Category: Political Science

For much of the nation’s history, the states and the nation operated under dual federalism, in which each level (Federal, State and Local) tended to exercise influence over different areas of policy. The era of dual federalism allowed for States’ to create policies unique to their state’s culture. This autonomy allowed for some states to exercise their State’s rights to create policies like racial and gender segregation of public spaces.
The boundaries between the authority of national and state governments have changed over time. Many of these changes have come about as a result of Supreme Court decisions finding states were violating the constitutional protections, privlidges, and or immunities of its residents. Historically, the Federal government has intervened on behalf of the residents within a state that are being denied their constitutional rights. The Federal government has also grown in size and in scope after major national catastrophies, for example: The Great Depression; Terrorist Attacks of 9/11/01; The Housing Crash of 2008; and the World Pandemic of COVID-19.
There are benefits and disadvantages to states creating laws for their own residents. There are are disadvantages and benefits to the Federal government creating laws that all states must adhere to.
After reading and viewing/listening to the lectures this week answer the following prompt:
Give one example (in history or current day) where a strong state government is in the best interest of U.S. residents.
Gives one example (in history or current day) where a strong national government is in the best interest of U.S.residents.
In both examples, explain why and cite your lectures and readings where applicable.

Hello, I’m attaching the draft structure approved for now with some notes and I need help in writing the whole dissertation. For now I need help in writing the first draft chapter, LR is the main thing I need help with and the most urgent, in addition to the theoretical framework and background, research aims, hypothesis and structure. please check the attached draft and let me know if you have any questions, also I’m attaching some ppt for your info if needed.
thanks

-If you are assigned a opening statement or closing argument or are assigned to pre-trial, please write out a summary outline of your argument for my review. Also remember the time restriction given for the openings and closings and limit your summary for that purpose. For pre-trial, you will want to cite at least 3-4 cases for your argument.
Plrease read the “Form and Substance of a Trial” and “Procedures for Presenting a Mock Trial Case” sections in the mock trial packet to understand what is expected for presenting evidence in a case as an attorney and a witness.

I need 1.5 pages for each, double spaced.
1. If you were the President of the USA, who would you nominate for the Supreme Court and why?
2. What does the USA Constitution say about parties?
3. What is so important about the 14th Amendment?
4. Do you consider yourself a Federalist or an Anti-Federalist and why?

Part I: Answer four questions based on chapters 7-9 of your American Government textbook and class discussions. These questions focus on the roles of the House Rules Committee and the Conference Committee in lawmaking, the differences and unique powers of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the powers and limitations of the presidency, and the powers of the judiciary within the system of checks and balances.
Part II: Answer five questions based on the essay “Why is the Constitution Not Democratic?” by Dennis Hale and Marc Landy. These questions explore themes like the intentionally slow process of lawmaking, the constraints on majoritarian rule by the Constitution, the concept of stable versus ephemeral majorities, and a historical example illustrating the impact of democratic deliberation.
Part III: Reflect on the course content, discussing two or three key insights you gained about American government and specify an aspect of American government you wish to explore further.

Completion of clean copies based on the last completed research proposal
“Check-In” Assignments: These are ungraded assignments in which you must submit clean copies of your research work up to that point. These assignments include any thought pieces, compositions of certain sections, outlines, evidence and commentary blocks, notes, or any remarks related to your research

template and information hopefully all provided bellow please for further questions feel free to contact me i will reply quickly

I already completed first half of the paper. The requirements for the second half is as follows:
The second half of your paper will then consist of you identifying a problem area of housing relevant to the course literature. Pick one area of study from our entire course that you have been writing towards in your syntheses, and decide on a place that you would like to study regarding that issue. This will require some research and background on your part, so do NOT procrastinate on this part of the project. Once settled, then do the following: Explain, in detail, the cause of housing issues or problems in a place of your choice within the context of the topic you are studying ( some examples include, but are not limited to, segregation, development, legal frameworks…etc.). You are free to choose an entire state, a metropolitan area, or even a specific municipality. A brief tip here, the more specific you are about your chosen problem and discussing that literature on causes of said problem, the easier the assignment will be. So, be thorough in your citations. It will make your life and your writing much easier.
Research a solution. This is really the point of the assignment, and probably the section of which you can devote most of your time. In providing your solution, you must choose something that: A) Specifically addresses a solution that may serve in your chosen place, B) Has been used before in another instance somewhere in the world or have been attempted somewhere at some time (another country is fine) C) Have literature and studies done on the solution that you can discuss to argue for your solution. Thus, your proposed solution must address your topic and also not have been created out of thin air. It must be rooted in literature and have studies and/or results that you can discuss. This section of the paper should also discuss how your solution will be tailored to fit your case.
Your thesis statement will be absolutely key to this project and you should spend a considerable amount of time on it. As in: What has the literature of this course led you to identify and why/how does YOUR proposal help solve the problem? A great thesis will give you something to write to, don’t rush it!
I have attached my synthesis and part of the second part that I started in the paper here. Please let me know if you want anything else. I have also provided an outline to follow. I do think 2 pages should be enough but, if not, I will tip you after the work has been completed. BONUS: if you can proofread this paper.

Please check the instructions document uploaded
14 pages, times roman font, double spaced, MLA citations for atleast 10 sources

Submit a 1-2 page analysis of Laffan’s alternate scenarios on the future of European integration (ch. 29 of Cini). What are they, which are most and least probable and why? In your analysis be sure to cover how each scenario would impact issues of legitimacy and the democratic deficit perception among EU citizens.