Category: Operations Management homework help

Scenario
You are a nursing home administrator who has recently been assigned to oversee a skilled nursing facility built in the 1970s. You must prepare and deliver a PowerPoint presentation outlining how you intend to provide person-centered care, organization, and services. To be a good presentation, it must cover important aspects of social services, admission, and discharge, such as medical care, nursing, and rehabilitation, to name a few.
Instructions
Create a PowerPoint presentation (8-10 slides), with speaker notes, in which you respond to the following:
What are the three principles upon which resident-centered care, in a modern nursing home, is guided and relates the challenges to a full integration? 
What are the various skills and competencies associated with social services, admission, and discharge functions?
What are the six main activity programs that are valuable in LTC and how can you determine their effectiveness and implementation?
There are several considerations to ensure the effective purchasing of food and supplies; however, three considerations are fundamental to menu planning. What are they and why are they essential?
Summarize your key findings on one slide.
Use five sources to support your writing. Sources should be recent and published within the last five years. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment.
 Assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide with relevant graphics (photographs, graphs, clip art, etc.) to ensure the presentation is visually appealing and readable from 18 feet away. 
Include a title slide containing the assignment title, your name, the professor’s full name, the course title, and the date. The title and reference slides are not included in the required number of slides.
Make use of your speaker notes to clarify and elaborate on the information contained in your slides.

Per the text, when patients cannot receive needed medical care, nursing services, or rehabilitation therapies in a community-based setting, they are typically admitted to a long-term care facility, where medical care is traditionally delivered by physicians and/or practitioners with advanced qualifications. All nursing services in long-term care facilities are delivered by a nursing staff which is headed by a Director of Nursing (DON).
Compare and contrast the roles of the medical director and the DON.
Select the role that has the overall greater impact on patient care.

Provide a rationale for your response.

 Using Case Studies 20.1, 20.2, and 20.3, why does organized sport in a country like the USA lobby for a continuation of the prohibition of sports betting? 
While betting interest stimulates an interest in sport, indirectly promoting additional revenue, and as Case Study 20.1 illustrated, providing the prospect of a direct revenue stream as well, it also carries dangers. Where betting markets are liquid enough to absorb large bets, criminals have the potential to win large sums of money by persuading sports insiders to manipulate events on the field in their favour.

Can you help me understand this?
For this assignment, write a 1–2 page double-spaced paper in which you will:
Describe the organization you selected based on the following criteria.

Identify the organization you have selected.
The organization should be one you are familiar with.
You have access to internal processes.
It has an organizational issue that needs to be resolved.
You can think of a realistic and enforceable solution to the issue.

Discuss the issue you will be analyzing.
Explain why the issue hinders the organization’s efficiency.
Use the description and feedback from the instructor in the Week 2 Activity.
Confidentiality: Since you will be addressing real issues in real organizations in your assignments, it is important to respect confidentiality. Feel free to use an alias for any company or individuals you might mention in your assignments. Remember that all discussions about these organizations should only occur within this course and not be shared with people outside the course.

 
Apply project management tools and a PM outline type of your choice to structure and plan the project by defining, planning, and controlling. The project will be a continuation of how to improve the process you chose in Weeks 1 and 2.
Create a 10- to 12-slide PowerPoint presentation (supported by Excel and Word as needed), with detailed speaker notes, that includes the following:
Project description
Project Management Charts (Critical Path, Gant Chart, etc.)
Improved Process Flowchart from Week 1
Meeting cadence/rhythm and timing
Metrics to measure the project’s success
Financial and budgetary considerations
Description of the project reporting structure
Cite references to support your assignment.

For this activity, you will consider influences on constructive engagement with your topic. You will also propose how your ideas to transform conversations about your topic might influence how we as a larger society perceive it. This activity contributes to your draft of the critical analysis section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission. 
 
In this activity, you will work on the second part of the critical analysis of your topic in diversity. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity and use your responses to inform this assignment. Throughout the process, you will support your analysis with reliable evidence from varied sources, which include at least two resources from course materials and two resources from the library. For this activity, you will assess factors that may influence engagement with your topic and then explain one potential obstacle that could interfere with constructive conversation about your topic. Finally, you will describe a possible outcome of your proposed engagement that might influence societal conversations about your topic.
You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.

It is important to draw from a more diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
You will be evaluated on both criteria.

Assess at least two significant factors that could affect your topic, such as biases, beliefs, assumptions, and/or values.

In the previous activity, you identified positive elements in conversations about your topic and elements that might benefit from change. Now, determine factors that might influence how insiders and outsiders engage with your topic. What might change their perceptions of the topic or how they talk about it?

Explain how at least one potential obstacle could interfere with the population’s engagement with your topic.

In the previous activity, you identified conversational elements that present opportunities for change. Now, determine a possible obstacle that could interfere with this constructive engagement.

Describe a possible outcome of your proposed engagement that might influence the societal conversations that add to critical awareness of diversity.

You have critically examined how insiders and outsiders of your chosen population engage with your topic. How might your ideas for more constructive, transformative engagement impact how we, as a greater society, talk about your topic?

What to Submit
Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Using the readings by Alderson and Nielsen (2002) and Mahutga and Jorgenson (2016), answer the following questions in two sentences or less.
How are imports from the global South thought to increase inequality in developed countries?
How are exports to the global North thought to increase inequality in less-developed countries?
Synthesizing information from the two readings and the lecture, answer ONE of the following two questions:
How should institutions alter the relationship between imports from the global South and income inequality in developed countries? Cite any relevant evidence to support this idea.
How should EU integration alter the relationship between exports to the global North and income inequality in less-developed countries? Cite any relevant evidence to support this idea.

Hello all, this is a page summarizing the assignment in simpler terms. It helped me to break it down.
Create a Handbook: You and your group are tasked with making a handbook. This handbook will have strategies (or methods) to help people in an organization think better, make decisions wisely, and solve problems effectively.
The Structure:
Chapters/Modules: Each student in your group will write a separate chapter or section (module) for the handbook. The number of chapters corresponds to the number of students in your group.
Your Part: In your chapter, you’ll focus on the industry you work in or are most familiar with. You’ll explain how critical thinking (thinking deeply about problems) and decision-making (choosing what to do) are important in your industry, with examples and evidence to back up your points.
Working in a Group:
Although working in groups can be challenging, it’s a key part of this project. You’ll need to:
Pick a Handbook Title: Agree on a title for your handbook with your group.
Connect Your Chapters: Make sure there’s a theme or connection between all your chapters so the handbook feels cohesive.
Write Together: As a group, write an introduction and conclusion for the handbook. These parts should tie everything together and are graded as team efforts.
What to Include:
Your handbook should be informed by recent research (from the last 5 to 7 years) and cover various topics that are vital for leaders and decision-makers in organizations. Topics might include different types of reasoning (like deductive or inductive reasoning), the role of logic in decision-making, systems thinking, team building, handling uncertainty, fostering innovation, and ensuring customer satisfaction, among others.
The Final Product:
Team Effort: Even though each person writes their own chapter, you must submit the complete handbook as a team for grading.
Research: Dive deep into current research to understand what makes an organization, especially a learning organization, successful. Use both scholarly and non-scholarly resources to support your strategies.
Think Tank Approach: Immerse yourselves in the task. Don’t stop until you’ve created a comprehensive guide that could lead an organization to success.
Submission Details:
Same Document Submission: Every student must submit the same finalized version of the handbook in their own assignment submission area. This is crucial for grading and auditing purposes.
References: If you use sources in your introduction and conclusion, include a separate references page after the conclusion. This is apart from the individual references each student might have in their chapters.
Goal:
Your ultimate aim is to develop a handbook that will be seen as an invaluable resource for promoting success within an organization by enhancing critical thinking, decision-making, and problem-solving among its members.
Think of this project as an opportunity to combine your knowledge with your real-world industry experience to create something that could genuinely help organizations improve. Each chapter should offer unique insights into how these skills apply in different sectors, making the handbook a versatile tool for various industries.
List of topics to choose for individual chapter to tie into Mindfulness and inclusion ( we decided to all pick 2 of these):
Team Building:
Handling uncertainty:
No more than 5 pages long

1. Chapter 5 discusses several estimating methods.  Read the chapter and discuss which method do you feel is most effective from a project management perspective.  Then select and discuss which method you think is most ineffective from a project management perspective.  Support your selections.
Textbook: Project Management: The Managerial Process Seventh Edition
2. Read the attached article.  Critique it.  I am looking for you to discuss the best practices addressed.  Are the points discussed in the article industry specific in terms of their value?  Or is the article more individual-specific? Based on what you have read, how do the practices discussed affect scheduling? etc…  Please explain your thoughts.
Article: Small Budget, Big Ambition.pdf

Describe your preferred conflict-management style (collaborative, competitive, accommodating, avoidance,
 or compromising) and discuss how it complements your personal leadership theory. What types of
 situations would prompt you to use an alternative conflict management style and why? 
Submission, APA, 2 paragraphs,