Ethical Misconduct: In your opinion, why is ethical misconduct more difficult to

Ethical Misconduct:
In your opinion, why is ethical misconduct more difficult to overcome than poor financial performance?
Answer with a minimum of 150 words. Points will be deducted from any question that does not meet the minimum word requirement. I look forward to reading your responses.

s your work on your case study, make sure you complete the following: Choose the

s your work on your case study, make sure you complete the following:
Choose the situation on which to write. Gather as much information as possible about the situation. You may use your text as well as outside sources. Analyze all of the elements surrounding the situation:
Stakeholders
Policies
Torts
Ethical issues
Spirituality views
Determine the final solution implemented. Critical thinking, decision making, and leadership styles will be explored. Gather information about why the solution worked. Construct a 4-page case study in APA format. You should have at least 3-4 references. Support your statements with evidence from the required studies and your research.
Examples of adverse events:
Medication errors. Medication-related harm affects 1 out of every 30 patients in health care
Surgical errors. Surgical errors continue to occur at a high rate; 10% of preventable patient harm in health care was reported in surgical settings.
Health care-associated infections. Health care-associated infections result in extended duration of hospital stays.
Sepsis. Of all sepsis cases managed in hospitals, 23.6% were found to be health care associated, and approximately 24.4% of affected patients lost their lives as a result.
Diagnostic errors. These occur in 5–20% of physician–patient encounters. Most people will suffer a diagnostic error in their lifetime.
Patient falls. Patient falls are the most frequent adverse events in hospitals.
Venous thromboembolism is a highly burdensome and preventable cause of patient harm, which contributes to one third of the complications attributed to hospitalization.
Pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers affect more than 1 in 10 adult patients admitted to hospitals. they have a significant impact on the mental and physical health of individuals, and their quality of life.
Patient misidentification.

Like the link above, often times Hollywood more than exaggerates the law and/or

Like the link above, often times Hollywood more than exaggerates the law and/or law-related activities. However, there is still value when doing an ethical review.
Pick any law-based movie(s) and find 4 instances of ethical rules (they can be violations or compliance). Watch the movie(s) of your choice. Find any (4) ethical issues which we went over in this course. The issues you examine can all be in the same movie or different movies. Identify the issue, tell me what the relevant rule is, then provide analysis of it (use cases when you are able), identify whether there was compliance or a violation and then provide the legal conclusion. If there was a violation, indicate what the lawyer could or should have done to comply with the rule. Your answer to the Assignment should include the following and substantially in an IRAC form (issue, rule, analysis, conclusion). Identify the movie, identify where in the movie the ethical rule is demonstrated and provide some facts surrounding it in the movie. What rules were violated? What rules were followed? Be specific. Do not simply tell me, the lawyer lied. Do tell me that the lawyer violated rule 1.6 when he disclosed confidential information to his girlfriend, etc.
You will be graded on your ability to identify ethical rules, analyze them in accordance with the relevant Model Rules, case law examined in this course including in the discussion board and/or textbook, and the conclusion ie whether the lawyer complied or violated said rule. You may include any relevant state law on the issue. You may also compare the movie scenarios if they deal with the same rule or issue. I will critique your writing for completeness and creativity.
Again 4 different scenarios, each worth 25 points for a total of 100 points.

1- Information and background information: – Desсrіption of business ethics and

1- Information and background information:
– Desсrіption of business ethics and CSR, its importance to business organization.
– Background of a chosen local company (Lucid Motors).
– Background of chosen international company (Tesla).
2-Literature Review on Business ethics, CSR, different parameters found in 10 commandments of social
responsibility attached, write a critical evaluation of literature review.
3- brief introduction on CSR initiative number 8 (Establish and maintain a formal corporate code of conduct), the initiative in Lucid Motors, the initiative in Tesla, benchmark between the two companies.

Go through the Final Paper Assignment- Bioethics document, my topic is PVS and H

Go through the Final Paper Assignment- Bioethics document, my topic is PVS and Higher- Brain death.
go throught the guidelines for writing a Philosohy paper, this is a Chicago style writing paper, so in the endnotes write a specific page number from which information was retrived, should have atleast 4 quotes from the reading, follow the rubric when writing. This should be very opnionated essay–( use phrases like ″I think″). Make sure this paper follows the desсrіptive grading rubric. Use the 4 (Bernat, Veatch, Laureys, President′s Commission documents) to write the paper. it should be atleast 1400 words. please make sure to follow the desсrіptive grading rubric document.

Offer the opportunity to introduce your tentative analysis and theoretical refle

Offer the opportunity to introduce your tentative analysis and theoretical reflection on the reading by answering the question. Certainly, this isn’t a place for googling what other people might say about an issue being posed, and No one is in a position to settle issues that are inevitably subtle and complex. Conclusions are not really at issue: the intellectual process certainly is. **Questions are used to spark discussions, not necessarily to settle issues or come to conclusions.** Please respond to the question, and to at least one other student’s posts or comments engaging in coversation. Attached is a pdf of other students’ responses to the question. QUESTION:CONFIDENCES AND UTILITY
Hope and Dunn explicitly endorse a utilitarian approach to understanding the practice of confidentiality. Of course, that should be a tough sell since confidentiality, like promise-keeping, seems designed to resist an analysis in terms of good outcomes. Aren’t promises supposed to override considerations of good outcomes? How do Hope and Dunn propose making a utilitarian account of confidentiality work?