Explain the differences between how state and local governments budget and how t

Explain the differences between how state and local governments budget and how the federal government budgets. Which system do you think is better and why? Do you think it would be possible for the federal government to adopt the budgeting strategies of the state and local governments or not?
Why or why not?

Part 1: Based on what you learned in the reading (attached as Part 1), pick 2 be

Part 1: Based on what you learned in the reading (attached as Part 1), pick 2 benefits, a legally required benefit and a discretionary benefit that interest you. Pick an organization (United States Army will be the organization) and talk about how your organization administers them. Then, for the required benefit, conduct some research to learn more about how local, state, or federal laws impact that benefit. For the discretionary benefit, discuss some of the implications of the benefit for the SHRM (such as retention, recruitment, equity, budgeting, etc.).
Please cite specific readings in your answer and describe how these readings relate to your response (theory to practice).
Part 2: For your discussion post this week, 1. include a general response to the required reading (Labled as Part 2.1, 2.2, 2.3). 2. Then use the stakeholder analysis chart (use file attached) to brainstorm key audiences for an issue of your choice. This topic will be **DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)**. Start with potential key groups, then brainstorm relevant values and interests, and then some back and forth. You do not need to complete the middle, just the left column and top row. You can also look over the water example of that exercise (also attached) you like, but you don’t need to come up with as many groups. ****Part 1 and Part 2 are completlely separate. Do not cross refernece the two. Each part should be equal in length***

Select two (2) leadership styles covered in the Week 3 module that approach lead

Select two (2) leadership styles covered in the Week 3 module that approach leadership in different (almost contradictory) ways. Compare and contrast both leadership styles and how they apply (or do not apply) in a public safety organization. Answer the following questions:
Can different leadership styles that appear to be contradictory approaches be used effectively in the same organization. Why or why not?
How do they impact each other?
Which appears to be more effective? Least effective? Why?
Give examples from your own experiences or observations that illustrate the use of these leadership styles.

Explain the differences between how state and local governments budget and how t

Explain the differences between how state and local governments budget and how the federal government budgets. Which system do you think is better and why? Do you think it would be possible for the federal government to adopt the budgeting strategies of the state and local governments or not?
Why or why not?

Part 1: Based on what you learned in the reading (attached as Part 1), pick 2 be

Part 1: Based on what you learned in the reading (attached as Part 1), pick 2 benefits, a legally required benefit and a discretionary benefit that interest you. Pick an organization (United States Army will be the organization) and talk about how your organization administers them. Then, for the required benefit, conduct some research to learn more about how local, state, or federal laws impact that benefit. For the discretionary benefit, discuss some of the implications of the benefit for the SHRM (such as retention, recruitment, equity, budgeting, etc.).
Please cite specific readings in your answer and describe how these readings relate to your response (theory to practice).
Part 2: For your discussion post this week, 1. include a general response to the required reading (Labled as Part 2.1, 2.2, 2.3). 2. Then use the stakeholder analysis chart (use file attached) to brainstorm key audiences for an issue of your choice. This topic will be **DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)**. Start with potential key groups, then brainstorm relevant values and interests, and then some back and forth. You do not need to complete the middle, just the left column and top row. You can also look over the water example of that exercise (also attached) you like, but you don’t need to come up with as many groups. ****Part 1 and Part 2 are completlely separate. Do not cross refernece the two. Each part should be equal in length***

Select two (2) leadership styles covered in the Week 3 module that approach lead

Select two (2) leadership styles covered in the Week 3 module that approach leadership in different (almost contradictory) ways. Compare and contrast both leadership styles and how they apply (or do not apply) in a public safety organization. Answer the following questions:
Can different leadership styles that appear to be contradictory approaches be used effectively in the same organization. Why or why not?
How do they impact each other?
Which appears to be more effective? Least effective? Why?
Give examples from your own experiences or observations that illustrate the use of these leadership styles.

Topic: Government Accounting Methods. Question to answer and research: From the

Topic: Government Accounting Methods.
Question to answer and research: From the perspective of the bureaucrats, discuss which government accounting method (cash basis, modified accrual, or full accrual) is more feasible for each of the following revenue sources: property taxes, sales taxes, donations, block grants, licenses and fees, public utility fees, gaming fees (casinos), motor fuel taxes, and state income taxes?
Requirement: use one source or two sources for this question.

Weekly Report must consist of one (1) typed page (cover page does not count) in

Weekly Report must consist of one (1) typed page (cover page does not count) in essay format, with one-inch margins, Calibri or Times New Roman size 12 font.
Weekly Report must provide specifics about the tasks you completed per the duties defined within the Internship Agreement.
The report must state what you learned during the week.
The report is based on my duties as an operations manager for the Building an permitting Department for the Village of Palmetto Bay, please complete report based on task 1 task 1 Involved the hiring/ interviews/ onboarding/training process of our inspections coordinator and records request position.

React to the videos (saved as Scripts) and readings (Reading 1 can be found at:

React to the videos (saved as Scripts) and readings (Reading 1 can be found at: https://beyondintractability.org/essay/framing . Reading 2 will be attached as “Source2”) with any questions or key insights about framing. If you are working on a particular issue (DEI is my issue but it it’s okay if you ignore this part), you can talk about how you might frame that issue or even develop some basic drafts using one or more of the different types. Then look over at least three different examples of frames from the Examples folder Links to an external site (Three examples will be posted as PDFs) Try to look at some different styles; at least one CPD (Center for Public Deliberation) and one non-CPD. Write about what you liked, didn’t like, or had questions about in the examples. (This is broad likes, dislikes, and questions but must pertain to the topic of framing. Please rely on sources) ***Please open all attached files as it will be noticable if they were not read*** Thank you!

Case Study on Governance This week we are looking for—and analyzing—governance v

Case Study on Governance
This week we are looking for—and analyzing—governance via the case study method again.
Important reminder I have shared previously but sometimes there is still some confusion. A case study is not a political article or opinion paper of someone else, an advocacy group, or even your opinions. Nor is a case study an analysis of one of the current or previous assigned references (e.g., Jefferson article).
Look for case studies that are real life examples and situations that examine and discuss the policy formation, development, and implementation processes. What was the problem faced by the organization? Who were the stakeholders? What strategy, process, or methodology was used to engage the issue? What was the result? How did the process of governance actually work? What was the impact on citizenry?
Apply: Submit your discussion post with the following critical components.
• Apply concepts related to governance in a specific, researched public administration case study. The actual case study must focus on a real-world public administration situation that is being discussed and analyzed in the chosen article.
• The article research methods can be qualitative or quantitative in nature, but it must specifically focus on the public administration context.
• Remember to synthesize your research and findings with the required readings and presentations for this week and a Biblical/covenantal model of statesmanship, leadership and organizational behavior
Here are my recommendations for this assignment:
Asks/Assignment: Seek out a (preferably peer-reviewed academic journal) article that analyzes a real-world public administration governance situation being discussed and assessed in the chosen article. Introduce the topic to the professor and student colleagues and share what you learned from that case example in a robust discussion board post briefing the professor and the class on the governance challenges inherent within your selected case study topic. Post—and please use these section headings to help readers track with your thinking: • Definition: What is “governance”? Please share your definition of governance. • Section 1: Present the citation and summarize what happened in your selected case study—i.e., what the rest of us need to know so we will understand the case study and your analysis—who did what, how, when, what results… • Section 2: Present and assess the governance challenge inherent in the case study. Did the person act in accordance with your definition of governance? Ethically? Evidencing statesmanship?
• Section 3: What could have been done differently to maximize results? What would you have done to improve the outcomes of the case study?