Category: Other

This is a four-part paper that will last about four pages each. Please utilize the following attachments to outline each part of the paper. If formatted correctly, a bonus or tip will be included at the end of the paper when it is complete.

In at least 500 words, using the rubric for guidance and referencing one primary source (film review, artist interview, reference to promotional materials), one secondary source (the provided journal article), the film (Hitchcock) and your textbook discuss the following:
In what way does this film provide a glimpse into the film making process from scriipt to screen? How likewise does it engage with film culture and film reception? In your discussion consider the hardships that Hitchcock faced as part of his creative process in trying to have Psycho made in the way that he envisioned.
Make sure to support your argument by citing the aforementioned research both in text and as a works cited page and giving specific examples from the film to illustrate your discussion. Also, do not forget to save this assignment as a word document or PDF prior to upload.

 
1. Nature vs Nurture debate: Do you think that gender and race are ‘natural’, (e.g. genetic) or do you think they are ‘social constructs’ constructed by culture (e.g. socialization of habit and mentality)? Support your answer with evidence and arguments.
 
2. What are the similarities and differences between sexism and racism?
 
3. In what ways are sexism and racism disanalogous, to other forms of discrimination like classism, homophobia, agism and ablism?
 
4. USING Divine Command Theory determine the wrongness of sexism and racism according to you? Support your answer with evidence (Bible) and arguments.
 
5. What do you think about the FLWAS of social engineering where we move beyond merely ending discrimination, and towards the more ambitious project of actually creating a UTOPIC society and culture (e.g. through active desegregation and affirmative action and integration in all social institutions)?
 

Locate sources of information that will be used to learn more about the company and its diversification plan. Make sure to also address the following:
1) What is the company’s mission and history, and how it’s organized?
2) How did the company make the decision to diversify, and what is its diversification plan?
3)How has the company implemented its plan, and how successful has it been so far?
Paper between 400-800 words. Sources should be cited in APA style. Guidelines and Rubric is attached and well as a word document w a link.

Assessment Descriiption
For this assignment, you will interview a person from a diverse population in order to gain understanding about a person different than yourself.
Examples of diverse populations:
Sexual orientation
Race
Religion
Gender
Disability
In your interview, be sure to include engagement strategies for dealing with diverse clients and personal biases. Record the interview (audio only) and provide a written transcriipt of the interview. There are various free applications you can use to record with your phone or computer that provides a transcriipt:
Easy Voice Recorder
Audacity
BandLab
Aktiv MP3 Recorder
Wavosaur Free Audio Recorder
Submit the transcriipt of the interview along with a summary (300-500 words) that explains how social workers should use the NASW Code of Ethics with decision-making regarding diverse populations. Also explain how you would handle your personal biases (with cultural competency) if the interviewee were your client.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
GCU Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency and professional standards:
MSW
2.1: Make decisions at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels informed by the code of ethics related to diversity. [EPAS 2]
This assignment is informed by the following EPAS Standards:
2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice
6: Engage With Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities
7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

Hi please find the attached documents with this order.
Topic for this week: Musculoskeletal.
Also, for one of the reference can you please use textbook reference by L. Story 5th Ed. Pathophysiology: a practical approach. Thank you.

Whatch the movie Back to the Future and read the 3 articles then conduct this movie essay review. on Back to the Future 1985.
Your essay will be scored as follows.
1 points: Did the student display good grammar, spelling, sentence & paragraph structure — writing conventions. 0 (very little), 1 (lots of mistakes, but could be read without wincing too much), 2 (yes).
2 points: Did the student’s essay conform to a critical analysis structure as follows
Introduction
title & date of the movie
outline of the main ideas of the movie
state your own thesis statement and your main idea about the movie.
What you are doing is making a case for an idea that you have in your brain. That idea is called the thesis statement. Just use plain language, like you would in talking to a friend.
Summary
briefly summarize the plot of the movie
who, what, where, when, why and how
structure, style or point of view of the movie
Critical Analysis You are making an argument about your idea on a movie, using information from the movie, the readings, and infused with the perspective of the overview presentation about a critical analysis of a movie. You will have at least 3 main points to support your thesis/idea, but you could have as many as 7 if you write concisely.
Conclusion
Restate your thesis/main idea in new words
Summarize your main ideas with new and stronger words than you did before
Length
No more than 4 double spaced pages (2 single spaced) with 12 point font.
3 points: What is the clear evidence that the student employed information in the overview presentations on critically analyzing cultural, political and social practices in movies and related texts (the readings) across temporal or spatial dimensions. The scale is 0 (no evidence that the student even skimmed the overview presentations), 1 (reading between the lines, the student grasped a little bit), 2 (overview perspective present in half the essay), 3 (influenced the entire essay)
4 points: What is the evidence that the student employed information from the readings? The scale is 0 (no evidence), 0.5 (reading between the lines, the student grasped a little bit), 1 (impacted the essay, but not much), 2 ( influenced most of the essay), 3 (influenced the entire essay). WARNING: YOU CANNOT “embed” or hint at reading content. You must EXPLICITLY state the source and ideally use a relevant quote from the reading to emphasize your point.
4 points: What is the evidence that the student employed information from the faculty lecture? The scale is 0 (no evidence), 1 (reading between the lines, the student grasped a little bit), 2 (present in half the essay), 3 (influenced the entire essay), WARNING: YOU CANNOT simply infer content from the faculty lecture was used in your essay. In other words, when we do not add 4 points because you did not bring in a substantive amount from the faculty lecture to enrich your essay — then simply inferring that you got information from the lecture will fall on deaf ears. You must be explicit as to what the faculty said and how it relates to your essay.

SOME BASIC HINTS ON WRITING:
Support your thesis with detailed evidence from the readings and faculty lecture. Do not forget to document quotes and paraphrases and attribute them to their source.
Remember that the purpose of a critical analysis is not merely to inform, but also to evaluate the worth, utility, excellence, distinction, truth, validity, beauty, or goodness of something.
Even though as a writer you set the standards, you should be open-minded, well informed, and fair. You can express your opinions, but you should also back them up with evidence.
Your critical analysis should provide information, interpretation, and evaluation. The information will help your reader understand the nature of the movie under analysis. The interpretation will explain the meaning of the movie, therefore requiring your correct understanding of it. The evaluation will discuss your opinions of the movie and present valid justification for them with assistance from the faculty presentation and readings.

Hello, This paper is a weekly report as a follow up to a research paper. The recommendations and conclusion portions of the research paper is due Sunday. This paper is to record the “progress” that has been made thus far. I’ve attached a copy of the paper in its current state without the recommendations and conclusions as well as a copy of an example of how weekly report should be formatted and the status report that was submitted last week. Obviously, “progress” should have been made by now so please phrase as if that is the case.
1. Tasks Outlined in Previous Weekly Progress Report (Provide detailed information on the tasks to be completed in this week)
2. Progress Made in Reporting Week (Provide detailed information on the progress that you made in the reporting week.
3. Difficulties Encountered in Reporting Week (Provide detailed information on the difficulties and issues that you encountered in the reporting week. )
Paper Requirements
Written Communication: : Write in a professional manner using APA 7th Edition and formatting with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. You CAN use “I” in the weekly reports as you explain tasks you are working on, progress you made, and difficulties you faced.

Recommendations and Conclusions (8 pages): This section will provide substantive
recommendations and conclusions regarding the problem that has been undertaken for study.
This section will include a presentation of the conclusions drawn from the study, weighing
evidence and coming to a final judgment based on the evidence that has been accumulated. This
section requires analysis and the support of conclusions with solid evidence. In addition, future
recommendations will be presented
I have attached a copy of the paper that I have thus far. Please feel free to use the references that are listed in the paper as well as include new references.

For this assignment, you will reference the video you chose to review from the options provided and the Listening Styles Profile (LSP-R) assessment you completed last week. If you did not complete the LSP-R assignment, or you did not watch one of the videos on the “Exercise Your Listening” page, go back to the last topic and complete these two activities.
The assignment will focus on listening styles (task-oriented, relational, analytical, critical); your LSP-R assessment, listening barriers, and paraphrasing.
Writing Assignment Instructions:
In the first part of your paper, define the four listening styles using your textbook, and discuss your LSP-R scores for each of the listening styles. Each listening style should be a separate paragraph. In your discussion, provide your scores for each of the listening styles. Which styles did you score higher in? Which styles did you score lower in? What surprised you about your results on the LSP-R? Based on this data, what do you conclude about your listening?
In the next part of your paper, identify at least two listening styles you engaged with when watching the video. Provide supporting details as to why those styles were the ones you identified with most. Also, did your scores on the LSP-R agree with your experience watching the video? Why or why not? Be sure to include supporting details and specific examples to support your findings.
The listening chapter identifies several barriers we encounter when it comes to listening (information overload, personal concerns, noise, rapid thought). In the third section of your paper, identify at least one barrier you experienced when listening to the video. Be sure to include supporting details and specific examples to support your findings.
The listening chapter informs us about paraphrasing messages we believe the speaker sent. In the last part of your paper, think about the overall messages in the video that resonated with you. What did you pay attention to and what was important to you? In other words, how did you use mindful listening? In section 8.4.3, your textbook identifies two types of paraphrase. The first is a paraphrase of factual information, or summarizing the content of what the speaker was talking about. The second, and more difficult type of paraphrase, is a paraphrase of personal information where you paraphrase the underlying message about the speaker’s thoughts, feelings and wants. Provide one of each type of paraphrase about what the speaker said in the video. (Note: Remember, you are paraphrasing…NOT “parrot-phrasing” or repeating exactly what you just heard in the video! Use your own words.)
Additional Details:
Your paper should be typed, 3-4 pages long, and double spaced.
The paper should also be proofread, and mistakes in grammar, spelling, sentence structure, formatting and other areas of paper mechanics should be kept to a minimum.
Include a complete introduction to the paper that includes a thesis statement introducing the main ideas of the paper. Organize the body of the paper into main ideas that fit with your thesis statement. Include a conclusion to the paper that reviews and summarizes the paper.
Include proper in-text citations in either APA or MLA format; be certain that you include the textbook definitions of the concepts you use and that you cite these definitions correctly. Sources that you Google or other external sources will not be accepted, we expect you to use your required course textbook, Interplay, 16th Edition. A works cited or reference page should be included at the end of your paper.