You’re a Nurse Practitioner in a busy clinic. Your first patient is a newborn. Write a SOAP Note for normal healthy findings for a newborn.
Use the SOAP Note Template attached. In addition to your SOAP note, post an explanation of your rationale for analysis, evaluation, and/or conclusions that were part of your SOAP note. Be sure to follow the discussion rubric and use peer-reviewed references to support your rationale.
Category: Medicine
This assignment is a clinical case narrative on a pediatric sick patient that a
This assignment is a clinical case narrative on a pediatric sick patient that a nurse practitioner sees in a clinic. Please feel free to make up info as needed. I just need the patient to be a 16 vear old female who is coming to the office for complains of sore throat and fever. Her diagnosis will be Streptococcal Pharyngitis (Strep Throat). The instructions my teacher gave me was to follow the example she provided which I attached (CNN Sample attachment). If you have any questions at all or need additional pages, please let me know! Thank you! 🙂
please place the answers bellow each question. Please answer the case questions
please place the answers bellow each question.
Please answer the case questions using the probing depth measurements in mm
Comments from Customer
Discipline: Dentistry
This semester you have been exposed to all of our wonderful industry experts, bu
This semester you have been exposed to all of our wonderful industry experts, but some of you have not had the opportunity to work in the lab. This homework exercise will give you a small taste of what some of the labwork looks like from one of our most important viewpoints – documentation.
You are a QA reviewer assigned to review notebooks for an analytical group. One of your analysts has turned in the following lab notebook:
Download NB review activity.pdf – print, use a colored pen to make comments ask the analyst for specific corrections, or asking questions)
Try to find at least 15 items that need correcting, though there are at least 30.
Use the following resources to critique the notebook you received:
Lecture on Documentation (Module 2)
SOP ECU-019 (Module 4.2)
SOP ECU-020 (Module 4.2)
Module 3 Lab 1 – Documentation
Instructions are in the separate file and so is the articles. Please be careful
Instructions are in the separate file and so is the articles. Please be careful as there are two articles.
I am developing a research paper for a 400-level Fitness and Wellness course. I
I am developing a research paper for a 400-level Fitness and Wellness course. I need a “Results” section and a “Discussion” section, as well as one chart for the research paper based on the five articles in the attachment. I’ve also offered my annotated report, which includes the citations, for reference.
Hypothesis: The frequency of strength training sessions is pivotal in influencing muscle growth and strength; for individuals who engage in high-frequency training or opt for lower-frequency routines, there may be a slight difference in muscle size and strength improvements.
The assignment guidelines are as follows: “Please write the results and discussion sections of your final project following the guidelines presented in this module. Include a chart or diagram to demonstrate your results further.
Please include your hypothesis statement at the top of the paper for my reference.
The free version of Piktochart may be helpful to you in creating a chart or diagram. When you get to the site, scroll down for the templates for charts and diagrams. Here is a link to the site:
https://create.piktochart.com/beta/teams/28199351/editor/1622 ”
Thank you.
Select one quantitative study that you have identified in your quality improveme
Select one quantitative study that you have identified in your quality improvement problem and purpose statement assignment and answer the following questions embedded in the Guidelines for Critiquing Data Collection Plans in Quantitative Studies:
Was the collection of data using structured methods (in contrast with unstructured methods) consistent with the study aims?
Were the right methods used to collect the data (self-report, observation, etc.)? Was triangulation of methods used appropriately? Should supplementary data collection methods have been used to enrich the data available for analysis?
Was the right amount of data collected? Were data collected to address the varied needs of the study? Was too much data collected in terms of burdening study participants—and, if so, how might this have affected data quality?
Did the researcher select good instruments, in terms of congruence with underlying constructs, data quality, reputation, efficiency, and so on? Were new instruments developed without a justifiable rationale?
Were data collection instruments adequately pretested?
Did the report provide sufficient information about data collection procedures?
Who collected the data? Were data collectors judiciously chosen, with traits that were likely to enhance data quality?
Was the training of data collectors described? Was the training adequate? Were steps taken to improve data collectors’ ability to elicit or produce high-quality data, or to monitor their performance?
Where and under what circumstances were data gathered? Was the setting for data collection appropriate?
Were other people present during data collection? Could the presence of others have resulted in any biases?
Were data collectors blinded to study hypotheses or to participants’ group status?
Book: Bellevue – Three Centuries of Medicine and Mayhem at America’s Most Storie
Book: Bellevue – Three Centuries of Medicine and Mayhem at America’s Most Storied Hospital
Write in full sentences and in clearly organized paragraphs. Demonstrate that you’ve engaged in some way with the reading material. Feel free to link the reading with discussions we’ve had in class or with previous readings, but be sure to focus primarily on the actual assigned reading. How is this author approaching the subject matter? What kinds of issues are raised by this particular subject? What sources is the author using, and what argument is he or she making? (i.e. why does the subject matter? Why should we care about it?)
[18F]Fluoride PET provides distinct information on disease activity in ankylosin
[18F]Fluoride PET provides distinct information on disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis as compared to MRI and conventional radiography
briefly summarize the article,
then write your critique
I am a dentist applying for continuing specialiaty in Peads i want you to includ
I am a dentist applying for continuing specialiaty in Peads i want you to include in my cv
I graduated from british system (igcse)2013
Itook bachelor of biology from umkc(usa)2019
A dds from Jordan university 2023
Have certificates in diploma primary care in dentistry,bls,acls
I did volunteering more than 300 hours in usa mostly with kids
I participated in dental conferences in usa and jordan
Had interest in peadiatric and spent most of my time in peads clinic
Participated in roojump competition which is designing a medical device and earned 3rd place
Could you add more so that you can help me with the application