Please, buddy use easy English words becase I have to explain the summary to the

Please, buddy use easy English words becase I have to explain the summary to the students,
Ans try to do the summary in bullet points
Here is The reading:
Introduction to Comparative Politics, Research Design
Comparative method 1- Arend Lijphart. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review (APSR) 65.3: 682-693.
Conceptualization 2- Giovanni Sartori. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” APSR 64.4: 1033-1053.
3- David Collier & James Mahon. 1993. “Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited.” APSR 87.4: 845-855.

Please, buddy use easy English words becase I have to explain the summary to the

Please, buddy use easy English words becase I have to explain the summary to the students,
Ans try to do the summary in bullet points
Here is The reading:
Introduction to Comparative Politics, Research Design
Comparative method 1- Arend Lijphart. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review (APSR) 65.3: 682-693.
Conceptualization 2- Giovanni Sartori. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” APSR 64.4: 1033-1053.
3- David Collier & James Mahon. 1993. “Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited.” APSR 87.4: 845-855.

Write a five-page essay describing how the presence of international personnel a

Write a five-page essay describing how the presence of international personnel affects the day-to-day operation in your experience at work and in the classroom, in particular during the internship. Provide examples to support your point such as traditions or customs brought from abroad, celebrations of holidays, availability of international food, language barriers, etc. Be specific by providing relevant examples drawn from your observations, context, and influence of the global aspect you are highlighting. Draw meaningful conclusions of your observation and include some suggestions you may have.
Make it about your own experience, don’t copy and paste text, try to cite as needed on best practices.
I am including grammar and spelling tools to provide you feedback as this assignment can be resubmitted many times. I want to review a paper that reflects care, professional-level writing, and a mature approach from you.
In broad strokes the way I will grade this assignment is as follows:
If you do not submit the assignment or submitted something copied from the internet you will get 0 points
If you submitted the assignment but did not make an explicit case, did not provide evidence, and did not provide your personal viewpoint you will not get more than one point.
Please check the rubric’s criteria associated with this assignment to best address the expected results.

Write a five-page essay describing how the presence of international personnel a

Write a five-page essay describing how the presence of international personnel affects the day-to-day operation in your experience at work and in the classroom, in particular during the internship. Provide examples to support your point such as traditions or customs brought from abroad, celebrations of holidays, availability of international food, language barriers, etc. Be specific by providing relevant examples drawn from your observations, context, and influence of the global aspect you are highlighting. Draw meaningful conclusions of your observation and include some suggestions you may have.
Make it about your own experience, don’t copy and paste text, try to cite as needed on best practices.
I am including grammar and spelling tools to provide you feedback as this assignment can be resubmitted many times. I want to review a paper that reflects care, professional-level writing, and a mature approach from you.
In broad strokes the way I will grade this assignment is as follows:
If you do not submit the assignment or submitted something copied from the internet you will get 0 points
If you submitted the assignment but did not make an explicit case, did not provide evidence, and did not provide your personal viewpoint you will not get more than one point.
Please check the rubric’s criteria associated with this assignment to best address the expected results.

Task: Read the following two articles on conducting literature reviews: Iain McM

Task: Read the following two articles on conducting literature reviews:
Iain McMenamin, Teaching Students to Review the Literature, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Jan., 2006), pp. 133-135
Jeffrey W. Knopf , ‘Doing a Literature Review’, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Jan., 2006)
Respond: 1: In no more than 275 words, summarise the main points of McMenamin’s article. Post your summary in the forum. Compare your summary to those of others, and post a comment reflecting on the differences between the summaries.
2: Focus on Knopf’s article: a) Summarise in bullet point form the questions that a good literature review should ask, according to Knopf.; b) explain the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography (concentrating on the issue of critical synthesis). Post your answers to the forum and comment on the answers provided by others.
Outcomes: To be able to distinguish the qualities of a good literature review from other summaries of existing literature.
To begin to reflect on the value of a literature review to your dissertation research.

Task: Please read the two sources: Patrick White, “Developing Research Question

Task: Please read the two sources:
Patrick White, “Developing Research Questions: a guide for students, researcher and pratitioners”, (Palgrave, 2008), Chapter 2 “What makes a research question” p.33-59.
Peter Burnham, Karin Gilland Lutz, Wyn Grant, and Zig Layton-Henry, Research Methods in Politics, 2nd ed. (Hampshire: Palgrave, 2008), Ch. 11 ‘Ethics and Political Research’
Please go back to your post-it with your proposed question and consider again how it compares with what your read in this phase of the dissertation module.
Is the question one you are still interested in and one you think worthy of devoting your time and energy to?
Remember, don’t worry if you are unsure – research is an iterative process.
Respond: Please post your updated question to the forum, and take time to read other people’s contributions.
Maybe someone else’s ‘form of words’ will be helpful in trying to get your point across.
Tip: keeping your Post-It explanation to hand/in your head will enable you to quickly explain your purpose to your friends and colleagues. That kind of erudite explanation, admittedly on a larger scale, is crucial for high quality research.
Outcome: You will have formulated, in draft form, an overarching question that may form the basis of your future dissertation, (equally it may not ultimately be the question, or even the subject area you address, but you will have gone through the process of formulating a research question).
In doing this, you will have honed your writing, research and analytical skills.

Position paper “Do you agree with Katz& Mair’s so-called “cartel party” theory i

Position paper “Do you agree with Katz& Mair’s so-called “cartel party” theory in contemporary politics?
Please submit your position papers dedicated to the suggestion of so-called “cartel party theory” of Katz & Mair in “Changing Models of Party Organization and party Democracy: the emergence of cartel party”, Party Politics , Vol. 1. No. 1, pp-5 – 31 (1995), regarding the proposition that modern parties actually disengage from the voters due to their dependence on state subsidies and support. Please indicate wheter you agree or disagree with this observation and the theory in general.
Papers should be 5-7 standard pages long (cover page, 12 times roman, single space, bibliography and correct citation).
MATERIAL :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel_party_theory
Please Zero plagiarism .

Since the dismantling of Roe vs. Wade in the summer of 2022, the topic of reprod

Since the dismantling of Roe vs. Wade in the summer of 2022, the topic of reproductive rights and women’s reproductive rights has constantly been in the media. Several states across the nation have since enacted abortion bans with states choosing different exemptions for medical abortions. Louisiana’s trigger law went into effect in late June 2022 and reports of misinterpretation and confusion have been accounted for since then. In the fall of 2022, a pregnant woman went to two different hospitals in Baton Rouge that would not give her the answer of if she were having a miscarriage or not. The family told National Public Radio that a nurse said it was a miscarriage but that “they didn’t want to say that’s what it is” (Westwood, 2022). An earlier case in Louisiana took place when a pregnant woman was denied an abortion after the fetus was diagnosed with Acrania, which is on the list of exemptions for medically futile abortions (Woodruff, 2022).
Kettl referenced the three themes of public administration as politics, performance, and accountability (Kettl, 2017, pg. 5). Abortion bans relate to public administration because the emphasis of women receiving the fear and burden of the laws. Male partners do not have any consequences from these interactions. The consequences will impact women’s lives even in cases of rape and incest in various states. Yes, only one of the partners would birth the child but why is all of it on women? This is simply one of the politics of this topic. The second theme of performance would relate to how effective the policy is being currently implemented. In the case of abortions, how is this performance being measured? If doctors are holding off on potential preventative care due to fear of losing their medical license, is that effective care or performance?
“Legislators who are not doctors should not be practicing medicine, but if they’re going to, they ought to have an understanding of the science of fetal development and fetal health,” said Dr. Rebekah Gee, an OB-GYN, CEO of Nest Health, and former secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health (Woodruff, 2022). Legislators have a big responsibility to create the policies that their campaigns were built on but how can they know everything? How can someone that may not understand something outline a policy that the administration must deliver? White suggests that with the overwhelming list of problems that legislators must solve, they must rely on experts for the technical questions. Experts on diverse topics are invaluable to the legislators as they cannot know everything (Shafritz, 2017, pg. 71). It should not be asked of legislators to know everything, or that a number or lack of degrees means understanding of research but there should be accountability in the research. What qualifies someone to be a legislator’s expert? Where is the money from the research studies coming from? What are the thoughts from other experts in the specific field? These are just a few questions that should be considered before making decisions that will affect the lives of any number of individuals.
Here are my main questions. If public administration is how the policies are put into action, what steps need to be taken to ensure that legislators are qualified to make these decisions? Should there be any adjustments to the Constitution on the current qualifications to run for office? Current requirements to run include specific ages, United State citizenship for a specified number of years, and residency in the place that you intend to represent? How do you make a list of requirements ensuring that the elected officials are not only trusted for their word but competent enough to understand the diverse topics they will encounter in office?
I need a reply to this. At least 300 words.

Should the United States join the International Criminal Court? Would U.S. membe

Should the United States join the International Criminal Court? Would U.S. membership help promote international justice or would it expose American officials and service-people to politically motivated harassment? If you support American membership, explain why in the U.S. In the ICC thread; if you oppose U.S. membership, explain why in the U.S. Out of the ICC thread. Defend your position with either logical arguments or contemporary or historical facts. Post your essay no later than midnight on Friday, January 20. Make sure to give an provide in depth evidence/ support, cited in MLA format
Requirements:
1200 words minimum
Use at least 4 citations and cite them at the bottom

Individual paper on a legal topic with important particular social, political an

Individual paper on a legal topic with important particular social, political and other implications Legalisation of firearms
Recommended approach: Analysis of the legal and social problems the topics raise, based on an example of a country/countries.
Size: 7-8 pages (12000-14000 characters)
Due: through Moodle, by the end of the semester (26.01.2023)
Evaluation criteria for the papers:
– Focused on the topic
– Informative (thorough assessment of the facts)
– Clear analysis and argumentation
– Good structuring
– Originality of ideas and presentation
– Respecting the size and the timing
Font size: Times News Roman 12 pts. 4. Spacing: 1,5 lines
zero plagiarism.
You can use your own material ..