Category: Political Science

What is participant observation? Review and incorporate two recent (2018-present) journal articles on this topic into your assignment. Which types of questions, in particular, would interest you? Why? How would you gain access to conduct this study? What kinds of jargon could be necessary for you to learn? How would you conduct yourself (i.e., dress, language, etc.) to avoid sticking out? Describe the ethical issues (i.e., illegal acts, confidentiality, etc.) that could be problematic in this study. How will you remain unbiased and objective?

Each of these criminal justice policies is shaped by constitutional issues and will have future implications. Your Final Paper must: Summarize the criminal justice policy by explaining how the policy affects the basic premises of the criminal justice system, its organization, and its structure. Complete a literature review for the policy incorporating your two journal article reviews. Analyze the criminal justice policy process including the relationships between the federal, state, and local stakeholders who influence criminal justice policy. Address the constitutional issues that should be addressed by policy makers or the U.S. Supreme Court. Revise existing public policy to address specific criminal justice issues. Explain the effects of public policy on internal criminal justice operations. Analyze the effect of criminal justice policy on social justice. Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper must: Be a minimum of eight double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing CenterLinks to an external site.. Include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Utilize a minimum of 10 scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources; five of these must be from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library. Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. Include a separate references page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.

Support your claims with examples from the required materials and/or other scholarly sources, and properly cite your references with both in-text and APA citation at the end of your post. must be apa format

1. You need to read both the articles and your paper must demonstrate your engagement with arguments presented in both the articles. 2. Identify the Research questions and problem that the authors are trying to raise. As you read each article focus on how the author are identifying the problem and framing research questions. What is the problem that the author is trying to raise in this article? How is this problem, research question significant, relevant? Contextualize the problem with the help of both the articles. 3. You must then try to identify each and every key argument that the authors are making with regard to the question that has raised. Every paragraph usually contains a separate argument so read and identify carefully. There is a difference between an argument and an example. An example only illustrates the argument. You need to be able to identify the arguments made by both the scholars. You also need to be able to put these scholars in conversation with each other to identify similarities and differences in their approaches and arguments. 4. Only after reading and demonstrating your comprehension and engagements with both the articles can you also articulate a critique and a position on this particular problems. 5. Your paper must not only provide a clear and comprehensive summary integrating ideas from both the articles identifying the research question, problem and key arguments in your own words but also demonstrate some grasp of the possibilities and limits of diplomacy in International Relations. 6. No quotations and instead focus on paraphrasing (writing and expressing the arguments in your own words for clarity of expression.) 7. You will be assessed in terms of your comprehension, content, clarity of expression, organization, critical insights and analysis. 8. This assignment should not exceed 1800 words. It should be typed and have a cover page with your name, student number, date, course number and title, page numbers.

Instructions: Anthony Lucero, you must write an essay (1000 words minimum) in which you address the following two questions or topics: The fundamental values that inform how our democratic government is legitimated and organized are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution of the United States. Identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of American democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government. Those ideals and principles are discussed in the first and second chapters of your textbook. You can also visit the following websites to read the original document in which these fundamental values were first stated and how they were later incorporated in the American Constitution: http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/ https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript Identify the most important Supreme Court cases and executive actions and their impact on law and on our society. The history of the United States has been marked by the progressive expansion of voting rights and the protection of its citizens through legislation and Supreme Court decisions. At the same time, executive orders, particularly in periods of crisis led to the violation of individual rights. Throughout this module, these issues are covered. In chapters 3 and 4 you will find the information you need to answer this question. You are also encouraged to visit the following websites for further details. Supreme Court LandmarksLinks to an external site. 15 Supreme Court Cases that Changed AmericaLinks to an external site. Executive Orders – The American Presidency ProjectLinks to an external site. NAACP was instrumental in the landmark case of Brown v Board of Education. Visit the website to find information on the case that led to desegregation. NAACP Website (Brown v Board of Education)Links to an external site. Instructions for Writing Your Essay: All essays must be written using proper English grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Points will be deducted for grammatical, punctuation, syntax, capitalization, etc. errors. Essays are automatically submitted to Turnitin. Work that Turnitin identifies as having more than a 10% rate of similarity (plagiarism) after quoted material and small matches (10 words or less) are excluded will not be read and will receive a grade of 0.

state’s (Ohio) constitution vs bill of rights. instructions are listed on the file attached. thank u!

state’s (Ohio) constitution vs bill of rights. instructions are listed on the file attached. thank u!

NO AI USE. NO PLAGIARISM. Cite your work, work cited page. Between 600 – 800 word count. There will be an AI checker. Answer each question asked. Please Let me know if you need me to clear anything up. Do not hesitate to ask.
Write a 5 Paragraph Essay on whether you believe that complete disarmament is feasible and desirable or If you believe that arms control is feasible and desirable.
Write either about Complete Disarmament or about Arms Control, using historical facts to support your argument. Have nuclear weapons rendered war unthinkable? Should the world ban the possession and use of nuclear weapons, or should it agree to limit and control the inevitable spread of these weapons?

Read, watch, or listen to each of the following ancillary materials (there are 5 items).
Write an abstract for each of the ancillary items. Put them all into a single Word or pdf document

Module 2 Discussion Prompts:
Again, these prompts are simply meant to get the discussion started; you may raise any issues relevant to the topic.
-1- Why do you think people join together to form governments?
-2- What is ‘Social Contract Theory’ and, absent government, do you think people would be basically hostile and competitive or benign and cooperative?
-3- When, if ever, is political revolution justified?
-4- Are there contemporary issues/debates in the U.S. where you can apply the ‘Harm Principle’?