Category: Political Science

After creating your original PSA, make sure you complete your two peer reviews of your classmates’ PSAs, using the “3C’s and a Q” format outlined in the Getting Started Module. Engage in constructive and respectful feedback, addressing their arguments and perspectives presented in their PSAs.
See attached post from two peers ; a review is needed on each of them.
The following is adapted from Jennifer Stewart-Mitchell’s originalLinks to an external site. 3C and a Q approach. Each of your two replies should feature:
1) Compliment: It is good to start your reply on a positive note. Compliment the original post about something you liked or were impressed by.
2) Comment: Comment on something specific that the person wrote. The comment should be relevant and meaningful (and should go beyond just “I agree”). The comment can even involve disagreeing with something they wrote, though if you do so then please make sure to always be polite and respectful.
3) Connect: Now things get a bit harder. You should connect something in their original post either with something from your own personal experience or with something else we have covered in the class.
4) Question: Finally, finish by asking the original author something specific about something they wrote. It could be something you want to hear more about or something you were left wondering after reading their post.

The reviews need to include a summary of each of the following (in order) of each of the following from your chosen article: 1) the theory, 2) the research puzzle, 3) the hypothesis/hypotheses, 4) the methods, 5) and the findings/results.

the main document is called “UNESCO 2” where i will require you to take relevant information from both attached documents called “report” and “4 Impact and consequences of the current situation in the Gaza” where you will implement the relevant information into the main document “UNESCO 2” anything that you implement please highlight. No sources are required or in-text citation. Ensure that in the document called “report” on page 5 you will find more relevant information to insert into the main document. I will require you to elaborate on the information HOWEVER only using the two documents as your main source of information.

Please see link below and follow instructions closely.
Homework Assignment
Create 10 multiple choice test questions from Chapter 13.
All answer choices must be plausible options with respect to that question. Make sure to place an asterisk on the correct answer before the letter (as shown below). Make sure questions/answers line up (as shown below). USE LOWER CASE LETTERS FOR ANSWER OPTIONS (as shown below). No “all of the above” or “none of the above” choices will be accepted. ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE IN THE SAME FORMAT (no exceptions). Pay attention to grammar and upper/lower case letters. Please stick to the format below.
Please see link to access format.
ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE IN THE SAME FORMAT (no exceptions). Pay attention to grammar and upper/lower case letters.
EXAMPLE OF QUESTION FORMAT:
1. Question Here?
a. answer choice.​​​
*b. Correct choice.
c. answer choice.
d. answer choice.

2. Question Here?
*a. Correct choice.
b. answer choice.
c. answer choice.
d. answer choice.

On the bottom of your assignment / questions please indicate where the information was obtained i.e. Chapter and page.
Example:
1. Chapter ______ page_____
2. Chapter______ page _____
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK: International Human Rights; BY Jack Donnelly and Daniel Whelan; Sixth Edition. ISBN: 978-0367217853

dear writer,
please see the attached file
there will be 3 questions, so please ignore the question number 2
and only answer the Q1 and Q3.
citations needed to APA.
and questions needs to be well answered as requested, using some strong sources.

you have to have argument and evident and theories to support this argument in the paper
So after you finish the paper i am require to create a presentation which have to include: so the paper have to be organize this way:
Clarity:
1) put your core arguments up and front;
2) organize your presentation in a coherent way;
Creativity (interesting):
1) make sure you have read the existing arguments/articles;
2) clarify your own arguments;
3) if possible, challenge the conventional wisdom/existing arguments;
Reasoning (evidence):
1) deal with some obvious counter-arguments;
2) provide some evidence to support your arguments;
3) support your arguments with some theories.
For example you can write about this argument “Will India Surpass China to Become the Next Superpower” this is from the class reading
Please see the attachment reading in the document
– Also you can write about Foreign Policy and Foreign Policy of China and India as well (i will attached the reading)
– I will attached the reading and the class material so that you know what write about

Instructions
Discuss campaign finance reform policies, including the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and efforts under the President Obama and Trump administrations. Make an argument as to how effective or ineffective these efforts were, either practically or politically. If relevant, explain how such laws affected the ability to self-finance campaigns. Support assertions with facts and data.
Essays should be written in third person perspective. The goal is to create a scholarly argument by presenting a thesis statement and then providing evidence to support that position. “I think, I feel, I believe” and “in my opinion” should appear nowhere in the essay. Personal opinions are not necessary and may weaken your argument.

Please no into or conclusion require you just have to star answering directly
use easy English words please
Debating Mearsheme: Is the Ukraine Crisis (really) the West’s Fault？
Please read Mearsheimer’s article and discuss whether you agree or disagree with his controversial argument.

2-3 page backgrounder memorandum on the key period relating to America’s rise and role in world affairs: Cold War.
I will give more details once I match with a writer.

Objective: To analyze different electoral systems and assess how they impact representation in democratic societies.
Instructions:
Part 1: Introduction to Electoral Systems (20 points)
Provide an overview of different types of electoral systems, such as first-past-the-post (FPTP), proportional representation (PR), mixed-member systems, and single transferable vote (STV). Explain the basic principles and mechanisms of each system.
Highlight the importance of electoral systems in shaping political representation and governance.
Part 2: Case Study Analysis (40 points)
Select a specific country or region that uses one of the electoral systems mentioned above. Describe the political context and history of this region, including its unique challenges and issues related to representation.
Analyze the electoral system in use, including its strengths and weaknesses in the context of representation. Consider factors such as proportionality, inclusiveness, accountability, and the impact on minority representation.
Part 3: Comparison and Evaluation (20 points)
Compare the chosen electoral system to one or more alternative systems, discussing how these alternatives might influence representation differently.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the current electoral system in promoting fair and accurate representation in the chosen country or region. Consider potential reforms or changes that could enhance representation.
Part 4: Recommendations (20 points)
Based on your analysis, provide recommendations for potential changes to the electoral system in the chosen country or region. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these recommendations and their potential impact on representation.
Grading Criteria:
Thoroughness and accuracy of the description of electoral systems.
Depth and relevance of the case study analysis.
Critical evaluation of the electoral system and its impact on representation.
Quality and feasibility of recommendations.
Additional Information:
The assignment should be submitted electronically.
Proper citation and referencing of sources are mandatory.
The assignment is due on [Insert Due Date].
Late submissions may be penalized [Insert Penalty].
If you have any questions or need clarification, don’t hesitate to contact the instructor.