Category: Nursing

Find two articles that provides an overview of a condition that discusses congenital Renal Agenesis that you found interesting and may help your classmates better understand the GI tract and/or urogenital systems
USE APA FORMAT.
DO NOT USE AI IT WILL DETECT IT
HAVE REFERENCES AND REFERENCE PAGE
THANK YOU!!

Develop your own nurse educator philosophy statement. Identify your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator. Address how this philosophy will guide you in the tripartite roles of a nurse educator – how it will guide your teaching, scholarship, and service. Support your philosophy with your knowledge of historical events that are pertinent to your work. In addition, identify the competencies that you see as critical to your role.
In sum, your philosophy statement should guide your practice as a nurse educator.
Your educator philosophy statement should do the following:
Identify the area of nursing education or the area in health care in which you will apply your MSN, education specialization skills, and knowledge.
Formulate your nurse educator philosophy statement, which should comprise of your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator.
Apply your philosophy statement to each of the tripartite roles of the nurse educator. What does your philosophy mean for your approach to teaching, scholarship, and service? As you discuss the role of teacher, be sure to address any theories (adult learning theory, learner-center education, and others) that shape your approach as an educator.
Analyze the relationship of significant historical events that have shaped the role you seek to fill.
Analyze the most essential nurse educator competencies necessary for this MSN-prepared nurse educator. Explain why you selected the competencies you did.
Conclude with a summary.
Format: 12-point Times New Roman or Arial font, double spaced in Microsoft Word.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the historical evolution of nursing education.
Analyze the influence of historical events on a nurse educator role.
Competency 2: Analyze the tripartite role of teaching, service, and scholarship.
Formulate an informed nurse educator philosophy statement.
Applies a nurse educator philosophy to the tripartite roles of teaching, scholarship, and service.
Competency 3: Analyze professionally established nurse educator competencies and models.
Analyze the competencies necessary for a specific nurse educator role.
Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of a nursing education professional.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format and style as expected of a nursing education professional.Length: 3–5 pages plus a title page and a references page.
Use correct APA format, including page numbers and a title page. Citations and references (if used) are to be in correct APA format.
Writing should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from content.

Hi please find the attached document. Also please include in your reference the textbook by L. Story 5th edition. Pathophysiology: a practice approach. I believe this book can be accessed online. Thank you!
I have included the rubrics too! Please highly consider rubrics when writing the paper- my professor is particular about it. Thx!

Discussion Post-
Reply to 2 different people (see attached)
Minimum 150 words each
APA format
2 references

For this assessment, you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.
Collapse All
Introduction
Interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of a nurse’s work. Through interprofessional collaboration, practitioners and patients share information and consider each other’s perspectives to better understand and address the many factors that contribute to health and well-being (Sullivan et al., 2015). Essentially, by collaborating, health care practitioners and patients can have better health outcomes. Nurses, who are often at the frontlines of interacting with various groups and records, are full partners in this approach to health care.
Reflection is a key part of building interprofessional competence, as it allows you to look critically at experiences and actions through specific lenses. From the standpoint of interprofessional collaboration, reflection can help you consider potential reasons for and causes of people’s actions and behaviors (Saunders et al., 2016). It also can provide opportunities to examine the roles team members adopted in a given situation as well as how the team could have worked more effectively.
As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the What is Reflective Practice? activity. The activity consists of five questions that will allow you the opportunity to practice self-reflection. The information gained from completing this formative will help with your success on the Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate course engagement
Note: The Example Kaltura Reflection demonstrates how to cite sources appropriately in an oral presentation/video. Your assessment will reflect on either a professional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.
ReferencesSaunders, R., Singer, R., Dugmore, H., Seaman, K., & Lake, F. (2016). Nursing students’ reflections on an interprofessional placement in ambulatory care. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 393–402.
Sullivan, M., Kiovsky, R., Mason, D., Hill, C., Duke, C. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration and education. American Journal of Nursing, 115(3), 47–54.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work more effectively together.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature, which would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.Communicate via video with clear sound and light.
The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Professional Context
This assessment will help you to become a reflective practitioner. By considering your own successes and shortcomings in interprofessional collaboration, you will increase awareness of your problem-solving abilities. You will create a Kaltura video of your reflections, including a discussion of best practices for interprofessional collaboration and leadership strategies, supported by references to the literature.
You may choose to reflect on a collaborative interprofessional project you worked on in your current or former place of practice, or you may choose to imagine that you worked on the collaborative interprofessional scenario presented in the Assessment01Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF]Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and LeadershiReflectionVideo [PDF]resourc

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design.
Selection of Research Studies: choose and critically appraise two research studies
One qualitative research study in nursing.
One quantitative research study in nursing.
Citation and Mention: Clearly cite and reference both research studies you have selected.
Mention the titles and authors of the chosen studies within your response.
Critique and Analysis: critically appraise each of the selected studies by discussing their:Research objectives and questions.
Methodologies (for qualitative: data collection, analysis, and for quantitative: study design, data analysis).
Strengths and weaknesses.
Contribution to nursing practice and knowledge.
Should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within 5 years. This is submitted through turnitin and AI detector, therefore requires less than 20% plagiarism.

In the context of your current work environment, explore innovative strategies that professional nurses can employ to champion the integration of nursing theory into practice, enhancing the quality of patient care. Consider how leveraging evidence-based practices, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and utilizing technology can advance the application of nursing theory as a framework for delivering high-quality care in today’s dynamic healthcare settings.
Initial Post Screening Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.
Submit your initial post as a Word document to this assignment.
Black, B. P. (2023). Professional Nursing Concepts and Challenges (10th ed.). Elsevier.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25982.
The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health EquityLinks to an external site.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2010). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health [report brief]. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/12956/F…
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing HealthLinks to an external site.
WatchNational Academy of Medicine. (2021, May 12). Report release webinar: the future of nursing 2020-2030 [Video]. YouTube.
Report Release Webinar: The Future of Nursing 2020-2030 (1:33:35)Links to an external site.
NASEM Health and Medicine Division. (2013, December 12). Back to the future of nursing: A look ahead based on a landmark IOM report [Video]. YouTube.
Back to The Future of Nursing: A Look Ahead Based on a Landmark IOM Report (2:10:46)Links to an external site.
Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity. (2016, February 19). The IOM graduate medical education report (10.09.14) [Video]. YouTube.
The IOM Graduate Medical Education Report (10.09.14) (43:02)Links to an external site.

Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriiptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:
Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
For example, if your implementation plan includes the need for increased staffing, you might want to research errors or patient falls that occurred as a result of high patient and low staff ratio in the literature.
Use at least four evidence-based or scholarly sources that are relevant to your chosen topic to support your explanation.
Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.
Outcomes and opportunities for growth should focus on economic considerations.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Additional Requirements
Length of Submission: 3–5 double-spaced pages.
Number of References: Cite at least four sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.
APA formatting: Titles, headings, resources, and citations are formatted according to the current APA style.
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.
Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.
Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.
Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization’s resources and its ability to provide quality care.
Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.
Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Please read discussion number one, which is written by the student, and provide a response (75-100 words). Cited per APA (7th ed) comparing the nursing protocols discussed in discussion number one to the nursing protocol in discussion number two (discussion number two is written by me). Ensure that your cultivated responses are complete and rationale is provided from text or other scholarly resources.
So, basically, you are comparing two discussions. The first one is written by the student Jess, which is the main one, and the second one is mine. Please only use references from the last five years only. I attached the rubric as well.
Discussion number one:
Suicide Prevention Policy:
In my current workplace, an internal medicine office, we do not have as many nursing protocols as you would find in an acute setting. One protocol that we, unfortunately, use quite often is the suicide prevention policy and procedure. In brief, all patients who visit the office are screened for depression using a screening tool called the PHQ2/9. If they have had thoughts of harming themselves, we then use the suicide prevention protocol. Going forward with the visit the patient is not left alone in the exam room and the provider is notified through EPIC chat. Once the provider arrives the nurse may exit. The provider completes their own assessment and screening tool to determine their risk level. Mobile crisis may be called based on the outcome of this assessment.
The suicide prevention policy is lengthy, 18 pages, but outlines procedures for acute and sub-acute care as well as medical offices. The policy was created using several resources including the Joint Commission Standards BoosterPak for Suicide Risk, and the Sentinel Event Alert Issue 56: Detecting and Treating Suicide Ideation in All Settings. Interestingly enough, I could not access the actual reference listed in the policy for the joint commission publication, but it is from 2013. However, the joint commission does have a great deal of information about suicide prevention on their website including tool kits and safety planning videos (The Joint Commission, 2024). The other resource, Detecting and Treating Suicide Ideation in All Settings, is also published by the joint commission and reviews risk factors for suicide, methods for recognizing individuals at risk, and recommendations for actions when treating these patients (Collander, 2016).
While our policy seems comprehensive and was written using credible resources, it only goes so far in protecting patients in an outpatient setting. Unfortunately, the lack of mental healthcare services in the community presents a huge barrier when trying to support severely depressed individuals.
References
Collander, T. (2016). Detecting and treating suicide ideation in all settings. The Joint Commission. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/webinar-replays/webinar_slides_detecting_treating_suicide_settings_collanderpdf.pdf
The Joint Commission. (2024). Suicide prevention. Retrieved October 22, 2024, from https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics/suicide-prevention/
Discussion number two:
Chronic Care Management Protocol:
The nursing protocol I have recently worked with is Chronic Care Management (CCM). It is a Medicare-sponsored virtual care program for patients with chronic conditions. Implemented in a primary care office, the program promises continuous, remote care and lets patients monitor and manage their home health. The main aim of the CCM is to ensure that patients acquire regular care and supervision to help prevent their condition from worsening (Tandan et al., 2024).
A dedicated virtual care team allows patients to access CCM anytime, anywhere, without appointments or office visits (Dufour et al., 2023). The team coordinates cross-provider care to achieve the patient’s health goals. CCM helps patients avoid serious health events like emergency department visits or falls by engaging patients via regular, coordinated check-ins and communication. It also intends to lower long-term healthcare bill costs by addressing such issues before they become problematic.
Medicare guidelines and evidence-based practices in chronic disease management underline the development of the CCM protocol (Gibbs et al., 2021). The informed consent form explains the personalization of care and coordinated support. CCM builds on focusing on patients’ health and quality of life and helps people manage their condition effectively. The program’s structure provides an opportunity to continue interacting with healthcare providers, resulting in improved health outcomes and increased effectiveness in chronic care.
References
Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., … & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 176.
Gibbs, J. F., Guarnieri, E., Chu, Q. D., Murdoch, K., & Asif, A. (2021). Value-based chronic care model approach for vulnerable older patients with multiple chronic conditions. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 12(Suppl 2), S324.
Tandan, M., Dunlea, S., Cullen, W., & Bury, G. (2024). Teamwork and its impact on chronic disease clinical outcomes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health, 229, 88-115.

Develop a proposal for an intervention plan to fulfill a need within a specific population. We will be exploring the population of mature aged adults (65 and older) about managing their chronic kidney disease effectively while simultaneously incorporating the use of informatics in improving patient care outcomes.
Part 1: Problem Statement
Need Statement
Analyze a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need., which will be the population of mature aged adults (65 and older) about managing their chronic kidney disease effectively while simultaneously incorporating the use of informatics in improving patient care outcomes. Consider the following questions:
• What type of need is your project trying to address?
• Why is addressing this need important?
• What are one or more key pieces of evidence that support the urgency of the need?
Population and Setting
Describe a target population and setting in which an identified need will be addressed, which will be the population of mature aged adults (65 and older) about managing their chronic kidney disease effectively while simultaneously incorporating the use of informatics in improving patient care outcomes. Consider the following questions:
• What is the population you will be targeting with your project?
o Why is it important to address your identified need within this population?
• What is the setting you will be targeting with your project?
o Why is it important to address your identified need and target population within this setting?
Intervention Overview
Explain an overview of one or more interventions that would help address the population of mature aged adults (65 and older) about managing their chronic kidney disease effectively while simultaneously incorporating the use of informatics in improving patient care outcomes. Consider the following questions:
• What interventions could be applied to your identified need?
o How well do the interventions fit your target population?
o How well do the interventions fit your target setting?
o How well do the interventions address your identified need?
Comparison of Approaches
Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention overview with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting.
• Discuss one or more alternatives to the intervention(s) presented in your Intervention Overview.
o How do the alternatives encourage interprofessional care approaches compared to the interventions in your overview?
o How well do the alternatives fit your target population compared to the interventions in your overview?
o How well do the alternatives fit your target setting compared to the interventions in your overview?
o How well do the alternatives address your identified need compared to the interventions in your overview?
Initial Outcome Draft
Define an outcome that identifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.
• What is one outcome (or goal) that you want to achieve with your intervention and project?
o How does this outcome illustrate the purpose of your intervention and project?
o How does this outcome illustrate what you hope to accomplish with your intervention and project?
o How does this outcome establish a framework that can be used to achieve an improvement in the quality, safety, or experience of care?
Time Estimate
Propose a rough time frame for the development and implementation of an intervention to address an identified need.
• What is a rough time frame for developing your intervention?
o Is this time frame realistic?
o What potential challenges may impact this time frame?
• What is a rough time frame for implementing your intervention?
o Is this time frame realistic?
o What potential challenges may impact this time frame?
Part 2: Literature Review
Analyze current evidence to validate an identified need and its appropriateness within the target population and setting.
• How does the evidence validate your identified need?
• How does the evidence support the appropriateness of attempting to address your identified need within your target population?
• How does the evidence support the appropriateness of attempting to address your identified need within your target setting?
Evaluate and synthesize resources from diverse sources illustrating existing health policy that could impact the approach taken to address an identified need.
• What health policy exists that is relevant to your identified need?
o How will this health policy impact the way to try to address your identified need?
 In other words, are there considerations that you need to be sure you include or approaches that will be unavailable to you based on policy, as you continue to develop your project?
• Remember: In this literature review you are expected to have addressed 10–15 unique resources.
Address Generally Throughout
Communicate problem statement and literature review in a way that helps the audience to understand the importance and validity of a proposed project.
• Is your writing clear and professional?
• Does your writing effectively communicate your problem statement?
• Does your writing effectively communicate your literature review?
• Is your writing free from errors?
• Is your submission 5–9 pages?
• Does your submission conform to current APA style standards?
***Use Times New Roman Font size 12.