Category: Ethics

Read Chapter 7 PowerPoint attached. (Application of Ethics in the Community) and Then, read the following case study attached and then for your initial post, answer each of the questions listed below.
Initial Response Questions:
1. Which basic principle or principles might Janeen use to illustrate why nurses may not feel ethically comfortable participating in collecting forensic data from an inmate’s person?
2. Is it always wrong for a nurse to participate in a cavity search? How would you respond to Officer Deene’s challenging question, in which a nurse’s participation in the search might seem to be the “lesser of two evils” and possibly prevent harm?
3. How do you predict Janeen will settle the issue of forced feedings during a hunger strike?

Hi Dear,
please writer who will accept this work should have experience in quality in healthcare setting. this paper intended to be given to patient experience officer to let them learn how to understand and read the survey and calculation for patient experience and satisfaction and take improvement decision depend on it.
The first file attach called (Course content) here is the curriculum and topic need you to write about it.
The second file attach called (chapter 1. exapmle to be follow) please use this Word file in all your writing, also you can find chapter 1 which i wrote to show you how i want this paper and work to be done,please follow the format and style there. (please do not create anther Word file).
The third file called (Module Template) here you can find the structure need for writing this paper.
The Fourd file called (Module Writing Guidelines) here you can find all guidelines and instruction writing the paper.
The fifth file called (references) this is an example of references you might use. since as you can see in the guidelines it’s required to use 25 to 30% of the citation from Books
please note that many books can be access through google search and have free access for reading only.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Extra Instruction:
1. Module writing guidelines has all headings/sections that I should follow. So, just want to say here some writer forget about the hyperlink, number of pages if the reference is BOOK so i can find the information you cited for my review purpose, and the references should be written after the cited information and any thing you will write below the reference it should be consider your own saying as extra explanation. some writer writing whole paragraph without reference, in this case i have to reject it because i can not know if this is right or wrong information.
2. I know APA format that will not include page numbers BUT and I do not need page number in references part BUT i need it when you right the references after each paragraph or information so i can go to the pages number and read it to double check this information was taken from this pages and there is no misinterpreted.
3.I have to write chapters, following the guidelines and format presented in the above mentioned files.
Now my questions:
4.Not all chapters have the same length, so some chapter might be longer or shorter than others.

5.I prefer simple language.

In American history, two documents are considered to contain the fundamental rights of citizens: The preamble to the Declaration of Independence and (more completely) the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Nearly 180 years later, in December of 1948, the United Nations General Assembly voted to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations.
Your assignment, in 4-5 paragraphs, is to locate 2-3 rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that are not echoed in the U.S. Constitution or Declaration of Independence which address employment or freedom of movement for the opportunity. State their article number and quote them. Then, for each, you will argue briefly if they should or should not be considered a right.
Note that in order to argue for or against something becoming a right, you must first develop a short-form theory answering the question “what is a right?”. Many examples are given in the reading, so you may either pick one and try to apply it consistently, or you may create some solid view of your own and apply it consistently.
The points in this assignment are split between:
1. Locating 2-3 new rights proposed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, citing and naming them
2. Stating and briefly developing your view of how we define and identify legitimate rights vs non-rights.
3. Applying your standard of rights to the new proposed rights consistently and with sufficient explanation.
Link to UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Link to US Bill of Rights:
https://ratical.org/co-globalize/BillOfRights.html
Link to US Declaration of Independence: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriipt

If you had to restart society from scratch, what rules would you make? Who would be in charge? In this week’s assignment, you will put yourself in the position of drafting a new social contract.
It might be helpful to conceive of this in the context of a fictional scenario. Imagine that you are enjoying a pleasant vacation on a cruise ship, only to find that a global nuclear war has broken out. The only survivors left on the planet are the few thousand passengers and crew on the cruise ship. Since governments, as you knew them no longer exist, it is up to the survivors to “restart” society.
In this fictional scenario, consider the following questions:
What should the rules be?
What kind of rights and protections would everyone have?
What responsibilities would they have?
Who should have the power to make decisions?
Should society be divided into “groups” or “classes”?
How would disputes be handled?
In other words, what kind of government should the survivors adopt?
In one single-spaced page or roughly 500 words, answer these questions.

The categorical imperative is one of the more important and famous tests for ethical action. The formulation of the categorical imperative that Kant includes in the section of the Groundwork that we read is the following: “I ought never to conduct myself except so that I could also will that my maxim become a universal law” (18). For this essay I would like you to apply the categorical imperative while making a case for its effectiveness. To apply the CI, you may use Kant’s example (which begins on page 18 and goes to page 19 in our text) whether or not it is morally permissible to make a promise without the intention of keeping it, or you may come up with your own ethical issue. In either case, make careful use of Kant’s text to apply the categorical imperative and then reflect on its usefulness. While you are asked to argue for its effectiveness, you might also consider reflecting on questions such as this in your concluding paragraph(s): Can you think of instances where it might not work? Would reasonable people potentially disagree on the results of applying the categorical imperative?

What does “right” really mean? How do you know when something is truly right or wrong? Explain and document your reasoning in 350 words using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.
For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format.
Acceptable sources include journal articles, theoretical texts (you are required to incorporate/cite the textbook, the Bible).
Discussions are encouraged to be written in third person.

Week Three – Philosophical Ethics and Business

DISCUSSION-
From your perspective, what makes a decision or an issue an ethical one? Please explain the differences between ethical/non-ethical on one hand, and non-ethical/ethical, on the other.

What does “right” really mean? How do you know when something is truly right or wrong? Explain and document your reasoning in 350 words using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.
For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format.
Acceptable sources include journal articles, theoretical texts (you are required to incorporate/cite the textbook, the Bible).
Discussions are encouraged to be written in third person.

Week Three – Philosophical Ethics and Business

DISCUSSION-
From your perspective, what makes a decision or an issue an ethical one? Please explain the differences between ethical/non-ethical on one hand, and non-ethical/ethical, on the other.

What does “right” really mean? How do you know when something is truly right or wrong? Explain and document your reasoning in 350 words using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.
For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format.
Acceptable sources include journal articles, theoretical texts (you are required to incorporate/cite the textbook, the Bible).
Discussions are encouraged to be written in third person.