Category: Nursing

he assignment on global public health issues is intricately connected to the course materials provided through Course Point, including the podcasts and interactive modules. These resources are designed to support and enhance your understanding of the assignment’s topics by providing foundational knowledge, real-world examples, and interactive learning experiences. Here’s how they relate:
Foundation of Knowledge:Podcasts: The Course Point podcasts offer expert discussions on global public health issues such as infectious diseases, chronic illnesses, environmental health, and health equity. These discussions provide a solid foundation of knowledge that is directly relevant to the assignment topics. For example, if your assignment involves developing an intervention for reducing the spread of infectious diseases, the podcasts on global health security and pandemic preparedness will offer valuable insights and evidence that you can incorporate into your work.
Interactive Modules: The interactive modules provide a hands-on learning experience, allowing you to engage with the material in a practical way. These modules often simulate real-world scenarios, such as outbreak investigations or the impact of climate change on health. This experience is directly applicable to the assignment, where you are expected to analyze global public health challenges and propose evidence-based interventions.
This assessment fulfills the following objectives:
MLO 8.1, 8.2
Refer to the Course Structure and Alignment page for detailed information regarding objectives alignment to materials, activities and assessments.
Instructions
Scenario Overview:You are a public health professional attending an international conference focused on global public health issues. The conference brings together experts, policymakers, and healthcare providers from around the world to discuss pressing health challenges and develop collaborative strategies for addressing them. The attendees are divided into three groups, each tasked with discussing a specific aspect of global public health. Your role is to facilitate a discussion within your group, drawing on your knowledge and experience to explore the complexities of global health challenges.
Group 2: Chronic Diseases and the Global Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)Scenario: Your group is discussing the increasing prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. These conditions are becoming more common worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and they pose significant challenges to global public health.
Discussion Questions:
What are the primary global drivers of the increase in chronic diseases?Consider factors such as urbanization, lifestyle changes, and aging populations.
What strategies can be implemented at a global level to reduce the burden of NCDs?Discuss prevention, early detection, and management strategies that could be effective across different cultural and economic contexts.
How can global health initiatives be designed to address the disparities in NCD outcomes between high-income and low-income countries?Explore the role of policy, education, and healthcare infrastructure in reducing these disparities.
RequirementsInitial Post
Word Count: The initial post should be between 250 – 300 words.
Content:Discuss a specific community health issue.
Explain the significance of this issue in the context of community health nursing.
Provide evidence-based practices or interventions that address this issue.
Reflect on personal experiences or observations related to the topic, if applicable.
Sources Referenced:Use at least two credible sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journals, reputable health organizations).
Properly cite all sources in APA format.
Include a reference list at the end of the post.
Deadline:First reply should be posted by Day 4 of the discussion week.
Second reply should be posted by Day 7 of the discussion week.
Peer Replies
Number of Replies:Respond to two peers, one from each of the other two groups.
Choose one peer from each of the other two groups (groups here)
Word Count:Each reply should be between 150 words.
Content:Engage with the peer’s post by providing thoughtful feedback, additional insights, or alternative perspectives.
Support your replies with evidence or personal experience when relevant.
Ask open-ended questions to encourage further discussion.
General Guidelines
Tone and Etiquette:Maintain a respectful and professional tone in all posts and replies.
Be constructive and supportive in your feedback.
Timeliness:Submit the initial post by the specified deadline.
Post replies within the given timeframe to ensure peers have time to respond.
Engagement:Actively participate in the discussion throughout the week.
Aim to contribute meaningfully to the learning community.
Evaluation Criteria
Quality of Content:Depth of analysis and understanding of the topic.
Relevance and accuracy of information provided.
Engagement:Interaction with peers and quality of contributions to the discussion.
Writing and Format:Clarity, coherence, and organization of posts.
Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and APA format for citations and references.
Rubric
DISCUSSION BOARD GRADING RUBRICDISCUSSION BOARD GRADING RUBRICCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post to Assigned Discussion Question3 ptsExceptionalInitial post is made in a timely fashion, by day 4, giving others ample opportunity to respond.2 ptsGoodInitial post is made by day 5, giving others limited opportunity to respond.1 ptsNeeds ImprovementInitial post is made by day 6 or 7, giving others minimal opportunity to respond.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingInitial post is not made.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReplies to Initial Post for Each of the Alternate Peer Group’s Assigned Discussion Question3 ptsExceptionalParticipated on two days.2 ptsGoodParticipated on only one day. Posted two replies on same day as initial post.1 ptsNeeds ImprovementPosted initial post and one reply.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingReplies not posted.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis for Initial Post20 ptsExceptionalSynthesizes new content from assignment and what has already been learned in the course; addresses inconsistencies; poses new possibilities based on readings and research.15 ptsGoodTranslates new content from the assignment and what has already been learned in the course; addresses inconsistencies; connects to other content and real-life situations. Less than 250 words.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementMakes connections from real-life situations but the translation of new content is unclear, not firmly established, or not obvious.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingMakes no connections from real-life situations but the translation of new content is unclear, not firmly established, or not obvious.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply to Peer #1 Initial Post7 ptsExceptionalReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes critique and analysis of the peer’s points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting how the writer supports or questions that point. Uses at least one new peer-reviewed reference.5 ptsGoodReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes analysis of points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting why the writer agrees or disagrees. Evidence is not clearly connected.3 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides opinions; reply is rudimentary and superficial, lacking any degree of analysis, critique, comparison, or contrast. No references utilized. Less than 150 words.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingNo reply.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply to Peer #2 Initial Post7 ptsExceptionalReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes critique and analysis of the peer’s points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting how the writer supports or questions that point. Uses at least one new peer-reviewed reference.5 ptsGoodReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes analysis of points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting why the writer agrees or disagrees. Evidence is not clearly connected.3 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides opinions; reply is rudimentary and superficial, lacking any degree of analysis, critique, comparison, or contrast. No references utilized. Less than 150 words.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingNo reply.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReadings and Resources5 ptsExceptional Minimum of two (2) references for initial post (textbook and/or one to two peer-reviewed journal articles) published within five (5) years unless a classic or historical source. • Minimum of one (1) additional different reference for each peer reply (two [2] total). • Reply references may be peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five (5) years unless a classic or historical source or valid and reliable government or organizational website. • Peer-reviewed journal articles should be available in the FSW Library. Journal articles from StatPearls database or the National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information are also acceptable. • NOTE: A total of four (4) different references must be used.
0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingReferences are not supplied or do not meet the minimum criteria.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, and APA Format5 ptsExceptionalProper grammar, spelling, and APA format of citations and references is used throughout the initial post and two peer replies. 0 to 2 errors3 ptsGoodContains minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or in APA format of citations and references. 3 to 4 errors1 ptsNeeds ImprovementContains multiple errors in grammar, spelling, and/or APA format of citations and references. 5 to 6 errors0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingLacks proper grammar or APA format; contains multiple misspelled words. Greater than 6 errors
5 pts
Total Points: 50

This assignment will allow you to practice searching for three quantitative nursing research articles by using online databases. Follow the search strategy given in the assignment instructions below. When you are successful with this assignment, you will use these nursing quantitative research articles in a follow-up assignment in Module Four – Annotated Bibliography. Submit the three articles as pdf’s only. NO articles earlier than 2019 accepted unless the article is considered “gold standard” research. Only the first three articles you submit will be graded-regardless of the day you turn into the submission link.
Quantitative Research Article Criteria
Identifies 3 appropriate study articles in a professional journal. Studies are quantitative. articles (for example: quantitative descriptive, correlational, comparative, quasi-experimental, or experimental designs). At least two studies must be prospective (data actually collected at the time of the study). The other may be retrospective or prospective. Studies/ articles must be current, within 5 years and in English. Studies must logically relate to your topic, problem identification, and nursing practice. ‘ Studies are NOT qualitative, a mixed-method study, a quality improvement study, a systematic review, meta-synthesis, meta-analysis, meta-summary, an integrative review, or a thesis or dissertation. No animal studies or pilot studies. Not a general information study without the elements of a study (e.g.: must include a review of literature and a methods section with results and discussion).

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF]resource.Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

he assignment on global public health issues is intricately connected to the course materials provided through Course Point, including the podcasts and interactive modules. These resources are designed to support and enhance your understanding of the assignment’s topics by providing foundational knowledge, real-world examples, and interactive learning experiences. Here’s how they relate:
Foundation of Knowledge:Podcasts: The Course Point podcasts offer expert discussions on global public health issues such as infectious diseases, chronic illnesses, environmental health, and health equity. These discussions provide a solid foundation of knowledge that is directly relevant to the assignment topics. For example, if your assignment involves developing an intervention for reducing the spread of infectious diseases, the podcasts on global health security and pandemic preparedness will offer valuable insights and evidence that you can incorporate into your work.
Interactive Modules: The interactive modules provide a hands-on learning experience, allowing you to engage with the material in a practical way. These modules often simulate real-world scenarios, such as outbreak investigations or the impact of climate change on health. This experience is directly applicable to the assignment, where you are expected to analyze global public health challenges and propose evidence-based interventions.
This assessment fulfills the following objectives:
MLO 8.1, 8.2
Refer to the Course Structure and Alignment page for detailed information regarding objectives alignment to materials, activities and assessments.
Instructions
Scenario Overview:You are a public health professional attending an international conference focused on global public health issues. The conference brings together experts, policymakers, and healthcare providers from around the world to discuss pressing health challenges and develop collaborative strategies for addressing them. The attendees are divided into three groups, each tasked with discussing a specific aspect of global public health. Your role is to facilitate a discussion within your group, drawing on your knowledge and experience to explore the complexities of global health challenges.
Group 2: Chronic Diseases and the Global Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)Scenario: Your group is discussing the increasing prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. These conditions are becoming more common worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and they pose significant challenges to global public health.
Discussion Questions:
What are the primary global drivers of the increase in chronic diseases?Consider factors such as urbanization, lifestyle changes, and aging populations.
What strategies can be implemented at a global level to reduce the burden of NCDs?Discuss prevention, early detection, and management strategies that could be effective across different cultural and economic contexts.
How can global health initiatives be designed to address the disparities in NCD outcomes between high-income and low-income countries?Explore the role of policy, education, and healthcare infrastructure in reducing these disparities.
RequirementsInitial Post
Word Count: The initial post should be between 250 – 300 words.
Content:Discuss a specific community health issue.
Explain the significance of this issue in the context of community health nursing.
Provide evidence-based practices or interventions that address this issue.
Reflect on personal experiences or observations related to the topic, if applicable.
Sources Referenced:Use at least two credible sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journals, reputable health organizations).
Properly cite all sources in APA format.
Include a reference list at the end of the post.
Deadline:First reply should be posted by Day 4 of the discussion week.
Second reply should be posted by Day 7 of the discussion week.
Peer Replies
Number of Replies:Respond to two peers, one from each of the other two groups.
Choose one peer from each of the other two groups (groups here)
Word Count:Each reply should be between 150 words.
Content:Engage with the peer’s post by providing thoughtful feedback, additional insights, or alternative perspectives.
Support your replies with evidence or personal experience when relevant.
Ask open-ended questions to encourage further discussion.
General Guidelines
Tone and Etiquette:Maintain a respectful and professional tone in all posts and replies.
Be constructive and supportive in your feedback.
Timeliness:Submit the initial post by the specified deadline.
Post replies within the given timeframe to ensure peers have time to respond.
Engagement:Actively participate in the discussion throughout the week.
Aim to contribute meaningfully to the learning community.
Evaluation Criteria
Quality of Content:Depth of analysis and understanding of the topic.
Relevance and accuracy of information provided.
Engagement:Interaction with peers and quality of contributions to the discussion.
Writing and Format:Clarity, coherence, and organization of posts.
Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and APA format for citations and references.
Rubric
DISCUSSION BOARD GRADING RUBRICDISCUSSION BOARD GRADING RUBRICCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post to Assigned Discussion Question3 ptsExceptionalInitial post is made in a timely fashion, by day 4, giving others ample opportunity to respond.2 ptsGoodInitial post is made by day 5, giving others limited opportunity to respond.1 ptsNeeds ImprovementInitial post is made by day 6 or 7, giving others minimal opportunity to respond.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingInitial post is not made.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReplies to Initial Post for Each of the Alternate Peer Group’s Assigned Discussion Question3 ptsExceptionalParticipated on two days.2 ptsGoodParticipated on only one day. Posted two replies on same day as initial post.1 ptsNeeds ImprovementPosted initial post and one reply.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingReplies not posted.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis for Initial Post20 ptsExceptionalSynthesizes new content from assignment and what has already been learned in the course; addresses inconsistencies; poses new possibilities based on readings and research.15 ptsGoodTranslates new content from the assignment and what has already been learned in the course; addresses inconsistencies; connects to other content and real-life situations. Less than 250 words.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementMakes connections from real-life situations but the translation of new content is unclear, not firmly established, or not obvious.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingMakes no connections from real-life situations but the translation of new content is unclear, not firmly established, or not obvious.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply to Peer #1 Initial Post7 ptsExceptionalReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes critique and analysis of the peer’s points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting how the writer supports or questions that point. Uses at least one new peer-reviewed reference.5 ptsGoodReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes analysis of points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting why the writer agrees or disagrees. Evidence is not clearly connected.3 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides opinions; reply is rudimentary and superficial, lacking any degree of analysis, critique, comparison, or contrast. No references utilized. Less than 150 words.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingNo reply.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply to Peer #2 Initial Post7 ptsExceptionalReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes critique and analysis of the peer’s points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting how the writer supports or questions that point. Uses at least one new peer-reviewed reference.5 ptsGoodReplies to alternate peer discussion. Reply includes analysis of points mentioned, comparing and or contrasting why the writer agrees or disagrees. Evidence is not clearly connected.3 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides opinions; reply is rudimentary and superficial, lacking any degree of analysis, critique, comparison, or contrast. No references utilized. Less than 150 words.0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingNo reply.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReadings and Resources5 ptsExceptional Minimum of two (2) references for initial post (textbook and/or one to two peer-reviewed journal articles) published within five (5) years unless a classic or historical source. • Minimum of one (1) additional different reference for each peer reply (two [2] total). • Reply references may be peer-reviewed journal articles published within the last five (5) years unless a classic or historical source or valid and reliable government or organizational website. • Peer-reviewed journal articles should be available in the FSW Library. Journal articles from StatPearls database or the National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information are also acceptable. • NOTE: A total of four (4) different references must be used.
0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingReferences are not supplied or do not meet the minimum criteria.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, and APA Format5 ptsExceptionalProper grammar, spelling, and APA format of citations and references is used throughout the initial post and two peer replies. 0 to 2 errors3 ptsGoodContains minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or in APA format of citations and references. 3 to 4 errors1 ptsNeeds ImprovementContains multiple errors in grammar, spelling, and/or APA format of citations and references. 5 to 6 errors0 ptsInsufficiency or LackingLacks proper grammar or APA format; contains multiple misspelled words. Greater than 6 errors
5 pts
Total Points: 50

This assignment will allow you to practice searching for three quantitative nursing research articles by using online databases. Follow the search strategy given in the assignment instructions below. When you are successful with this assignment, you will use these nursing quantitative research articles in a follow-up assignment in Module Four – Annotated Bibliography. Submit the three articles as pdf’s only. NO articles earlier than 2019 accepted unless the article is considered “gold standard” research. Only the first three articles you submit will be graded-regardless of the day you turn into the submission link.
Quantitative Research Article Criteria
Identifies 3 appropriate study articles in a professional journal. Studies are quantitative. articles (for example: quantitative descriptive, correlational, comparative, quasi-experimental, or experimental designs). At least two studies must be prospective (data actually collected at the time of the study). The other may be retrospective or prospective. Studies/ articles must be current, within 5 years and in English. Studies must logically relate to your topic, problem identification, and nursing practice. ‘ Studies are NOT qualitative, a mixed-method study, a quality improvement study, a systematic review, meta-synthesis, meta-analysis, meta-summary, an integrative review, or a thesis or dissertation. No animal studies or pilot studies. Not a general information study without the elements of a study (e.g.: must include a review of literature and a methods section with results and discussion).

Maximum of 5 pages, Must be in APA format, 7th edition, four references within five years, requires introduction and conclusions. Introduction 1/2 pages. Body of the literature review 3.5 pages. I’ll give more specificities later.

Select a nursing theory that has had an impact in the development of community nursing and explain its contribution to field.
Guidelines:
APA Format
MUST utilize credible data sources such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinical Key, The Cochrane Library. Library resources can be accessed from the Library page at the FNU.edu website. FNU Librarians are available to assist each student with retrieving the required scholarly content.
Research paper must be 500 words.
3 or more scholarly sources must be utilized
Sources must be within the last 5 years
Must have a minimum of 3 Sources
All article sources must be cited by including them in reference sheet (separate).

Week 7 Case Study (4 cases) with Template:
Please follow the instructions written, as per the grading rubric.
1.COPY AND PASTE THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT BELOW (Starting from Q1), INCLUDING THE QUESTIONS, AND GIVE ANSWERS WHERE IT SAYS ‘YOUR ANSWER.’
2.BE VERY BRIEF.
PRIMARY FOCUS: ADVANCED PHARMACOLOGY! ADVANCED PHARMACOLOGY!
3.For each of the scenarios below, answer A, B, C, D & E using Clinical
Practice guidelines where applicable.
4.If any parts of the rubric (A, B, C, D & E) do not have an answer, for example, no prescriptions can be written, please leave the answer blank. (Say N/A means Not Applicable)
5.List the drugs (not just the drug class) in discussion (B). This is Advanced Pharm Course!
6.Explain the problem and how you would address the problem (in Rationale, C).
7.When prescribing a new drug, write a complete medication order (D) as you would write a prescription order. For example, if you’re prescribing a beta blocker, say ‘metoprolol 25 mg once daily.’ Spell out the drug names, not just the drug class.
8.List the three references (E)
9.Written expression and formatting, proper English writing standards, correct grammar and mechanics, and proper punctuation are required.
10.Please provide the answer under Rationale (C) if any additional/specific information is asked in the question.
Question 1. Mary is a 35-year-old woman who has been diagnosed with hypothyroidism. Her labs today show a TSH of 20, MCV 78, MCHD 26, Ferritin 9, and TIBC 418. She has a history of iron deficiency anemia for two months. Current medications include Kelp tablets daily, ibuprofen 400 mg daily as needed, and ethinyl
Estradiol/norgestrel one tablet daily. What medication would you start this patient
on for her hypothyroidism? How would you monitor this patient’s response to the
medication? What education would you provide regarding her medications and
their interactions?
A. Patient history considered in making the medication selection:
YOUR ANSWER
B. Medication prescribed or changed (Spell out the names of drugs):
YOUR ANSWER
C. Rationale provided to include ‘WHY’ the decision using Clinical Guidelines:
YOUR ANSWER
D. Written medication orders with all 5 aspects required for a valid prescription order (your prescription order:
YOUR ANSWER
E. At least 3 References for the scenario scholarly, peer-reviewed, the past 5 years to include the appropriate clinical practice guidelines if applicable:
YOUR ANSWER
Question 2. Joe is a 48-year-old male diagnosed with Type II Diabetes Mellitus for a year. He has controlled his blood glucose through dietary changes. He has
hypertension and is currently on Lisinopril 20 mg po daily. He has no known
allergies. His lab work includes these results: fasting BG is 225 mg/dL; HgA1C =
7.5%. Basic Metabolic Profile (BMP) is normal except for a Cr of 2.0 and eGRF
of 28. What treatment plan would you implement for Joe? What medications
would you prescribe and how would you monitor them? What education would
you provide regarding his treatment plan?
A. Patient history considered in making the medication selection:
YOUR ANSWER
B. Medication prescribed or changed:
YOUR ANSWER
C. Rationale provided to include Current literature to support the rationale with Clinical Guidelines:
YOUR ANSWER
D. Written medication orders with all 5 aspects required for a valid prescription order.
YOUR ANSWER
E. References for the scenario scholarly, peer-reviewed, the past 5 years to include the appropriate clinical practice guidelines if applicable. Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA format:
YOUR ANSWER
Question 3. Jose is a 55-year-old truck driver being evaluated for his commercial driver’s license. He has a known history of diabetes mellitus type II. Current medications include Metformin 1000 mg Bid, Glipizide 20 mg PO daily. Diltiazem 120 mg po BID. He is allergic to sulfa. Lab results show a fasting blood glucose of 325
mg/dL, HgA1C = 10.6%. Basic metabolic Profile is normal. What treatment plan
would you implement for Jose? What medications would you prescribe, and how
would you monitor them? What education would you provide regarding his
treatment plan?
A. Patient history considered in making the medication selection:
YOUR ANSWER
B. Medication prescribed or changed:
YOUR ANSWER
C. Rationale provided to include Current literature to support the rationale with Clinical Guidelines:
YOUR ANSWER
D. Written medication orders with all five aspects required for a valid prescription order.
YOUR ANSWER
E. References for the scenario scholarly, peer-reviewed, the past five years to include the appropriate clinical practice guidelines if applicable. Use at least three sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA format:
YOUR ANSWER
Question 4. Jenny is a 63-year-old woman with complaints of heartburn 4 to 5 times a week over the past 3 months. Her symptoms are worse at night after going to bed. Her
heartburn is worse, and she coughs a lot at night. She has tried OTC Lansoprazole (Prevacid) 24-hour once daily for the past 2 weeks. This has helped some symptoms, but she is still bothered by them. Current medications include Diltiazem CD 120 mg PO once daily, Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg PO once daily, Metformin 500 mg PO
twice daily, Aspirin 81 mg PO daily, Fluticasone/salmeterol DPI 100 mcg/50 mcg
one inhalation twice daily. Your working diagnosis for this patient is GERD. What treatment plan would you implement for Jenny? What medications would you
prescribe and how would you monitor them? What education would you provide
regarding her treatment plan?
A. Patient history considered in making the medication selection:
YOUR ANSWER
B. Medication prescribed or changed:
YOUR ANSWER
C. Rationale provided to include Current literature to support the rationale with Clinical Guidelines:
YOUR ANSWER
D. Written medication orders with all 5 aspects required for a valid prescription order.
YOUR ANSWER
E. References for the scenario scholarly, peer-reviewed, the past 5 years to include the appropriate clinical practice guidelines if applicable. Use at least 3 sources for each scenario and cite sources using APA format:
YOUR ANSWER

read the ethical issue assignment, APA, 2 scholarly nursing articles/journals. no government sources.

After watching the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2mi8zhnhYM
answer the following questions:
1. Do you do a self-evaluation before you meet with your manager?
2. Based on your last performance appraisal (evaluation), have you made changes to your nursing practice because of the comments your supervisor has given you?
3. Please explain why you decided to make or not make any changes.
4. Does an increase in your salary/bonus depend on your performance appraisal? (YES) or do you work in an organization where it’s an across-the-board increase (i.e. a collective bargaining organization, NYSNA, 1199,…).
5. Do you think that there should be incentives for performance and if so what should they be?
6. Should nurses be given incentives for meeting nursing/hospital goals such as a decrease in falls, pressure ulcers, and a decrease in infection rates? Why or Why not?