Week 2 Key Assignment Instructions In accordance with the requirements of our Ke

Week 2 Key Assignment
Instructions
In accordance with the requirements of our Key Assignment (Due in Week 7) in this course, please review the following list of potential problem/situations and choose one for your final assignment, Strategic HR Plan. You can write your paper as if you were employed at a Fortune 500 company, a current organization that is in the news, or a past or present employer.
Below is the list of potential problems or situations from which you can select, choose one to research for your final project:
Rollout of a change management initiative.
Creation and implementation of a new compensation and benefits package.
Creation and implementation of a new performance appraisal system or method of conducting performance appraisals.
Creation and implementation of an effective recruiting and retention program to enhance the quality of employees and management within the organization.
Creation and implementation of a succession plan.
Technological changeover from one computer system to a newer computer system (HRIS – include possible conversion problems).
Creation and implementation of a revised policy to replace a current policy, which is not working (and lawsuits have resulted from the current, for example – a poorly written disciplinary policy).

Choose your problem/situation from the list above for your strategic HR plan. Include a paragraph or two on the importance of the topic and your rationale for selection. Please submit via MS Word in the appropriate drop box for Week 2 Assignment.

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) directly assess performance behaviors

Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) directly assess performance behaviors. The BARS method depends on critical incidents or short descriptions of effective and ineffective behaviors that ultimately produce a number value. The assessor is responsible for rating the specific behaviors of an employee based upon the behavioral expectations that are provided as anchors. When rating the employee, most employers prefer to also provide written feedback for why the employee received a specific rating.
“Typically, supervisors rate several performance dimensions using BARS and score an employee’s overall job performance by taking the average value across all the dimensions” and “because the critical incidents convey the precise kinds of behaviors that are effective and ineffective, feedback from BARS can help an employee develop and improve over time.”
Source of the quote above: Colquitt, J.A., Lepine, J.A., & Wesson, M.J. (2011). Organizational behavior (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. (Note: This textbook is not available from the Trident Online Library).Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
Two Assessment Area Examples:
Oral Communication: Organizes thoughts and expresses them in a clear and logical manner, quickly comprehends another’s meaning, uses appropriate vocabulary, correct grammar, and appropriate non-verbal communication (gestures, etc.).
Expresses ideas clearly and concisely.
Answers questions completely and precisely. Speaks with a voice that exhibits an appropriate command presence.
Relates thoughts in an organized manner. Gives concise answers to questions. Demonstrates effective active listening behaviors (e.g., leans forward, nods in agreement, repeats statements back, verbalizes understanding).
Clearly enunciates words. Attentively leans forward.
Voices ideas randomly or several at a time.
Interrupts others inappropriately. Excessive use of filler words, phrases (umm, like I said, etc.)
Fails to listen to questions asked by role player(s). Uses incorrect words or grammar in responding to questions.
Takes too long without making a point.
Uses profanity.
Problem Analysis & Resolution: Ability to critically evaluate a situation, gather and analyze relevant information, identify underlying issues, assess alternative solutions, and to consider the implications of problems and potential solutions.
Identifies possible resources to resolve problem. Deals with problems before they worsen.
Ensures a follow up plan is established. Develops alternative approaches to deal with the problem. Verbalizes the impact on the organization as a whole (morale, operations, budget, etc.). Thoroughly considers relevant information.
Provides feasible solutions; considered feasibility of alternatives. Makes suggestions for resolving the problem.
Assures adherence to standards.
Is unable to support conclusions with facts or logic.
Fails to consider alternatives.
Considers only a portion of the available information. Abdicates responsibility, blames others.
Waits until a problem has worsened before dealing with the problem.
Fails to act.
Source of the above examples: The City of Columbus, Civil Service Commission. Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Slide presentation retrieved from http://www.ipacweb.org/Resources/Documents/conf13/reed.pdf.
SLP 2 Assignment:
Following the examples above, create a similar BARS instrument (based on your current position) with at least FIVE different areas of assessment. Meet with a colleague or supervisor to have him or her evaluate your behaviors. Discuss the results with your colleague/supervisor to figure out where you scored highest and where you scored lowest.
Write a paper discussing the following issues:
Your results
The process you went through
How your instrument can be adjusted for optimal results
What the strengths and weaknesses of BARS are
How the feedback from the BARS can help an individual improve over time
How BARS compares to two other performance appraisal processes
Other recommendations you may have
This pragmatic approach will help you get into the routine of continuously being evaluated. You will submit both the BARS instrument that you created and the paper.
Bring in at least 2 library sources to help strengthen your discussion.
Your paper should be at least 2-3 pages, (not including the cover sheet and reference list). Deal with these issues in an integrated fashion, not as a series of individual questions.
Please upload your submission by the module due date.
Please note that the links below labeled ‘LinkedIn Learning’ will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscription to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.
Required Material
Davenport, T. H. (2012). Case study: Social media engages employees. FT.Com, Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.
Wilkie, D., & Wright, A. (2014). Balance risks of screening social media activity. HR Magazine, 59(5), 14. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Wright, A. (2014). How Facebook recruits. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/technology/Pages/How-Facebook-Recruits.aspx
Optional Material
Social Media for Working Professionals – LinkedIn Learning
Segal, J. A. (2014). The law and social media in hiring. HR Magazine, 59(9), 70-72. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Segal, J. A., & LeMay, J., (2014). Should employers use social media to screen job applicants? HR Magazine, 59(11), 20-21. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library
Swain, K. (2017). The impact of social media in the workplace pros and cons. Retrieved from http://work.chron.com/impact-social-media-workplace-pros-cons-22611.html
Walden, J. A. (2016). Integrating Social Media Into the Workplace: A Study of Shifting Technology Use Repertoires. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 347-363. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Wright, A. D. (2014). More states prohibit social media snooping. HR Magazine, 59(10), 14. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
Required Material
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Systems—BARS. Retrieved from http://performance-appraisals.org/appraisal-library/Behaviorally_Anchored_Rating_Systems_-_BARS/
Optional Material
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). Example. Retrieved from www.in.gov/spd/files/bars.doc
Simulation Training
Required Material
Abernathy, D., Allerton, H., Barron, T., & Salopek, J. (1999). Everyday simulation. Training & Development, 53(11), 37. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.
Virtual Tours: Video, Photo, and VR – LinkedIn Learning
Optional Material
Catling, C., Hogan, R., Fox, D., Cummins, A., Kelly, M., & Sheehan, A. (2016). Simulation workshops with first year midwifery students. Nurse Education in Practice, 17, 109-115. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Lambert, C., and Lloyd-Jones, H. (2014). Run simulation in your workplace. Education for Primary Care. 25(6), 357-359. Retrieved from EBSCOHost in the Trident Online Library.
McMaster, S., Ledrick, D., Stausmire, J., & Burgard, K. (2014). Evaluation of a simulation training program for uncomplicated fishhook removal. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 25, 416-424. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Uptick in simulation training. (2013). Air Force Time, 3. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

This assignment will bring together the information from the previous three assi

This assignment will bring together the information from the previous three assignments to create a presentation to your senior management team. Integrating the HR data elements, using the communication plan, and following the process map will create a presentation that will validate your recommendations concerning the recruiting resources for the organization.
hat will make a case for increasing, decreasing, or keeping stable the recruiting resources of the organization.
Your presentation will need to include the current situation, provide the supporting data in numbers as well as graphs, and make your recommendation again supported by data and graphs. Costs are important and must be supported by your data and graphs. Remember, you are selling these recommendations to the leadership team.
The presentation must include:
The problem to be solved, why the problem exists, and the impact on the organization
The data that supports the problem. Typically this shows current historical (year over year, quarter over quarter) data
Predictive data to show the future
Recommendations and solutions supported by data and graphs
PowerPoint is the medium typically used to present this type of information and is the required format for this assignment. The presentation should consist of 10 to 12 slides with a minimum of six data graphics.
I attached some of my past assignments in case you need to reference it

You are the Human Resources manager for large distribution site. Your recent emp

You are the Human Resources manager for large distribution site. Your recent employee opinion survey indicated that overall, employees felt that this was a good place to work. However, recent downturns in the economy have resulted in the loss of large contracts, which provided a significant portion of the company’s revenue. One of the impacts from this loss in revenue is that the company will be unable to provide annual COLA or merit increases for the first time in more than 15 years. You have heard rumors from employees close to you that there is talk about efforts to unionize. What guidelines will you develop for supervisors to successfully respond to employee questions about unionization? What can your supervisors say or do that is legally permissible in this situation?

I need an explanation on the abstract section, I did highlight the area to be ex

I need an explanation on the abstract section, I did highlight the area to be explained. I want to know from where the numerical results came from if they are not presented in the research paper then how it was calculated ?. Moreover, i want a simple explanation on how the mean was interpreted in table 2 and 5 (for example as stated in the explanation of table 5 in page 42, on what bases the statistical analyst says that the mean of 2.74,2.61,2.49 and 2.57 show that its employee disagree that the company’s BAS encounters irregular power supply), etc.

Textbook for this assignment is Employee Training & Development 9th Edition by R

Textbook for this assignment is Employee Training & Development 9th Edition by Raymond Noe available on Vital Source. Give thoughtful answers to the Chapter 7 & 8 questions below:
Ch. 7 Case: Developing Leadership at Farm Bureau Financial Services. Read the case and answer the questions at the end.
Ch. 8: Discuss how new technologies make it easier to learn. How do they facilitate transfer of training? Identify and explain two pitfalls to consider.
Ch 8 Case: Training Customer Service Team Members at Valvoline Instant Oil Change. Read the case and answer the questions at the end.
The response to each question should be at least a paragraph long and should thoroughly answer the question, referencing content from the textbook or cited outside sources. All work should be submitted as an attached Word document.

Many employers do not have a plan to manage and transfer knowledge. Because work

Many employers do not have a plan to manage and transfer knowledge. Because workforce dynamics have changed, there is a greater need than ever for a knowledge-transfer strategy. Business wisdom is taken from organizations with retirements, resignations, and terminations, leaving companies more likely than not to have less growth capacity and less efficiency, especially in the short run.
In the past, the expectation of passing along knowledge and leaving a legacy was a good fit with the values of long-tenured employees who spent their careers with the same company. But in the modern workplace, where four generations work side by side, knowledge is not always well-filtered throughout an organization.
“As the Baby Boom generation of corporate leaders and experts approaches retirement, businesses in the U.S., Canada, and many European nations face the loss of experience and knowledge on an unprecedented scale,” says Diane Piktialis, Mature Workforce Program Leader at The Conference Board. “Younger workers can’t be counted on to fill the void, as they lack the experience that builds deep expertise. They also tend to change jobs frequently, taking their technological savvy and any knowledge they’ve gained with them.”
Knowledge does not exist in a vacuum, so it is important to first identify and evaluate what kind of knowledge company executives are interested in capturing and sustaining.
Because so much knowledge transfer is cross-generational, from long-tenured to newer employees, an understanding of different learning styles based on generation facilitates the process. Understanding generational learning preferences and adapting how knowledge is conveyed can make the difference between merely harvesting knowledge and actually using it.
Adaptations should be made when the knowledge is specific to the organization and is mission critical, and when the less knowledgeable employee has specific generational learning preferences. For example, employees entering the workforce may prefer getting Instant Messages (IM) in real time rather than setting a schedule to meet. Gen Y employees may set up blogs to capture knowledge. Firms considering or using knowledge transfer processes should assess their readiness for Instant Messaging, blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, podcasts, and virtual reality.
There are many knowledge transfer methods available, including training seminars, formal education, interviews, mentoring, apprenticeships, instant messaging, job transfer, simulations and games, peer assists, communities of practice, storytelling, wikis, blogs, white papers, and conferences.
Revised from:
American Management Association. (2017). Effective knowledge transfer can help transform your bottom line. Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org/training/articles/Effective-Knowledge-Transfer-Can-Help-Transform-Your-Bottom-Line.aspx
Assignment Overview
Steve Trautman is one of America’s leading knowledge experts. View the following four videos to understand the depth of the knowledge-transfer process and follow Mr. Trautman’s widely used knowledge transfer solution.
Pay close attention to the process. Developing your own Knowledge Silo Matrix and discussing what you found will be the basis of your Case 1 assignment. Please note that the links below labeled ‘LinkedIn Learning’ will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscriiption to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.
Facilitating succession planning and knowledge transfer – LinkedIn Learning
Case Assignment
For this Case Assignment you will be completing and analyzing a matrix following the Knowledge Silo Matrix instructions in the third video above. (The team you choose could be a current or past work group, a group of committee members, a group of family members, members of a rock band, or any group where you know the expertise needed and the skill levels of the employees/members.)
You may (a) complete the matrix by hand or (b) use the Knowledge Silo Matrix Word form. Remember these key points:
The Knowledge Silo Matrix (KSM) is a high-level tool of knowledge silos. Think bigger picture. For example, if you were filling out a KSM for building a house, some example silos would be Plumbing, Electrical, Flooring, Insulation, etc. Not “Weld a pipe” or “Test for adequate water pressure.” The blog article, Tip for Better, Faster Knowledge Transfer—It’s Not What People KNOW, It’s What They Know How to DO, provided by The Steve Trautman Co., addresses the important distinction between Knowing vs. Doing. This will help you create a more actionable KSM.
Once you have your matrix completed, then respond to the following questions using the section headings in your paper that are marked in bold below. Utilize at least two sources of outside information from other authors; be sure to cite them and provide a reference list at the end.
Introduction—This section is often written after you have completed the rest of your paper.
Work Team Overview—Provide an overview of the work team you have assessed in the Knowledge Silo Matrix. Who are they, how long have they been in the group, and what are their jobs?
Skill Level in Silo—Discuss each group member’s job in terms of his/her silo status—discussing why you have evaluated them as purple, green, yellow, or white.
Matrix Analysis—Analyze what the matrix tells you.
Look at each silo and analyze what you see and what needs to be done to minimize the knowledge risk.
Look at the colors assigned to each employee (horizontal colors). What should be done next to minimize the risk related to each employee as well as to enhance the performance of the work team? Be sure to discuss the training needed (or not) for each member and what the format of the training should be given what you learn from the matrix.
Application of the Matrix–Discuss what you have learned from this exercise and the strengths of the Knowledge Silo Matrix approach and the challenges you see managers could face in an organization using the Matrix.
Conclusion
Submit BOTH your Knowledge Silo Matrix and your discussion covering the points above by the module due date.
Social Media
Please note that the links below labeled ‘LinkedIn Learning’ will open in a new window and may require activation of a LinkedIn account on the first attempt. Trident students may use their student email address to access this free subscriiption to LinkedIn Learning as a part of this course.
Required Material
Davenport, T. H. (2012). Case study: Social media engages employees. FT.Com, Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.
Wilkie, D., & Wright, A. (2014). Balance risks of screening social media activity. HR Magazine, 59(5), 14. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Wright, A. (2014). How Facebook recruits. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/technology/Pages/How-Facebook-Recruits.aspx
Optional Material
Social Media for Working Professionals – LinkedIn Learning
Segal, J. A. (2014). The law and social media in hiring. HR Magazine, 59(9), 70-72. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Segal, J. A., & LeMay, J., (2014). Should employers use social media to screen job applicants? HR Magazine, 59(11), 20-21. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library
Swain, K. (2017). The impact of social media in the workplace pros and cons. Retrieved from http://work.chron.com/impact-social-media-workplace-pros-cons-22611.html
Walden, J. A. (2016). Integrating Social Media Into the Workplace: A Study of Shifting Technology Use Repertoires. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 347-363. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Wright, A. D. (2014). More states prohibit social media snooping. HR Magazine, 59(10), 14. Retrieved from ProQuest in the Trident Online Library.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales
Required Material
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Systems—BARS. Retrieved from http://performance-appraisals.org/appraisal-library/Behaviorally_Anchored_Rating_Systems_-_BARS/
Optional Material
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). Example. Retrieved from www.in.gov/spd/files/bars.doc
Simulation Training
Required Material
Abernathy, D., Allerton, H., Barron, T., & Salopek, J. (1999). Everyday simulation. Training & Development, 53(11), 37. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.
Virtual Tours: Video, Photo, and VR – LinkedIn Learning
Optional Material
Catling, C., Hogan, R., Fox, D., Cummins, A., Kelly, M., & Sheehan, A. (2016). Simulation workshops with first year midwifery students. Nurse Education in Practice, 17, 109-115. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Lambert, C., and Lloyd-Jones, H. (2014). Run simulation in your workplace. Education for Primary Care. 25(6), 357-359. Retrieved from EBSCOHost in the Trident Online Library.
McMaster, S., Ledrick, D., Stausmire, J., & Burgard, K. (2014). Evaluation of a simulation training program for uncomplicated fishhook removal. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 25, 416-424. Available in the Trident Online Library.
Uptick in simulation training. (2013). Air Force Time, 3. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

For this assignment, you are a benefits consultant responsible for keeping your

For this assignment, you are a benefits consultant responsible for keeping your clients abreast of employee benefits trends. You will team up with a few other people in class (you can either email me your group name and topic or let me know what you are interested in for the topic and I will create the groups) and deliver a presentation to your client based on a published survey. You are not required to complete a paper, in addition to the presentation. The presentation can be with or without video.
You will be comparing various benefit provisions and looking at historical trends. A good consultant is able to provide analysis and context in addition to merely stating the facts.
Your team will be consultants meeting with your client to review the latest survey results that your company has compiled. Create a PowerPoint presentation to lead the discussion with the client.
Your presentation should be about minutes 10-15 minutes in length and include the following components:
-One thing that surprised you and why
-One thing that did not surprise you and why
-One recommendation to your client that is supported by the findings. Remember trends should not be followed blindly. Make up some aspect about the client that makes your recommendation a good fit with their strategy and explain why. (e.g., “Knowing that you are an organization that is striving for maximum health care consumer engagement, we recommend you introduce an HRA or HSA account to your medical plan.”)
-Anything else you deem relevant and interesting to the client
The topic is 2019 Best Practices in Health Care Employer Survey Report. I will attach the file for the survey report.