Category: Linguistics

I need the assignment within 2-3 hours with only around 200 – 250 words
I need able to state the different and should be accompanied by an annotation (summary) of the text.
Some point mybe useful: (better include in the assignment)
1. estrogen hormones limit the effects of stress on cognition in women.
2. Male: experience effect on cogniitive processes (e.g. memory)
3. Femalre: experience a state of hyperarousal, constanly being ‘on-edge’, agitation/ restlessness / slee / consentration problem

Part 1: A) Review the Kieffer & Lesaux (2007) article, highlight portions of the text that respond to the following content question: How can insights from morphology inform classroom practice? B) What is the biggest takeaway message about the structure/format of this article? In other words, why is this a good example of the type of source you should find for your literature review? Address these questions in a brief paragraph (4-5 sentences) that includes at least one quotation from the original text.
Part 2: Morphology Mini-Lesson: Using the steps outlined on p. 140 of the article (and the tables of common roots in the article) or root words and affixes that are common in your content area/useful at your grade level, create a mini-lesson activity in which you engage students in word study.

write a short essay comparing the use of the variables (q) and (dʒ) by Ahmad and Hejazi. Are there any differences in their use? If yes, how can you explain the differences? How do you relate the variation in the speech of the host and guest?
Youtube link : just watch the first 10 minutes

### Task Overview:
**Objective:** Apply theoretical concepts in pragmatics to analyze an extract from Sting’s memoir, “Broken Music.” Attached as “text_for_analysis.pdf”
**Components:**
1. **Co-text level analysis:**
– Focus on grammatical and lexical coherence.
– Analyze microphenomena within the text, such as word choice, sentence structure, and local coherence.
2. **Context level analysis:**
– Expansion level analysis (macrophenomena).
– Higher order predicates level (meta-phenomena).
– This involves understanding the broader context and implications of the text, including cultural, situational, and historical elements.
3. **Politeness and Negative Politeness Analysis:**
– Apply concepts of politeness theory to the text.
– Investigate how negative politeness strategies are employed.
### Framework for Analysis:
**Cicourel’s Model (1980):**
– Utilize Cicourel’s model as the foundational framework.
– Emphasize on both the observable (co-text) and inferable (context) aspects of meaning.
### Structuring the Analysis:
1. **Introduction:**
– Briefly introduce the text and its relevance to the study of pragmatics.
– Outline the approach and theoretical frameworks to be used.
2. **Key Words:**
– Identify and justify the selection of not more than five key words relevant to the analysis.
3. **Discussion of Findings:**
– **Co-text Analysis:**
– Detail the grammatical and lexical coherence found in the text.
– Discuss specific examples of microphenomena.
– **Context Analysis:**
– Expand on the macro and meta-phenomena.
– Explore how the text’s meaning extends beyond its immediate lexical and grammatical features.
– **Politeness Analysis:**
– Examine instances of politeness and negative politeness.
– Analyze how these strategies affect the interpretation of the text.
4. **Conclusion:**
– Summarize key findings.
– Reflect on the implications of these findings for understanding the pragmatic aspects of the text.
### Submission Details:
– ** File format: Microsoft Word ).doc or .docx)
– **Formatting:** Font size 12, Times New Roman.
### Additional Notes for Students:
– Focus on applying theory to practice.
– Ensure that each part of the analysis is grounded in relevant theoretical concepts.
– Be critical and innovative in your analysis.
– Remember, the goal is to demonstrate deep understanding and practical application of pragmatic theories, not just to recount them.

In this assignment, you have to have to find an English passage that is appropriate for illustrating the use of a grammatical topic that we have covered in class. The passage must be short (no longer than 1 page – could be just one paragraph) and include at least three instances of your grammatical topic. Now pick three to four instances of your grammatical topic and describe the form, meaning, and use of these instances. (You don’t have to comment on all the instances of the grammatical topic seen in the passage; just comment on three or four instances).

Linguistic And Cultural Specificity of The African American Community in The United States – Translation Analysis of The Film „The Help” (Translation to Polish)

I just uploaded all the files that you need
1-Handout and rubric.
2-The topic that I’ve chosen, Sentence structure:constituents.
3- There is a sample if you need it.
Also I want two references

I’m a masters student dealing with LINGUISTICS.handle the question with masters level knowledge give examples where necessary discuss extensively and clearly with zero plagiarism the Functional Grammars
The Theory of functional Grammar,Simon C.Dik

Watch the first 25 minutes of the video called SLA Case Studies (starting at 7 min) and describe one of the famous cases of L2ers described by Scott Thornbury: Alberto, Julie, or Wes. Include information about the learners’ language proficiency in terms of communicative ability and grammatical accuracy, as well as about their social skills or cultural integration. Try to identify the relevant terminology from the theoretical constructs mentioned in each case.
Video Link:

Literature Review on Relational Grammar: The Verb Phrase
Objective: Conduct an extensive literature review on the topic of Relational Grammar with a specific focus on the Verb Phrase. Your review should encompass a comprehensive examination of the subject matter, showcasing your ability to critically engage with complex syntactic theories.
Requirements:
Scope of the Review:
Begin with a thorough definition of Relational Grammar, tracing its historical development as a syntactic theory.
Narrow the focus to the concept of the Verb Phrase within Relational Grammar, detailing its characteristics and significance.
Comparative Analysis:
Present a critical comparison of key researchers’ perspectives on Relational Grammar and the Verb Phrase. This should include foundational theorists as well as contemporary scholars in the field.
Highlight any areas of contention or debate among these researchers, providing a balanced view of differing approaches.
Practical Application:
Discuss the practical implications of the principles of Relational Grammar in understanding the Verb Phrase. This may include applications in computational linguistics, language teaching, or linguistic analysis of English .
Provide real-world examples or case studies where these principles have been applied.
Methodology:
Your review should be based on a wide range of academic sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and conference proceedings.
Prioritize current research and publications (within the last 10-15 years) to ensure the review reflects the latest developments in the field.
Presentation and Structure:
The review should be between 1000 to 1200 words in length.
Organize the content logically, with clear section headings, a comprehensive introduction, and a conclusion summarizing key findings.
Writing must be academically rigorous, well-argued, and adhere to the highest standards of academic integrity.
Referencing Style:
Use provided ) referencing style for citations and bibliography.
Ensure all sources are credibly academic and properly referenced.
Submission Details:
Format: Submit as a Word document file.
Assessment Criteria: Submissions will be evaluated based on the depth of analysis, clarity of argument, originality of thought, thoroughness of research, and adherence to academic writing standards.