Category: Leadership

Discuss Tuckman’s model of the dynamic group process from the perspective of the leaders supervising those teams. What do you think is the most important stage, and why?
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Structuring and Writing Your Paper

1. Understand the Assignment’s Objective: The goal of this assignment is to examine Tuckman’s model of the dynamic group process from the perspective of leaders who supervise teams. You are tasked with discussing each of the stages in Tuckman’s model, highlighting the role of leaders in guiding their teams through these stages. Additionally, you need to identify which stage you believe is the most important and provide reasons for your choice. You should integrate relevant course concepts, theories, and scholarly citations into your response.

2. Research and Gather Your Content: You will need to understand the key concepts of Tuckman’s model, which outlines the stages of group development: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning. You should also research how leadership influences these stages and how leaders can effectively guide their teams through each phase. Find scholarly articles that discuss leadership in the context of group development and Tuckman’s model.

   Key Points to Focus On:

   • Tuckman’s Stages: Understand each of the five stages and how teams evolve through them.
   • Leadership Role: Explore how leaders support their teams during each stage and the challenges they face.
   • The Most Important Stage: Decide which stage you think is the most crucial for leaders to focus on and justify your reasoning with relevant theories.

3. Outline Your Paper: Before starting your paper, create an outline to organize your ideas and ensure a logical flow. Your outline might look something like this:

   • Introduction: Briefly introduce Tuckman’s model and the importance of leadership in guiding teams through these stages.
   • Stage 1 – Forming: Explain the role of leaders in this stage where teams are just beginning to work together.
   • Stage 2 – Storming: Discuss the challenges leaders face as teams experience conflict and struggle to find their roles.
   • Stage 3 – Norming: Describe how leaders help teams establish norms and work more cohesively.
   • Stage 4 – Performing: Explore how leaders facilitate peak performance and autonomy in well-functioning teams.
   • Stage 5 – Adjourning: Discuss the leader’s role in managing the dissolution or transition of teams.
   • The Most Important Stage: Discuss which stage you believe is most important and why.
   • Conclusion: Summarize key points and emphasize the role of leaders in managing group dynamics.

4. Write the Introduction: Start your paper by introducing Tuckman’s model and the importance of group development in the context of leadership. Provide a brief overview of the five stages and explain the purpose of the paper (to explore the model from a leadership perspective).

5. Analyze Each Stage in Detail:

   • Forming: In this initial stage, teams are just getting to know each other. Leaders play a key role in setting expectations, defining roles, and providing structure. Research shows that leaders must foster trust and clarity early on (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006).
   • Storming: This stage is marked by conflict and power struggles. Leaders need to be skilled in conflict resolution and maintaining team focus despite challenges. This is often the most difficult stage for leaders, as they must navigate differing personalities and working styles (Wheelan, 2009).
   • Norming: In this phase, teams begin to settle into their roles. Leaders should focus on reinforcing collaboration, promoting open communication, and encouraging cohesion. Research indicates that strong leadership during this stage helps set the foundation for high performance (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977).
   • Performing: Here, teams are functioning at a high level of productivity and autonomy. Leaders’ role shifts toward facilitating rather than directing. At this stage, leaders should focus on fostering innovation and supporting the team’s self-management (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006).
   • Adjourning: As teams dissolve or transition, leaders must manage the emotional and logistical aspects of separation. Recognizing team achievements and providing closure is crucial for maintaining morale (Wheelan, 2009).

6. Discuss the Most Important Stage: Identify which stage you believe is most crucial for leaders and provide a rationale. For instance, you might argue that the Storming stage is the most important because it tests the team’s resilience and ability to overcome challenges. If leaders can navigate this stage effectively, the team is more likely to progress to higher levels of performance (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977).

   Example Argument for Storming: “The Storming stage is critical because it involves conflict, which can either make or break the team. Effective leadership during this time can help resolve conflicts and refocus the team on its goals, setting the stage for future success.”

7. Integrate Scholarly Citations: Use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles to support your points. Be sure to cite these sources correctly in APA format.

   Example Citation: Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x

   Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

8. Conclusion: Summarize the importance of leadership in navigating the stages of Tuckman’s model and reassert which stage you find most important. Discuss how leaders can facilitate the transition between stages and maintain team cohesion and effectiveness.

9. Edit and Proofread: Once your paper is written, carefully edit and proofread to ensure it meets academic standards. Make sure it follows APA style for citations, references, and formatting.

10. Final Touches:

• Ensure all references are properly cited.
• Review your arguments for clarity and coherence.
• Double-check for grammatical errors or typos.

Good luck with your paper! By following this guide, you’ll be able to effectively analyze Tuckman’s model from a leadership perspective and create a well-structured response.

After rephrasing the following problem statement, use it to write a research paper to support the thesis statement that if there is a deliberate process for equipping women in religious roles then they will experience respect and empowerment and a sense of support in fulfilling their calling by in depth research on the Feminist Theory and Intersectionality Theory.
Feminist Theory provides the foundation for addressing gender inequality, and Intersectionality Theory ensures the experiences of Black women are analyzed through the dual lens of race and gender, providing a more comprehensive understanding.
Problem:
Black women remain significantly underrepresented in leadership positions across industries, despite efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. They face unique challenges that are often overlooked in traditional mentorship programs, resulting in limited career growth and leadership opportunities.
Background:
Research highlights systemic barriers that hinder the advancement of Black women in leadership, including implicit bias, unequal access to tailored mentorship, and the compounding effects of racism and sexism. For example, the “2020 Women in the Workplace” report by McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.org revealed that Black women face a lack of sponsorship and advocacy at critical career junctures. Studies on mentorship programs also show that many fail to address the intersectional challenges faced by Black women, leaving a gap in effective leadership development. Additionally, qualitative feedback from surveys conducted with professionals and mentees suggests that Black women often feel unsupported and undervalued in their leadership journeys, leading to higher attrition rates.
Historical and contemporary examples, such as the leadership of Fannie Lou Hamer in civil rights advocacy, demonstrate the transformative impact of tailored mentorship that acknowledges and addresses systemic barriers. However, these examples remain the exception rather than the norm, underscoring the need for structured, research-based mentorship models specifically for Black women.
Relevance:
Underrepresentation of Black women in leadership has broader social and economic implications. Organizations miss out on the diverse perspectives that drive innovation and inclusive decision-making. Moreover, the lack of representation perpetuates systemic inequities, undermines social mobility, and reduces career satisfaction for Black women. This program’s focus on empowering Black women through mentorship aims to address these gaps, creating a more equitable pathway to leadership and fostering a more inclusive professional landscape.
Proposal:
This research seeks to develop and implement the Women’s Mentoring Network Program, a structured mentorship initiative designed to address the unique challenges faced by Black women in leadership. The program will include targeted training for mentors, emphasizing intersectionality and systemic barriers, and will measure outcomes through both qualitative and quantitative methods. By equipping mentors with the tools to support Black women effectively, this program aims to increase representation, improve career satisfaction, and establish a replicable model for addressing leadership disparities
The paper should be written as follows
1- Introduction (2-4 pages)
2 – Feminist and Intersectionaity Theories (14-18 pages)
3 – Conclusion (2-4 pages)
Total – 18-26 pages
The bibliography of this paper should have no
fewer than 25 sources with at least 7 or more
from the past 10-15 years

After rephrasing the following problem statement, use it to write a research paper to support the thesis statement that if there is a deliberate process for equipping women in religious roles then they will experience respect and empowerment and a sense of support in fulfilling their calling by in depth research on the Feminist Theory and Intersectionality Theory.
Feminist Theory provides the foundation for addressing gender inequality, and Intersectionality Theory ensures the experiences of Black women are analyzed through the dual lens of race and gender, providing a more comprehensive understanding.
Problem:
Black women remain significantly underrepresented in leadership positions across industries, despite efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. They face unique challenges that are often overlooked in traditional mentorship programs, resulting in limited career growth and leadership opportunities.
Background:
Research highlights systemic barriers that hinder the advancement of Black women in leadership, including implicit bias, unequal access to tailored mentorship, and the compounding effects of racism and sexism. For example, the “2020 Women in the Workplace” report by McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.org revealed that Black women face a lack of sponsorship and advocacy at critical career junctures. Studies on mentorship programs also show that many fail to address the intersectional challenges faced by Black women, leaving a gap in effective leadership development. Additionally, qualitative feedback from surveys conducted with professionals and mentees suggests that Black women often feel unsupported and undervalued in their leadership journeys, leading to higher attrition rates.
Historical and contemporary examples, such as the leadership of Fannie Lou Hamer in civil rights advocacy, demonstrate the transformative impact of tailored mentorship that acknowledges and addresses systemic barriers. However, these examples remain the exception rather than the norm, underscoring the need for structured, research-based mentorship models specifically for Black women.
Relevance:
Underrepresentation of Black women in leadership has broader social and economic implications. Organizations miss out on the diverse perspectives that drive innovation and inclusive decision-making. Moreover, the lack of representation perpetuates systemic inequities, undermines social mobility, and reduces career satisfaction for Black women. This program’s focus on empowering Black women through mentorship aims to address these gaps, creating a more equitable pathway to leadership and fostering a more inclusive professional landscape.
Proposal:
This research seeks to develop and implement the Women’s Mentoring Network Program, a structured mentorship initiative designed to address the unique challenges faced by Black women in leadership. The program will include targeted training for mentors, emphasizing intersectionality and systemic barriers, and will measure outcomes through both qualitative and quantitative methods. By equipping mentors with the tools to support Black women effectively, this program aims to increase representation, improve career satisfaction, and establish a replicable model for addressing leadership disparities
The paper should be written as follows
1- Introduction (2-4 pages)
2 – Feminist and Intersectionaity Theories (14-18 pages)
3 – Conclusion (2-4 pages)
Total – 18-26 pages
The bibliography of this paper should have no
fewer than 25 sources with at least 7 or more
from the past 10-15 years

For this assignment, choose two articles from the list provided in this syllabus and write a comparative analysis. 3 pages not including the title page and reference page.
Although this is not a strict check-list, you may want to address the following in your analysis:
Methods — what are the different research methods of these two pieces? Do they cover similar or different issues/questions?
Evidence — what is the data here? How can you compare and contrast the evidence, both in terms of the methods that shaped it but also in terms of the size or scope of it?
Site — although this could be embedded in evidence, you may want to address it separately. What is the location of this research, what is the date of it, what is the setting? Two studies could both look at 16 year old boys, but if one is from 1950 and one is from 2018, that’s very different; similarly, 16 year old boys in high school may be very different from 16 year old boys who are incarcerated. Try to compare this aspect of the research.
Results — what are the actual findings here and how could you think of them side by side?
Limitations — what are the limitations of these pieces (this could include both the limitations the articles make explicit and any limitations you infer)? Might one article address or “fill-in” the limitations of the other? Or does one article compound/highlight the limitations of the other?
Theoretical–practical spectrum — some articles are very focused on the theoretical implications, while others are very practitioner-oriented. How would you place these two articles on such a spectrum?
Audience — a related but separate question from #6. Who, do you think, are the intended audiences for these articles?
Critical-ness — while all research looks to produce new knowledge, not all research approaches existing structures from a critical stance? How critical of their settings, comparatively, would you say these two articles are?
Authorial stance — different methods, different projects, and different research traditions call on the researcher/author to be present in different ways. Sometimes, articles even include a “researcher’s stance” section; other times, such stances are more embedded in the work. How might you characterize the author(s’) stance to research?
Applicability — what connections can you draw between these two articles and your area of expertise or scope?
3 pages not including the title page and reference page. double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font. using APA citation.

Write an academic book review for the book, Better by Atul Gawande. Book reviews are an interesting form to start thinking about, because there are “general interest” book reviews and there are academic/discipline-specific book reviews. For this writing assignment, as you begin to transition into a doctoral program, you will write an academic/discipline-specific book review. The purpose of the Academic Book Review is to critically evaluate the text, not just inform the readers on the content.
This encompasses several tasks:
Give an uninformed reader enough big-picture explanation of the arguments, methods, and evidence in the book that your reader will feel as though they’ve read it.
Analyze the key themes/major takeaways from the book through the lens of a specific discipline or industry outside of healthcare. What lessons does this book, written from a medical perspective, provide for the context you’re writing about? What transfers and is applicable, and what is NOT applicable?
Provide a critique. What is valuable about this book? What (if anything) is problematic? Approach this part as if you are writing for a specific audience within the discipline or industry that you are focusing on.
Be prepared to discuss the book’s three parts “diligence,” “doing right,” and “ingenuity” in addition to the role of the disruptor and idea of positive deviance in each area. 5 pages not including the title page and reference page. double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font. using APA citation.

For this assignment, choose two articles from the list provided in this syllabus and write a comparative analysis. 3 pages not including the title page and reference page.
Although this is not a strict check-list, you may want to address the following in your analysis:
Methods — what are the different research methods of these two pieces? Do they cover similar or different issues/questions?
Evidence — what is the data here? How can you compare and contrast the evidence, both in terms of the methods that shaped it but also in terms of the size or scope of it?
Site — although this could be embedded in evidence, you may want to address it separately. What is the location of this research, what is the date of it, what is the setting? Two studies could both look at 16 year old boys, but if one is from 1950 and one is from 2018, that’s very different; similarly, 16 year old boys in high school may be very different from 16 year old boys who are incarcerated. Try to compare this aspect of the research.
Results — what are the actual findings here and how could you think of them side by side?
Limitations — what are the limitations of these pieces (this could include both the limitations the articles make explicit and any limitations you infer)? Might one article address or “fill-in” the limitations of the other? Or does one article compound/highlight the limitations of the other?
Theoretical–practical spectrum — some articles are very focused on the theoretical implications, while others are very practitioner-oriented. How would you place these two articles on such a spectrum?
Audience — a related but separate question from #6. Who, do you think, are the intended audiences for these articles?
Critical-ness — while all research looks to produce new knowledge, not all research approaches existing structures from a critical stance? How critical of their settings, comparatively, would you say these two articles are?
Authorial stance — different methods, different projects, and different research traditions call on the researcher/author to be present in different ways. Sometimes, articles even include a “researcher’s stance” section; other times, such stances are more embedded in the work. How might you characterize the author(s’) stance to research?
Applicability — what connections can you draw between these two articles and your area of expertise or scope?
3 pages not including the title page and reference page. double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font. using APA citation.

Write an academic book review for the book, Better by Atul Gawande. Book reviews are an interesting form to start thinking about, because there are “general interest” book reviews and there are academic/discipline-specific book reviews. For this writing assignment, as you begin to transition into a doctoral program, you will write an academic/discipline-specific book review. The purpose of the Academic Book Review is to critically evaluate the text, not just inform the readers on the content.
This encompasses several tasks:
Give an uninformed reader enough big-picture explanation of the arguments, methods, and evidence in the book that your reader will feel as though they’ve read it.
Analyze the key themes/major takeaways from the book through the lens of a specific discipline or industry outside of healthcare. What lessons does this book, written from a medical perspective, provide for the context you’re writing about? What transfers and is applicable, and what is NOT applicable?
Provide a critique. What is valuable about this book? What (if anything) is problematic? Approach this part as if you are writing for a specific audience within the discipline or industry that you are focusing on.
Be prepared to discuss the book’s three parts “diligence,” “doing right,” and “ingenuity” in addition to the role of the disruptor and idea of positive deviance in each area. 5 pages not including the title page and reference page. double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt font. using APA citation.

Virtual teams are commonplace in the work environment and have been for years. With the advent of COVID-19, virtual teams are having a resurgence. Organizations cannot operate in the fashion that was considered normal and currently operate in a “new normal.”
In a 500-word initial post,
Identify the significant components of virtual teams, and analyze how teammates or team members get selected for virtual teams.
Analyze how Tuckman’s stages effect or operate in the arena of virtual teams.
Explain two of the most critical factors that virtual team leaders must be aware of when dealing with multi-location team members. Provide any appropriate citations to support your findings.
Express what you would like to know more about when it comes to managing a virtual team. Frame this as a question that your classmates can help you with. It could be an anecdotal experience that you struggled with and seek advice or just a broad best practice question regarding managing a virtual team.

Create 4-5 questions for each dimension that will help one learn about each dimension in the Ukraine.
Dimension 1: Power Difference
Dimension 2: Uncertainty Avoidance
Dimension 3: Indulgence
*** References***
https://globeproject.com
https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1038411108099289
https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/science/article/pii/S1090951612000053?via=ihub

Create 4-5 questions for each dimension that will help one learn about each dimension in the Ukraine.
Dimension 1: Power Difference
Dimension 2: Uncertainty Avoidance
Dimension 3: Indulgence
*** References***
https://globeproject.com
https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177/1038411108099289
https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/science/article/pii/S1090951612000053?via=ihub