Category: Law

Items to include: Violent or disrupted incident occurring on: the school grounds of an American K-12 school any school property (even if off site) at any school related event on any school bus *You can use whichever website but I still provide some links to make it easier, just DONT DUPLICATE events. * Please fill up the 2024 file I’ll attach, DONT create a new file

Assignment 1 (1 Page) Answer the Questions
*Make At least one reference to Chapter 1 of Essentials Of Real Esstate Law
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com
Login details will be available only for the assigned writer.
An Overview of Real Estate
In the interest of conducting a lively, engaging discussion, please keep the following in mind:
Opposing viewpoints are critical to any vibrant discussion, but remember to use internet etiquette and respect your classmates’ views and opinions. Provide constructive feedback or ask clarifying questions if you do not understand a classmate’s comment.
Most importantly, have fun interacting with the unit content, your classmates, and your instructor!
Refer to your course syllabus or the Discussion Rubric posted in Course Documents for discussion requirements.
*How do the courts treat real property and personal property?
To see how the courts treat one type of property, consider the scenario of a broken engagement. When it comes to a broken engagement, learn how one state’s courts treat this property type. Please read Gaden v. Gaden, 272 N.E.2d 471 (N.Y. 1971). In Gaden, real property was the “engagement gift” instead of personal property, like the engagement ring.
Answer the following questions:
*What was the court’s decision? What was the dissenting judge’s argument?
*Would the outcome in Gaden be different if the court treated the engagement ring as a different property type? Why, or why not?
*Remember to reference the property law rules in your answer and analysis.
—————————————————–
Assignment 2 (1 page) Review Unit 1 Seminar PowerPoint
1/2 page of Notes ( as if you were listening to the professor present the powerpoint)
1/2 page of key take aways of the PowerPoint. References and citations are not necessary.
—————————————————–
Assignment 3 (1/2 page) Expound on the topic with at least 150 words to include asking one question to Brandon G and citing 1 reference.
Brandon G Posted
Hello class!
The Court of Appeals of New York (1971) reversed the appellate division’s decision and reinstated the trial court’s judgment. The court held that Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965), allowing for the recovery of property given in contemplation of marriage, applied to the real property in question. This was because the sole consideration for transferring the property to the wife was the contemplation of marriage, which did not occur. Since the former husband would bear the complete financial loss of the down payment in case of default, the court ruled in his favor for the return of the property (Gaden v. Gaden, 1971).
Justice Breitel dissented, arguing that applying Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) to real property in this context was inappropriate. His position was that this law was meant to apply to personal property, such as engagement rings, and not complex cases involving real property. Breitel argued that the majority’s interpretation could disrupt established property laws and transactions concerning real estate (Gaden v. Gaden, 1971).
If the court treated the engagement ring as personal property rather than real property, the outcome might differ due to the unique treatment of personal property in property law. Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) explicitly contemplates recovery of personal property given in contemplation of marriage. Engagement rings, as conditional gifts, are typically subject to return if the marriage does not occur, regardless of fault in breaking the engagement. However, real property has greater legal complexity and involves considerations of title transfer, financing, and equity contributions.
-Brandon
Gaden v. Gaden, 272 N.E.2d 471 (N.Y. 1971)
New York Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965). Gifts made in contemplation of marriage. Retrieved from https://1-next-westlaw-com.us1.proxy.openathens.net/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&pubNum=1000060&cite=NYCRS80-B&originatingDoc=I24471c60171d11e78e18865f4d27462d&refType=LQ&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&ppcid=10be92f499304a1bb57a8cca358d9857&contextData=(sc.Search)
————————————————————
Assignment 4 (1/2 Page) Answer the Professor’s 2 questions from her response to Brandon G post. Site at least one reference.
Professor Navarro Posted,
Brandon, great start to our discussion.
I appreciate how you highlighted the application of New York Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) and its focus on gifts given in contemplation of marriage. Your explanation of Justice Breitel’s dissent, particularly his concern about the broader implications for real property law, provides valuable context for understanding the legal complexity of this case.
Your analysis of the potential outcome if the engagement ring had been treated as personal property is sharp. You correctly point out that personal property, such as engagement rings, is often treated differently under property law due to its conditional nature.
However, I’d like to expand on your point about legal complexity:
*what do you think about the potential for equity considerations to influence the court’s decision if real property had involved joint contributions or improvements by both parties?
Class, Brandon raised a great point about how real property has greater legal complexity compared to personal property.
*How do you think courts should balance the equitable interests of both parties when resolving disputes over real property given in contemplation of marriage, especially if one party made significant contributions to the property after the gift was made?
Thanks for sharing.
– Prof.

Assignment 1 (1 Page) Answer the Questions
*Make At least one reference to Chapter 1 of Essentials Of Real Esstate Law
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com
Login details will be available only for the assigned writer.
An Overview of Real Estate
In the interest of conducting a lively, engaging discussion, please keep the following in mind:
Opposing viewpoints are critical to any vibrant discussion, but remember to use internet etiquette and respect your classmates’ views and opinions. Provide constructive feedback or ask clarifying questions if you do not understand a classmate’s comment.
Most importantly, have fun interacting with the unit content, your classmates, and your instructor!
Refer to your course syllabus or the Discussion Rubric posted in Course Documents for discussion requirements.
*How do the courts treat real property and personal property?
To see how the courts treat one type of property, consider the scenario of a broken engagement. When it comes to a broken engagement, learn how one state’s courts treat this property type. Please read Gaden v. Gaden, 272 N.E.2d 471 (N.Y. 1971). In Gaden, real property was the “engagement gift” instead of personal property, like the engagement ring.
Answer the following questions:
*What was the court’s decision? What was the dissenting judge’s argument?
*Would the outcome in Gaden be different if the court treated the engagement ring as a different property type? Why, or why not?
*Remember to reference the property law rules in your answer and analysis.
—————————————————–
Assignment 2 (1 page) Review Unit 1 Seminar PowerPoint
1/2 page of Notes ( as if you were listening to the professor present the powerpoint)
1/2 page of key take aways of the PowerPoint. References and citations are not necessary.
—————————————————–
Assignment 3 (1/2 page) Expound on the topic with at least 150 words to include asking one question to Brandon G and citing 1 reference.
Brandon G Posted
Hello class!
The Court of Appeals of New York (1971) reversed the appellate division’s decision and reinstated the trial court’s judgment. The court held that Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965), allowing for the recovery of property given in contemplation of marriage, applied to the real property in question. This was because the sole consideration for transferring the property to the wife was the contemplation of marriage, which did not occur. Since the former husband would bear the complete financial loss of the down payment in case of default, the court ruled in his favor for the return of the property (Gaden v. Gaden, 1971).
Justice Breitel dissented, arguing that applying Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) to real property in this context was inappropriate. His position was that this law was meant to apply to personal property, such as engagement rings, and not complex cases involving real property. Breitel argued that the majority’s interpretation could disrupt established property laws and transactions concerning real estate (Gaden v. Gaden, 1971).
If the court treated the engagement ring as personal property rather than real property, the outcome might differ due to the unique treatment of personal property in property law. Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) explicitly contemplates recovery of personal property given in contemplation of marriage. Engagement rings, as conditional gifts, are typically subject to return if the marriage does not occur, regardless of fault in breaking the engagement. However, real property has greater legal complexity and involves considerations of title transfer, financing, and equity contributions.
-Brandon
Gaden v. Gaden, 272 N.E.2d 471 (N.Y. 1971)
New York Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965). Gifts made in contemplation of marriage. Retrieved from https://1-next-westlaw-com.us1.proxy.openathens.net/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&pubNum=1000060&cite=NYCRS80-B&originatingDoc=I24471c60171d11e78e18865f4d27462d&refType=LQ&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&ppcid=10be92f499304a1bb57a8cca358d9857&contextData=(sc.Search)
————————————————————
Assignment 4 (1/2 Page) Answer the Professor’s 2 questions from her response to Brandon G post. Site at least one reference.
Professor Navarro Posted,
Brandon, great start to our discussion.
I appreciate how you highlighted the application of New York Civil Rights Law § 80-b (1965) and its focus on gifts given in contemplation of marriage. Your explanation of Justice Breitel’s dissent, particularly his concern about the broader implications for real property law, provides valuable context for understanding the legal complexity of this case.
Your analysis of the potential outcome if the engagement ring had been treated as personal property is sharp. You correctly point out that personal property, such as engagement rings, is often treated differently under property law due to its conditional nature.
However, I’d like to expand on your point about legal complexity:
*what do you think about the potential for equity considerations to influence the court’s decision if real property had involved joint contributions or improvements by both parties?
Class, Brandon raised a great point about how real property has greater legal complexity compared to personal property.
*How do you think courts should balance the equitable interests of both parties when resolving disputes over real property given in contemplation of marriage, especially if one party made significant contributions to the property after the gift was made?
Thanks for sharing.
– Prof.

I need you to to write me an essay for UK Employment Law module (4000) word count which consists of part A which is 2000 words and part B for 2000 words. The writing style and perspective should exclusively be UK based only. It has to have references of articles and books from credible academic sources. It must be written in UK English from a university student level (Bachelors and above). No AI or plagiarized. generated content please. Attaching detailed assignment question A and B for you. Finally you must also use the pdf of a book titled “Employment Law – The Essentials” by David Balaban (attached).

Please use Oscola ref. kindly follow instructions as per the attachment (summative MS word file). I have included my first attempt that was submitted before, and the feedback i received, you can use it and elaborate more, you can add more contradictions other than the Delayed payments

Assignment guidelines:
1- 1500 words, including the footnotes and references
2- use the Chicago reference style (by using footnotes)
3- the font (Times New Roman)
4- font size 12 for the text in the main document (body) and size 10 for the footnotes, single space.
5- use standard page margins of 1′ inch on all sides.
6- 5 references minimum.
7- no cover page. (Add your name, ID, and the class section to the page’s header.)

You need to answer the question that follows:
1- a short introduction to a franchising system
2- How does Kuwaiti law regulate franchising agreements in Kuwait? The definition of a franchise under Kuwaiti law includes the following points:
– market entry
– registration of franchising
– dispute resolution- between the franchise contractual parties, if any
– use franchising regulations in the GCC countries for comparison

Q1. Using 500-700 words, discuss and describe what is meant by a ‘victim precipitated homicide’. In doing so, briefly describe and elaborate a bit on how ‘situational rage’ and/or ‘accumulated rage’ may be connected to a victim precipitated homicide. No direct quotes should be utilized in the response. Note: The essay response given should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing in accordance with current APA standards. The essay response is to include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources listed in proper APA format with in-text citation(s) in proper APA format. In-text citations are to correspond to a source in proper APA format listed after the essay response. Q2. Using 500-700 words, per the week 7 lesson and assigned readings, provide an overview of the rationale as to why some view the American process of rendering criminal justice as a non-system. No direct quotes should be utilized in the response. Note: The essay response given should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing in accordance with current APA standards. The essay response is to include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources listed in proper APA format with in-text citation(s) in proper APA format. In-text citations are to correspond to a source in proper APA format listed after the essay response.

Challenges in investigating crimes against children are different than those of adults. 1. Identify at least three (3) specific investigative challenges that are present in child victim cases. 2. Are these challenges general or unique to a specific form of child abuse? Explain. 3. Utilize at least one source, aside from your required readings, to support your position. 4. Recommend a procedure for ensuring that each of these challenges are met so the victims are appropriately served and the integrity of the investigative process is maintained. In your reply posts Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide substantive replies to at least two (2) different individual initial posts. Compare and contrast the challenges identified by your peers to yours. Provide additional insight and feedback regarding their procedural recommendations.

In your reply posts: Reply posts are due no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CT. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide substantive replies to at least two (2) different individual initial posts. Compare and contrast your findings and position to that of your peers.

Which hypothesis best describes the context of the early American slavery system? Why? Justify your response by accurately describing the theory you chose and applying it to the historical case of pre-Civil War America. This is a discussion post that require two responses.