A poster and a critical commentary. iwiil send poster sample and critical commen

A poster and a critical commentary. iwiil send poster sample and critical commentary sample and assessment
actually ididi but I want to correct paster and change based on assessment andcommentary examples
The poster content should essentially be descriptive and summarise the essential elements of who, what, why, when, where and how from the case study. It should clearly communicate to the viewer what the case study is about, i.e., where the activity took place; when and who was targeted, and of course why? How was the health promotion activity done? Text, images and infographics are recommended for the creation of your poster: it must be visually appealing and readable for a passing audience.
NOTE: the poster is NOT an academic research poster so please do not use such templates when creating yours!
A note on referencing for the poster: Keep it to an absolute minimum! You may reference the case study as part of your poster title .For more advice about how to produce a poster and to view past exemplars please see black board
Your poster should be accompanied by a 2000-word critical commentary about how the theoretical key concepts you identified in your poster were used in the case study. For this, you will need to consult the academic literature and provide definitions of those concepts to enable you to make an informed appraisal.
You may find it helpful to use an essay format to structure your commentary. Essays should have an introduction, body and conclusion.As a suggestion, you may wish to write 250 words on the introduction, 300 on the conclusion and the rest of your word limit (1450) on discussing .You may wish to structure your paragraphs of the body of the essay by handling a key concept at a time. For guidance about how to write essays, please refer Blackboard

SCENARIO You are supervising three nurses working on the medical-surgical floor

SCENARIO
You are supervising three nurses working on the medical-surgical floor of a local teaching hospital. This hospital is nationally recognized as a leader in education and has a computer lab with an online library where staff has access to medical research databases (that is, CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane library) and online sources of all hospital policies, procedures, and guidelines, and computers at nurse workstations that also have access to these resources. (For this scenario, use the Capella University Library to simulate the hospital’s online library.) You have given the nurses their patient assignments and you have all participated in shift report. A new nurse who just completed orientation and training a week ago approaches you and tells you that one of the assigned patients has a diagnosis he or she is very unfamiliar with. Knowing that patient-centered care based on best practices is imperative to positive patient outcomes, you want to assist this nurse to find research that can be utilized to provide the best care for this patient. Describe how you would communicate with this nurse to encourage him or her to research the diagnosis. Assume you will assist in the quest to locate evidence, then describe where you would go within the facility and what resources you would look for. These resources may include websites, journals, facility policies or guidelines, or any other sources of online information.
To select the diagnosis for the patient in this scenario, review the three diagnoses presented in the Assessment 01
Supplement: Locating Credible Databases and Research [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Locating Credible Databases and Research [PDF]resource and select one. You will use this same diagnosis to complete the next two assessments.
Create a list of at least five sources that could be used to find evidence, with the best source listed first, and explain why the sources you chose are best to find evidence for the diagnosis you chose and the clinical scenario. You are only evaluating the sources of evidence (database, website, policy database or website, journal article, et cetera). You are not actually completing a search and selecting evidence. Consider the following examples: a nursing journal in CINAHL may not be the best source of evidence for information on how to administer medications through a central-venous catheter, whereas a hospital policy database found on a website may not be the best source of information on caring for a patient with a rare chromosomal abnormality.
INSTRUCTIONS:
The purpose of this assessment is to understand where to find evidence that can be applied to clinical scenarios and to learn effective communication and collaboration with clinical staff during the process of evidence location. As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will not only use research for self-improvement in your clinical role, but you will also serve as a mentor to supervised nursing staff. Therefore, you will need to be able to communicate and collaborate effectively to guide them toward resources to find research, as well as support them through the initial evidence location process. In doing so, nurses can gain access to evidence that can be analyzed and utilized to stay current on best practices. This allows them to provide safe, patient-centered care and improve patient outcomes.
For this assessment:
Describe your role as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse supervising clinical staff nurses with regard to communication and collaboration in locating evidence for application to a nursing practice scenario.
Compile a list of five online databases or other online sources (that is, websites, journals, facility policies or guidelines, et cetera) that can be used to research evidence to apply to the diagnosis in this scenario and describe to which of these you would direct a nurse colleague to search for evidence.
Describe where you might go in the work place to complete this research and how you would access the desired, relevant research within research databases or other online sources.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe communication strategies to encourage nurses to research the diagnosis/practice issue, as well as strategies to collaborate with the nurses to access resources.
Describe the best places to complete research and what types of resources you would want to access to find pertinent information for the diagnosis/health care issue within the context of a specific health care setting.
Identify five sources of online information (medical journal databases, websites, hospital policy databases, et cetera) that could be used to locate evidence for a clinical diagnosis/practice issue.
Explain why the sources of online information selected should provide the best evidence for the chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Note: While you are not selecting and evaluating specific evidence to help with the clinical diagnosis/practice issue, you should still be citing the literature and best practices to support your description of your communication and collaboration approach. Additionally, it is appropriate to cite best practices related to EBP and evaluating databases to support your explanation as to why you selected the five sources of online information that you did.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 1 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 1 Example [PDF].
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
Length of submission: 2-4 pages (not including the title page or the reference page) description of communication, collaboration, and evidence location process, including a list of databases or other sources with description of why they are appropriate for clinical scenario diagnosis/health care issue (that is, something that would be useable in professional practice for other nurses). Be sure to include an APA-formatted reference page at the end of your submission.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
( I ATTACHED THE RESOURCE TO GET THE DIAGNOSIS FROM , THE GRADING CRITERIA, AND ONE EXAMPLE)

This assignment will ask you to answer important questions based on the last two

This assignment will ask you to answer important questions based on the last two lessons: The Market Revolution and “Indian Problem”. In addition, the textbook can be used to answer questions with specific examples.
Answer the following questions with details and examples:
Why did factory owners begin to hire young, single women between the ages of 15-25? Why would mill girls seek work in the factories? Why did factory owners begin replacing mill girls with immigrants in the 1840s?
What factors were pushing Irish and German immigrants out of their countries? What factors were pulling them to the United States?
What kind of jobs were open to Irish and German immigrants? (Different for each one, Irish immigrants were typically poor, unskilled, and uneducated; while Germans, for the most part, were middle class, skilled, and educated).
Are there workers today who are similarly exploited as the ones you researched for this assignment?
What impact did northern economic expansion have on Native Americans?

Facts or Flim-flam? A recent study by Stanford University found an overwhelming

Facts or Flim-flam?
A recent study by Stanford University found an overwhelming majority of (middle school to college) students were not able to tell the difference between so-called fake news and real news. Here’s a short audio report about the same Stanford study.
Read the study 1-page synopsis or listen to the audio report (4 minutes) in the links above to begin.
In this bonus assignment, YOU will explore the problems with misinformation /disinformation /manipulated news and gain confidence exploring the media that you encounter every day by analyzing the credibility of a health/physiology piece that YOU choose.
STEP 1: Become a master media manipulator!
Inoculate yourself against the techniques of manipulative media by creating it yourself and trying to gain followers, by any means necessary!
This online game, created by Dutch researchers (about 20 minutes) guides you through the techniques commonly used to gain followers through six different tactics. You gain a badge for each manipulative tactic you master.
Question 1
HomeworkUnansweredDue Apr 28th, 11:59 PM
What was your final score on the game?
Type your answer and submit
Word AnswerWrite your response here…
Please type your answer to submit
Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 2
HomeworkUnansweredProvide some feedback with your experience of the game or your knowledge of manipulative media practices before and after the game.
Provide some feedback with your experience of the game or your knowledge of manipulative media practices before and after the game.
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
STEP 2: NOW YOU’RE THE FACT-CHECKER!
What I’d like you to do is find a health/physiology related media piece (long-form article – at least two pages, > 2 minute news segment or video – Tiktok, Instagram, youtube, podcast episode, etc.) and evaluate the credibility of the piece using the RADARS (Rationale, Accuracy, Date, Authority, Relevance, Sources) technique. RADARS is a technique for independently EVALUATING THE CREDIBILITY OF INFORMATION SOURCES.
Pick your target: Your piece can be any health/physiology media piece you’re interested in, **that you suspect is NOT CREDIBLE**.
You will NOT be graded on the piece’s accuracy OR whether I agree with your conclusion; you’ll be graded on your own *careful analysis*!
Question 3: CHOOSE YOUR TARGET
HomeworkUnansweredProvide a link or a copy of the media piece that I can review.
Please also provide the source for the piece.
Describe the health/physiology connection in the piece.
1. Provide a link or a copy of the media piece that I can review. 
2. Please also provide the source for the piece.
3. Describe the health/physiology connection in the piece. 
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Answer the questions provided in each section as RADARS guides you through evaluating your piece.
RATIONALE
RATIONALE FOR THE PIECE: WHY WAS IT PUBLISHED? WHO IS IT FOR? WHO PAYS FOR IT? IS IT TRYING TO EVOKE EMOTION?
Question 4:
HomeworkUnansweredRATIONALE: Explore what is the intended purpose? (to inform, to argue, to persuade, to sell, educate, question, etc.)
RATIONALE: Explore what is the intended purpose? (to inform, to argue, to persuade, to sell, educate, question, etc.) 
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 5:
HomeworkUnansweredRATIONALE: Who is the intended audience for this piece (those with knowledge of a specific discipline, the general public, a specific target audience, other)?
RATIONALE: Who is the intended audience for this piece (those with knowledge of a specific discipline, the general public, a specific target audience, other)?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 6:
HomeworkUnansweredRATIONALE: Is there advertising? Is there a sponsor? Who pays to make this information available? Please note if there is a link to purchase anything associated with the piece.
RATIONALE: Is there advertising?  Is there a sponsor? Who pays to make this information available? Please note if there is a link to purchase anything associated with the piece.
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 7:
HomeworkUnansweredRATIONALE: Misinformation often seeks to exploit our most deeply held values and beliefs to generate outrage and anger.
Exaggerated or provocative headlines often generate more attention. Explore the following …
Does the author use emotionally provocative language?If so, cite the language you think is provocative.
If not, does the headline seem to fit the piece’s tone and content well?
RATIONALE: Misinformation often seeks to exploit our most deeply held values and beliefs to generate outrage and anger. 
*Exaggerated or provocative headlines* often generate more attention.  Explore the following …
Does the author use *emotionally provocative language*?
– If so, cite the language you think is provocative. 
– If not, does the headline seem to fit the piece’s tone and content well?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
AUTHORITY
QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT THE AUTHORITY/CREDIBILITY OF THE SOURCE: IS IT A JOKE? WHO ARE THE AUTHORS? ARE THESE REPUTABLE AUTHORS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Question 8:
HomeworkUnansweredAUTHORITY:
Is it a joke? MANY people have been fooled by an Onion article.
Before delving into credibility, check to see if the article is intended to be taken seriously.
Check the About page, if it exists.
– Is the piece intended as satire?
– Why do you think so or why not?
AUTHORITY: 
Is it a joke? MANY people have been fooled by an Onion article.
Before delving into credibility, check to see if the article is intended to be taken seriously. 
Check the About page, if it exists. 
– Is the piece intended as satire? 
– Why do you think so or why not?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 9:
HomeworkUnansweredAUTHORITY:
Who is/are the author/s? Investigate … What are the author’s educational credentials or organizational affiliations? Look deeply to find what you can.
Are their credentials relevant to the topic? For instance, a PhD in Astrophysics doesn’t make a person an expert in oncology.
What makes the author qualified to write about the topic?
AUTHORITY:
Who is/are the author/s? Investigate … 
– What are the author’s *educational credentials or organizational affiliations*? Look deeply to find what you can. 
– Are their credentials *relevant to the topic*? For instance, a PhD in Astrophysics doesn’t make a person an expert in oncology. 
– What makes the author *qualified to write about the topic*?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 10:
HomeworkUnanswered**AUTHORITY: Investigate further …
Open a new window and do a search about the publication, website, and/or author.
Do your best to find information about the author(s) on the internet or cited in other books in this field?
Has the author written authoritatively about this topic before?
See what other experts say about the organization, publisher, or author.
**AUTHORITY: Investigate further … 
Open a new window and do a search about the publication, website, and/or author.
Do your best to  find information about the author(s) on the internet or cited in other books in this field?
Has the author written authoritatively about this topic before?
See what other experts say about the organization, publisher, or author.
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 11:
HomeworkUnansweredAUTHORITY:
Does the author explain their method for collecting the information presented?
If not, what do you need to know about how the information was obtained?
AUTHORITY:
Does the author explain their *method for collecting the information* presented? 
If not, what do you need to know about how the information was obtained?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
DATE:
QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT THE DATE OF THE SOURCE: IS IT CURRENT ENOUGH?
Question 12:
HomeworkUnansweredDATE:
Since our scientific understanding accumulates with time, dates matter!
When was the piece published?
Is the topic from a field of study that changes rapidly?
Is the information obsolete?
Is there a more recent article on the topic that you can read?
DATE:
Since our scientific understanding accumulates with time, dates matter! 
*When* was the piece published?
Is the topic from a field of study *that changes rapidly*?
Is the information obsolete?
Is there a *more recent article on the topic that you can read*?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
ACCURACY
QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT THE ACCURACY OF THE SOURCE: ARE THE CLAIMS DEMONSTRABLY FALSE? HAS THE PIECE ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED? FOR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, WHAT IS THE TYPE OF PUBLICATION?
Question 13:
HomeworkUnansweredACCURACY:
Does the piece contain statements you know to be false from other credible sources?
ACCURACY:
Does the piece contain statements you *know to be false from other credible sources?*
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 14:
HomeworkUnansweredACCURACY:
VERIFY WITH FACT-CHECKING SITES.
Here are a few to investigate.:
FactCheck.org https://www.factcheck.org
Fact Checker (The Washington Post) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/
Snopes https://www.snopes.com
AllSides https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news
Do any of these sites contradict the content in your piece?
ACCURACY:
VERIFY WITH FACT-CHECKING SITES. 
Here are a few to investigate.: 
FactCheck.org https://www.factcheck.org
Fact Checker (The Washington Post) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/
Snopes https://www.snopes.com
AllSides https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news
Do any of these sites contradict the content in your piece?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 15:
HomeworkUnansweredACCURACY:
There is a hierarchy of credibility in media pieces, especially those that refer to scientific phenomena:
1. Peer reviewed (reviewed by anonymous experts in the field prior to publication e.g. academic journals)
2. Editorially reviewed (reviewed by an editor, may be fact-checked e.g. popular publications)
3. Minimally reviewed (reviewed for grammar, spelling)
4. Anecdote (not reviewed e.g. personal blog post, internet post)
Investigate …. Where do you think your piece falls in the credibility hierarchy, with the information you’ve been provided? Explain your answer.
ACCURACY:
There is a hierarchy of credibility in media pieces, especially those that refer to scientific phenomena:
1. Peer reviewed (reviewed by anonymous experts in the field prior to publication e.g. academic journals)
2. Editorially reviewed (reviewed by an editor, may be fact-checked e.g. popular publications)
3. Minimally reviewed (reviewed for grammar, spelling)
4. Anecdote (not reviewed e.g. personal blog post, internet post)
Investigate …. Where do you think your piece falls in the credibility hierarchy, with the information you’ve been provided? Explain your answer.
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
RELEVANCE
QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT THE RELEVANCE OF INFORMATION: ARE THE CLAIMS RELEVANT TO THE EVIDENCE? EVEN IF THE CLAIMS ARE RELEVANT, ARE THEY SCIENTIFIC?
Question 16:
HomeworkUnansweredRELEVANCE:
Often the claims made are not supported by the evidence provided.
Does the evidence provided back up the author’s claims related to health or physiology?
RELEVANCE:
Often the claims made are not supported by the evidence provided. 
Does the *evidence provided back up the author’s claims* related to health or physiology?
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
Question 17:
HomeworkUnansweredRELEVANCE:
Be wary of articles stating ‘people say’, ‘sources report’, or ‘they say’ without identifying the sources.
None of these are sources for scientific information.
Is the information gossip, hearsay, or anecdote unsupported by sources or data?
RELEVANCE:
Be wary of articles stating ‘people say’, ‘sources report’, or ‘they say’ without identifying the sources.
None of these are sources for scientific information.
Is the information gossip, hearsay, or anecdote unsupported by sources or data? 
” class=”notranslate public-DraftEditor-content” role=”textbox” spellcheck=”true” style=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;” rel=”box-sizing: inherit; overflow-y: scroll; min-height: 200px; max-height: 400px; padding: 12px; z-index: 0; outline: none; user-select: text; white-space-collapse: preserve; overflow-wrap: break-word;”>Unanswered
SubmitPlease answer to submit
SOURCES
QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT YOUR PIECE’S PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES: LOOK FOR THE SOURCES
Question 18
HomeworkUnansweredSOURCES:
Check the source of your piece through this site, which assesses media sources on an interactive graph, from more to less reliable and from left, balanced, to right political bias.
If you found the source of your piece, where does it fall on the graph? If it’s not there, do your best to guess where it might fall.
Most reliable (green)
Reliable (yellow)
Some reliability issues (orange)
Serious reliability issues (red)
Check out the Interactive Media Bias Chart, paying attention to the Y-axis for accuracy: https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-c…
You can also look for your source on The Factual, paying special attention to where the source falls on the Y-axis (Average of Factual Grade) and searching for it in the table (The Factual’s Media Ecosystem 2022) : https://www.thefactual.com/blog/biased-factual-rel…
SOURCES:
Check the source of your piece through this site, which assesses media sources on an interactive graph, from more to less reliable and from left, balanced, to right political bias. 
If you found the source of your piece, where does it fall on the graph?  If it’s not there, do your best to guess where it might fall.
Most reliable (green)
Reliable (yellow)
Some reliability issues (orange)
Serious reliability issues (red)
Check out the Interactive Media Bias Chart, pay

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to thi

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
**Please do not include an introduction or conclusion paragraph since this is going to be a part of a much larger paper.
**Please only use the attached source. No other sources allowed. Here is the APA citation for it:
van Munster, M., Stümpel, J., Thieken, F., J. Pedrosa, D., Antonini, A., Côté, D., … & Mestre, T. A. (2021). Moving Towards Integrated and Personalized Care in Parkinson’s Disease: A Framework Proposal for Training Parkinson Nurses. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(7), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11070623
Prompt:
Important information related to advanced practice nurse: Highlight the role of advanced practice nurses in the pharmacological management of Parkinson’s disease. Discuss their responsibilities, such as prescribing medications, monitoring patient response, managing side effects, and providing patient education.
Requirements: 1-1.5 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages | .doc file
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each paragraph.

Use the Episodic/Focused Note Template found in the Learning Resources for this

Use the Episodic/Focused Note Template found in the Learning Resources for this week to complete this assignment.
Select a patient that you examined during the last three weeks based on musculoskeletal conditions. With this patient in mind, address the following in a Focused Note: