Category: History

The maximum word count for this essay is 4500 words. Here is the essay brief of the project – This should be an extended essay on a single or small number of directly related primary sources. The source/s should be focused, ie. a single book, painting, collection of letters, museum object, or alike. You should not try and select a broad range of different sources covering some theme.
The focus of the essay should be on situating the source/s in the appropriate historical context, advancing an argument with regards to interpretation, and reflecting on methodological and historiographical problems the source/s pose. You will also need to identify and make use of appropriate secondary literature yourself. The best essays will offer a novel interpretation of how to think about a particular period, place, episode, theme, or genre of source.
The 3 sources you’ll be looking at are 1)The Trench 2)The war 3)War cripples. in this essay you’ll have to analyse each source drawing onto what it highlights. Mention histography, historical context and discuss provenance when analysing each source. Discuss ideas of total war, social impacts, militarisation, expressionism in Germany at the time all leading back to the question and what insights the paintings offer on the horrors of war. When looking at the source and weighting it its important to critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of using visual sources like paintings as historical evidence, addressing issues of subjectivity, interpretation, and cultural context.
Interpreting Dix’s paintings within a historical context requires careful consideration of methodological approaches and historiographical debates. Formal analysis, iconographic interpretation, and contextual understanding are essential tools for unraveling the layers of meaning in these artworks. Moreover, engaging with secondary literature on German Expressionism, World War I history, and art historiography enriches our understanding of Dix’s contributions and the broader cultural milieu of his time.
Here are all possible ideas to tie in cial and Political Turmoil: Explore the broader socio-political context of Germany during World War I, including the effects of the war on civilian populations, the rise of revolutionary movements, and the collapse of traditional societal structures. Discuss how Dix’s paintings reflect these upheavals and contribute to our understanding of the era’s social dynamics.
Psychological Impact of War: Delve into the psychological consequences of total war, examining how soldiers and civilians alike grappled with trauma, anxiety, and disillusionment. Analyze how Dix’s artistic choices, such as distorted figures and haunting imagery, convey the psychological toll of wartime experiences.
Technological Advancements in Warfare: Consider the technological innovations introduced during World War I, such as mechanized weaponry, chemical warfare, and aerial bombardment. Discuss how these advancements influenced the nature of combat and contributed to the devastation depicted in Dix’s paintings.
Cultural and Artistic Movements: Connect Dix’s work to broader cultural and artistic movements of the time, such as Dadaism and Futurism. Explore how these avant-garde movements responded to the chaos of war and challenged traditional artistic conventions, influencing Dix’s own artistic style and thematic choices.
Memory and Remembrance: Reflect on the role of art in shaping collective memory and remembrance of war. Consider how Dix’s paintings, with their raw depiction of suffering and sacrifice, contribute to ongoing discussions about war memory, memorialization, and the ethical responsibilities of representing historical trauma through art.
Be sure to support the anaylsis with fact. You are analysing how well these paintings portray actual events. So be sure to be detailed and historically accurate. The essay should follow these points Argument: does the work give a persuasive answer to the question, with good use of evidence?
Knowledge: is the work based on a thorough factual knowledge of relevant historical events?
Understanding: does the work give a critical analysis of sources, theories, methods, and/or debates that are relevant to the topic at hand?
Presentation: is the work clearly written, logically organised, and correctly referenced?
In each class below, the bullet points cover argument, knowledge, understanding, and presentation, in that order.
First (88, 94, 100)
Compelling answer to the question, expertly supported by evidence
Comprehensive and precise knowledge of relevant topics and sources
Original and sophisticated understanding of relevant sources, theories, methods, and/or debates
Superb presentation, including elegant writing style, strong organisation, and flawless referencing
May achieve, or be close to, a publishable standard
ive added a sample essay. As well as these sources use secondary literate, histiogrphy and academic work to support your points. Also as its a painting have a photo of each painting above each section. Keep in mind the following points when anylsing a painting Visual Analysis: Begin by conducting a thorough visual analysis of each painting. Pay attention to details such as color palette, composition, brushwork, use of symbolism, and depiction of figures. Consider how these visual elements contribute to the overall message and emotional impact of the painting.
Contextual Understanding: Place each painting within its historical context, specifically the context of World War I. Consider the time period, societal norms, political climate, and the experiences of people during the war. Think about how these contextual factors influenced Dix’s artistic choices and the themes he explored in his paintings.
Interpretation and Meaning: Move beyond the surface level and delve into the deeper meaning of each painting. Interpret the symbolism used by Dix and analyze what each element represents in the context of the war. Consider how Dix’s personal experiences as a soldier in World War I may have influenced his interpretation of the subject matter.
Comparison to Written Sources: Compare and contrast the insights gained from the paintings with information from written historical sources. Consider how the paintings offer a unique perspective or complement the narratives found in traditional historical texts. Reflect on the strengths and limitations of using visual art as a historical source compared to written documents.
Impact and Legacy: Finally, discuss the impact and legacy of these paintings both during and after World War I. Analyze how they were received by contemporary audiences and how they have been interpreted by historians and art critics over time. Consider the role of art in shaping public memory and understanding of historical events.

Assignment Instructions for Final Essays:
Objective:
For this assignment, For this assignment, we are required to complete two essays, selecting one topic from Prompt A and another from Prompt B. Each essay should be between 750 and 800 words.
Structure and Selection:
1. Prompts: You have three topic choices within both Prompt A and Prompt B. Select one topic from Prompt A and one from Prompt B to write each of your essays.
2. Separate Files: Submit each essay as a separate document. Label each file clearly with the prompt and topic choice (e.g., “Prompt A – Topic 1” and “Prompt B – Topic 2”).
Content Requirements:
1. Analysis of Primary Sources: Focus your analysis on the primary sources relevant to the topic you have chosen. Include at least three primary passages from these sources to support your argument.
2. Identification of Passages: Clearly identify the passages you are analyzing at the beginning of your essay. This can be done by quoting a brief excerpt or describing the passage succinctly.
3. Thesis Development: Construct a solid thesis statement for each essay, supported by evidence from the primary sources.
4. Citations: Employ footnotes for citations, emphasizing the primary sources. Refrain from additional research as it is discouraged.
5. Quotations: Utilize direct quotations effectively and sparingly. Ensure they add value to your argument without overwhelming your word count.
Additional Guidelines:
• Ensure your analysis is thorough, focusing on depth over breadth. Each paragraph should clearly support your thesis.
• Maintain a coherent structure and logical flow of ideas in each essay.
• Adhere to the word limit to keep your writing concise and focused.

The foundation of this project lies in the SIFT method (Stop, Investigate, Find better sources, Trace claims), a systematic approach to assessing online sources:
Stop: Pause before accepting information at face value. This step encourages critical thinking and skepticism.
Investigate: Scrutinize the website for credible, authoritative sources and potential biases. Consider the author’s qualifications and any discernible agendas.
Find Better Sources: Seek out alternative sources to cross-verify information and identify inconsistencies.
Trace Claims: Verify the accuracy and currency of the information presented on the website.
Upon evaluating the chosen website, students are expected to craft a thoughtful critique. They should ponder whether the site relies on credible, authoritative sources or if there’s a discernible bias or hidden agenda. Cross-referencing multiple sources to check for inconsistencies and ensuring the currency of information are essential steps in this process.
Furthermore, students will be required to share their findings with the class. This part of the assignment attempts to promote critical discussion and peer learning.
The purpose of this assignment is to equip students with valuable skills in information literacy and critical thinking, vital not only for their future academic pursuits but also for their roles as informed citizens living in the digital age. It encourages students to explore African American history with discerning eyes, ensuring the integrity of their research and understanding.
Please describe (in no more that 250 words) what conclusions you made about the web site you examined, and please explain the process and resources you consulted to draw your conclusions.

What forces were behind the push toward greater European unity in the late twentieth century?
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Research papers often start by first submitting a proposal
This assignment will be a start to the written assignment due at the end of Week Six. For this assignment, you will need to start your research. You are allowed to choose your own topic, as long as it fits the the subject and time period of this course – American history before 1877. This means no papers on Hitler or the Holocaust, or Richard Nixon, World War II or the Great Depression, or anything else that is outside either the course time frame or subject area. If you are unsure if your topic is acceptable, please contact your instructor. Also, you want a topic that can be done in a three page paper. The entire Civil War – not so much. But a specific battle or person from the war, yes.
Then work through the following form. Formulate a thesis statement – an argument. List three aspect of your topic that you will use to support your thesis. An important note about your questions – you should formulate your questions before you look for sources. The questions should be related, part of a coherent whole, and not simply drawn from three different sources. If you create the questions only after finding sources, it’s very easy to end up with three entirely different questions that have nothing to do with each other. That will turn your three page paper into what amounts to three separate even shorter papers, which is not what I want. The questions do not have to be super-specific, just related to the general topic. The questions can then lead you to sources, rather than just randomly selecting sources from search results.
Then find three scholarly sources for your research. Scholarly means peer-reviewed or published by an academic or scholarly publisher. Note that encyclopedias and sites like history.com are NOT scholarly sources. The APUS Trefry Library is a good place to look for such sources, as is the Google Scholar search engine. These are required to be primary and secondary sources. These need to be formatted according to the style guidelines you choose – APA, MLA, or Chicago Manual of Style.
Please use the following format for this assignment and submit your proposal as a Word document. The format is also attached as a Blank Form you can download and fill in.
The Proposal is due on Sunday by 11:55 PM, ET.
Name:
Topic:
Thesis Statement: This is usually one to two sentences that summarizes the point of the paper. It states the argument of the paper and includes your conclusions.
Topic Subsections: List three related aspects of your chosen topic that you plan to develop in the paper. The intent here is to keep a manageable and relatively narrow focus for the paper, and not end up going off in three wildly different directions.
1.
2.
3.
Sources: Note that sources should be in alphabetic order by author’s last name / title.
Name of source and proper citation according to MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual of Style format: 

One paragraph summary indicating what the source is and why you think it will be important for your project.
Name of source and proper citation according to MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual of Style format:

One paragraph summary indicating what the source is and why you think it will be important for your project.
Name of source and proper citation according to MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual of Style format: 

One paragraph summary indicating what the source is and why you think it will be important for your project.
The short paper must include a cover page with your name, course number and course title, instructor’s name, and date. You must also include a bibliography at the end of your paper. While composing your paper, use proper English. Do not use abbreviations, contractions, informal language, passive voice, or first/ second person (I, you, we, our, etc). And finally, students are NOT allowed to use encyclopedias or Wikipedia.

Topic,Gallipoli Campaign.
(Mustafa Camal Ataturk)
1-Introduction of the battle . * Attention grabbing opening . * answer the 5 W question to establish the context. * clearly state the 4 thesis which are the 4th principal.
2- Brief commander background.
3-Competence
. Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their impact on the success of the Battle. * provide some evidence to support each claim.
4-Mutual Trust .
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their impact on the success of the Battle * provide some evidence to support each claim

5-Sharing Understanding
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their impact on the success of the Battle * provide some evidence to support each claim
6-Disciplined initiative
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their impact on the success of the Battle. * provide some evidence to support each claim 7-Conclusion
8-Endnotes(minimum 5 resources )
Types writing Times news Roman 12 double space

Every thing you need is in the documents, I want a well put together assigment please and thank you.

Topic,Gallipoli Campaign.
(General Ian Standish Monteith Hamilton)
1-Introduction of the battle . * Attention grabbing opening . * answer the 5 W question to establish the context. * clearly state the 4 thesis which are the 4th principal.
2- Brief commander background.
3-Competence
. Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their fail to success of the Battle. * provide some evidence to support each claim.
4-Mutual Trust .
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their fail on the success of the Battle * provide some evidence to support each claim

5-Sharing Understanding
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their fail to success of the Battle * provide some evidence to support each claim
6-Disciplined initiative
Strong understanding of the mission, command principle and their fail on the success of the Battle. * provide some evidence to support each claim 7-Conclusion
8-Endnotes(minimum 5 resources )
Types writing Times news Roman 12 double space

Please read the following request carefully. This article asks you to find an interesting anecdote on this website and describe it. You need to quote the content inside; the picture is an example.
Go to Colonial America website links to an external site.
Select the Documents tab. https://www-colonialamerica-amdigital-co-uk.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/Documents/Browse/Theme
Under Document Type, check “diary.”
Select a theme (e.g. “American Indians” [sic], “war,” or “frontier”).
Select a diary.
Read one page from the diary.
Record responses to the following questions:
Which theme did you choose?
Which diary did you choose? (Note carefully the date and author.)
What strikes you in the page you have read?
After selecting your source and identifying your anecdote, consider the following questions:
What does this anecdote tell us?
What does it not tell us?
What issues does this anecdote touch upon?
Write a short paper (2-3 pages, not counting the References page or section; Times New Roman; 12 pt font; double-spaced). You must use APA-style in-text citations in all applicable locations. When using someone’s exact words, quote and cite. When using someone’s ideas, cite. In both cases, provide references. These guidelines apply to the use of any readings and resources, including the textbooks and lectures. A References page or section is required; a cover page is not.

By the assigned due date, students will respond to the following question on which to compose a 5-7 page, double-spaced, 11- or 12-point font essay (not including the mandatory works cited page, which must be included). In addition to using websites, you may also use your textbook or other credible academic sources to help you in your research. You must also some of the sources provided below, but are STRONGLY encouraged to use more than the ones listed below to pass this assignment. Your work must also include the use of at least THREE primary sources, and a works cited page. A primary source is a first-hand account of an event. You can more abut what these types of sources are by viewing this website: http://research.library.gsu.edu/primaryhistory
Textbook Link – https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/history-textbooks/1/
History in the Making: A History of the People of the United States of America to 1877
Also, the links provided below are primary sources which you may find useful. However, you will need to find additional sources on your own.
Choose one of the following prompts to respond to in an essay that is 5-6 pages in length. Your response must include direct reference to at least THREE primary sources (the links to these sources are provided below each prompt. You can use these sources by quoting from them, or better yet, summarizing and analyzing them. You must use at least one of the sources below in your essay, but you will want to find other sources as well to help respond to the topic you have chosen. If you have questions about how to do this, please let me know. In other words, PLEASE BE SURE TO FIND MORE SOURCES THAN THE ONES LISTED BELOW, WHICH ARE JUST SUGGESTED SOURCES TO HELP YOU GET STARTED. You can also get some very useful suggestions and tips for this by accessing this website, Reading and Writing about Primary Sources
Assignments must be written in Times New Roman, 11 or 12-point font. Assignments will be no less than 5 full pages double-spaced. You must have a works cited page (which does not count as one of your 5-6 pages, and you must cite your sources using either footnotes or MLA format. If you have questions about how to cite sources, please let me know. Assignments not meeting these criteria will be deducted 20 points. Assignments will also be graded and assessed on content, spelling, grammar, syntax, and organization.
Prompt Question: What caused the American Revolution? Describe the causes—economic, religious, social and intellectual—that drove the Revolution. What were the key events from 1763 on that played a major role? Was the Revolution inevitable or could it have been avoided? Explain the competing ideas and ideologies that led to Revolution.

Sources to Consider and Refer to:
http://www.history.org/history/teaching/enewsletter/volume7/nov08/primsource.cfmLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.
http://www.smithsoniansource.org/display/primarysource/results.aspx?hId=1004Links to an external site.
https://www.amrevmuseum.org/big-idea-4-a-womens-warLinks to an external site.
Samuel Adams: The Rights of the ColonistsLinks to an external site., 1772
Mecklenberg Declaration of IndependenceLinks to an external site., May 1775
Thomas Paine (1737-1809): Common SenseLinks to an external site., full text
http://www.history.org/history/teaching/enewsletter/volume7/nov08/primsource.cfmLinks to an external site.
http://www.smithsoniansource.org/display/primarysource/results.aspx?hId=1004Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5717Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5799Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5819Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5825Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5833Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5796Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6475Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5815Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6597Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5823Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6624Links to an external site.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6236Links to an external site.
http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/religion-and-eighteenth-century-revivalismreligion/resources/religion-and-american-reLinks to an external site.
How to Analyze a Primary Source
When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources–whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies–that people from that period left behind.
Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.
In order to analyze a primary source, you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:
1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?
2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author’s message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?
3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?
4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?
5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person’s eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?
6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author’s choice of words tell you? What about the silences–what does the author choose NOT to talk about?
Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.
1. Is it prescriiptive–telling you what people thought should happen–or descriiptive–telling you what people thought did happen?
2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?
3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of “ordinary” people? From whose perspective?
4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?
5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?
6. If we have read other historians’ interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?