Category: Political Science

Please notice the attached document. A roughly drafted abstract, introduction, and conclusion are in the document. REVISE THE PROVIDED CONTEXT AND CONSTRUCT THE MISSING PIECES OF THIS PAPER SO Each of these will be edited, polished, and blended together into a comprehensive paper with continuity and overall flow. a. APA formatted title page with your final (revised) title for the paper b. Abstract (150 word limit) c. Introduction (with thesis statement) d. Case Study e. Lessons Learned (Include a mini-introduction to this section. Then discuss 2–3 policy-related lessons that emerge from your case and speak to a broad public administration audience. Each lesson should be clearly identified with a secondary heading in APA format. Conclude this section with a final conclusion paragraph that ends the paper with a powerful final thought.) f. References in APA format PLEASE MESSAGE ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS

American Politics
You are free to choose a topic that most interests you as long as it is related to American Politics. I must approve of the topic. Email me your research question by 6/9th. Think of the political science topics that most interest you. Is there something you have always been curious about? Can you develop a research question out of that curiosity? For example, would you be interested in understanding more about the low levels of voting in the U.S.? Or are you more interested in comparative politics and want to compare the U.S. educational systems to another country?. Or are you interested in reducing gender violence and want to research why gender violence is so persistent? You are free to follow your interests but the topic must be related to American Politics. From there, develop a thesis, find evidence to support your thesis and write an outline that includes your introduction, thesis, evidence, and conclusion. What you are doing with this assignment is the actual research without writing up a paper. LET ME REITERATE THAT – YOU ARE NOT WRITING A PAPER. DO NOT HAND IN A PAPER. Rather, you are handing in AN OUTLINE THAT HAS ALL YOUR RESEARCH FINDINGS AND AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY. You will spend hours reading everything there is to read on this topic. You will present your research findings to me in the form of an outline and you will put your sources in a proper APA formated annotated bibliography (Reference list). The focus of this project is helping you learn how to do research.
The annotated bibliography is something researchers often use to summarize the sources they find when they are doing research. You will turn in to me a list of your sources (using APA format for the bibliography) and under each entry, you will provide a short summary of the source. Here are some great sources to help you do an annotated bibliography:
Sample annotated bibliography:
https://library.tiffin.edu/annotatedbibliography/e…
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_…
Remember: Develop your own thesis and back up your argument with concrete examples, statistics, and quotes from your research.
Research Process:
Once you have chosen a research topic (which you should always be able to say in the form of a question), you will now begin the research process. I want you to become a mini-expert on this topic. Read all there is on the topic. You can read newspaper sources, online sources (if reputable), books, articles, etc. Use the library databases and Google Scholar. You should have used at least ONE peer-reviewed, scholarly source. As you are reading, collect and begin to form a bibliography of sources that are good ones for your purposes. Once you have done that, you should begin to start forming a thesis. In other words, after reading and looking at the evidence and arguments related to your question, you should form your own thesis based off of all of this evidence.
Once you have a thesis, you will begin to develop an outline. Typically, you will have an introduction of which your thesis is usually stated towards the end of that introduction. You will need to provide evidence (quotations, statistics, case studies, logical reasoning, or examples that you found while researching) in your outline to support your thesis. I want your evidence to be cited in the outline. Use in-text citations to do that in APA format. The reason you do that is you never want to separate any evidence you find from its source so you should get in the habit of always providing a citation – even for yourself as you do the outline.
What I will consider when grading:
Is it written free of spelling and grammatical errors? (5 points)
Does the outline have a thesis? Is the thesis focused narrowly enough? (10 points)
Do you provide evidence for your argument? Did you read a variety of sources in order to find good data, quotations, case studies, etc. to back up your thesis? (30 points)
Did you cite your evidence in the outline using APA format? (10 points)
Did you create an annotated bibliography of your sources and put it in APA format? Did you use at least 8 sources, one of which is from a peer-reviewed scholarly source? (20 points)

Please help me! Please you have to look for a journal article in the last page of the chapter to discuss on the assignment.
Reading Assignment:
– Rahm Ch. 14
– At least one journal article that is referenced in Rahm Ch. 14 (For references, see pp. 368-370. Search at least one journal article that you find helpful for you to deepen your understanding Rahm Ch. 14 at Maxwell Library and read that article.)
2023. “AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023.” Read “Summary for Policymakers.” https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
Please do not forget to go the the document I uploaded is chapter 14 of Rahm book
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Research title: How did the 2015 refugee crisis impact German citizens′ attitudes toward Muslim migrants. Details of topic and the Thesis paper format are attached below.
Also, the thesis needs to be 1.5 spacing, max 10,000 words (including including bibliography but excluding attachments such as appendices)
it is 23 pages in writing and 10 pages attached info
need experts that know how to use R or Stata

12 point font helvetica, or times new Roman. Seperate cover page and no less than 5 written pages minus cover page. Proper and consistent form of citation listing author, page number, and source) only use book as source (how civil wars start. Barbara Walter)

Hello Please see the assignment instructions uploaded . And see the grading rubric, syllabus ,etc. Chapters being read will be seen in the assignment instructions . Some Screen shorts of the books ( leigh …. & Olivia McDonald WILL BE SENT TO YOUR SUPPORT TEAM WHO WILL EVENTUALLY PASS HEM TO YOU . Please LET ME KNOW IF THERE ANY question or need for clarification . At least 5 strong scholastic sources ( books & peer reviewed articles, plus bible based books ,etc.)>

Hello, I need a political science research essay to answer the following question:
How does civil society produce hegemony in Modern America?
It needs to be highly researched with credible theoretical and empiral evidence as per the marking criteria attached. It is a first year undergraduate unit for context. Thank you

Final Exam
Please read the excerpt from the article below published by The Economist, and answer questions # 1 and # 2:
1. (1 paragraph min.) Do the concerns put forward about democracy in the article below reflect the factors identified by Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán in their article ‘Lessons from Latin America: Democratic Breakdown and Survival’? (Explain with three points of reasoning.)
2. (1 paragraph min.) Which model of democracy would Juan Linz argue is most effective to address these issues within democratic states today, and why? (Explain with three points of reasoning, which directly engage with the concerns expressed in this article.)
What′s gone wrong with democracy. (2014). The Economist, 410 (8876)
Democracy was the most successful political idea of the 20th century. Why has it run into trouble, and what can be done to revive it?
…Faith in democracy flares up in moments of triumph, such as the overthrow of unpopular regimes in Cairo or Kiev, only to sputter out once again. Outside the West, democracy often advances only to collapse. And within the West, democracy has too often become associated with debt and dysfunction at home and overreach abroad. Democracy has always had its critics, but now old doubts are being treated with renewed respect as the weaknesses of democracy in its Western strongholds, and the fragility of its influence elsewhere, have become increasingly apparent. Why has democracy lost its forward momentum?
…THE two main reasons are the financial crisis of 2007-08 and the rise of China. The damage the crisis did was psychological as well as financial. It revealed fundamental weaknesses in the West′s political systems, undermining the self-confidence that had been one of their great assets. Governments had steadily extended entitlements over decades, allowing dangerous levels of debt to develop, and politicians came to believe that they had abolished boom-bust cycles and tamed risk. Many people became disillusioned with the workings of their political systems-particularly when governments bailed out bankers with taxpayers′ money and then stood by impotently as financiers continued to pay themselves huge bonuses. The crisis turned the Washington consensus into a term of reproach across the emerging world.
…in recent years the very institutions that are meant to provide models for new democracies have come to seem outdated and dysfunctional in established ones. The United States has become a byword for gridlock, so obsessed with partisan point-scoring that it has come to the verge of defaulting on its debts twice in the past two years. Its democracy is also corrupted by gerrymandering, the practice of drawing constituency boundaries to entrench the power of incumbents. This encourages extremism, because politicians have to appeal only to the party faithful, and in effect disenfranchises large numbers of voters. And money talks louder than ever in American politics. Thousands of lobbyists (more than 20 for every member of Congress) add to the length and complexity of legislation, the better to smuggle in special privileges. All this creates the impression that American democracy is for sale and that the rich have more power than the poor, even as lobbyists and donors insist that political expenditure is an exercise in free speech. The result is that America′s image-and by extension that of democracy itself-has taken a terrible battering.
3. (1 paragraph min.) Should autocratic elections, based upon the argument put forward by Knutsen, Nygård & Wig (in the article Autocratic Elections: Stabilizing Tool or Force for Change?) be understood as another form of political control? (Explain with three points of reasoning)
4. (1 paragraph min.) Based on the following excerpt below, please answer the following question:
Would a scholar rooted in realism advise the Swedish legislature to support this new defense bill? If so, what would be the argument made in support of this new defense bill? If not, what would be the argument made in opposition to this new defense bill? (Please identify and explain three key points)
Sweden embarks on its largest military build-up for decades: The threat from Russia prompts a bill to raise defense spending by 40% in five years
The Economist, October 19, 2020
“AN ARMED ATTACK against Sweden cannot be ruled out,” warned Peter Hultqvist, Sweden’s defense minister, shortly after he introduced a new defense bill on October 14th. It promises the country’s largest military expansion for 70 years. The reason is not hard to discern. Russia’s assertive behaviour across Europe, from invasion to assassination, has alarmed Swedes.
In recent years, Sweden has accused Russia of violating its airspace and waters several times, most recently with a pair of warships south-west of Gothenburg in September. Sweden has accordingly deepened military ties with NATO (though it is not a member of the alliance), America and its Nordic neighbours. If the new bill is passed, as is likely, the defense budget is set to rise by SKr27.5bn ($3.1bn) between 2021 and 2025, a 40% boost that will bring expenditure to around 1.5% of GDP—the highest level for 17 years.
The new cash will pay for a 50% increase in the armed forces to 90,000 people, a figure that includes regular soldiers, consсrіpts and local reservists in the Home Guard (no longer the Dad’s Army of yesteryear). The army will grow from two mechanised brigades to three, each of around 5,000 soldiers, with a smaller additional brigade for the Stockholm area. The draft, abolished a decade ago and reintroduced for both genders in 2017, will double in size to 8,000 consсrіpts a year, and five new local-defense battalions will be established around the country, tasked with protecting supply lines from the Norwegian ports of Oslo and Trondheim. An amphibious unit will be re-established in Gothenburg, Scandinavia’s largest port. Civil defense is also getting attention, with funding for cybersecurity, the electricity grid and healthcare. “We’ve begun to rebuild a newer version of what we had during the cold war”, says Niklas Granholm of FOI, Sweden’s defense research agency. A big exercise to test national resilience was held this year. The aim is to enable Sweden to hold out in a crisis or war for at least three months, until help arrives (assuming that it does).
It is a dramatic expansion, but much of it is to patch up a creaking force. “The armed forces were in a state of crisis for the last 20 years,” says Henrik Paulsson of the Swedish Defense University. In 2013 Sweden’s top general admitted that his forces could only defend part of the country, and only for one week…Under the new plans, the army will have a more respectable 72 artillery pieces. “We are finally getting our house in order,” says Mr. Granholm. But he warns that “new budgetary black holes” could open up from 2026. “The debate about the bill after this one has already begun”.

For this assignment, you will contrast the Federal Bill HR7910 – Protecting Our Kids Act
Links to an external site. with the Second Amendment of the Bill of RightsLinks to an external site., and your state constitution regarding gun control. Write what similarities and differences are present between the three documents. Then, as a healthcare professional, analyze if you think gun reform should take place on the federal or state level or if it should be a congruent (shared) power. For this assignment, you will need to draw from the United States Constitution to clearly understand how powers are separated, as found in Article I Section 8 Clause 18Links to an external site..

Please write a literature review critically reviewing sources relevant to these three topics: Authoritarian resilience, Monarchic exceptionalism, personalistic politics. APA style.
Please make sure the citation is in static text