Category: History

his assignment assesses the following Course Outcome:
CJ101-4: Describe how the Fourth Amendment applies to search and seizure as related to legal precedent.
Complete the Unit 7 Assignment: How Does Search and Seizure Relate to California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
The ability to think critically is a key skill for success in the criminal justice field. It means not taking what you heard or read at face value, but using your critical thinking faculties to weigh up the evidence, and consider the implications and conclusions of the situation.
Resource: Chapter 10: “Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial”
Watch the video of a Mock Trial Flow to understand how a mock trial is conducted and follow this criteria in creating the trial for the assignment.
Review the details of California v. Greenwood. Compile the facts and witness information for this case. Decide which witnesses could support the prosecution’s case and which witnesses would support the defense’s case. How does search and seizure relate to the California v. Greenwood case? Review the types of evidence that can be proven or disproven at trial.
Review the following resources In Westlaw:
People v. Greenwood, 182 Cal.App.3d 729 (1986) 227 Cal.Rptr. 539
California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988) 108 S.Ct. 1625, 100 L.Ed.2d 30, 56 USLW 4409
Note: You should be logged in to Westlaw in the Purdue Global Library before you access the Westlaw link above.
Complete a trial script of the trial process of the California v. Greenwood case.
Download Unit 7 Trial Script Template
Include the following in your script:
The actions for each person involved in the trial process (Bailiff, Judge, Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, etc.)
Opening and closing statements
The questions asked on direct examination and cross examination
The verdict
In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria:
Include a cover page and references page in 10- to 12-point font (Arial, Courier, and Times New Roman are acceptable).
Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained.
Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
Writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.
Appropriate citation style should be followed.
You should also make sure to:
Include a title page with full name, class name, section number, and date.
Include an introductory and concluding paragraph and demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard English.
Use examples to support your discussion.
List all sources on a separate reference page at the end of your paper and cite within the body of your paper using APA format and citation style. For more information on APA guidelines, visit Academic Tools.
Westlaw. (2020). California V. Greenwood.
Westlaw (1986) People v. Greenwood.

You must provide a title page and a separate Bibliography page (list of sources).
You must use at least 7 “scholarly” sources for your essay. Do NOT use any type of “encyclopedias” as a source! You also must not use websites OTHER than those that end in .edu. You should use academic sources such as journal articles, monographs (books), journals, diaries, journal articles, newspapers, etc.
You must use the Chicago (commonly called Turabian) style and format. Make sure that you use “Endnotes” and “Bibliography” style. Do NOT use “footnotes.” If you are not familiar with Turabian, the following site may be very helpful: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/turabian-notes-and-bibliography-citation-quick-guide.htmlLinks to an external site.
Essays must be submitted via the “assignment link” by midnight on the date indicated. The link is located in Module 8. Papers must be typed using 12 point standard font (Times New Roman), double-spaced with one-inch margins, and in MS-Word format. Failure to comply will result in point deductions. Do NOT insert any type of chart, photo, image, or list into your narrative. Do not use “headings” in the main body of your essay. You also should not include an “abstract.” No e-mail attachments will be accepted. Students must include their name on the document.

Consider George Bancroft’s writings on the American Revolution in light of Hebert Butterfield’s critique of “Whig history.” To what extent does Bancroft write in the Whig idiom? Comment on the strengths and weaknesses of this style of history as a means of shedding light on the past. It may be useful to draw selectively on Becker as well.
Guidelines. I will grade the paper on both content (the key ideas you present) and the quality of the writing itself. On the writing, I will be looking for clarity, concision, and overall control. I offer, below, some more detailed suggestions regarding your approach to the materials and to matters of writing conventions and formatting. The best reference guide to writing style is The Chicago Manual of Style. Chicago offers an online version that may be of help https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.htmlLinks to an external site. (common sorts of questions are often addressed in the “Q&A section,” but you will see other helpful material elsewhere on the website).
A) Central elements of the strongest answers (these are mostly generic suggestions, not specifically tailored to this particular essay):
Make an argument. Your first paragraph should conclude with a thesis statement, and successive paragraphs should elaborate that thesis.
Define your terms. What are the key elements of heroic or Whig history, for example?
Make sure to consider place and time in your answers. Does it matter that one is considering Massachusetts or Virginia or some other place in the early republic? Does it matter that a document is written in 1789, 1800, or 1820?
Whenever possible, support your argument with references to primary sources. This does not mean that you need to pepper your text with quotes. But where there is primary material that is relevant, demonstrate that the position you take can be supported in documents of the period. When you introduce primary material, make sure to do a few things: note who is writing and when they are writing, “translate” what they are saying (don’t simply block quote without quickly summarizing what you take to the meaning of their text), and comment on how the material illuminates the issue at hand.
Similarly, whenever possible, support your argument by drawing on the secondary works we have read this term. You are encouraged to read these works critically: if you have persuasive evidence or reasoning to the contrary, it is perfectly acceptable to challenge historical interpretations.
Part of your argument should address what you imagine to be the strongest positions of someone who might take an opposing view.
Finally, find a balance here between breadth and depth. You can’t cover everything. Find what you think is essential and interesting – particular events, statements, persons — and do a thorough job in supporting your case.
only use the source i provide

Please use the suggested source (Nationalism and the Collapse
of Soviet Communism
MARK R. BEISSINGER) and other sources you find that support your thesis. The lecture outlines also contain relevant readings, especially week 9 lecture 2’s outline. If you have any questions, please ask me. Lastly, please inform me when you have your thesis statement. Thank you very much!

Hi i just noticed that in the directions it says to avoid using poems by Langston Hughes. Can you adjust the presentation from Langston Hughes poem and just put something else for the Harlem Renaissance

To help guide your viewing, here is a synopsis of the movie “Drawn Together: Comics, Diversity, and Stereotypes.”
With a lively backdrop of superheroes, comic books, and animated comics, Drawn Together: Comics, Diversity, and Stereotypes brings together three talented artists—a Sikh, a woman, and an African American—who are challenging the racist stereotyping currently endemic in America through their work.
The documentary provides a rare opportunity to explore the subjects of race, gender, and religion stereotyping through the universally popular medium of comic books and cartoons. Drawn Together boldly encourages viewers to unlearn stereotyping, look beyond the obvious, and confront media prejudices—all through an uncommon and inherently engaging everyday source.
Expert commentary is provided by Professor Arvind Singhal, a world-renowned expert in entertainment education; Andrew Farago, the curator of San Francisco’s Cartoon Art Museum; and Adam Elrashidi, a cartoonist and producer at Al Jazeera. They share their thoughts on how to solve the problem of racist stereotyping by changing the stories being told and discuss how the three profiled artists have brought about a groundswell movement to combat the way we traditionally look at racist stereotypes.
One was about what makes someone or something part of popular culture. The other was about creative people whose works support diversity rather than stereotypes.
For your main posting, please look back at American history from 1800 to recent times. Find a person, event, artifact, or movement, school, group, or institution that fits into our two themes this week, namely that it is a part of popular culture and that it supports diversity rather than stereotypes.
Your main posting should have three paragraphs. First, tell us what you chose and why it is part of popular culture. Second, describe how your choice supports diversity rather than stereotypes. Third, tell us why you chose it. Why did this attract your attention and also make it worthy of consideration in a course on the history of popular American culture?
Check the discussion rubric if you aren’t sure what a good discussion posting looks like. This rubric is in Part II of our syllabus. Remember to have all the required parts for this posting.
Post this new thread with your three paragraphs in our Week 9 Discussions board on or before Friday night at 11:59 pm Central time.

The five sources MUST include three peer reviewed sources. The paper also must contain a little about the doping and such in the whole history of the Olympics. Its a Kinesiology/History course. Thank you!

Answer questions in essay
How has globalization introduced new challenges and issues into Western life in the modern period? Alternatively, what are some advantages to globalization that we have not seen in previous moments in Western history?

The 20th century was a time of marginalized people groups starting to find new identities and ways of empowering themselves. Using the Havel and de Beauvoir texts, how should marginalized groups take a stand and empower themselves?
Paper has to have quoted citations 4 of them and page numbers
I will upload text and book citations have to be by

The Topic And Research question: Why did the fall of the Berlin Wall trigger the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe?
(Course Descriiption: Explores the history of Communism from its origins in Marxist theory to the rise and fall of Communist systems in Europe and around the world. Analyzes the history of selected Communist states, movements and leaders)
Assignment: Structure clear and persuasive, evidence based, arguments on Communism.
One of your writers, wrote a research proposal for me, which i will attach below as reference, just keep the feedback of the proposal in mind (I will paste it below)
“You are reaching too far. Your research question is way too broad. Rephrase it thusly.
Why did the fall of the Berlin Wall trigger the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe?
This will keep you paper more focused and still allow you to talk about the common problems with communism in Eastern Europe.
Your sources lean to heavily on what happened long term after the fall of the wall. You need more on what weaknesses led up to it.”