Overview As a consultant, you need to develop an in-depth analysis and evaluatio

Overview
As a consultant, you need to develop an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the selected agency’s ethics, cooperation, leadership, and legal decisions (if applicable), and then provide recommendations for improvement. The analysis will be read by the VP of public programs and client support, as well as by the leaders of the agency for whom you are working. Therefore, you will research related academic sources and government websites. Write a 5–7 page paper (including title and reference page) entitled Part 2: Evaluation of [Selected Agency]’s Ethics, Cooperation, and Leadership in which you separate the content into the following sections: also, if possible, I would like to use the same writer i used on my last order.
Administrative Ethics.
Leadership Influences.
Strategies for Consideration to Administrative Processes.
Recommendations for Improvements to Administrative Processes.
Instructions
Analyze one current event from the past two years and focus on the administrative responsibility and/or ethical implications to the stakeholders, and the organization.
To find news items about current events, go directly to the organization’s website or preview The Center for Public IntegrityLinks to an external site., for current event updates on public issues. Select a topic and review the latest news items about it.
Assess the primary leadership style of the organization by choosing either democratic, autocratic, or laissez-faire. Describe one way internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the success or failure of the agency.
Analyze one strategy for the agency’s future addressing an ethical or leadership issue. List one improvement the agency needs to make to its service to its primary recipients.
Based on models that influence public policy and the strategy presented in the previous criterion:
Recommend one strategy that will provide immediate (short-term) improvement and support to the administrative processes.
Use at least three quality sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. Include no more than one nongovernment website.
For help with research, writing, and citation, access the library or review library guides.
Produce writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling.

Prompt: What are the strengths and weaknesses of using quantitative methods in p

Prompt: What are the strengths and weaknesses of using quantitative methods in public administration? How can academicians use data analysis to inform public decisions and educate public leaders on the application of quantitative methods?
You must then post 3 replies of at least 250 – 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Module: Week, apart from Module 8: Week 8, in which your replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. For each thread, you must support your assertions with ideas and citations from all Learn items presented in the assigned Module: Week, along with a minimum of 4 scholarly citations in APA
format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citation(s) in APA format and can integrate ideas and citations from the Learn items assigned in any Module: Week. Biblical principles must be integrated in your personal thread and in all replies to peers.
PLEASE REPLY TO THE ATTACHED POST REGARDING THE ABOVE PROMPT. DO NOT REPLY TO THE POST JUST REPLY TO THE ATTACHED POST SEPERATLY

In section one, you are to discuss the findings in contemporary academic literat

In section one, you are to discuss the findings in contemporary academic literature about empathy, empathy’s contribution to ethics, and the influence that outgroup status has on empathy’s impact
In section two, you are to discuss, based on your experiences and supported by research, empathy’s role in your discipline or, if you’re not currently a practitioner, in the discipline you’re interested in.
Some factors you might address in your discussion of empathy’s role in your discipline are:
How well or poorly do members of the discipline relate to members of the community they serve as ingroup members (in a way that impacts their empathy toward them): Why is this so; how does it impact their empathy toward the community; how does it impact ethical decisions on the job; what, if any, factors make proper decisions toward the community possible/likely with or without empathy, etc?
Recognizing the impact of outgroup status on empathy, members of the public safety profession do or do not do enough to make themselves relatable and thereby more likely to be viewed as ingroup members to the community–and thereby more empathy worthy
What is it that makes them relatable or what could they do to make themselves more relatable?
Is it necessary for members of the discipline to make themselves “empathy” worthy? Why or why not?
Is it that members of the discipline don’t do enough to make themselves relatable or is it that the community is biased or doesn’t understand them or both?
What aspects of the discipline make it more or less conducive to the application of empathy?
Are there increased emotional costs to performing the job when empathy is used to make decisions.
What, if anything, can be done to protect the emotional wellbeing of practitioners in the discipline or ensure proper decisions are made?
You need not address all or even any of the suggested topics above related to “empathy’s role in your discipline.” The areas pointed out above are only intended to get you thinking about the topic and directions it could go in. The goal is not necessarily to address any specific topic(s) in section two. Instead, the goal is to demonstrate critical thinking skills in applying your understanding of empathy from the first section to a public safety discipline.
Paper requirements:
Have 1” margins
Be double spaced with no additional spaces
Include at least 4 sources with at least three of them being peer-reviewed academic sources.
Have proper APA 7th edition citations

MPA/534: Leading Organizational Change In Public Administration Wk 6 – Summative

MPA/534: Leading Organizational Change In Public Administration
Wk 6 – Summative Assessment: Leadership Style Presentation and Summary
Exam Content
Question
Imagine you are applying for a leadership position within a public administration organization. The hiring committee is interested in your style of leadership and how you will promote and drive change within the organization.
Determine the leadership theory that best suits your leadership style.
Create a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation for the hiring committee that demonstrates your leadership approach and communication style. Your presentation should explain your leadership approach to organizational change and why you would be a good fit for the position.
For your presentation you must:
Explain your leadership approach.
Explain how your leadership approach will mitigate issues and drive change.
Describe techniques to overcome potential group behavior issues that may arise as change is implemented.
Describe the types of leadership communication behaviors that can be expected from you.
Explain additional aspects of your leadership style that make you suitable for the position.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word executive summary on the contents of your presentation to provide to the hiring committee.
Cite a minimum of 3 scholarly sources.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

What are the strengths and weaknesses of using quantitative methods in public ad

What are the strengths and weaknesses of using quantitative methods in public administration? How can academicians use data analysis to inform public decisions and educate public leaders on the application of quantitative methods?
You will post one thread of at least 750 – 850
words by 11:59 p.m.
For
each thread, you must support your assertions with ideas and citations from all Learn items
presented in the assigned Module: Week, along with a minimum of 4 scholarly citations in APA
format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citation(s) in APA format and can
integrate ideas and citations from the Learn items assigned in any Module: Week. Biblical
principles must be integrated in your personal thread and in all replies to peers.

create a fictional employee whose work you have observed as exemplary. Write a l

create a fictional employee whose work you have observed as exemplary.
Write a letter of commendation for the employee.
To do this you must analyze the employee’s performance. Select something that the employee has done that was exemplary. The work should be the quality of a performance that you would like to see replicated throughout the institution.
You will write the commendation letter on one page highlighting the outstanding achievement, special acts, or innovation that the employee has completed with great praise. You will prepare the letter for your superior’s signature in standard professional business style.
Be sure to use proper grammar, spelling, and professional writing skills throughout the letter. The letter should have a solid introduction citing the purpose of the letter and praise for the specific act (or pretend) act of distinction in subsequent paragraphs

As doctoral students, you should be aware of the professional associations relat

As doctoral students, you should be aware of the professional associations related to our field of public administration. The American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) is our professional association and publishes several journals including the Public Administration Review. The National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) accredits graduate programs in our field.
The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) assists government leaders solve critical challenges in public administration. The congressionally chartered non-partisan, non-profit Academy includes over 1,000 Fellows including former cabinet officers, Members of Congress, governors, mayors, state legislators, prominent scholars, and public administrators.
Recently, The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) completed a study of the future of intergovernmental management and relations in the U.S.
Discuss the following concerns The Academy developed during its study:
What are the critical intergovernmental challenges that need to be addressed?
What are the current barriers to effective consultation and collaboration at both the enterprise and program levels within and across levels of government?
What procedural or institutional changes might best reduce those barriers?
How might needed institutional capacity be managed and funded?

As doctoral students, you should be aware of the professional associations relat

As doctoral students, you should be aware of the professional associations related to our field of public administration. The American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) is our professional association and publishes several journals including the Public Administration Review. The National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) accredits graduate programs in our field.
The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) assists government leaders solve critical challenges in public administration. The congressionally chartered non-partisan, non-profit Academy includes over 1,000 Fellows including former cabinet officers, Members of Congress, governors, mayors, state legislators, prominent scholars, and public administrators.
Recently, The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) completed a study of the future of intergovernmental management and relations in the U.S.
Discuss the following concerns The Academy developed during its study:
What are the critical intergovernmental challenges that need to be addressed?
What are the current barriers to effective consultation and collaboration at both the enterprise and program levels within and across levels of government?
What procedural or institutional changes might best reduce those barriers?
How might needed institutional capacity be managed and funded?