Category: Philosophy

it don’t have to be long !! Pull for your source and get information from do not use chat gpt my school
Can detect

Instructions
Course Objectives:
CO4: Evaluate and analyze various forms of argument for rhetorical devices, fallacies, and possible pseudo-reasoning. (Evaluate)
CO5: Create an argument free from logical errors. (Create)
Description:
For this assignment, you will use MS PowerPoint to present your final argument utilizing one of the three forms covered in the class (Classic/Aristotelian, Toulmin, or Rogerian).
After a catchy title slide, you will present your introduction paragraph on slide 2. This should be the same introduction produced in week 5, but with some tweaking based on instructor feedback.
Then, you will add at least one slide for each of the components of that type of argument. For example, if you choose the Classical argument, you will need at least one slide labeled for each component: Statement of the Background, Position, Proof, and Refutation. Be sure you see the lesson on Refutations. [See attached templates. You are not compelled to use them and if you do, they need jazzing up a bit. However, you should at least compare them to yours before submitting to ensure you have all the parts necessary for success on this assignment.]
You are NOT pasting a paper into the slides. Doing so will cost points for not following directions.
Each slide should have several bullets providing your best points for each component. Those bullets are then explained in the notes as commentary or in the transcript for any dialogue should you choose to narrate the presentation.
Be sure to include citations of scholarly resources either on the slides or in the notes (or both) and a final slide or two with APA or MLA formatted references.
Convince me that your position on your topic is the right one!

part one
Week 3A Assignment
For this module, please do the following from the textbook in the Overview:
Part I from the exercises in 1.4 (1-15)Special Directions: Simply state whether the argument is valid and sound, valid but unsound, or invalid (hence unsound).
If you determine that the argument is valid, that means soundness is still in question (see textbook and PowerPoint as a reminder). When determining soundness in those cases, you may need to look a few things up to know whether the premises are actually true or false!
……
….
.part two
Week 3B Assignment
For this module, please do the following from the textbook (which can be found in the Overview)Part II of the exercises in 1.4 (so 15 problems)
Special Instructions: Simply state whether the argument is strong and cogent, strong but uncogent, or weak (hence uncogent).
In the instances where you determine that the argument is strong, there may be a few things that you need to look up in order to determine cogency!

Instructions
Instructions:
Throughout the course, you encountered a number of different moral theories. While you had enough exposure in the first few weeks to build a moral compass, you have had more time to get to know the theories better and may be morally motivated by a different primary theory or set of theories than you used for the week three assignment. The goal here is to pick just one theory you feel is a “best guide” for moral behavior.
Then you are to create an Infographic promoting that theory, either on its own or by comparing it to other theories. Consider yourself as being in marketing and you are trying to convince others to choose your theory. Describe situations where this theory provides good guidance. Focus on the positives (i.e. consequentialist theories allow you flexibility while treating everyone equally, non consequentialist theories provide solid rules to follow and proper justification, virtue theories focus on the person and not the action, etc.)
Details:
Using one of the following programs, create an infographic that promotes your theory in a convincing way as an ideal guide for future moral decisions. https://piktochart.com/ https://www.visme.co/ https://prezi.com/ or MS PowerPoint
Have fun and try to be creative.
It is not bad to display some of the negatives, but the goal here is to promote your theory.
Be sure you submit as a PDF or that the link works (send it to others to see if they can open it). Keep in mind if your instructor cannot see it, he or she cannot assess it.
Please do not purchase a subscription, unless you want to, and do not submit anything one needs a paid subscription to see. Again, if free viewing is not possible, it will not be graded.
Lastly, when using resources, be sure to have a citation where the information is used on the presentation and include a references/works cited section at the bottom.

Essay needs to be about 10 pages long
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Title. Give a title that best summarizes your paper
Introduction. Give a brief introduction to your essay. You should clarify the
question you would want to deal with
Position. State your position toward the paper, i.e., whether you agree or disagree with the positions of the author
Argument/s. Provide argument/s to support your position, which can be based on the readings, or the three major moral theories, or your own ideas
Counter-argument and response. Think of a possible criticism to your argument and response to it
Conclusion. Provide a brief conclusion of your position and argument/s as you have mentioned above.
Bibliography. (Citation format for example: APA, MLA or Chicago)
Word Limit: Between 1500-2500 words but *not* including bibliography, footnotes and endnotes
Reference: Citations or quotations format for example, APA, MLA or Chicago
The use of AI in your essay writing is referred to as the “Guidelines for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Teaching and Learning (2023/24) (For Students)” in Moodle.

Hi, Please include a works cited page. Also, when you’re working on in-text citations, no need to be formal, basic things like (line 35) or something like that works. Here is the prompt:
Suppose that life is absurd for the reasons that Camus claims. If that were the case, do you think Camus’s response is appropriate? If you agree with Camus, discuss at least one objection to his proposed response and reply to it. If you do not agree, say why, and briefly describe what you think might be a more fitting response.
Source: Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus, pp. 3-65 (Only use info from these pages)
I appreciate your time and effort, thank you for your work.

The general idea is that you compare and contrast two thinkers.Be sure your essay is fully formed, i.e., introductory remarks, summaries, and analyses. When formulating your position, be sure to make your argument clear.Orient your essay around a single point you want to make, using your thinker(s) concepts and argument(s) as evidence.Be sure to present, describe, and explain significant concepts and their relations:Describe important concepts and lines of reasoning, e.g., ‘He says this, he argues that.’Explain important concepts and lines of reasoning, e.g., ‘This is what he means by this and that.’Connect important concepts and lines of reasoning to your thesis, e.g., ‘So, this is why…’Your completed essay should run between (no fewer than) 1000 and (approximately) 1200 words.Find and develop an epistemological point of contact between TWO (and only two!) of the following thinkers we′ve recently studied: Plato, Descartes, Hume, Appiah, and Toole.

Assignment Guidelines: Write a 1-2 page ( at least 500 words) comparison and contrast essay using the MLA format noted in English 1101 courses. This assignment requries MLA-formatted in-text citations and an MLA-fornatted Works Cited page including citations for Tupac Shakur’s song and Vincent van Gogh’s painting, along with any other quoted or reproduced content. For more information about MLA citation, see the resources in the Unit 5 folder. Compare and contrast the painting with the video/lyrics of Tupac from the posted video in this Unit 5 folder. Be sure to include the following: Include a brief summary for each artistic form. What is your interpretation of the meaning for each creation in terms of art being a source of imitation? Compare and contrast or analyze the similarities and differences between each artistic form. Regarding the painting, discuss the use of color, shapes, and images. Regarding the video/rap, be sure to discuss lyrics, images, and rhythms. Add MLA citation and Works Cited per the requirements described in these directions and include citation for any other sources used. Use this submission folder link to submit this assignment. Please use a Word document to ensure the structure does not change after uploading to the submission folder. Assignment Requirements: Your assignment should be 1-2 full pages, at least 500 words long, and written in essay format. This means it should have separate introduction, body, and conclusion paragraphs. Feel free to write more than the requirement. Your assignment should contain correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Your assignment should include the points listed above under the Assignment Guidelines. If you are unclear about the above guidelines, email or course message me. Must be well proofread and include the name of the movie or television show episode you are using In-text MLA citation and a Works Cited page are required for this assignment. For assistance with MLA citation, use the resouces linked in the Unit 5 folder. Must be submitted as a Word or PDF document through this submission folder. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Plagiarism will NOT be accepted. The consequences are not worth it; use your own writing abilities to complete this assignment. If you need any help, contact me to set up a meeting and we will discuss how to complete this assignment.

Revise dissertation based on comments below: (turabian format)
My comments are on page 140 and page 143. You have to download the document that I attached and click on the small box that you will see on the right side of the page of the document.
I am copying and pasting my comments here for your reference.
Pg. 140: You need to begin this chapter with a brief general introduction to the chapter as a whole (i.e. what you will do in this chapter and statement of goal for chapter. This should not be more than 4-6 sentences).
Pg. 143: You need to provide a concluding paragraph in which you state 5-6 sentences what you have concluded from your research. That is, what has your attempt to address the question of the problem of evil within the book of Genesis from a Biblical Theological perspective produced? What did you learn? what insights have you gained with respect to the question of the problem evil? What is your concluding thesis based on the research you just conducted? Finally, you need to provide a closing statement (1-2 sentences) about where you believe further can be done with respect to addressing the problem of evil from a biblical theological perspective.