Create a 5 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a

Create a 5 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue. And 1 page references,
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

Professional Attributtes Conduct Knowledge Skill Competency Honesty and Intergr

Professional Attributtes
Conduct
Knowledge
Skill
Competency
Honesty and Intergrity
Define professionalism
Explain how it affectsyou the profession, the client and the community.
Define each professional attribute listed include one example of each.
Write 2 page doubled space.
Cover sheet Nsme, title and date
Find and include one reference to support your idea
Cite resource on separate page and in text.

Welcome to week 7! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to musculoskele

Welcome to week 7! This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to musculoskeletal system disorders. We will cover the topics of NSAIDs, DMARDs, opioids, and muscles relaxants in relation to the treatment of arthritis, RA, gout, and addiction.
When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (i.e., diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease.

Checklist for Reading and Critiquing a Research Article 1. Critiquing the resear

Checklist for Reading and Critiquing a Research Article
1. Critiquing the research article
a. Title describes the article
b. Abstract summarizes the article
c. Introduction makes the purpose clear
d. Problem is properly introduced
e. Purpose of the study is explained
f. Research question(s) are clearly presented
g. Theoretical framework informs the research
h. Literature review is relevant, comprehensive, and includes recent research
i. Methods section details how the research questions were addressed or hypotheses were tested
j. Analysis is consistent with the study questions and research design
k. Results are clearly presented and statistics clearly explained
l. Discussion explains the results in relation to the theoretical framework, research questions, and significance to nursing
m. Limitations are presented and their implications discussed
n. Conclusion includes recommendations for nursing practice, future research, and policymakers
2. Determine the level and quality of the evidence using a scale (several can be found in ANA’s Research Toolkit http://www.nursingworld.org/Research-Toolkit/Appraising-the-Evidence ).
3. Decide if the study is applicable to your practice.

Use the two required articles to complete the assignment: Article #1: In the NR3

Use the two required articles to complete the assignment:
Article #1: In the NR351 Announcements, locate the announcement entitled, “IMPORTANT: Assigned Article for Weeks 4 & 6 Assignments.” This is the same article used for the Week 4 Assigned Article Summary assignment. In this announcement, you will find the link to the assigned article from Week 4 (you must be logged into the Chamberlain Library before clicking the link).
Article #2: Locate an article from the Chamberlain Library to answer this question: How does technology help or hinder nursing practice as it relates to the topic in the Week 4 article?
Follow the APA Scholarly Writing Paper template instructions to complete the paper.
When complete, save and close the template. Click the Submit button at the top of this page to upload your completed assignment.
Correctly cite and reference ideas and information from scholarly literature.
Follow grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).
Title Page and Paper Format Using Current APA Style
Appropriate margins and headings.
Use of 12-point Times New Roman font.
Use of double-line spacing.
Title page includes student name, course name, and faculty name.
Introduction & Conclusion
Introduction contains the purpose of the paper.
Length of Introduction must be 50-75 words.
Conclusion contains a concise summary of the paper’s main points and provides a concluding statement.
Length of conclusion must be 75-100 words.
Article #1: Week 4 Assigned Article Summary
Clearly summarize the major ideas within the assigned article.
Length of the Assigned Article Summary must be 175-200 words.
Include one paraphrased area with a citation using the assigned sentence for paraphrasing.
Include one short, direct quotation using the assigned quotation. Cite this quotation.
Article #2: Impact of Technology on Nursing Practice
Locate an article from the Chamberlain Library as outlined in the instructions and template.
Length of the Impact of Technology on Nursing Practice must be 125-150 words.
Clearly state how technology helps or hinders nursing practice as it relates to the topic in article #1.
Include one short, direct quotation from this article. Cite this quotation.
Reference List using Current APA Style
Author(s)
Year & article title
Journal name, volume, and issue numbers
Page numbers, parentheses, double-line spacing, DOI, and hanging indent
In-Text Direct Quotations and Citation for the Assigned Article #1 using Current APA Style
Quotation marks
Author name(s)
Year, page abbreviation, page number
Parentheses & punctuation
In-Text Paraphrased Area and Citation for the Assigned Article #1 using Current APA Style
Content paraphrased appropriately
Author name(s)
Year
Parentheses & punctuation
In-Text Direct Quotation and Citation for Article #2 using Current APA Style
Quotation marks
Author name(s)
Year, page abbreviation, page number
Parentheses & punctuation
Grammar and Organization
Correct grammar and punctuation.
Correct spelling.
Professional wording and complete sentences are used.
Writing is well organized, and main ideas are expressed and linked together.
Appendix with Permalinks
Appendix contains correct permalinks for Articles #1 and #2

After reviewing this module’s assigned readings, you will create a mind map iden

After reviewing this module’s assigned readings, you will create a mind map identifying the six cultural phenomena that should be considered when providing culturally appropriate care to patients, according to Giger and Davidhizar. For each phenomenon, provide a brief descriiption and example.
This mind map will be useful as you learn about the various cultural groups week to week and begin to prepare for your module seven assignment. For further project details and the final submission grading rubric, refer to Module 5 Assignment.
Submit the mind map as a URL or PDF. The use of Canva.com is recommended.
No citations/references are required for this assignment.
NO AI GENERATED WORK. TURNITIN MUST BE LESS THAN 20 %.
Read
Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. (2021). Transcultural Nursing: Assessment and Intervention (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
eBook ISBN: 9780323695565
Print ISBN: 9780323695541
Chapters 1-7
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded as Complete/ Incomplete.

Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics i

Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the health care delivery systems in the United States.

Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
NO AI GENERATED WORK, TURNITIN MUST BE LESS THAN 20%.
Read
Mason, D. J., Gardner, B. D., Outlaw, H. F., & O’Grady, T. E. (2016). Policy and politics: In nursing and health care. (7th ed.). Saunders. ISBN: 978-0-323-24144-1
Chapters 1-3, and 6
Discussion Rubric
Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
5 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
4 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
2 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
1 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
3 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
2 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
1 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
0 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to Posts of Peers
2 pts
Distinguished
Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
1 pts
Fair
Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
0 pts
Poor
Student provided no response to a peer’s post.
2 pts
Total Points: 10

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrat

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF]resource.Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.