Category: Psychology

Session Eight Overview
Presentations
1. Each student will deliver an oral presentation of the published empirical article selected.
Oral Presentation
A. Each student will deliver an oral presentation of the published empirical article selected. Please use PowerPoint slides or a Prezi. Each presentation will include a summary of the following:
1. An abstract
2. A brief review of the literature in your own words (summarize the background research in the published article you selected from the journal of choice, in addition to the findings of the study presented in that article)
3. The research question
4. The independent and dependent variables
5. Operational definitions and measurements of the variables
6. The research hypothesis and the null hypothesis
7. The experimental design or non-experimental research approach
8. The statistical analysis
9. The sampling procedure, participants, and sample size
10. Research ethical considerations.
11. The results
12. The issues covered in the discussion section.
The presentation should be about 15 minutes in length (no more than 20 minutes and include all the twelve elements mentioned above with headings on your slides that clearly identify each section.
Be prepared to answer questions from the instructor and class members about the process of evaluating the article as well as the content of the article itself. .
Rubric
Professor Thayil: Oral Presentations (1) (1)
Professor Thayil: Oral Presentations (1) (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNon-VerbalAttire (professional)
Eye Contact (consistent) and Facial Expressions
Posture (straight)
Gestures and Movement (appropriate)
10 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVerbal CommunicationVolume and Pitch
Pacing and Pauses
Clarity and Concision
Enthusiasm and Passion
10 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationThe type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and
audience. (5 points)
Information is presented in a logical sequence. (5 points)
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. (10 points)
20 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentIntroduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. (5 points)
Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. (5 points)
Presentation contains accurate information. (10 points)
Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose. (10 points)
Christian Worldview (10 points)
40 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagementVisual Aids (5 points)
Response to Audience Comments/Questions (5 points)
Time Limit (10 points)
20 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
20 pts

Overview
Scientific inquiry rests on a set of beliefs that scientists share. Given that behavior analysis is the science of human behavior, these assumptions guide us in how we approach our work as behavior analysts and researchers. For this assignment, you will explore the philosophical assumptions of science and behavior analysis, which include selectionism, determinism, empiricism, experimentation, replication, parsimony, and philosophic doubt.
Preparation
Review the relevant sections of Chapters 1 and 2 of your Applied Behavior Analysis textbook.
Instructions
Use the Philosophical Assumptions Template [DOCX] Download Philosophical Assumptions Template [DOCX]to complete the following:
Explain the assumption and why it is important to scientific inquiry. With a scholarly tone, use your own words for your explanation and do not use direct quotes from the textbook. (2–3 sentences per assumption.)
Provide an example that illustrates the importance of the assumption.
Note: Since you are using your Applied Behavior Analysis textbook as a reference, be sure to include a reference to the textbook. There is an example APA-formatted reference provided in the template for you to follow.
Refer to the Philosophical Assumptions rubric to ensure you understand the grading criteria for this assignment.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Resources: You are not expected to include references other than your textbook.
Length: 2–3 pages. In addition, include a title page and a reference page.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Explain the philosophical assumptions in behavior analysis.Define each philosophical assumption.
Explain how each assumption is important to scientific inquiry.
Provide an example that illustrates each of the philosophical assumptions.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Create a book reference using current APA standards with few errors.

Anna (taken from Sadek, 2019)
Use the assessment tool to determine Anna’s risk level. The forms are reproduced below for your use. Then click the link to complete the assessment tool.
Anna: Assessment tool
Shawn (taken from Sadek, 2019)
Use the assessment tool to determine Shawn’s risk level. The forms are reproduced below for your use. Then click the link to complete the assessment tool.
Shawn: Assessment tool
Christine (taken from Sadek, 2019)
Use the assessment tool to determine Christine’s risk level. The forms are reproduced below for your use. Then click the link to complete the assessment tool.
Christine: Assessment tool
Dear Sir/Madam, I will email you the sources by email since I had some trouble attaching them. Thank you.

Module 5
Dr. Barbara Stanley on suicide prevention technique YouTube Video:
Safety Planning

Safety Planning
11K views8 years ago
AFSPNational AFSP
Dr. Barbara Stanley, Director of Suicide Prevention Training Implementation & Evaluation Program, Center for Practice …
CC
Safety Planning

Your reflection please: 1 page
• 3 things you have learned
• 2 things you are confused about
• 1 thing you want more information about
• Module 5 – Additional Resources
• Counseling on Access to Lethal Means (CALM) CALM is a free online course for providers on how to ask patients about their access to lethal means. http://zerosuicide.sprc.org/resources/counseling-access-lethal-means-calm
• CAMS Stabilization Plan -Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) is a clinical philosophy of care and a flexible clinical framework developed by David Jobes (2009).
• Crisis Response Safety Plan (Rudd, Joiner, & Rajab, 2006) is a written, collaborative document that focuses on strength-based and calming skills building. https://dbhdid.ky.gov/dbh/documents/cmc/2015/McFarland1.pdf
• Crisis Text Line The Crisis Text Line provides free, 24/7 support via text messaging for those in crisis. Individuals can text 741741 from anywhere in the United States and connect to a trained volunteer crisis counselor. https://www.crisistextline.org/
• National Suicide Prevention Lifeline The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (1-800-273- TALK [8255]) provides free, 24/7 access by phone to a trained volunteer crisis counselor. https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org

Below is a list of statements about development. Select TWO of these statements and critically discuss
whether they are accurate or misleading.
• Using “baby talk” with an infant delays their ability to speak normally.
• Showing cognitively stimulating videos to babies boosts their language development.
• Drinking alcohol after the first trimester of pregnancy doesn’t carry risks for the foetus
o Your answer should be based on empirical evidence in developmental psychology (e.g.,
evidence from neural, cognitive, and/or social development), and include references to at least
one theory of development. Your answer should NOT be based on medical, political, religious,or economic arguments.
Adherence to APA style throughout, including in-text citations and list of references and maximum word limit is 1000. use research and try to include more than one researcher supporting the evidence for the same topic

This essay should be informed my the annotated bibliography as you should already have five academic sources, one being a primary source and the rest being secondary or primary sources. The essay will include an introduction and a conclusion which would equal 10 paragraphs total. Do not add any more paragraphs please as this essay is between 6-8 pages.
Body Paragraph 1: Social Demographics
The essay should begin with a brief introduction and give an overview of the social demographics of your chosen social group. This should include cited information from an academic source.
Body Paragraphs 2 & 3: Intersectionality of Isms
The essay should then explain the intersectionality of how the two types of isms identified in your thesis affect your social group.
ality.
Body Paragraph 7: Physical and Mental Health
The essay should then explain the physical and mental health effects of oppression and isms on the chosen social group.
Body Paragraph 8: Solutions
The essay should then explain ways that the chosen social groups could address or cope with the oppression and isms brought up in the essay.
Works Cited
The works cited page should be in MLA format and should be alphabetized with a proper half inch drop indent.

Module 4 – Activity: Videos about Dan and Ms. Rand
Alexander Street. (2016). Suicide assessment A-1. Video. (9:00) Dan
• View the video about Dan. Write down what stood out to you in terms of the suicide assessment. Also make a determination about risk level (e.g., low, moderate, high) using the risk tool.
Alexander Street. (2013). Suicide assessment A. Video. (8:46) Rand
• View the video about Ms. Rand. Write down what stood out to you in terms of the suicide assessment. Make a determination about risk level (e.g., low, moderate, high) using the risk tool.
Module 4 – Reflection: 3-2-1
• 3 things you have learned
• 2 things you are confused about
• 1 thing you want more information about

Please follow the instructions for the paper in its entirety. APA format. Please do not plagiarize or use AI to assist you. Your hard work is greatly appreciated!

Class 10 Assessment 2
For this assessment, complete the Introduction, theoretical orientation, review of the literature, synthesis of the research findings, critique of the research methods, and summary.
Expand AllThe purpose of the literature review is to provide the context within which the project will be developed and framed. The process of finding, reviewing, synthesizing, analyzing, and writing the literature review provides greater definition to the theoretical framework and gives you a strong foundation from which to work when developing support for the research concept.
You will continue developing your literature review, integrating and synthesizing the information gleaned as you developed your research topic, your annotated bibliography, and your annotated outline, if you created one.
In this assessment, you will focus on developing brief, carefully constructed paragraphs supported by the literature and research. You will research and present key findings of your literature review that you may not have addressed or that may need further development. Plan to build upon what you have already presented.
Overview
In addition to the other helpful links provided in Resources, we recommend you use an organizing tool from the Capella University Library Services and Tools page, such as the Scholarly Research Log, to help you track the theories, methods, and findings of the articles you have read.
Instructions
The literature review assessment is a standalone assessment; however, it is part of the overall concept paper. Therefore, you notice that it is part of the concept paper template. You are encouraged to consult the assessment rubrics as you complete each assessment, including the final paper, for an understanding of the depth and breadth required for each level of scoring.
The following is a complete description of each section and subsection of the literature review assessment. These instructions are also included in the concept paper template, they are meant to help guide your process as you complete each section.
[Restate the Title Here and Remove the Brackets]
The introduction to the literature review should follow immediately after the title. Its placement signals that it is an introduction and does not require a separate heading. Follow current APA guidance for creating a title. The title should be a statement and not a question. It should summarize the main idea of the paper. It should be concise and include the variables in the research and their relationship. See section 2.4 on page 31 of the APA manual. Use this space to discuss what the reader is expected to learn from the literature review. Introduce your research topic and describe the significance of your topic. Discuss how you conducted your literature search, the databases and keywords used.
Theoretical Orientation for the Research Concept
Many times, the term theory can be conflated with other uses. In research there are about three ways that theory is applied in research: a) empirical theories; b) theories of method; and c) theories of content.
Empirical theories are likely to drive quantitative projects. These theories are intellectual guesses, supported by the research literature, that become the impetus for initiating a quantitative research study. They guide research questions, justify what is being measured (variables) as well as how those variables are related, and guide the data collection instruments. Such theories are best described in the research question section of the paper and should make a clear connection to the research question.
Theories of method refers to the epistemological underpinnings of theories that drive decisions associated with the planning and development of research strategies. Theories of method is also understood as concept mapping. It’s a description of the research concept development with a discussion that includes a justification for making such choices. It’s helpful to include this description in the background section of the paper.
For this section of the assignment, the focus should be on theories of content. Examples of theory related to content include psychoanalytic theory, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, attribution theories, and cognitive and developmental theories. Theories of content should be identified, defined, and described with support from the theoretical and empirical literature. These theories should be grounded in psychology and provide a lens by which to understand the research topic.
With this mind, be sure to:
Identify and define the theory or theories that provide the foundation for the research.
Describe the theory or theories and explain how the research topic relates to the theory(ies).
Include macro/umbrella theory or theories from seminal sources that provide a reasonable theoretical foundation for contextualizing the research concept.
Review of the Literature
The review of literature is more than a summary of the information found through the literature search. Its purpose is to provide the context within which the project will be framed and developed. It should include a conceptually organized synthesis of the results of the process that clearly delineates what is known, what is unknown, and what is controversial regarding your topic. It is expected that you will organize topics and subtopics in the literature review thematically. Reviews that are organized article by article are not appropriate for this project.
It is important to understand that the process of finding, reviewing, synthesizing, and writing the literature review defines the theoretical framework and gives you a strong foundation from which to work when developing your research question. The literature review is part of the concept paper template, which you will use and build on throughout the course.
For this section of the assessment, the review of literature should reflect an effective understanding of the current state of empirical research on the topic. Include (1) studies describing and/or relating to the research topic; (2) studies on related research such as factors associated with the themes; (3) studies on the instruments used to collect data; (4) studies on the broad population for the study; and/or (5) studies similar to the proposed study. The themes presented and research studies discussed and synthesized in the Review of Literature need to demonstrate a working understanding of all aspects of the research topic. Analyze the relationships among the related studies instead of presenting a series of seemingly unrelated abstracts or annotations. The literature review should motivate the study. The reader should understand why the problem should be researched and why the study represents a contribution to existing knowledge.
Themes to be considered and addressed in your literature review include the following (this is not an exhaustive list):
Themes in the literature that illuminate the history of the discipline or area of practice of your project.
Themes in the literature that provide a theoretical background for the topic or area of practice regarding your project.
Best practices in your area of practice or specialization.
Themes regarding the proposed research that add something significant to the knowledge base of psychology.
Themes that identify the standards of your profession (values, attitudes, beliefs, professional attributes) and the sources from which these are derived.
Synthesis of the Research Findings
The introductory paragraphs in this section are usually followed by a review of the literature. Show how your research builds on prior knowledge by presenting and evaluating what is known about your research topic and problem. Assume that readers possess a broad knowledge of the field but not the cited articles, books, and papers. Discuss the findings of works that are pertinent to your specific topic.
This section requires that you take the research findings, discussed in the review of literature above, and integrate the findings so that they overlap and create a new understanding of the issues that relate to your research topic. This new understanding is developed by Identifying the connection between each of the themes from the literature and deciding what argument you are making. Use those same sources to support the final point that you want readers to know.
Critique of Previous Research Methods
Critiquing research is part of the research process. This calls for an evaluation of the methods that were employed in the research that informs the research topic. To do this well, a synthesis of the methods should be conducted. This synthesis should connect with the synthesis from the previous section. That is, the research that has been reviewed and synthesized for its findings will be reviewed and synthesized for its methods. Evaluate the various methodologies and designs that have been used in prior empirical research related to your research topic. Discuss how the methods helped advance the knowledge base, discuss the strengths of the methods, and what you might change to boost the research. Must include supporting examples with proper citation.
Summary
Restate the main arguments/points that were made throughout the paper provide supporting citations. The summary section reflects that the learner has done their due diligence to become well-read on the topic and can demonstrate that this research concept can potentially add to the existing body of research and knowledge on the topic. It synthesizes the information to define the gaps in or identified research needs arising from the literature and the theory or theories to provide the foundation for the study.
Additional Requirements
Formatting: Use the Concept Paper Template [DOCX] to complete your assessment. It has been created to reflect the proper structure. To avoid missing content and losing points, please do not modify the template.
Font: New Times Roman, 12 points, double-spaced, or any other font that complies with current APA guidelines.
APA: Use APA format and style throughout, including citations.
Length: The literature review draft assessment should be 5–6 pages, not including references.
Refer to the scoring guide to ensure that you meet all criteria.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment rubric criteria:
Competency 1: Determine the scientific merit of the professional literature.Identify the chosen research topic and describe its significance.
Competency 2: Apply theoretical and research findings from the discipline of psychology to professional and academic activities.Explain the theoretical orientation for the research concept.
Demonstrate an effective understanding of the current state of research and literature on the topic.
Synthesize research findings to create a new understanding.
Critique the various methodologies and designs that have been used in prior empirical research related to the chosen research topic.
Competency 5: Communicate psychological concepts effectively using the professional standards of the discipline.Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Exhibit proficiency in writing and use of APA (7th edition) style.

Review chapter 12 (Emotions, Stress, & Health) on the LMS. Use the materials to prepare the assignment as follows:
a. Use any one theory of emotion from the chapter to explain the relationship between emotion and stress. (Paragraph 1)
b. Identify one specific health concern that can be attributed to stress from the chapter (Paragraph 2)
c. Go to Google Scholar, search, and review two journal articles that support the link between emotions and ill-health. (Paragraph 3)
d. Summarize your personal strategy to manage emotions and be able to control stress. (Paragraph 4)
e. Your single file submission should be made through the LMS Turnitin. The write-up should be between 400 and 500 words. Do not email your assignment to your instructor. All submissions must go through Turnitin.
The deadline for this assignment is May 2nd, 2024. It will not be extended.
This assignment will be checked for the use of ChatGPT (Do not use at all) and plagiarism.