Category: Literature

This is a continuation from the previous assignment!
I have attached the previous work as well, this will be on the same topic
For this milestone, you should include the following:
a reminder of your topic, overall research design, and independent/dependent variables and how they are measured.
test of significance that you plan to use and a justification for why it is appropriate.
a sample table (with blank cells) that shows how you will present the relationship between your independent and dependent variables (see example in Week 7 discussion forum). For ideas, consider the advice and examples here.
Provide the requested information in your own words, using APA-style in-text citations and references for any outside sources that you use.

All lectures and stories referred to are linked at the end of this descriiption
Compose
Compose a diagram that helps us understand the major concepts in “The Romance of the Fox.” Consider the information below:
In Scheub’s lecture on “Lion-Child and Cow-Child,” he describes a diagram that illustrates the structure of the story. His diagram focuses on the relationships between major characters and how different parts of the story reproduce those fundamental relationships in order to narrate the increasing significance of the change that is taking place.
We want you to create a diagram that helps us visualize the relationships between the major characters in “The Romance of the Fox.” Your diagram should also help us see the change that takes place as the characters move through the narrative. (Your diagram does not need to look like Professor Scheub’s; it should simply reflect the way you visualize the structure of the story.)
You can draw your diagram on paper, take a photo of or scan it, and upload it to the forum; or you can create a digital image with software, such as Word or Photoshop.
Lion and cow child: https://www.icloud.com/photos/#0c2gKbyuzLVYjD2affnm0JE6w
Romance of the Fox: https://www.icloud.com/photos/#0d1fAKDcAIBUvWN2ITeaiHYEw

Answer the following questions in a short paragraph, using complete sentences:
What features characterized the Baroque literature in Europe?
Why is the Baroque in Spain known as the Golden Age of Spanish Literature?
Why did the Renaissance dream of a Christian Utopia in the New World fail? Explain briefly.
Why did Baroque art become the best vehicle to express the syncretism of Spanish, indigenous and African cultural and religious heritage in the Spanish Americas through what is known as “Barroco de Indias”?

The essay must be a minimum of four (4 full) pages long, double-spaced. This means that the fourth page must be completely full or that your essay ends on the 5th page.
You can not use any outside sources outside the story itself.
Do not use AI at all, will have to go through Ai detection
This essay will analyze Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” using Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism.(link here if you can’t find the story https://poemuseum.org/the-tell-tale-heart/)
Your essay should answer and cover all of the following:
Introduction Paragraph
Your introduction should include and answer:
Introduce the short story.
Provide a brief summary of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” to establish context for your analysis.
Introduce the concept of psychoanalytic literary criticism and its relevance to understanding the psychological dimensions of literary works.
Describe and explain how you will use psychoanalytic literary criticism to analyze the short story.
Develop a thesis statement that clearly states your interpretation of the narrator’s psyche and its impact on the story.
Body Paragraphs
Your body paragraphs should include and answer:
Utilize psychoanalytic concepts such as the id, ego, superego, repression, and unconscious desires to analyze the narrator’s behavior, thoughts, and motivations.
Examine the narrator’s relationship with the old man and explore how it reflects deeper psychological conflicts or desires.
Include a minimum of three (3) examples with their own arguments as evidence of what your literary element symbolizes and how it functions in the story.
Discuss the role of guilt, anxiety, or other psychological factors in the narrator’s actions and their consequences.
Support your analysis with direct quotations and specific examples from the text.
Conclusion
Your conclusion should include and answer:
Consider the implications of your analysis and discuss how understanding the narrator’s psyche enhances the overall interpretation of the story.
Summarize your main points and reinforce the significance of psychoanalytic literary criticism in unraveling the complexities of the story.
Conclude with a brief explanation as to why you picked this story for analysis and one of the main lessons you learned from it.

Read No David to a very small group of children ages 4-5 FILL IN THE LESSON AND write a reflection on how it went be honest.

I need the following:
one 1500-word essay instructor specifics below.
The actual format of the essay itself should contain a signature block in the upper right- or left-hand corner of the essay; the essay should be at least 12-point font in size; and the essay needs to be double-spaced. Generally, the MLA format is the basis for the essay model.
The major essay does require internal citations; it does require a List of Works Cited and/or a List of Works Consulted and/or List of Works Used, since researched work is included in the final form of the essay
The Topic for this Essay is:
Pick four poems by Phillis Wheatley, and discuss them in terms of her religious beliefs. Do not include more than a brief mention of her biographical history.

Consider the opposite
Consider an alternative
Delayed decision making
Perspective taking
Active open-mindedness
Your job this week will be to draw a useful connection between one of the above four concepts and any key concept from the Week 1 or 2 of the course. Some example topics from week 1 include any one of the 8 critical thinking standards (e.g., clarity, precision, completeness, fairness). Some example topics from week 2 include intellectual humility, fallibilism, confirmation bias, and hot cognition (there are several others!). You may select any of these or any of the other core concepts you read about in MAPS.
What I mean by “draw a useful connection”:
*Remember our course’s context—we’re interested in critical thinking. So, a useful connection would involve a way of jointly thinking about these two concepts that would aid your critical thinking.
*There are various ways to might connect two concepts with the goal of enhancing your critical thinking. By analogy, we use multiple tools when hanging a picture. I can’t just use one tool, like a hammer—I’m going to do a poor job!—and I can’t just use a measuring tap. Nothing meaningful will get done. I need a hammer, a measuring tape, a nail, maybe a small ladder (I’m not that tall!), etc. Similarly, it’s useful to use combinations of critical thinking tools to solve intellectual problems. For example, consider the opposite could be used to help you get out of a mental jam induced by confirmation bias.
*It’s always good to (a) express the general or abstract idea of how the two concepts could be linked and (b) illustrate for your reader with a precise context, like an example from life, in which you could jointly use two concepts. That would help make things nice and vivid for the reader.
Things are wide open for how you arrange your paper and the creative ideas you come up with, but don’t forget to use the critical thinking standards from week 1 to guide effective writing. Remember to always consider your reader to be a novice with these topics—what would you have to say to ensure they understand your concepts & connection?
Your papers will be graded as follows:
1) Clearly, precisely, & completely describe the connection between the two critical thinking concepts you selected. To do this in a complete fashion, its a very good idea to connect the two concepts (a) in a general or abstract sense AND (b) using a specific example context. Source usage requirements: To support your writing, you can have up to 2 written sources (no more than 2 and no non-written sources, like videos). Your sources may be course readings or readings that are linked/cited in your course readings (you do not need to get sources from beyond the course materials; however, if you decide to, you may select only one source beyond the course readings, it must be a written source, and it’s your job to make good decisions about the quality of source you select—if you’re at all uncertain about the quality of a source, please check with me).
2) Use APA style to (a) format your document and (b) cite and reference all information that did not come from your own thoughts and is not reasonably assumed to be common knowledge (see citation guide provided to you in Week 2). Like for mini-paper 1, your work will not earn points for good APA style. Instead, issues with APA style may receive deductions of up to 2 points out of 10 (or 20% of your grade on the submission) or, in some cases, your work may be returned to you for correction or receive a zero.

I have attached full directions along with a list of themes you can choose from
Ida B. Wells-Barnett will be my Author

For this creative writing assignment, you will do a character analysis to allow you to get inside the mind of one of the characters.
“Woman Hollering Creek” is told as a third-person narrative, not as a first-person narrative. The difference is that a third-person narrative presents the characters to us in the words of a narrator rather than from the words of the characters themselves. The story contains descriptions such as “Cleofilas did this” or “Cleofilas said that,” but it’s not as if Cleofilas herself is telling everything from their perspective. Of course, sometimes she speaks in the story, but she does not get to tell the story or what she thinking or feeling. It is up to the reader to determine what she might be thinking or feeling.
For this assignment, imagine you are Cleofilas writing a journal entry the events described in the story. Try to get into the mind of Cleofilas. Be imaginative and creative. Pretend you are Cleofilas and have successfully left your marriage with Felice’s help. You will not be retelling the plot of the story; you will be Cleofilas reflecting on what has happened. In this journal entry you can put down whatever thoughts she might have using absolute frankness and honesty. 
Criteria: Write a minimum 400 words in paragraph form, using Times New Roman 12-point font (or similar) with double spacing. A title page is not required.
Submit as a Microsoft Word attachment on the submission page (click title above). Assignments not submitted in this way may be returned to you ungraded.

For this assignment, you are to read a journal article about a topic
The report is to be 5-7 pages in length. Please be sure to use both a title page and works cited page. (title and works cited pages do not count toward the overall page count of your review) You are also encouraged to follow the MLA or Chicago formats to develop this report. Please double-space your review. And in your works cited page, please list the name of the article that you will be summarizing and analyzing. This an example of the type of the format you should follow:
“Argentina in 1983: Reflections on the Language of the Military and George Orwell,” by Alberto Ciria. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Vol. 11, No. 21 (1986), pp. 57-69.
In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points that the author is trying to convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type of article is this? Is the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background?
As for the second point of discussion, this is where you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You are definitely encouraged to write in first person singular (I feel that…, I think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 & 1⁄2 pages summary and 1 & 1⁄2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.