Category: Government homework help

 
Social Welfare is the most debatable topic in American policy politics, yet many Americans are frustrated by those who sit and collect a check every month without any desire to improve themselves. I often wonder if welfare creates more poverty and laziness. Comment.
 
The War on Terror has created a smaller faction’s terrorist groups than in the past. I wonder if we are making any inroads in the War on Terror or are, we creating more enemies against America.  Comment.
please have references 

 
Using the Ring Inc. and Law Enforcement: The Cost of Keeping Neighborhoods Safe
By: Andrew Hoffman case study;
In a 1-2 page policy memo to local officials, detail the following: a local stakeholder analysis (local for you), as detailed as possible regarding use of Ring Inc by local law enforcement.  There are at least 4 stakeholders to consider (hint).  What public problem(s) does Ring address?  What are possible externalities (both positive and negative) of a relationship of Ring Inc and local law enforcement? Based on the stakeholder analysis and discussion of possible unintended consequences of Ring, indicate what local government/law enforcement should consider concerns/issues) before entering into a relationship with Ring Inc. Provide a preliminary recommendation

 Based on the articles regarding different ways of approaching policy analysis, consider the programs of the “Community-First Public Safety” case study and the “Ring Inc. and Law Enforcement” program. In a 1-2 page policy memo for local officials in Wisconsin , compare and contrast each program in terms of the public problems (and any other conditions) the programs are set up to reduce/alleviate; possible externalities of both, and possible stakeholder concerns for each alternative. You will also include a preliminary recommendation based on this information, but be sure to note that additional data/evidence should be collected. 

 
Ring Inc. and Law Enforcement: The Cost of Keeping Neighborhoods Safe
By: Andrew Hoffman:
In a 150-200 word initial post, discuss the case study from the perspectives of Forrester and Stone. What insight do these perspectives bring to better understanding the problems addressed (and possibly caused) and the policy alternatives as discussed in the case study.  In other words, detail how might problem definition vary (by main stakeholder)? What problems might be an indirect (or even direct) result of Ring Inc., and its use as part of law enforcement. Why are these issues important?   
Note: the case study is from the perspective of Ring Inc. Your replies, however, should be from the point of view of local law enforcement and/or local government.  If it helps, think about “locally” in terms of where you reside. 

 Based on the articles regarding different ways of approaching policy analysis, consider the programs of the “Community-First Public Safety” case study and the “Ring Inc. and Law Enforcement” program. In a 1-2 page policy memo for local officials where you live, compare and contrast each program in terms of the public problems (and any other conditions) the programs are set up to reduce/alleviate; possible externalities of both, and possible stakeholder concerns for each alternative. You will also include a preliminary recommendation based on this information, but be sure to note that additional data/evidence should be collected. 

 Based on the articles regarding different ways of approaching policy analysis, consider the programs of the “Community-First Public Safety” case study and the “Ring Inc. and Law Enforcement” program. In a 1-2 page policy memo for local officials where you live, compare and contrast each program in terms of the public problems (and any other conditions) the programs are set up to reduce/alleviate; possible externalities of both, and possible stakeholder concerns for each alternative. You will also include a preliminary recommendation based on this information, but be sure to note that additional data/evidence should be collected. 

 Stone and Forester address policy analysis and how one might think about analysis and decision-making from a different angle/perspective than the more traditional policy approach. Using the following example, discuss how incorporating Stone and/or Forester’s ideas could make for a better analysis of how to renovate a “seedy” downtown. In particular, think about the types of questions you might first need to ask and consider based on Stone and Forester, including why I should consider a different word than “seedy”? 

 Considering the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and the articles on different ways of approaching policy analysis, in a second policy memo for the mayor, first discuss what problem the several programs/components (Reimagining Public Safety in Saint Paul) are addressing (be as specific as possible in defining the problem-and is it the same for the various stakeholders?).  Provide a brief overview of each program components. For the three most important components  in terms of the Mayor’s overall vision, forward map the policy components as best you can. Provide all this information in a detailed policy memo. 

 Review Weiner & Vining, particularly on backward mapping.  As part of a policy memo for the mayor and St. Paul city council, 1) include a stakeholder analysis as detailed as possible for the “Community-First Public Safety” case study, and 2) answer Leonard’s three questions for the proposed community-first public safety program as best you can based on the available material/information.  
 Question 1: Do we have the capacity to carry out this program? 
 Question 2: Do we have the support of the people or organizations whose support (or opposition) to this program is relevant to our carrying it forward? 
 Question 3: Would the operation of this action, program, or initiative create (net) public value? 

 
Forward Mapping
Map forward from the T.V.P.A. to an actual reduction of trafficking in Thailand, relative to what would have prevailed in the absence of the U.S. Legislation (using something like the table below). Forward mapping concerns policy implementation, and is a tool used to work through specific chains of actions and behaviors that will trace the link from the U.S. T.V.P.A. policy to an actual reduction in trafficking in Thailand .
Question that must be answered
  
Write a narrative that describe all the behaviors that must be realized for the policy to produce desired outcomes. Be specific about who, what, when and why. 
Hint: The narrative is (reducing sex trafficking)
Is the scenario plausible?
For each actor mentioned:
1. Is the hypothesized behavior consistent with personal and organizational interests?
2. If not, what tactics could actors use to avoid complying?
3. What counter tactics could be used to force or induce compliance?
Thinking of the direct and indirect effects of the policy, what other actors would have an incentive to become involved?
For each of these actors.
1. How could the actors interfere with the hypothesized behaviors?
2. What tactics could be used to block or deflect interference?
Revise the narrative to make it more plausible?