the shortcomings in the prior literature that the selected paper addresses. Perform a literature search to determine if there are any relevant papers that have not been cited by the authors.
c.
Methodology
Brierly Describe the methodology (algorithm, model, design, data) used to solve the problem. For empirical work discuss the statistical models used and the sources of data for the study. For theoretical work discuss the models and techniques used.
d.
Claimed Contributions
Summarize the significant results and contributions made by the authors.
e.
Conclusion
Summarize on the overall flow and general contributions of the paper.
f.
Possible extensionFuture work
Identify possible areas in which the research can be extended. Does the paper call for further research on any specific issue? Identify limitations of the paper and formulate them as potential research questions.
Prepare your Summary research paper using LaTeX or Microsoft Word with the
sections provided above, including the following items:
Paper title
Author(s)
References (at the end of the report)
Mark Sheet
item
Max. Markes
Problem solved
2
Related workPrior research
3
Methodology
3
Claimed Contributions
2
Conclusion
2
Possible extensionFuture work
1
References
1
Proper Formatting ( grammar, …)
1
Overall Presentation in Class
5 Total 20

Critical Thinking Assignment: Write an Introduction (110 Points)
This Critical Thinking (CT) assignment builds on the assignments from previous modules.
Write an Introduction based on the references identified in the Module 4 CT assignment. The Introduction should provide an overview, background, and explanation of the research topic you chose. Include an overview of your research question, what software might be used in your analysis, and ethical principles in research. Week 9’s module lecture provides guidance on writing introductions for research papers.
Your introduction should meet the following requirements:
Be three paragraphs in length (1-2 page maximum), not including the title or reference pages.
Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from the scholarly articles you have gathered.
Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
The previous model is attached

This Critical Thinking (CT) assignment builds on the assignments from previous modules.
Write an Introduction based on the references identified in the Module 4 CT assignment. The Introduction should provide an overview, background, and explanation of the research topic you chose. Include an overview of your research question, what software might be used in your analysis, and ethical principles in research. Week 9’s module lecture provides guidance on writing introductions for research papers.
Your introduction should meet the following requirements:
Be three paragraphs in length (1-2 page maximum), not including the title or reference pages.
Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from the scholarly articles you have gathered.
Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Previous model is attached

Critical Thinking Assignment: Write an Introduction (110 Points)
This Critical Thinking (CT) assignment builds on the assignments from previous modules.
Write an Introduction based on the references identified in the Module 4 CT assignment. The Introduction should provide an overview, background, and explanation of the research topic you chose. Include an overview of your research question, what software might be used in your analysis, and ethical principles in research. Week 9’s module lecture provides guidance on writing introductions for research papers.
Your introduction should meet the following requirements:
Be three paragraphs in length (1-2 page maximum), not including the title or reference pages.
Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from the scholarly articles you have gathered.
Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.The previous assignment is attached

This Critical Thinking (CT) assignment builds on the assignments from previous modules.
Write an Introduction based on the references identified in the Module 4 CT assignment. The Introduction should provide an overview, background, and explanation of the research topic you chose. Include an overview of your research question, what software might be used in your analysis, and ethical principles in research. Week 9’s module lecture provides guidance on writing introductions for research papers.
Your introduction should meet the following requirements:
Be three paragraphs in length (1-2 page maximum), not including the title or reference pages.
Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from the scholarly articles you have gathered.
Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.
The previous assignment is attached