In 4-5 paragraphs, describe your code of ethics. Define your core ethical values and how you arrived at them. You must use the attached material to support your reasoning and must reference 3-5 sources from the material. Use the name of the docx file as reference name.
Category: Ethics
DISCUSSION- What is the difference between a perception, a generalization, and a
DISCUSSION-
What is the difference between a perception, a generalization, and a stereotype? What can organizations do to address these areas and avoid workplace issues between the employees?
DISCUSSION- While some companies block employee access to social networks such a
DISCUSSION-
While some companies block employee access to social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, others have a more permissive attitude. Explain two reasons a company might choose to permit — or be indifferent to — employee access to social networks.
Please do not use AI to complete this assignment. I have my way of knowing when
Please do not use AI to complete this assignment. I have my way of knowing when its used.
Watch the two lectures linked below, then answer one of the discussion prompts.
– https://youtu.be/8yT4RZy1t3s
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie6wKCvuXsk
Sandel suggests that motherhood and military service might be things that are beyond price, goods that should not be exchanged on the free market. Whether or not you agree with him on those two specific issues, are there things that money should not be able to buy?
For the purposes of this discussion, we will define the free market as the exchange of goods and services for monetary compensation among consenting adults (for example, a “free market” would not advocate selling alcohol to children, human trafficking, slavery, etc.).
Respond to one of the following two prompts with a substantive and detailed argument:
1. If you agree that there are some things that should not be for sale because attaching a price to something fundamentally degrades that good or service:
– Name a good or service that money should not be able to buy (apart from things mentioned in the book or in my lectures). This should be something that, conceivably, has the potential to be traded on the free market (for example, don’t say “happiness;” it’s impossible to purchase happiness).
– Explain and defend your reasoning why we should restrict its trade in the free market.
We want to know what things might be fundamentally degraded when offered for sale, not what goods and services you think should be offered for “free” or at a discount.
– The case for free markets typically rests on two claims—one about freedom, the other about welfare.
The first is the libertarian case for markets. It says that letting people engage in voluntary exchanges respects their freedom; laws that interfere with the free market violate individual liberty.
The second is the utilitarian argument for markets. It says that free markets promote the general welfare; when two people make a deal, both gain. As long as their deal makes them better off without hurting anyone else, it must increase overall utility. (Sandel 75)
How might a utilitarian or libertarian argument in favor of free markets fall short in the case of offering this particular good or service in the free market?
2. If you think you should be able to buy or sell anything on the free market, because attaching a price to something does not fundamentally degrade that good or service:
– Make your case. Why is this so? On what grounds do you make this claim?
– Refute Sandel’s suggestions that military service and surrogacy should be beyond price. Where is his argument wrong?
– Tell us something that many people think should be restricted (or is actually restricted) that you believe should be sold in the free market, and why (this should be something not mentioned in the book or my lectures).
After viewing the three videos listed for this week’s Reading & Resources , thin
After viewing the three videos listed for this week’s Reading & Resources , think of a real or hypothetical Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) situation you’ve encountered or can imagine encountering in a workplace setting that presents ethical challenges. Describe the situation, including the key stakeholders , the ethical dilemmas involved, and how you think these dilemmas should be addressed or resolved . Use at least two of the four schools of ethical thought that have been studying in this Unit to analyze the situation and suggest possible solutions . Consider the potential consequences of different courses of action and the broader implications for individuals, teams, and the organization’s DElefforts – in light of the current, volatile, political situation
DISCUSSION- While some companies block employee access to social networks such a
DISCUSSION-
While some companies block employee access to social networks such as Facebook and Twitter, others have a more permissive attitude. Explain two reasons a company might choose to permit — or be indifferent to — employee access to social networks.
DISCUSSION- What is the difference between a perception, a generalization, and a
DISCUSSION-
What is the difference between a perception, a generalization, and a stereotype? What can organizations do to address these areas and avoid workplace issues between the employees?
Please do not use AI to complete this assignment. I have my way of knowing when
Please do not use AI to complete this assignment. I have my way of knowing when its used.
Watch the two lectures linked below, then answer one of the discussion prompts.
– https://youtu.be/8yT4RZy1t3s
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie6wKCvuXsk
Sandel suggests that motherhood and military service might be things that are beyond price, goods that should not be exchanged on the free market. Whether or not you agree with him on those two specific issues, are there things that money should not be able to buy?
For the purposes of this discussion, we will define the free market as the exchange of goods and services for monetary compensation among consenting adults (for example, a “free market” would not advocate selling alcohol to children, human trafficking, slavery, etc.).
Respond to one of the following two prompts with a substantive and detailed argument:
1. If you agree that there are some things that should not be for sale because attaching a price to something fundamentally degrades that good or service:
– Name a good or service that money should not be able to buy (apart from things mentioned in the book or in my lectures). This should be something that, conceivably, has the potential to be traded on the free market (for example, don’t say “happiness;” it’s impossible to purchase happiness).
– Explain and defend your reasoning why we should restrict its trade in the free market.
We want to know what things might be fundamentally degraded when offered for sale, not what goods and services you think should be offered for “free” or at a discount.
– The case for free markets typically rests on two claims—one about freedom, the other about welfare.
The first is the libertarian case for markets. It says that letting people engage in voluntary exchanges respects their freedom; laws that interfere with the free market violate individual liberty.
The second is the utilitarian argument for markets. It says that free markets promote the general welfare; when two people make a deal, both gain. As long as their deal makes them better off without hurting anyone else, it must increase overall utility. (Sandel 75)
How might a utilitarian or libertarian argument in favor of free markets fall short in the case of offering this particular good or service in the free market?
2. If you think you should be able to buy or sell anything on the free market, because attaching a price to something does not fundamentally degrade that good or service:
– Make your case. Why is this so? On what grounds do you make this claim?
– Refute Sandel’s suggestions that military service and surrogacy should be beyond price. Where is his argument wrong?
– Tell us something that many people think should be restricted (or is actually restricted) that you believe should be sold in the free market, and why (this should be something not mentioned in the book or my lectures).
After viewing the three videos listed for this week’s Reading & Resources , thin
After viewing the three videos listed for this week’s Reading & Resources , think of a real or hypothetical Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) situation you’ve encountered or can imagine encountering in a workplace setting that presents ethical challenges. Describe the situation, including the key stakeholders , the ethical dilemmas involved, and how you think these dilemmas should be addressed or resolved . Use at least two of the four schools of ethical thought that have been studying in this Unit to analyze the situation and suggest possible solutions . Consider the potential consequences of different courses of action and the broader implications for individuals, teams, and the organization’s DElefforts – in light of the current, volatile, political situation
After reading the attached article “CURRENT REALITIES OF ETHICAL ISSUES IN CORP
After reading the attached article “CURRENT REALITIES OF ETHICAL ISSUES IN CORPORATE AMERICA”, you should begin drafting your first Individual research paper.
The topic of Research Paper: Research and find a real-world example of a company with an unethical corporate culture. What do you think were the causes of this culture? How did this type of culture affect the organization and employees? What do you think could have been done to prevent it?
Approach: You should have at least 3 sources for your paper. (Internet sites, professional journal articles, professional publications, etc.) Your paper, excluding the title page, should be 2 to 4 double-spaced pages with an introduction, body of the paper, and a conclusion.
Please follow APA 7th Edition style guidelines. The title page should also follow APA 7th Edition guidelines. Margins will be 1″ on all sides.
This paper should be uploaded no later than 11:59 PM on October 1st.
MGMT 4302 Ethics in Organizations
Writing Assignment 1 Grading Rubric
Organization
Points (20)
Points (16)
Points (14)
Points (0)
Weight
Well-planned and well-thought-out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions, and conclusion.
Good overall organization includes the main organizational tools.
There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing
No sense of organization
20%
Content
Points (60)
Points (48)
Points (42)
Points (0)
Weight
Exceptionally well presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well developed, and supported with specific evidence & and facts, as well as examples and specific details.
Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed, and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.
Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature
The content is not sound
60%
Grammar & Mechanics
Points (20)
Points (16)
Points (14)
Points (0)
Weight
Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Follows APA style format.
A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation, but not many.
Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, and/or punctuation. This could also be a sign of a lack of proofreading
Continuous errors
20%