Category: Nursing

PLEASE USE ATTACHED TEMPLATE WHEN COMPLETING ASSIGNMENT AND PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES
Case #1. Teresa.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Teresa is a 34-year-old Hispanic G2P2002. She presents to your office
today at 10-weeks post-partum (PP) for her 6-week PP check. She underwent a C-section for failure to
progress following a 20-hour labor with Pitocin augmentation. She was discharged from the hospital on
day 2 post-partum without complications. Teresa has had difficulty with breast feeding due to
discomfort in her suture line and terrible pain in her right breast since her discharge from the hospital.
She reports occasional chills- she has not measured her temperature at home. Teresa was seen by the
lactation consultant while in the hospital but “nothing is working” and her son “cries all the time”. She
is afraid to feed her son formula as her mother-in-law wants her to “keep trying to breastfeed”. Teresa
tells you she feels as if she has failed her son- “it was so easy with my first baby, I know my husband
thinks I am a bad mother”.
Prior medical history: None. Prior surgical history: Appendectomy (2000)
Current medications: Prenatal vitamins, stool softener. Allergies: None
OB- GYN History: NSVD (2019) healthy female 7lb 10oz; C-section healthy male 8 lbs. 8 oz as per HPI.
Menarche age 12, cycle length- 5 days- frequency every 28 days- 4-5 tampons per day. No history of
sexually transmitted infections (STDs). History of abnormal pap smear in 2019 which was followed by a
normal colposcopy. Last pap (during recent prenatal care) reported normal. HIV negative.
LMP: First PP menstrual cycle last week. Has not resumed sexual activity PP. Contraception history:
Oral contraceptives, condoms.
Social history: Lives with husband, mother- in- law, and children. Stay at home mom. Denies EtOH or
recreational drug use, never smoker. Her family speaks Spanish at home; she is fluent in English.
Family history: Unremarkable.
Review of Systems (ROS): Negative except as noted in HPI.
Physical Exam (PE)
VS: BP: 110/70, P: 90, RR: 18, T: 38.4, Weight: 132 lbs.
Teresa’s C-section suture line is healing well without erythema or tenderness. No vaginal discharge or
lesions, no cervical motion tenderness (CMT), uterus normal size firm and non-tender. On breast exam,
you do note an erythematous, swollen, and painful area to the right breast. Her physical exam is
otherwise unremarkable.
RUBRIC:
The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriiptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.
The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.
Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

Complete a one page paper explaining one cultural consideration associated with organ donation.
Must use APA.
Must be a minimum of one page.
Must include at least one nursing reference article less than 5 years old.

Hi, pls find the attached files with this order. Rubrics grading is also include- pls highly consider this when writing the paper. Thanks for your help.

Even the best intervention plan will not be effective without a sound and reasonable approach to implementing it. The implementation of the same intervention plan can vary drastically between different care settings, based on the culture of the care setting, the resources available, and the stakeholders involved in the project, as well as the specific policies already in place. A successful implementation plan blends contemporary and emerging best practices and technology with an understanding of the on-the-ground realities of a specific care setting and the target population for an intervention. By synthesizing these various considerations it is possible to increase the likely success of the implementation and continued sustainability of an intervention plan.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
What are the needs of your stakeholders that are relevant to your target population and need?
What applicable health care policy and regulations are relevant to your target population and need?
How will these considerations impact the development of your Intervention Plan Design assessment?
How can you work these considerations into the development of your Implementation Plan Design assessment?
Part 1: Management and Leadership
Propose strategies for leading, managing, and implementing professional nursing practices to ensure interprofessional collaboration during the implementation of an intervention plan.
Analyze the implications of change associated with proposed strategies for improving the quality and experience of care while controlling costs.
Part 2: Delivery and Technology
Propose appropriate delivery methods to implement an intervention which will improve the quality of the project.
Evaluate the current and emerging technological options related to the proposed delivery methods.
Part 3: Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
Analyze stakeholders, regulatory implications, and potential support that could impact the implementation of an intervention plan.
Propose existing or new policy considerations that would support the implementation of an intervention plan.
Part 4: Timeline
Propose a timeline to implement an intervention plan with reference to specific factors that influence the timing of implementation.
Address Generally Throughout
Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of an implementation plan for a planned intervention.
Communicate implementation plan in a way that clearly illustrate the importance of interprofessional collaboration to create buy-in from the audience.

Find two articles that provides an overview of a condition that discusses congenital Renal Agenesis that you found interesting and may help your classmates better understand the GI tract and/or urogenital systems
USE APA FORMAT.
DO NOT USE AI IT WILL DETECT IT
HAVE REFERENCES AND REFERENCE PAGE
THANK YOU!!

Develop your own nurse educator philosophy statement. Identify your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator. Address how this philosophy will guide you in the tripartite roles of a nurse educator – how it will guide your teaching, scholarship, and service. Support your philosophy with your knowledge of historical events that are pertinent to your work. In addition, identify the competencies that you see as critical to your role.
In sum, your philosophy statement should guide your practice as a nurse educator.
Your educator philosophy statement should do the following:
Identify the area of nursing education or the area in health care in which you will apply your MSN, education specialization skills, and knowledge.
Formulate your nurse educator philosophy statement, which should comprise of your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator.
Apply your philosophy statement to each of the tripartite roles of the nurse educator. What does your philosophy mean for your approach to teaching, scholarship, and service? As you discuss the role of teacher, be sure to address any theories (adult learning theory, learner-center education, and others) that shape your approach as an educator.
Analyze the relationship of significant historical events that have shaped the role you seek to fill.
Analyze the most essential nurse educator competencies necessary for this MSN-prepared nurse educator. Explain why you selected the competencies you did.
Conclude with a summary.
Format: 12-point Times New Roman or Arial font, double spaced in Microsoft Word.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the historical evolution of nursing education.
Analyze the influence of historical events on a nurse educator role.
Competency 2: Analyze the tripartite role of teaching, service, and scholarship.
Formulate an informed nurse educator philosophy statement.
Applies a nurse educator philosophy to the tripartite roles of teaching, scholarship, and service.
Competency 3: Analyze professionally established nurse educator competencies and models.
Analyze the competencies necessary for a specific nurse educator role.
Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations of a nursing education professional.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format and style as expected of a nursing education professional.Length: 3–5 pages plus a title page and a references page.
Use correct APA format, including page numbers and a title page. Citations and references (if used) are to be in correct APA format.
Writing should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from content.

Hi please find the attached document. Also please include in your reference the textbook by L. Story 5th edition. Pathophysiology: a practice approach. I believe this book can be accessed online. Thank you!
I have included the rubrics too! Please highly consider rubrics when writing the paper- my professor is particular about it. Thx!

Discussion Post-
Reply to 2 different people (see attached)
Minimum 150 words each
APA format
2 references

For this assessment, you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection that addresses either an interprofessional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.
Collapse All
Introduction
Interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of a nurse’s work. Through interprofessional collaboration, practitioners and patients share information and consider each other’s perspectives to better understand and address the many factors that contribute to health and well-being (Sullivan et al., 2015). Essentially, by collaborating, health care practitioners and patients can have better health outcomes. Nurses, who are often at the frontlines of interacting with various groups and records, are full partners in this approach to health care.
Reflection is a key part of building interprofessional competence, as it allows you to look critically at experiences and actions through specific lenses. From the standpoint of interprofessional collaboration, reflection can help you consider potential reasons for and causes of people’s actions and behaviors (Saunders et al., 2016). It also can provide opportunities to examine the roles team members adopted in a given situation as well as how the team could have worked more effectively.
As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the What is Reflective Practice? activity. The activity consists of five questions that will allow you the opportunity to practice self-reflection. The information gained from completing this formative will help with your success on the Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate course engagement
Note: The Example Kaltura Reflection demonstrates how to cite sources appropriately in an oral presentation/video. Your assessment will reflect on either a professional collaboration you experienced or a collaboration case study scenario that you imagine you experienced.
ReferencesSaunders, R., Singer, R., Dugmore, H., Seaman, K., & Lake, F. (2016). Nursing students’ reflections on an interprofessional placement in ambulatory care. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 393–402.
Sullivan, M., Kiovsky, R., Mason, D., Hill, C., Duke, C. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration and education. American Journal of Nursing, 115(3), 47–54.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work more effectively together.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature, which would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.Communicate via video with clear sound and light.
The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Professional Context
This assessment will help you to become a reflective practitioner. By considering your own successes and shortcomings in interprofessional collaboration, you will increase awareness of your problem-solving abilities. You will create a Kaltura video of your reflections, including a discussion of best practices for interprofessional collaboration and leadership strategies, supported by references to the literature.
You may choose to reflect on a collaborative interprofessional project you worked on in your current or former place of practice, or you may choose to imagine that you worked on the collaborative interprofessional scenario presented in the Assessment01Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF]Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and LeadershiReflectionVideo [PDF]resourc

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design.
Selection of Research Studies: choose and critically appraise two research studies
One qualitative research study in nursing.
One quantitative research study in nursing.
Citation and Mention: Clearly cite and reference both research studies you have selected.
Mention the titles and authors of the chosen studies within your response.
Critique and Analysis: critically appraise each of the selected studies by discussing their:Research objectives and questions.
Methodologies (for qualitative: data collection, analysis, and for quantitative: study design, data analysis).
Strengths and weaknesses.
Contribution to nursing practice and knowledge.
Should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within 5 years. This is submitted through turnitin and AI detector, therefore requires less than 20% plagiarism.