1.  An off-shoot of electronic monitoring is GPS monitoring, which allows tracki

1.  An off-shoot of electronic monitoring is GPS monitoring, which allows tracking of an offender’s movements.  Address the following:
What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of GPS monitoring? 
For what types of offenses would you use this type of alternative to imprisonment?
Does it depend on whether it is a first or second offense?
2. Should private companies be allowed to run correctional institutions?
Why or why not?
Use specific data from class and/or outside materials to support your argument.

*I believe that correctional facilities should NOT be for profit*

1.  An off-shoot of electronic monitoring is GPS monitoring, which allows tracki

1.  An off-shoot of electronic monitoring is GPS monitoring, which allows tracking of an offender’s movements.  Address the following:
What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of GPS monitoring? 
For what types of offenses would you use this type of alternative to imprisonment?
Does it depend on whether it is a first or second offense?
2. Should private companies be allowed to run correctional institutions?
Why or why not?
Use specific data from class and/or outside materials to support your argument.

*I believe that correctional facilities should NOT be for profit*

Teams of grant writers within agencies will work together to communicate with st

Teams of grant writers within agencies will work together to communicate with stakeholders, conduct research, and compile the components needed for a grant proposal.
A critical component of the grant process is communication. Whether it is while building a relationship with a funding partner, during the solicitation process, or when supplying updates to existing funding, you will need to be prepared to provide multiple types of letters, reports, and executive summaries. In this discussion, you write a draft of a letter to a potential funding source you identified in Week 1, discuss the purpose and importance of this type of communication with grantors, and provide feedback on a classmate’s letter.
Write a letter to a potential funding source for one of the following purposes:
Introduce yourself to build a potential relationship.
Inquire about potential funding.
Summarize your project in a letter of intent that persuades the organization to request a full proposal.
Follow up after a phone call with a recap of the agreement and reminder of the next steps.
Thank them for providing support during the application process.
Attach a draft of your letter to make it available for peer feedback and write a response to the following:
Consider the purpose and audience for the letter you wrote. Why did you choose to write for this purpose? Why might this type of communication be important to a potential grantor?
Which components should be included in the type of letter you selected? Which resources were helpful to you when writing your letter?

Definition A staff study is a succinct and objective analysis of a specific prob

Definition
A staff study is a succinct and objective analysis of a specific problem accompanied by potential solution choices. The study discusses the facts, data and supplementary information and usually makes a recommendation, based on the research concerning which action plan to implement. Staff studies are not position papers, but rather are a rational presentation of the facts and well-researched and supported recommendations for problem solving. In many respects a staff study follows the form and format of an academic research paper, master or doctoral thesis.

Staff studies are used to:

Asset in the solving of organizational problems.
Provide solutions to problems of particular interest to individual administrators.
Identify the causes of problems and to propose solutions that can be used to address them.
Identify programs with the greatest potential for success.
Make decisions with regard to the allocation of resources.
Determine if current resources are being used effectively and efficiently.
Develop new approaches to service delivery problems.
Serve as the basis for requesting additional financial resources.
The paper will consist of four parts:

A declaration and clarification of the problem.
A review of the relevant literature.
Methods or solutions for addressing the problem.
A specific recommendation or set of recommendations for solving the problem.
General Writing Guidelines:

Accuracy in problem statement, supporting data and recommendations.
Brevity of content.
Clarity of expression
Completeness of information
Coherence of presentation
Objectivity of evaluations
Unity of design – stick to one issue or problem per study.
Procedure
Use the following steps to plan and design your study:
First, think through the topic or problem before developing a prospectus (that is a concise outline done in narrative format). In selecting a topic that meets this need, the student is asked to discuss this issue with a co-worker or supervisor before finalizing a topic. You can also search the library to ascertain if adequate resources are available to examine the problem.
Planning your study- the planning phase should be an opportunity for you to explore various issues related to the identified problem; thus you should:
Engage in unlimited speculation regarding factors related to the problem;
Seek different points of view by involving others; and
Seek information from a variety of sources that include:
Agency records, reports and studies
National institute of justice reports
United states census data
Libraries
Reports prepared by personnel of municipal, county, state, and commonwealth governments.
Serial publications such as: the World Almanac, NIJ sourcebook, The Municipal Yearbook, Statistical Abstract of the United States.
Criminal Justice, Social Science, Business and Management Journals.
The student will then write and submit the introduction chapterand a reference list that will:
Define the relevant organizational problem you have selected to examine. This is a critical first step because the entire staff study is based on the identification of the problem.
Discuss why it is an important issue for your agency by relating its impact on the mission and the objectives of the organization.
Explain how your approach will improve the situation or advance the state of knowledge on the issue.
The introductory chapter requires five types of information:
    A brief background of the issue.
    A statement of the problem or objective.
    Your research questions clearly set forth.
    Your methods or design discussed.
    Explain the potential relevance of the findings. Briefly discuss the potential impact of the study and subsequent action plans in terms of personnel, facilities, budget and implementation processes.
    5.  Lay out your plan of action for obtaining information to solve this problem by listing sources you have identified.
Introductory Chapter submission and approval.
Once you have completed the first chapter you will submit it for review and approval. I will make suggestions and comments and return it to you. You will then have several weeks to complete the final paper which is due at the end of the quarter.
Format of the staff study:
Use APA format for all portions of the paper. This should include:
Cover page
Executive Summary – this is a one page summary of the outlines the paper that takes the place of an abstract.
Table of Contents
The body of the paper should be organized as follows:
Introduction. This should include a clear and concise problem identification statement.
Literature review – find and document at least 8 relevant articles related to your topic.
Methods section – discuss how you chose to study the problem.  Surveys, archival data, interviews, etc…
Discussion – present your findings
Implementation plan – discuss how any changes you propose will be implemented in your agency. Pay particular attention to any impact on personnel, structure or budget. You can use your best guess for any financial impact of your proposed changes.
Conclusion – briefly review the problem and proposed solution and discuss any justification for the proposed solution.
5. The final paper should be 15 pages in length. This does not include the cover page, table of contents, references and appendices.  It should be double spaced no more than 12 point font.

In this course, you will work to develop a grant proposal focused on a selected

In this course, you will work to develop a grant proposal focused on a selected issue and initiative. You will add components to your grant proposal for this initiative each week in preparation for the final summative assessment in Week 5.
In this assignment, you communicate your selected topic (criminal justice issue and initiative to address the issue), as well as a funding source to pursue with your grant proposal. As you select a topic, think small; do not try to solve large global or societal problems. Focus your topic on an issue that is currently relevant in a local community. You may write a grant proposal for an agency where you work or volunteer, or for a different organization in need of a grant.
Obtain faculty approval for your choice of topics for your grant proposal by responding to the questions below in complete sentences. Address faculty feedback until your final topic is approved.
Question 1.
Which specific criminal justice issue did you identify as a problematic situation? Which community is affected by this issue? How will the initiative that you selected address this issue? Cite your sources.
Question 2.
Which funding source have you selected to pursue to meet the needs of this initiative with your grant proposal? Provide a link to the funding source.

1. What types of crimes do you think pretrial diversion programs should be used

1. What types of crimes do you think pretrial diversion programs should be used for? Are there specific offenses where you think pretrial diversion should always be the only option? Are there any in which you feel pretrial diversion should never be an option? Justify your position.
2. Along with victim impact statements, there has been a movement to increase the rights of victims. Using the following website, http://www.nvcap.org/states/stvras.html (Links to an external site.) choose two or more states and compare the rights guaranteed to victims. Are there any you think are missing? Why are these rights important for the victims?
Only one page necessary for each discussion topic.  Responses can be only a couple paragraphs.  These are discussion topics intended to spark debate & dive deeper into our current topics.

In this chapter, we discussed the atmosphere in terms of pressure, density, temp

In this chapter, we discussed the atmosphere in terms of pressure, density, temperature, composition, and the various layers. I’m confused about a couple things. Please explain them to me:
At 18,000 feet, atmospheric pressure is about half of what it is at sea level. Thus, I would suspect that at 36,000 feet atmospheric pressure would be zero. However, this isn’t the case. Atmospheric pressure doesn’t reach zero until infinity; in other words, an infinite number of feet above sea level. That’s a lot farther than 36,000. How is this possible?
If I go scuba diving and descend to only 33 feet below the surface, I experience twice the atmospheric pressure as compared to standing on the ground at sea level. How is this possible?

This “legacy of conquest and colonialism [becomes] implanted into the American m

This “legacy of conquest and colonialism [becomes] implanted into the American mindset, institutions, and legal regime so deeply [] we are blinded to its presence.” [Echo Hawk p105]
This is why after decades of advocacy, the international community adapted the existing human rights framework to apply to the unique circumstances of the indigenous experience. 
Unsurprisingly, criticisms emerged.  Critics questioned why indigenous peoples needed “special” rights separate from those rights already afforded to all humans.  Criticisms were wide-ranging from claims of reverse discrimination against non-indigenous persons to charges that the preferential treatment itself was racist and isolating to indigenous peoples. 
Supporters argue that it was not enough to simply announce people had these rights, but that there existed an affirmative duty to ensure people were achieving these rights.  So, UNDRIP not only list the entitlements, but it includes guidance on how to implement and measure its achievement.
In this assignment, you will explore further the need for UNDRIP.  You will form an opinion regarding whether UNDRIP actually does afford indigenous peoples “special” rights, or if it just acknowledges the same rights already given to others – i.e., native rights are just “human rights” 
Instructions
1) Review and consider our lessons on the International Bill of Rights which are meant for “all.”
2) Watch this required video: More than a Word
The film explores the history of the slanderous term “redskin,” and delves into cultural stereotypes of Native Americans and their relationship to history. Ultimately, the film argues for representations that honor and celebrate the humanity of Indigenous people.
https://www.kanopy.com/en/sjsu/video/796511
To see the opposition these protections face, watch either of these videos (you can choose which)
3a) Fighting Indians
On May 16, 2019, the state of Maine made history by passing LD 944 An Act to Ban Native American Mascots in All Public Schools, the first legislation of its kind in the country. For Maine’s tribal nations, the landmark legislation marked an end to a decades long struggle to educate the public on the harms of Native American mascotry.
FIGHTING INDIANS chronicles the last and most contentious holdout in that struggle, the homogeneously white Skowhegan High School, known for decades as “The Home of the Indians”. This is the story of a small New England community forced to reckon with its identity, its sordid history, and its future relationship with their indigenous neighbors. The film serves as a microcosm for a host of national divisions, as the “mascot debate” exposes centuries old abuses while questioning whether reconciliation is possible.
https://www.kanopy.com/en/sjsu/video/13041627
OR
3b) In Whose Honor? – American Indian Mascots in Sports
The Cleveland Indians. Washington Redskins. Atlanta Braves. What’s wrong with American Indian sports mascots? This moving, award-winning film is the first of its kind to address that subject.
IN WHOSE HONOR? takes a critical look at the long-running practice of “honoring” American Indians as mascots and nicknames in sports. It follows the story of Native American mother Charlene Teters, and her transformation into the leader some are calling the “Rosa Parks of American Indians” as she struggles to protect her cultural symbols and identity. IN WHOSE HONOR? looks at the issues of racism, stereotypes, minority representation and the powerful effects of mass-media imagery, and the extent to which one university will go to defend and justify its mascot.
https://www.kanopy.com/en/sjsu/video/157323
(4a) Show you understood each video (No. 2, and 3) by describing what it showed about Native oppression.  You simply are being asked to prove you watched it. Avoid generalized summaries (i.e., “they were discriminated against”).  Instead, you only earn points by specifically describing scenes or scenarios from the video.
(4b) Show your understanding by identifying the UNDRIP provisions you believe would protect the Natives from this oppression.  You simply are asked to match the UNDRIP article (as shown in your textbook and the supplemental materials) and briefly describe why you believe it applies.
    (to illustrate: “Under Article X, indigenous peoples have the right to practice and revitalize their cultural … which I believe was violated when in the video…)
4c) Based on both documentaries and our course materials, do you believe UNDRIP provides indigenous peoples “special” rights, or instead, does it just ensure they can enjoy the rights we “all” already enjoy.  Use specifically cited references to our course materials to explain what are the rights we “all” enjoy.  And use specific references to the documentary and course materials to compare the rights afforded to indigenous peoples. 
4d) Based on both documentaries and our course materials, what do you believe are the reasons for the United States to be hesitant, if not opposed to, UNDRIP.  Use the example of the sports mascots as the example to frame your opinion.
    Textbook: In the Light of Justice-
        “ABC’s of colonization” Echo-Hawk (pg. 55).
Universal Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRI
Study Note- again, you are graded on your ability to not just list quotes from materials, but to show your ability to understand its significance.  By reviewing these materials, you at least will have a general idea of the framework of human rights.  It will help avoid you later citing an example out of context. 

At the beginning of the course you posted an introduction that included your own

At the beginning of the course you posted an introduction that included your own perceptions of crime and criminals. Take some time to reflect on the material that we have covered in this course.
Create a 20-minute audiovisual presentation that reflects on your most significant insights in this course. You can deliver a video (with audio), PowerPoint with synchronized audio, Prezi with synchronized audio, or another approved format. It is strongly encouraged that you host your presentation on YouTube or elsewhere and provide a link to your instructor. If, however, you wish to directly upload the file to the LMS, the maximum file size allowed is 10MB. If you have any questions or doubts about the format, please consult with your instructor before creating the presentation. Late deliveries will not be accepted.
Address the following elements in your presentation. (You may change the sequence to present your ideas in the most organized and fluid manner.)
1. Identify two perceptions (opinions, beliefs, or values) about crime or criminality that you held but that have changed as a result of taking this course.
2. Explain how your perception of a particular pattern or type of crime has changed.
Briefly describe the pattern or type of crime.
Summarize your previous ideas and if they map to larger misconceptions in society. Where do you think these ideas or misconceptions come from?
What parts of the course material and scholarly evidence influenced your change in perception?
3. Explain how your perception of who commits crime has changed.
Summarize your previous ideas and if they map to larger misconceptions about these groups in society. Where do you think these ideas or misconceptions come from?
What parts of the course material and scholarly evidence influenced that change?
4. Explain how a structural, interactionist, or critical theoretical perspective influenced the change in your perception.
Describe the theoretical perspective.
Explain how it has informed your new perspective.
5. Explain how your changed perception and new knowledge will influence your personal and/or professional life.