Category: Other

Analyzing primary sources
You have learned that the historians craft involves using evidence from the past to learn and write about what happened. This evidence comes in the form of primary source provide the foundation for any historical narrative. Throughout this course, we have introduced you to the skill of Analyzing primary sources and to numerous primary sources that professional historians have used to develop a narrative of U.S history. Now you will have the opportunity to practice the historians craft by reading and analyzing two primary sources yourself. To complete this assignment you will use the template attached. Please see all attached documents to complete this assignment.

Please write a 800-1000 word essay discussing the government role in the development of technology and society.
Upload your Paper 2 to this link.

You will type a FIVE (5) PARAGRAPH Essay. This should be structured as a normal five-paragraph essay:
1. Clam/Thesis paragraph
2. First Reason
3. Second Reason
4. Third Reason
5. Conclusion.
No sources will be required. No quotes will be required
You will write a topical argument derived from watching Perfect World: A Deadly Game.
A two-part documentary following a group of gamers who receive a series of disturbing messages from their friend Menhaz, a known troll on the online game “Perfect World.” When Menhaz tells his friends that he plans to murder each of his family members one by one, they think this is just another one of his sick pranks. Menhaz sends pictures of his mother and grandmother brutally slaughtered, forcing the gamers to slowly realize that this isn’t a hoax and that they are witnessing the murders in real time. Having no clue where he lives or if Menhaz is even his real name, the gamers quickly tap into their hacking skills to try to track him down before he can kill his sister and father.

Address, in essay form, the topic below. Should have 4-5 paragraphs of substance, reading material information, & development of thought. Your submission should be typed & double-spaced. Outside research is unnecessary; your textbook is sufficient to address the topics.
Questions:
2- What of the argument(s) presented by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong of the individual & moral responsibility with environmental issues? Is he convincing? Why or why not? Use the Gardiner article as well from the climate change chapter in highlighting & discussing your views.

1 page Essay comparing and contrasting the Huntington’s Disease versus Parkinson’s Disease.
Title “Huntington’s Disease vs Parkinson’s Disease”
12 font
single-spaced
1 FULL page paper

The transition from Roman republic to Roman empire was a gradual and chaotic one, marked by political turmoil and violence. The assassination of Julius Caesar was an important turning point in the state’s political development. Analyze two causes and two effects of Caesar’s assassination. How did Caesar’s assassination contribute to the transition from republic to empire?

For this discussion, choose a nursing intervention strategy that you can use to promote health for a specific family. Review the “family nursing invervention” section in your book starting on page 158. Select one of the three strategies:
Providing direct care
Removing barriers to needed services
Improving the capacity of the family to act on its own behalf and assume responsibility
Describe the major points of the strategy you select. Then, identify and describe a family you know who might benefit from the selected strategy. Identify why the family needs to develop this health promotion practice. Explain specifically how you would go about intervening with this family to help them with health promotion activities.
Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references.Robinson, M., Coehlo, D. P., & Smith, P. S. (2022). Family Health Nursing (7th ed.). F.A. Davis.this is the required book and the other one has to be peer reviewed reference that are not no longer than 5 years and creadable sources.300 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)
In APA format please make sure you follow the steps and include all the required question answers in step by step.Start with good introduction and the purpose of the paper at the end start the conclusion like In conclusion.AI free ,no direct quotes or copy paste.

you will be comparing two short stories in terms of a single theme. I suggest taking the short story that you worked on for your first essay and comparing it to another short story. The whole of the essay should call attention to its similarities in its treatment of a theme (dialogue, language), but more importantly, it should call attention the key difference that makes the two stories unique in terms of this theme. I want you to compare the short stories Bloodchild by Octavia Butler and Recitatif by Toni Morrison in terms of one theme. Don’t use any other sources besides the story’s themselves and make sure ideas presented have enough context given from the stories. I’ve attached my first essay as a model but you don’t necessarily have to use the theme I describe in that essay as the comparison do whatever comparison you think is best.

Instructions
Locate a Qualitative research article to critique. It is recommended that you utilize the LIRN Library for this activity. You can access the LIRN Library in the Canvas navigation bar.
Create a Microsoft Word document and paste in the following sections. Then critique the qualitative research article by providing content in the sections.
What makes this a Qualitative Research article?
What is the title APA citation for the article you are critiquing?
Problem Statement (rationale why study needs to be conducted, background, and importance):
Why does the study require a qualitative methodology?
Method (phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography):
Sample selection:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Sample size:
Setting described:
Data collection strategy (interview, observation, focus group):
What was done to enhance the study’s credibility, trustworthiness, and auditability?
Is protection of human subjects addressed?
Conclusions/Implications:
Is the significance of the research described in the context of what is already known?
Do the conclusions/implications reflect the reported findings?
Are study limitations addressed?
Are recommendations for practice/research provided?
Level of evidence (placement on evidence hierarchy used in class):
Submit a copy of the full text article used with your paper.

Use the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the current APA format. Start with the edited Part 2 Manuscript Assignment, complete all the edits received, and add the Methodology section and appendices as described below.
After submitting your assignment by the due date, and receiving feedback from your course faculty, you will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit your week 6 assignment one time and your assignment will then be graded.
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
The final manuscript will be graded on the quality of information, use of current research, use of Standard English and grammar, proper sentence structure, APA format, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the guidelines and grading criteria/rubric.
Review the grading rubric carefully and consider how to incorporate each required criterion into Part 3 of the DNP Project Manuscript Template. 
The Week 6 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
Review the tutorial on the use of the DNP Project Manuscript Template in the Week 2 lesson.
Please make all the course faculty recommended revisions to your previous papers first. All course faculty recommended revisions must be completed to receive full points in the final assignment. Start working early on this assignment so you can ask your course faculty any questions you may have about the revisions required.
Your final submission will have the following sections:
Introduction/Background/ Purpose, Problem
Project Aim and Supporting Objectives
Practice Question
Evidence-Based Intervention with Research Synthesis
Methodology
Organizational Setting
Population
Translational Science Model and Project Management Plan
Plans for Sustainability
Follow the instructions in these guidelines and rubric for the organizational setting, population, and methodology sections. Include the appendices in this final manuscript per the instructions. Submit your edited Part 2 DNP Project Manuscript with the new sections added for this assignment. The Week 4 paper is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).
Organizational Setting
Provide a detailed description of the setting for the project including the following:
State the type of healthcare setting or community setting.
Describe the location.
Explain the typical patient and typical diagnoses.
Identify how many patients or participants are seen monthly and- If applicable- state the average length of stay.
Describe the interdisciplinary care team that contributes to the patients’ health management and outcomes.
Population
Describe the details of your specific project population.
Estimate the approximate total number of participants.
Explain inclusion and exclusion criteria for the project.
Describe how you will enroll the participants and if informed consent is needed.
Translational Science Model and Project Management Plan
Identify the theory or model that will serve as the framework for the project; translational science models are recommended.
Identify the primary concepts or steps of the model.
Create the steps in your DNP practice change project that coincide with the theoretical concepts.
Create your project implementation plan that includes the timeline of weeks for the project (usual projects are 8-12 weeks, keeping in mind the requirement to implement the intervention for at least eight weeks).
Use the research articles to guide your intervention implementation plan. Create a detailed description of each step in the intervention implementation. Describe in detail how each participant will engage with the intervention from the beginning to the end of the intervention. Discuss who will implement the intervention, who will receive the intervention, when, where, and how. The intervention implementation must be a full eight weeks while the project implementation might be 8 to 12 weeks.
Include the plan for the pre-and post- summative data collection.
Include the weekly plan for the formative evaluation to ensure high intervention fidelity. Develop a week-to-week formative evaluation plan utilizing observation, 1:1 discussions, huddles, leadership meetings, or other processes to describe your project management oversight during implementation.
For each step or activity in the intervention plan, identify the intervention week in which that activity will occur.
Plans for Sustainability
Create your detailed plan to sustain the project over time.
Identify the specific strategies used to ensure the project has ongoing evaluation and modification as needed to ensure its success after your implementation phase is complete.
Appendices
Appendix A – Johns Hopkins Summary Tool with a minimum of 10 research studies leveled and graded (required)
Practicum site support letter (required)
Practicum site IRB letter (can combine with the practicum site support letter)
Compliance Checklist (formative evaluation documents) (required)
Data Collection Tools (if applicable)
Permission to use the data collection tool letter or email (if applicable)
Educational Offering Table (outline) (required)
Informed consent (if applicable)
Assent document (if applicable)
References
Information in this manuscript must be substantiated by citations.
Reference publication dates must be within the last 5 years.
References must be from peer-reviewed journals, government websites, and credible national and global organizations.
In-text citations should align with the reference page.
In-text citations and references must be in the current APA format.
Scholarly Writing Criteria
Submit the paper on the DNP Project Manuscript Template
Use the headers in the template.
Use the current APA style and format throughout this assignment.
Use the Chamberlain Guideline for Writing Professional Papers (located in Student Resources) to complete this assignment.
Turn on Grammarly to check the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
Use third person in this DNP Project Manuscript. However, per APA, you can use first person in the project management section when you are talking about what you will do during implementation.
Notes:
Make sure to include the edited Part 1 and 2 manuscript items.
The nomenclature when saving the file should be Last name_First name_ DNP Project Manuscript_ NR 702_Date.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 10-12 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial
Headings & subheadings
In-text citations
Title page
References page (without permalinks)
Standard English usage and mechanics
Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Demonstrate project management and leadership skills in the design process for the evidence-based translational science project. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Create collaborative relationships with interprofessional and intraprofessional groups to champion organizational improvements through project design. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
The chart and graph ordered is for the questioner that will be created in the appendix.
Also the information needed to be inserted is in the readiness form please be sure to not include the name of the Primary care office. The staff included 3-4 Nurse Practitioners and 2 RN. The clients served are 30-60 but we would like to look at a sample size of 5-10.