Category: Philosophy

Instructions are provided in the uploaded PDF file, please read everything and follow instructions. ( Don’t use AI)

Presentation – Leadership & Administrative Philosophy Write about Leadership & Administrative Philosophy in higher education with citation and APA formatting, including Leadership & Administrative Philosophy in higher education • What does leadership look like in higher education • Connecting to philosophy readings Include intro _ body + conclusion Write a word file about what I should say during the presentation approximately (20 minutes) And create 8 PowerPoint slides with questions and references Read all the attached references, and make the presentation according to the leadership Administrative Philosophy in higher education. If anything related to leadership, Administrative Philosophy higher education is in the references, please write about it. No use AI No plagiarism APA formatting make this presentation Do this according to the references provided.( attached) and this link https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/the-leadership-vacuum-in-higher-education/2011/10/31/gIQA1X0lZM_story.html https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/the-little-book-of-leadership-pdf/135265 https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/04/the-pandemics-impact-on-education/ https://www.thisamericanlife.org/534/a-not-so-simple-majority https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLmbgaXYiY4&list=PLZhDVfdrWFKB5yUHlppX53_dGL_qJm_rc&index=13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQfrcOX5tW4&t=2s

This is part 2 of your evidence-based practice project.
In this assignment, you will refer to the topic you selected for your evidence-based practice problem and the three research articles selected from your week 2 assignment.
For this assignment, you must complete a matrix table for three research articles (see template provided below). You will be identifying the following to complete the table: Articles/reference (in APA format), Purpose of the article/Study question, Variables (i.e. independent vs dependent), Study design: Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixes, Sampling, Methods, Instruments, Findings/Result.
You will be identifying the concepts being explored in the study “what” of the study, the methods or the “how” of the study, participants in the study or the “who,” along with the instruments/tools used in the study to collect data, i.e., surveys, interviews, etc. Lastly, you will state the findings of the study.
Remember, the studies should support your ideas and should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases. Use the resources found in the library.
In addition, you must follow APA 7th edition guidelines when documenting the reference in the first column.
Please use, at minimum three scholarly references for this assignment.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

THREE PARAGRAPHS for each question – Intro,body, conclusion
Include 2 or MORE quotes from the provided reading for each question:
1. Discuss one of your favorite Presocratic philosophers from class. Explain who they are and their theory.
2. Explain Anaximander’s 7-step argument for the Boundless. What is the Boundless? Why is the Boundless so important – at least – according to Anaximander.
I will provide the reading to be used as the source.

Here is the prompt
You have encountered various theories of knowledge and theories of being in this course, beginning with Plato/Socrates (as well as pre-Socratics like Parmenides), Descartes and the rationalists, empiricism, and Kantian constructivism. The phenomenological method as described in Week 7 can also give us tools for a theory of knowledge. Use one or more theories from epistemology and/or metaphysics to discuss what kinds of things you can know and how you can claim to know what you know.
Define and describe the theory or theories that you use to make your claim.
Say something about the range of possible knowledge that you can legitimately claim as knowledge. That is, does it include only knowledge of what can be sensed and whatever is physical? Or can we know abstract objects like universals? Can we have knowledge of more spiritual or esoteric realities, like the soul, God, religious doctrines, etc.?
Explain the reasons that support your viewpoint by providing arguments that are in dialogue with relevant thinkers discussed in our course.

THREE PARAGRAPHS for each question – Intro,body, conclusion
Include 2 or MORE quotes from the provided reading for each question:
1. Discuss one of your favorite Presocratic philosophers from class. Explain who they are and their theory.
2. Explain Anaximander’s 7-step argument for the Boundless. What is the Boundless? Why is the Boundless so important – at least – according to Anaximander.
I will provide the reading to be used as the source.

Here is the prompt
You have encountered various theories of knowledge and theories of being in this course, beginning with Plato/Socrates (as well as pre-Socratics like Parmenides), Descartes and the rationalists, empiricism, and Kantian constructivism. The phenomenological method as described in Week 7 can also give us tools for a theory of knowledge. Use one or more theories from epistemology and/or metaphysics to discuss what kinds of things you can know and how you can claim to know what you know.
Define and describe the theory or theories that you use to make your claim.
Say something about the range of possible knowledge that you can legitimately claim as knowledge. That is, does it include only knowledge of what can be sensed and whatever is physical? Or can we know abstract objects like universals? Can we have knowledge of more spiritual or esoteric realities, like the soul, God, religious doctrines, etc.?
Explain the reasons that support your viewpoint by providing arguments that are in dialogue with relevant thinkers discussed in our course.

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 3
Lesson
InstructionsIntroduction”Observation is key to diagnosis, and art can teach students to slow down and really look,” said Craig Klugman, a bioethicist and medical anthropologist at DePaul University who is a co-author of a study on using art to enhance the observational skills of nursing students. “A clinician might notice one thing about a patient, such as dirty hands or torn clothes, and jump to conclusions without looking more closely. We found that art can teach students to see both the big picture and small details that can be easily overlooked,” he said. In physical examinations, it’s important for clinicians to remove this type of bias, explained Klugman, in order to make only evidence-based observations that are free of bias (Krugman & Beckmann-Mendez, 2015).
George Washington High School in San Francisco, California, is the site of a mural, “Life of Washington,” painted by Depression-era artist Victor Arnautoff. In 2018, the mural became the subject of controversy when some parents and students wanted the murals removed as racially and ethnically offensive while others vigorously defended the murals (Tucker, 2019)
Nancy Truong, a 2013 graduate of the school. “This mural is not teaching students about the history of slavery and indigenous genocide under George Washington or other white settlers. Instead, it is teaching students to normalize violence and death of our black and indigenous community” (Tucker, 2019, para. 4).
Supporters argued the historic work is an important piece of art that is actually critical of oppression and imperialism and that destroying it or covering it equates to book burning. “’They should not be removed,’ said George Wright. ‘Removing them represents censorship as well as a reactionary moment in time’” (Tucker, 2019, More Mural Coverage section ).
Do an online search about this controversy (suggested search ). Be sure to look at the murals, taking careful note of the mural panels contained in them. Should the panels be removed or covered over, or should they stay in place? With whom do you agree, and why?   
Think: Ask yourself: What do I see? What do I see that makes me think that? What more do I see? Examine your reasoning. Does it demonstrate the important standards of critical thinking? What are your premises for your opinion? Do you make reasonable inferences from the observed facts? Are your assumptions warranted? 
Write: Write a short paper in which you express your conclusion about what should be done with these murals.
Be sure to include your reasons and evidence (in the form of references with in-text citations) that supports your opinion.
At the end of your paper, include a summary and diagram of your argument.
This paper must be no more than 300 words, or about 1.5 pages in length, not including the title page diagram and reference page.
Writing RequirementsLength: 1.5 pages
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (lesson/textbook citation and outside source citation in APA format)

Instructions
Same instructions. 300-word minimum. Post, here, in Assignments, and to Discussions for the reply.
Articulate 1
Among the variety of philosophers who preceded Socrates, and thus are referred to as “Pre-Socratics,” identify two of these thinkers from Chapter 4. Pick one who is a materialist and one who is an immaterialist. Using a direct quote from the textbook (cite page number) or the PowerPoint articulate the major interest and thesis of each.
Articulate 2
Present the critical differences between the metaphysics of Plato and Aristotle. Use references from the textbook, either via direct quote or paraphrase (cite page number). What does each mean by the concept of “Form” or “form” per Solomon and Higgins? A link to a helpful video on this is also provided for you.
Argument
Defend, don’t explain (you’ve done that above), whether Plato’s or Aristotle’s metaphysics makes the most sense? Give examples or evidence to support your position.

1. Please put in whether the argument is inductive or deductive.
2. Should the panels be removed or covered over, or should they stay in place? I will respond that I believe the painting should be removed.
3. You will have to google the California Washington mural controversy to see the pictures of the painting.
Comments from Customer
Discipline: critical reasoning