Reply to each discussion board with at least 150 words, one reference and one qu

Reply to each discussion board with at least 150 words, one reference and one question at the ending for EACH discussion. Total of 300 words and two references.
APA format
References must be within a 5 year range. 2019-2024.
I will add the discussions to whom you will reply to and will add an example as well.
You will reply to Luis and Alexa.

Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the ind

Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.
As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.
As a master’s-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:
Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.
Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.
Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.
Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.
Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.
Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.
Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, or national level.
Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.
Incorporate social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.
Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.
Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.

I am a student nurse and today I had my check off from tracheostomy suction and

I am a student nurse and today I had my check off from tracheostomy suction and trach care.The scenario that I had was a patient that was stable with Oxigen 93% on a step down unit that needed OPEN SUCTION AND TRACH CARE. On respiratory assesment I could hear some rhonchi in his longs and I detremined that he needed to be suctioned. Everything went well, the entire procedure. I passed the proceddure. I will attach the file to look at and help you to complete the paper. I highlighted that I did the open suction and trach care. I have to mention that this is done on skills LAB , on a MANECHIN.

Your topic of interest. A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you s

Your topic of interest.
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
” PLEASE USE WALDEN UNIVERISTY LIBRARY “

Complete the following flow chart by adding the names of the veins. Where possib

Complete the following flow chart by adding the names of the veins. Where possible,
include the organs/areas each vein serves above or next to each box. Note that some of
these veins are more medial than others; this is important for determining the naming. We use visible body app and book by Cynthia Harley, Ph.D.

SYNTHESIS OF LITERATURE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW I’VE ATTACHED THE PREVI

SYNTHESIS OF LITERATURE ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
I’VE ATTACHED THE PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENT WHICH IS A TEMPLATE FOR THIS ONE. THE REFERENCES ARE THERE IN THAT ASSIGNMENT SO THIS PAPER IS A CONTINUATION
Utilize the articles addressed in the literature matrix to write a synthesis of the research. You will
only have 10 – 15 articles, but you should be able to draw some conclusions and form opinions
about how the research could be used to make a practice change. It is important that students are
able to not only analyze individual research studies, but to then see how the evidence on a topic
“fits together”. This is beyond a simple literature review; it is looking at research as a whole and
drawing conclusions.
Review the articles you’ve gathered and address the following:
1. What are the overall strengths and weaknesses of the research studies?
2. Where there any obvious gaps in the research (something that wasn’t addressed that
really needed addressing)?
3. Which studies had similar conclusions? How did these studies differ in terms of strength
of design, level of evidence (using Melnyk classification system), number of subjects,
usefulness for practice, and other pertinent aspects of research?
4. Were there studies that had very different or contradictory results? Why do you think this
is the case?
5. What is your overall conclusion about what the research is concluding and using the
evidence for a practice change?
6. Anything else you found pertinent or noteworthy about the research studies you
reviewed.
Keep in mind that this is a synthesis, so you don’t want to discuss research using a “shotgun”
approach where you talk about research A, then research B, then research C, etc. This doesn’t
demonstrate an understanding of the research as a whole. An example of an approach for
synthesis might be research A & B reached similar conclusions while research C reached a
different conclusion with a smaller sample size. You would then add your own
conclusions/opinion, based on the whole of what the studies are telling you.
INSTRUCTIONS
 This is a formal paper and should be written in narrative format, utilizing APA format per
LU graduate level paper guidelines.
 Please include a title page, abstract, and reference page.
 Use headings to separate sections of your paper.
 Clearly cite information from the research studies themselves and other sources used in
evaluating them. Note that you may have several citations in one paragraph as you
discuss different research studies.
 A minimum of 5 pages is required, not including title, abstract, and reference pages.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

Work with your EBP group for this part of the project; however, this is an indiv

Work with your EBP group for this part of the project; however, this is an individual assignment. Use the articles you retrieved from the previous assignment. Each student will select two (2) research articles from your prior submission which are approved by your course instructor. Each group will be analyzing a total of six (6) unique articles for the project. Try to select the best articles for your PICOT question. This will be your final article set.
Picot: IN ACUTE CARE GERIATRIC PATIENTS, HOW DOES BED ALARMS COMPARE TO NO BED ALARM IMPACT FALLS DURING HOSPITALIZATIONS.
Read each article carefully several times and answer the questions to the best of your ability about the merit of the article. Create an evidence table for your two (2) articles, using the template provided. Use either the quantitative or qualitative article templates depending on the type of article you are evaluating. This table will be a tool to inform your article analysis. Use the EBP article analysis document as a basis to evaluate the scientific merit of your articles. Write a summary of your findings in about 2 paragraphs for each article. Submit your assignment in one contiguous document (i.e., article 1 evidence table, article 1 analysis, article 2 evidence table, article 2 analysis).
im sending 12 articles that was approve my the instructor you just have to choose 2 from it, also there is an example

I am working on a PICO research paper about birth control and infertility. I nee

I am working on a PICO research paper about birth control and infertility. I need sections 3,4,5 of the rubic completed.
Section 3 – search and strategy / level of evidence
Section 4- literature review
Section 5- analysis of literature
I will attach my research paper, a rubic, and example research paper of what’s expected for this assignment.