Category: Ethics

MUSEUM VISIT ASSIGNMENT 2
National Gallery Of Art
Adress: Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20565
ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS PAGE 6&7
1. “In what ways is this museum engaging with social or political issues that matter to its audience and local communities?”
2. “Is this museum taking on stand on issues that matter to YOU?
3. “In what ways do you think this museum is welcoming and accessible?”
4. “Does this museum seem interested in the perspectives, voices, and ideas of visitors or community members?”
5. “How might this museum represent POWER? Whose POWER?”
6. “What sorts of rules (spoken and unspoken) are people following?”
7. “What forms of surveillance or control do you notice?”
8. “Museums require many different kinds of labor to operate, and much of this work is not visible to most visitors. During your visit, notice those you see working there and recognize all the work happening that you might not see.”
9. “How are workers and their labor recognized throughout this museum?”
10. “What types of museum work do you want to know more about?”
11. “Can you find anything in the news about employee experiences or union organizing at this museum?” (use a good news source)
12. Who you noticed working in the museums.
An evaluation of Monument Lab’s Field Trip: Museums. Each part should be a separate
paragraph (6-8 sentences per paragraph)
3a) What audience (age level, cultural experience level, etc.) is Monument Lab’s
Field Trip: Museums designed for and what led you to make this assessment?
Cite specific features of the publication beyond just pages 6 and 7.
3b) What is the efficacy of Monument Lab’s Field Trip: Museum as an activity
packet, freely available and distributed to the public? To answer this, consider
what the goals are, what audience would use this, and if this packet achieves
these goals for that audience.
Note: The monument field lab is included in the attachment.

Read the case study on Engineering Ethics in Spain: The Risky Tank.
· Identify and explain at least two ethical issues in this case study. If exploitation is one of your issues, explain the extent to which the conditions for exploitation are met in this situation.
· For each ethical issue you identified, address/analyze the issue using one of the tools found in Section 8.4 Boundary Crossing Problems and determine what action or inaction Carlos should take in relation to that issue. Be sure to explain why this seems to be the best ethical decision for that issue. (At least two paragraphs)
· Summarize what Carlos should do by tying together your previous responses. (At least one paragraph)
· Use a table to show the positive and negative outcomes of Carlos’s actions and who the outcomes impacted. One idea for a table might be as shown below. (One table)

Assignment Paper C – Current Or Emerging Technology Ethics Research Paper
1. Papers Objective. The objective of this paper and outline is to:
Evaluate a new ethical issue (not used in prior submissions as this will be your final class paper before the Assignment D presentation.)
Focus your research, so that one or more ethical principles are applied and explained as a result of your research. This process helps you establish a thesis for your research.
2. Topic Selection. Select a digital ethical issue for your research that is caused by the existing or emerging technology.
Students must select a new ethical issue (not used for prior assignments) related to an existing or emerging technology and research the topic and its related ethical issues.
Be sure to keep in mind that the technology aspects of this assignment are different from those of Paper A (Application of decision-making frameworks to IT-related ethical issues) or Paper B, which dealt with aspects of ethical issues and a subsequent organizational policy.
The link below provides some suggested topical ideas you may want to consider. Please remember that the emphasis on this paper is on digital technology and the ethical issue(s) with its use
Recommended Source: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethics-articles/
3. Research Paper Outline
a. Title Page – Begin with a topic title that describes what you will research.
b. Topic Justification – Briefly explain the reason for your topic selection (100- 150 words recommended).
c. Research Questions – Based on your research and the ethical theories discussed in class, determine three ethically critical (important) questions to be addressed by the paper regarding your topic. List your questions in order of priority and for each question:
(1) State your question
(2) Justification “why” this question is critically important to the papers ethical issue.
(3) Research Findings. Using your research,
List or summarize your research findings.
List any ethical issues or principles, other problems, solutions or research gaps (areas that require further study to address the question if any).
d. Research Conclusions – Provide a conclusion for your research that addresses the following.
Summarize the papers’ major takeaways and overall conclusions
Of all your papers points, select the most important (or relevant) ethical theory that relates to your conclusions
List the ethical principles that apply.
e. Reference Page. List and cite your references in accordance to APA requirements.
Note: Your research of the topic, questions and answers must be based on at least three reference sources. This paper is an academic research paper, therefore, two of these sources must be from the UMGC library database (or an equivalent academic database). These reference sources must have external links. (Note: You are likely to find additional and even better references/sources as you continue your research for this Assignment.)
Remember: the emphasis on this paper is on digital technology and the ethical issue(s) with its use! Therefore, please ensure that your research for this assignment addresses the ethical issues of an existing or emerging technology!
4. APA Format. Follow all APA formatting requirements. Therefore,
a. The title page must include the topic tittle, your name, the UMGC/Name of the Class, and date.
b. Excluding the title and reference page, the papers “size” should be a minimum 4-6 page, double-spaced paper and submit it to the Assignments Module as an attached Microsoft Word file.
c. Use appropriate APA compliant reference citations for all sources you use.
d. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills, your paper should reflect appropriate grammar and spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style. Paper C is due at the end of the sixth week of this course
ATTACHING PREVIOUS PAPERS SO WE CAN AVOID DISCUSSIONG TOPICS ALREADY COVERED. Thank You Soooo Much!

Assignment Paper C – Current Or Emerging Technology Ethics Research Paper
1. Papers Objective. The objective of this paper and outline is to:
Evaluate a new ethical issue (not used in prior submissions as this will be your final class paper before the Assignment D presentation.)
Focus your research, so that one or more ethical principles are applied and explained as a result of your research. This process helps you establish a thesis for your research.
2. Topic Selection. Select a digital ethical issue for your research that is caused by the existing or emerging technology.
Students must select a new ethical issue (not used for prior assignments) related to an existing or emerging technology and research the topic and its related ethical issues.
Be sure to keep in mind that the technology aspects of this assignment are different from those of Paper A (Application of decision-making frameworks to IT-related ethical issues) or Paper B, which dealt with aspects of ethical issues and a subsequent organizational policy.
The link below provides some suggested topical ideas you may want to consider. Please remember that the emphasis on this paper is on digital technology and the ethical issue(s) with its use
Recommended Source: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethics-articles/
3. Research Paper Outline
a. Title Page – Begin with a topic title that describes what you will research.
b. Topic Justification – Briefly explain the reason for your topic selection (100- 150 words recommended).
c. Research Questions – Based on your research and the ethical theories discussed in class, determine three ethically critical (important) questions to be addressed by the paper regarding your topic. List your questions in order of priority and for each question:
(1) State your question
(2) Justification “why” this question is critically important to the papers ethical issue.
(3) Research Findings. Using your research,
List or summarize your research findings.
List any ethical issues or principles, other problems, solutions or research gaps (areas that require further study to address the question if any).
d. Research Conclusions – Provide a conclusion for your research that addresses the following.
Summarize the papers’ major takeaways and overall conclusions
Of all your papers points, select the most important (or relevant) ethical theory that relates to your conclusions
List the ethical principles that apply.
e. Reference Page. List and cite your references in accordance to APA requirements.
Note: Your research of the topic, questions and answers must be based on at least three reference sources. This paper is an academic research paper, therefore, two of these sources must be from the UMGC library database (or an equivalent academic database). These reference sources must have external links. (Note: You are likely to find additional and even better references/sources as you continue your research for this Assignment.)
Remember: the emphasis on this paper is on digital technology and the ethical issue(s) with its use! Therefore, please ensure that your research for this assignment addresses the ethical issues of an existing or emerging technology!
4. APA Format. Follow all APA formatting requirements. Therefore,
a. The title page must include the topic tittle, your name, the UMGC/Name of the Class, and date.
b. Excluding the title and reference page, the papers “size” should be a minimum 4-6 page, double-spaced paper and submit it to the Assignments Module as an attached Microsoft Word file.
c. Use appropriate APA compliant reference citations for all sources you use.
d. In addition to critical thinking and analysis skills, your paper should reflect appropriate grammar and spelling, good organization, and proper business-writing style. Paper C is due at the end of the sixth week of this course
ATTACHING PREVIOUS PAPERS SO WE CAN AVOID DISCUSSIONG TOPICS ALREADY COVERED. Thank You Soooo Much!

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
Lesson
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook).
Instructions
First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. (attached)
Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Include the following:
Publication details
Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)
Each annotation section should include the following:
Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.
Use the following as a model:
APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.
Requirements
Length: 4 pages (not including title page or references page)

Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
Lesson
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook).
Instructions
First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. (attached)
Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Include the following:
Publication details
Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)
Each annotation section should include the following:
Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.
Use the following as a model:
APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.
Requirements
Length: 4 pages (not including title page or references page)

Part 2
Once everyone has made their contributions to our museum, it is time to begin organizing and assessing its contents. In a 700-800 word essay, imagine that you are now the head curator for the collection, which requires that you make decisions on how to best organize the contents. Consider the following:
What objects would you display together and why? (Note: you don’t have to mention every item; however, do be sure to consider the entire collection when choosing categories and then mention a few examples).
Collectively, what story (or series of stories) do the items tell about pursuing a liberal education?
What might museum visitors find intriguing about the objects? Remember that the context that is given to an object is as important as the object itself. Museums don’t just store knowledge, they organize it and craft it into narratives that impact the way people think and feel about a particular subject.
As an essay, this should have an introductory paragraph and a conclusion.
Examples attached…

This Final research paper is a buildup of a proposed research outline submitted before. It involves critical analytical evaluation and comprehensive case-study analyses
We were tasked to choose our own topic relating to a development issue and analyze it through an ethical lens of our choosing.
I WILL ATTACH A COPY OF MY OUTLINE AS WELL AS THE STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER. PLEASE USE THIS AS THE BASE ON WHICH YOU DEVELOP THE PAPER. – THIS IS IMPORTANT
NOTE: THIS ISN’T A DESCRIPTIVE PAPER, IT IS AN ANALYTICAL PAPER THAT INVOLVES A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CASE STUDIES PROVIDED IN THE OUTLINE THROUGH THE ETHICAL LENS OF RAWLSIAN JUSTICE
The ideal essay embodies thorough research, clear argumentation and skillful writing
techniques. These qualities are essential in establishing the essay as a benchmark for academic
discussions. In this analysis, we will explore the key components of an outstanding student essay, from its structural organization to its substantive content.
Research and Foundation:
– In-depth Research; A remarkable essay arises from engaging extensively with relevant
sources. It is crucial for students to examine a wide range of primary and secondary
materials related to their topic. This ensures that the essay is grounded in a diverse
spectrum of perspectives.
– Critical Evaluation; Simply referencing these sources is insufficient. A thoughtful essay
involves critically analyzing and evaluating the materials, identifying their strengths,
weaknesses and relevance to the central argument.
Coherent Structure:
– Introduction; The introduction should concisely introduce the topic, present a clear
thesis statement and outline the objectives of the essay.
– Body; It is essential to organize the main body in a logical manner by using subheadings
or clear thematic breaks. Each section should have a distinct argument supported by
evidence and seamlessly connect to the following section while maintaining a coherent
flow.
– Conclusion; This section aims to provide a concise summary of the main arguments and
explore the broader implications of the findings.
Argumentation and Clarity
– Developing a Thesis; Each essay should present a clear and defendable thesis statement.
This central idea acts as a guiding principle, influencing every aspect of the essay.
– Analytical Rigor; Claims should not be left unquestioned. A strong essay critically
examines each assertion by incorporating both empirical and theoretical evidence to
support its arguments.
– Clarity and Precision; Following academic conventions, the language used should be
straightforward yet sophisticated, ensuring that arguments are effectively communicated
without any ambiguity.
Originality and Insight
– Unique Perspective; While students can build upon existing literature, it is vital to bring
in a fresh perspective or introduce an innovative approach to the topic.
– Synthesis; Effective essays often synthesize diverse sources and ideas to generate new
insights or overarching conclusions.
Your own voice: Based on my personal observations, the most remarkable essays are the ones that
challenge conventional norms and deeply resonate with readers on a personal level. In other words,
master these skills but also bring your passion to the topic. What do you really believe about a topic?
Why do you believe it? How has the new information in the course impacted your understanding?
Interrogate those ideas (from the outset) and be honest with what you write.
Also Important:
I’m looking at 3 cases in the paper, but due to the word count (2500), You can choose 2 to ensure an in-depth analysis
Please make use of the sources and quotes I provided, and more from other REFERRED (PEER-REVIEWED SOURCES)

Write an essay about generative AI and how will it affect people. 7 page essay excluding the works cited page. The prompt of the essay will be provide below. The essay has be be in APA.

Choose a 2022 or 2023 business or accounting ethics issue from a reputable source (ex: WSJ, NYT, Forbes, CNN, etc.). Please do not choose the same topic used for the SEC Enforcement Group Presentation. Students should summarize the ethical issue, the stakeholders, and the different ethical choices that could have been made in this situation. Students should incorporate a minimum of 2 to 3 ethical concepts learned in this course in the analysis of the ethical issues identified. It is my expectation that this paper will be completed using your own words. I am asking for your interpretation of the ethical issues, stakeholders, and alternative choices for your selected topic. Students who use artificial intelligence to write this paper will be subject to the suggested sanctions detailed below in the Scholastic Honesty section of the syllabus. The paper must be submitted using the Turnitin Assignment Tool in eLearning. Note: No late assignment submissions will be accepted.
The Ethical Issue Paper should be formatted:
3 pages to 6 pages in length (3 pages minimum length)
Double-spaced
Normal margins and font
APA-style citations (no abstract is required)
Below is the Grading Rubric that will be used to assess the Ethical Issue Paper.
Mechanics (Correct Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation) 5 Points
Summary of Ethical Issue/Identifying Stakeholders 15 Points
Analysis of Ethical Choices 15 Points
Connection to Course Material 15 Points
and please use citations i can access.
and for ethical concepts please see attached files