Category: Research & Summaries

For this project, you will rhetorically analyze two argumentative pieces of nonfiction that address a pressing and relevant social issue (also referred to as “texts”). By analyzing these texts’ use of rhetorical strategies and appeals, you will develop a complex understanding of how these texts function and advance their argument. Your texts may be written, visual, aural, or any other kind of multimodal argumentation.
Your rhetorical analysis must advance a claim about how these texts function as persuasive arguments and the degree to which their arguments are effective or ineffective for their intended audience. That is, this paper must have a thesis claim about the effectiveness of the arguments and consistently support the thesis through textual evidence and analysis. Your paper should explain how the arguments are made— not just what the arguments are. You must address ethos, pathos, logos, and Kairos, which are concepts we will cover in class.
The texts you are working with will NOT be included in the paper. The reader is relying on you to adequately summarize and contextualize the texts you are using.
Brainstorming Questions
Here are some ideas for choosing and analyzing different texts for this assignment (this is not an exhaustive list):
Compare news articles from two different news sources about the same topic/event
Compare trailers of the same documentary/movie that were adapted for different audiences
Compare PSAs on the same issue
Compare parodies—for example, a real political speech and an SNL skit of the politician
Compare two political ads for the same election (from the same politician or two different politicians). What rhetorical strategies do the candidates implement?
Compare two songs that depict an event, issue, or topic from different standpoints
Project Requirements
To be successful in this assignment, you must:
make a thesis claim which argues for or against how the rhetorical elements of each text are effective
present an effective summary of the texts being analyzed. (Note: even though a summary is an integral part of the assignment, it should not become your main objective.)
include sufficient supporting evidence drawn from at least four sources (including the texts being analyzed)
apply rhetorical analysis terms and strategies learned in class (ethos, pathos, logos, and Kairos)
include a discussion that connects the different elements of your rhetorical analysis to your thesis claim
include a conclusion paragraph that effectively summarize and synthesize your thoughts
use language, mechanics, and conventions that consider audience and enhance clarity
use appropriate documentation (i.e., citation) of the secondary source (in-text and in the Works Cited page)
Minimum Requirements
1500–2000 words, double-spaced with one inch margins
Compares the rhetorical strategies of two separate, argumentative texts
12-point Times New Roman font and written in MLA format (4 line heading upper left of first page, last name/pg # in upper right of each page—see the ASU Citation guide for help)
Four outside sources cited in an MLA formatted Works Cited page and with in-text citations
Submitted to Canvas before the assigned due
The two text :https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9778909/ , and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34959961/

I am doing a video but I need help with writing the hook describing the problem and call to action this had to be atleast 3 to 5 mins long on the policy I am doing. My policy is a local virgina policy will send the policy. Also can you tir this into reunification of families

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Evaluate the study according to methodological expectations for this type of research in a 5 to 6 full page paper that answers the following questions, using your own evaluation and critical thinking:
Discuss a minimum of 5 ways a Descriptive (non-experimental) Research method was appropriate for investigating the construct(s) or variable(s) of interest.
After reading the Data Collection Procedures information, evaluate and summarize two or more strengths, two or more weaknesses, and two or more opportunities for improvement.
After reviewing the survey instrument (or instruments) used in the study, comment about the appropriateness of the instrument(s) in representing the construct(s) or variable(s) of interest. Be sure to include details related to validity, reliability, and practicality.
Berry, J. W. (2016). Burnout, autonomy, and job satisfaction in full-time public community college faculty members: A regional survey and analysis. The University of North Dakota. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).
Berry, J. W. (2016). Burnout, autonomy, and job satisfaction in full-time public community college faculty members: A regional survey and analysis. The University of North Dakota. Published Dissertation (ProQuest).
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Requirements: 5-6 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Evaluate how the Literature Review informs and guides new research related to a specific topic of investigation regarding a health program evaluation topic listed in the Module 1 Background notes.
Analyze reasons why Recommendations for Future Research or Applications of Research Findings and Conclusions are important sources to consider in the development of a health care-related research project.
Please see the below references;
Deegan, A. (2016). Graduate Writing Handbook. Trident University International. Available in MyTLC under My Resources
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2019). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson. Chapter 1, 2, 3.
Murray, N. (2008). Writing up your university assignments and research projects: A practical handbook. Open University Press. Chapter 6: What are the different components of a research project?. Available at Trident Library.
The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Tips and Tools. Resources available at http://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/
Requirements: 5-7 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to use scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.

The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest. For our RUA papers, here is our proposed PICOT question. We have decided to base our PICOT question on the Prognosis/Prediction route.
By the end of today though i would have to know what two article you chose so i can submit it to the class before you start writing
this is the focus of your group’s work
In post-operative adults (P), how does music therapy (I) compared to non-musical arbitration ( C) influence pain level score (O) over a 24 – 72 hour period (T) after surgical intervention?

in the 12 monthes have a special day in every month we do a little search about it
in the pdf have all information

in the 12 monthes have a special day in every month we do a little search about it
in the pdf have all information

The prompt is Does viewing the world through an academic ‘lens’ clarify or obscure it?
300 words with two MLA citations. free from plagiarims and No AI content,

In this assessment tasks, you will delve into the intricate relationship between innovation, sustainability, and environmental practices. These tasks are designed to test the knowledge and understanding of research methods, and how they apply to real-world environmental and organizational challenges.
Assessment Tasks Instructions
Task 1: Environmental Sustainability and Carbon Taxation (1500 words)
Objective: To evaluate and analyze the impact of carbon taxation on environmental sustainability in selected countries and companies.
Instructions:
Mini-Report on Environmental Sustainability: Country and Company Selection: Choose one country from the provided list and a company within that country.
Investigative Analysis:

Carbon Tax Component: Analyze the carbon tax policies in 2-3 countries from the list. Compare and contrast these with the chosen country, focusing on how they manage greenhouse gas emissions.
Lifecycle Assessment: Conduct a lifecycle assessment for a non-biodegradable product from the chosen company, using the Ecological Loop model.
Systems Thinking in Sustainability Research:
Discussion on Systems Thinking: Explain how systems thinking contributes to sustainability research, particularly in addressing greenhouse emissions.
Mitigation Approaches: Critically discuss various approaches to mitigate greenhouse emissions using systems thinking.
Task 2: Innovation Processes and Design Thinking (1000 words) Objective: To understand the innovation process and the role of design thinking in promoting sustainable innovation.
Instructions:
Innovation Process and Sustainable Innovation: Innovation Steps: Discuss the steps involved in the process of innovation.
Factors Driving Innovation: Identify and evaluate both general and task-related factors that drive sustainable innovation in organizations.
Challenges and Recommendations: Discuss the challenges faced by organizations in sustainable innovation and provide recommendations for overcoming these, with a focus on green management and environmental capital.

Design Thinking in Innovation and Sustainability: Relevance of Design Thinking: Critically evaluate the importance of design thinking in the models of innovation and sustainability.
Process and Impact: Explain the process of design thinking in organizations and assess its benefits and risks.
Encouraging Design Thinking: Provide insights on how organizations can encourage design thinking for organizational effectiveness.

Task 3: Green Design Plan for a Sustainable Future (1000 words) Objective: To conceptualize a green design plan that promotes sustainability for the future.
Instructions:
Development of a Green Design Plan: Plan Creation: Develop a green design plan that addresses key sustainability indicators.
Analysis and Reporting: Analyze these indicators and present the findings in a concise format for stakeholders.
Realistic or Hypothetical Approach: Your plan can be based on realistic or hypothetical scenarios but should aim to inspire sustainable practices.

Assessment Guidelines Diagnosing the Problem: Recognize the need or gap that innovation aims to address.
Idea Generation: Employ brainstorming, research, and creativity to generate potential solutions.
Concept Development: Refine ideas, develop prototypes, and evaluate feasibility.
Action Plan: Implement the chosen idea through testing, development, and production.
Evaluation: Assess the success, impact, and effectiveness of the innovation.
Factors Driving Sustainable Innovation General Factors: Leadership commitment, innovation culture, resource allocation, collaboration.
Task-Related Factors: R&D, employee involvement, market understanding.
Challenges and Solutions in Sustainable Innovation Challenges: Budget constraints, regulatory concerns, resistance to change.
Solutions: Sensitivity training, green management, partnerships and collaboration, employee engagement, long-term vision focus.

Essay as Word document i have example i will send it
Write a 1250-1500 words essay to summarize the outputs of your presentation with reference to the following points:-
Refer to one theory of communication to explain and justify the campaign strategy.
– Discuss the cultural, technological, and economic aspects considered in the campaign.
– Identify ethical issues relevant to the campaign.
Guidelines- Synthesize and properly integrate all sections (All sections must be connected. Quotes must be wellintegrated according to the rules discussed in class)- Use the Harvard citation method-
Use 6-9 recent sources and never use the same source twice- Comment on each quoted orparaphrased segment and make sure that your comment is longer than the quoted or paraphrased segmen.