Category: Political Science

Based on your readings in The Heart that Bleeds for Brazil and Mexico, are the countries that different from each other in terms of their democratic and economic outcomes in 2023? Support your answer with examples from The Heart that Bleeds and the lectures
Required page readings are pp. 47-67 and 237-258
and pp.151-177 and 287-316 for summary

1-Outline
2-Essay : Reveal the difficulty of getting a job after serving time in prison. A story about the hardships that people who have been to prison face when trying to find jobs and rebuild their lives.
Use simple and clear words. Not a lot of quotes.

This research paper will examine theoretical frameworks and case studies surrounding the issue of abuse of international legal mechanisms to target political opposition. Specifically, how kleptocratic regimes, like Kazakhstan, use international law to repress its political opponents, to ensure regime’s survival. The cases of Mukhtar Ablyazov and Rakhat Aliyev highlight the complexities of this phenomenon, and sheds light on the often-overlooked Central Asian region and its impact on global affairs.

A 1000-word analysis (write without using Chat GPT; use news sources) that assesses how Gennady Timchenko (Russian oligarch) reacted to being sanctioned in the aftermath of February 2022 and how closely they followed the advice of the Chat-GPT-generated strategy document (see “Step 1 (by ChatGPT)” file)

Choose one of the global issues topics discussed in class (terrorism, cybersecurity, humanitarian
interventions, refugee crises, religion, gender, climate change, the global environment, or global trade),
and apply it an analysis of US Foreign Policy in one of the regions we covered (Middle East, EU, Russia,
Asia-Pacific, Latin America, or Africa). Discuss how the US has approached the global issue in the
context of that region. Did the US make the right decision in your eyes? Were these decisions in pursuit
of the stated US national interest? Were the decisions in this region beneficial in addressing the global
issue? How has the relationship between the US and this region been affected? What future steps should
the US government take in regards to these global issues and this region?

Core question: What makes alliances resilient?
Please read carefully the attached file. Thank you

please analyze the movie and use the relative reading
you should use only the reading that i send you
The paper should reflect that you’ve watched the movie and thought about it in the context of the course readings and materials. Therefore, you should cite course readings in your analysis of the film and make sure not to just summarize the movie. Full credit papers will draw connections between the film and (5) readings. You may select any course readings to connect to the film and cite in your analysis. You are not expected to do any outside research for this assignment and most (if not all) of your citations should be readings from the course.
Papers should be written in size 12, Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spaced. Papers should be at least 4 full pages in length, not including the bibliography.
====================
4 pages not include the reference
Please look at the document(move response papers instructors) for details
No summary or recap at all please
use easy English words please
Here is the movie: (The River and the Wall (2019))

I attached two examples of response paper for other movie, please have a look at them.
you must use 5 reading selects any 5 reading that related to the movie from week2 to week 12 see the document that called class topics
I attached the reading

Homework No. 6 – Give your paper a title – Underneath the title, write ‘Keep’ or write ‘Change’ to indicate your position on a proposed constitutional change – Write the word count – The essay portion, by itself, must be a minimum of 650 words and have a minimum of 5 paragraphs ­- Do not include the research portion in the word count (this would be the candidate requirements for the U.S. and other countries to hold the office of president or prime minister) There is no film to watch for this assignment For this assignment, you must answer this question: Are the constitutional qualifications sufficient for the office of the United States president? There are two positions to choose here: YES: means the Constitution requirements are sufficient and should not be changed NO: means the Constitutional requirements are not sufficient and should be changed to include the new requirement or requirements that you will suggest. There is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answer here. Your score fully depends on how effectively you argue for change or for keeping the requirements as they are now. Procedure for this assignment: Before you pick a side and write your persuasive essay: FIRST: list by bullet points the Constitutional requirements for the office of the U.S. president SECOND: choose five countries in which the heads of state (president, prime minister, etc.) are chosen by a vote of the people. In separate, bullet-pointed format, list the countries and ALL of their requirements. Some countries will have more requirements than others. No paragraphs or blocks of type here. Cite the online link to your source. The information is to be listed in the same format as shown below: U.S. requirements for president: list these YOU MUST CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR THIS INFORMATION Country Number One (list all the requirements) Requirement Requirement Requirement Requirement Requirement Country Number Two (list all the requirements) Requirement Requirement Requirement Requirement Requirement Continue until you have five countries and all their requirements for the office of president. This will give you an idea of how the United States compares with five other countries in the world regarding what a potential leader is expected to bring to the office. Remember to choose only countries in which people vote for their leaders. They can be presidents or prime ministers. Now you’re ready to for the essay section of your homework, which should be written in paragraph format, with at least 5 paragraphs. The 650-word minimum requirement starts here: If you pick ‘YES’ that the qualifications for the U.S. president are sufficient, then you must explain why they are sufficient. You must make a strong and persuasive argument in support of your position on why they should be kept as they are. You must also present the counter-argument. That is, in defending your position you must address the weaknesses of the existing qualifications. You must thoroughly justify the keeping of the current constitutional requirements as they are. Do not say dumb things such as they should all be kept because they’re perfect just the way they are. This will get you a score of zero. Do not even use the word ‘perfect’ anywhere in your essay, or you will get a zero. In detail, you must explain the rationale for why the qualifications for the most powerful human on earth should remain unchanged. If you pick ‘NO’ that the qualifications for the U.S. president are not sufficient, then you must explain why they are not sufficient. You must make a strong and persuasive argument in support of your position on why the requirements should change. And then you need to list the changes that you would make. Your choices: You may change all of the original requirements You may keep all the original requirements and add to this list You may keep some of the original requirements and add to this list You may change all of the original requirements and add more requirements. For whatever position your choose, you must argue rationally and persuasively to support your position. Do not say dumb things like the requirements should change because they’re ridiculous and leave it there. This will get you a score of zero. In detail, you must explain the rationale for why the qualifications for the most powerful human on earth should be kept or changed. BEFORE you begin your essay, that the qualifications for president should change, you must write a bullet-pointed list of changes Change one: from what to what? Change two: from what to what? Change three: from what to what? Change four, etc. There is no limit on changes, just support these changes. FOLLOW THIS FORMAT EXACTLY. YOU MUST PUT A BULLET POINT. YOU MUST WRITE THE WORDS “CHANGE ONE,” “CHANGE TWO,” “CHANGE THREE,” ETC. If there is a change from nothing to something new, then write from “no requirement” to whatever it is that you wish to add. For example: Change one: from no educational requirement to requiring a four-year college degree Change two: from no experience required to must have held an elected office These are only suggestions. The actual choices/choices are up to you. REMINDER: AFTER ALL THE BULLET-POINTED CHANGES ARE PRESENTED, THEN WRITE YOUR ARGUMENT FOR THE CHANGES IN PARAGRAPH FORMAT

Respond to one (1) of the following prompts in an essay of not less than 2 nor more than 3 pages, submitted in a Word document. Your essay should be double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman font, and follow all appropriate rules of grammar. Your essay should identify the issues raised by the prompt and respond to them in a coherent argument using your readings of class material and our in-class discussions. These essays ARE NOT research essays NOR are they invitations to memorize and regurgitate your notes. You will be graded on how well YOU pull the material together in your essays. USE SPECIFIC EVIDENCE (a phrase or brief sentence is okay; NO BLOCK QUOTES!) and make sure to indicate which prompt you are using. REMEMBER: the minimum requirements of your essay is that it should make the Buddha smile and the angels weep with joy. You should also avoid crimes against the Queen’s English and unsubstantiated cosmic musing. 1. “For better or worse, the character of modern politics is determined by how human beings see themselves and their relationship to nature (including human nature).” Use the work of (1) Hobbes or Locke, (2) Wollstonecraft, (3) Marx, and (4) Nietzsche to work through the implications of this idea for modern conceptions of politics. OR 2. “The Enlightenment’s commitment to the rational self-governing individual both liberates and confines human possibilities.” Use the work of (1) Locke, (2) Rousseau, (3) Mill/Taylor (including the role of women), and (4) Nietzsche to work through the implications of this idea for modern conceptions of politics.

It should be no more than 4,000 words (about 12-15 pages). Citations should follow the Chicago Style format and include footnotes and bibliography; neither the footnotes nor the bibliography count toward the overall word count of the paper. There is no single “right” way to craft a campaign analysis; however, remember that it should address how tactics, operations, strategy, policy, and politics interact and inform one another. To do this effectively will require the use of secondary and primary sources as well as their careful interpretation. The campaign analysis is designed to examine a major battle in its campaign/war context, addressing how tactics, operations, strategy, policy, and politics interact and inform one another. It is primarily a work of analytical history designed to address how and why a campaign came to pass in the way that it did and assess the strategic considerations that informed it.