Category: Ethics

1. Complete the reading and video below.
Mill’s Utilitarianism, Utilitarianism Download Utilitarianism. Please read the section entitled, “What is Utilitarianism.”
Please watch: Video: The Trolley ProblemLinks to an external site.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOpf6KcWYyw
2. Consider the following questions:
Should you pull the lever to change the trolley’s course so that it kills one worker but saves the life of the five workers who would have been killed had you not acted? Explain your answer.
How might Mill’s utilitarianism lead to the conclusion that one should act to sacrifice the one in order to save the lives of the many (five)? (Make sure to quote Mill in your response to this question.)
The video presents a variation on the traditional trolley problem with its option that one could choose to push a very large man from a bridge onto the tracks so that the train would be stopped before killing the five workers. Would you push the large man onto the track? What does this variation reveal about Mill’s consequentialist reasoning that might be problematic?

Your research paper will be on a suitable ethics topic, and it must be approved by the instructor in Week 2. Utilize the table of contents of your textbook for suggestions on appropriate topics for research or find current events in business related sources.
Coordinate your chosen topic with the Instructor prior to gathering your authoritative resources. This is to ensure the topic is suitable for the assignment.
The research paper length: at least 10 pages (content). These 8 pages do not include the Title Page and References. Ensure that you include a Title Page and all References (a minimum of 8 are required), which were cited within the content of your paper. APA papers are double-spaced with one-inch margins. This Major Research Paper endeavor will account for 20% of the final grade.
(I chose to my topic on the issues faced by many who work in the conservation field with the public, and how conflicts arise between people that live near conservation areas. The population is ever-growing and people want to use conservation land for human use and benefit. The idea of the paper is to discuss these issues and find solutions that benefit the public and wildlife)

please see syllabus pages 20 to 24 for the full instruction.
<
<
I also attached my outline for the topic you can start with.

Please read the article I provided about the ethical dilemma (Smashing Printers), and answer the questions.
Question 1 is “What is the ethical dilemma?” This must be one paragraph and 7-10 sentences long. If you can make it 8 sentences that would be great! (my professor got mad for this part being so long even though the rubric says 7-10 sentences)
Question 2 is “What are the options in dealing with the situation?” Just list a couple of options on how you can resolve this. (Personal opinion)
Question 3 is “What is your decision? Why? What are the possible consequences of your decision?” This will be the longest part of your paper, and your decision should be supported by information in the textbook. Out of the options you listed in question 2, pick one that you seems is the best option.
The only sources should be from the article and the textbook. I added the textbook (A Decision Making Process for Ethics) to the files, but I do not know if you can fully access it. Please let me know as soon as possible because it is very important you use the textbook as well.
Also please do not add direct quotes from the article or textbook. My professor got mad at me for that for some reason.
I am sorry for all this information, but everything you need is in the files, as well as the assignment template. Please add in-text citations, but do not worry about the reference page. I will handle that. Please get back to me to confirm you got all this, and let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Please read the article I provided about the ethical dilemma (Smashing Printers), and answer the questions.
Question 1 is “What is the ethical dilemma?” This must be one paragraph and 7-10 sentences long. If you can make it 8 sentences that would be great! (my professor got mad for this part being so long even though the rubric says 7-10 sentences)
Question 2 is “What are the options in dealing with the situation?” Just list a couple of options on how you can resolve this. (Personal opinion)
Question 3 is “What is your decision? Why? What are the possible consequences of your decision?” This will be the longest part of your paper, and your decision should be supported by information in the textbook. Out of the options you listed in question 2, pick one that you seems is the best option.
The only sources should be from the article and the textbook. I added the textbook (A Decision Making Process for Ethics) to the files, but I do not know if you can fully access it. Please let me know as soon as possible because it is very important you use the textbook as well.
Also please do not add direct quotes from the article or textbook. My professor got mad at me for that for some reason.
I am sorry for all this information, but everything you need is in the files, as well as the assignment template. Please add in-text citations, but do not worry about the reference page. I will handle that. Please get back to me to confirm you got all this, and let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

The political debate about Abortion – For or Against? What is your Religious or Spiritual Position?
2) Arguments “AGAINST”
a) What is your evidence of support (EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE)
b) ethical challenges (RIGHT OR WRONG) “FOR”
c) Your personal connection “AGAINST”
Argument should be “AGAINST” using a christianity basis for reasoning.

The political debate about Abortion – For or Against? What is your Religious or Spiritual Position?
2) Arguments “AGAINST”
a) What is your evidence of support (EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE)
b) ethical challenges (RIGHT OR WRONG) “FOR”
c) Your personal connection “AGAINST”
Argument should be “AGAINST” using a christianity basis for reasoning.

Read Chapter 7 PowerPoint attached. (Application of Ethics in the Community) and Then, read the following case study attached and then for your initial post, answer each of the questions listed below.
Initial Response Questions:
1. Which basic principle or principles might Janeen use to illustrate why nurses may not feel ethically comfortable participating in collecting forensic data from an inmate’s person?
2. Is it always wrong for a nurse to participate in a cavity search? How would you respond to Officer Deene’s challenging question, in which a nurse’s participation in the search might seem to be the “lesser of two evils” and possibly prevent harm?
3. How do you predict Janeen will settle the issue of forced feedings during a hunger strike?

Hi Dear,
please writer who will accept this work should have experience in quality in healthcare setting. this paper intended to be given to patient experience officer to let them learn how to understand and read the survey and calculation for patient experience and satisfaction and take improvement decision depend on it.
The first file attach called (Course content) here is the curriculum and topic need you to write about it.
The second file attach called (chapter 1. exapmle to be follow) please use this Word file in all your writing, also you can find chapter 1 which i wrote to show you how i want this paper and work to be done,please follow the format and style there. (please do not create anther Word file).
The third file called (Module Template) here you can find the structure need for writing this paper.
The Fourd file called (Module Writing Guidelines) here you can find all guidelines and instruction writing the paper.
The fifth file called (references) this is an example of references you might use. since as you can see in the guidelines it’s required to use 25 to 30% of the citation from Books
please note that many books can be access through google search and have free access for reading only.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Extra Instruction:
1. Module writing guidelines has all headings/sections that I should follow. So, just want to say here some writer forget about the hyperlink, number of pages if the reference is BOOK so i can find the information you cited for my review purpose, and the references should be written after the cited information and any thing you will write below the reference it should be consider your own saying as extra explanation. some writer writing whole paragraph without reference, in this case i have to reject it because i can not know if this is right or wrong information.
2. I know APA format that will not include page numbers BUT and I do not need page number in references part BUT i need it when you right the references after each paragraph or information so i can go to the pages number and read it to double check this information was taken from this pages and there is no misinterpreted.
3.I have to write chapters, following the guidelines and format presented in the above mentioned files.
Now my questions:
4.Not all chapters have the same length, so some chapter might be longer or shorter than others.

5.I prefer simple language.

In American history, two documents are considered to contain the fundamental rights of citizens: The preamble to the Declaration of Independence and (more completely) the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Nearly 180 years later, in December of 1948, the United Nations General Assembly voted to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations.
Your assignment, in 4-5 paragraphs, is to locate 2-3 rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that are not echoed in the U.S. Constitution or Declaration of Independence which address employment or freedom of movement for the opportunity. State their article number and quote them. Then, for each, you will argue briefly if they should or should not be considered a right.
Note that in order to argue for or against something becoming a right, you must first develop a short-form theory answering the question “what is a right?”. Many examples are given in the reading, so you may either pick one and try to apply it consistently, or you may create some solid view of your own and apply it consistently.
The points in this assignment are split between:
1. Locating 2-3 new rights proposed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, citing and naming them
2. Stating and briefly developing your view of how we define and identify legitimate rights vs non-rights.
3. Applying your standard of rights to the new proposed rights consistently and with sufficient explanation.
Link to UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Link to US Bill of Rights:
https://ratical.org/co-globalize/BillOfRights.html
Link to US Declaration of Independence: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriipt